Monday, January 4, 2010
Nigerian terrorists False Flags and Patriot Act 3.0.
Information
Was This Staged? Why Wasn't Anything Done?
R
John Calkins - Chuck Dages - Alan E. Bell - Kenneth Rubenstein
nd Issues Surrounding the Iviewit Stolen Patent...
Now Keep in Mind As you Read this...
Ken Rubenstein Patent Attorney for Proskauer the AOLTW/WB checked with... is who Iviewit is Accusing of Major Fraud on the USPTO - of Which the USPTO does not seem to have issue with and Proskaur Rose seems to Have No Problem with Either.
Kenneth Rubenstein claimed under deposition and to a civil court that he does not know anything about the Iviewit Companies, the Iviewit Patents, or the Inventor Eliot Bernstein.
John Calkins - Chuck Dages - Alan E. Bell All have Known about this for Around 8 Years, and Have Done NOTHING to make it Right or to Warn Time Warner Inc. Stock Holders of this HUGE Liability. Where is Kevin Tsujihara and the Other Big Wigs at Warner in all This ? Well We intend to Tell you MORE with Each Passing Day.....
$$$$$
"From: David.Colter@warnerbros.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:51 AM
To: John.calkins@warnerbros.com
John Calkins
Cc: CHuck.dages@warnerbros.com;
Chuck Dages
Alan.Bell@warnerbros.com
Alan E. Bell
Subject: Iviewit
John,
In all the review we have done with Ivieiwit it seems to boil down to the status of the patents and their inherent value. At that point it is a risk-reward evaluation -- without awarded patents it is difficult to completely assess the value.
I would suggest that we consider one other perspective... Prior to Ivieiwit (approx Feb 2000) the video we (WB Online) delivered on the web was QCIF (160x120) or smaller and was below full frame rate.
At the time of our first meeting we also identified On2 along with ivieiwit as two solid players who could deliver full screen full frame rate web video. All who saw it were impressed.
Greg and I visited ivieiwit in August and reported back that they had filed patents on scaling techniques that hinged upon a visual 'trick' which allowed the human eye to accept 320x240 video scaled to 640x480 at 30 fps as close to VHS quality.
We checked with Ken Rubenstein and others who provided some solid support for ivieiwit, and Chris Cookson asked Greg and I to continue to work with Ivieiwit in an R&D capacity.
In the fall of 2000 Iviewit also met with a number of folks at WB Online (in September and October) and demonstrated their process and techniques to Sam Smith, Houston, Joe Annino and others.
Sam contacted ivieiwit a number of times and requested the patents, along with specifics of the ivieiwit process to evaluate what they were doing.
I was not part of these meetings, but was aware they had occured,
When I sat down with Morgan and Houston in March 2001 to see what technology they were using to encode video, it was clear that they were using some of the techniques that would overlap with iviewit's filed process patents (still pending), but it is not clear that these were all learned from Iviewit -- we may wish to explore this a little.
This meeting was to determine what equipment we would get for our lab at 611 Brand. This same information was also provided to ivieiwit by Morgan as they were establishing the company as an outsourcing facility for encoding our content.
I am aware of several meeting held between ivieiwit and WB Online to share information of techniques and process, and was invited to a few of them.
We all signed ivieiwit's confidentiality agreement.
So to the other perspective....
We have an opportunity to establish a license with ivieiwit for a modest fee at this time, and establish a MFN.
As we have discussed on a few occasions, these techniques now appear in the public domain to some extent in documentation for Real Producer, WMP Developer Guides, Media Cleaner Pro, etc, but they were not available in 2000.
I would not suggest we learned the techniques completely from iviewit (I actually do not know the answer), but a modest licensing fee may be appropriate and honorable considering our good faith relationship in signing the confidentiality doc.
If we choose to pass at this time the risk is primarily from iviewit's main investor, Crossbow Ventures, gaining control of the IP and approaching WB later for a license -- I do not believe they will be as friendly considering their dealings with ivieiwit and it's employees since Feb of 2001. It is estimated that the patents will be completed in 8-12 months.
As you are all aware I have a personal relationship with Eliot Bernstein, the founder of iviewit, and as a result, I left the evaluations and decisions to Greg, and others, and only assisted iviewit to get to the correct people in WB and AOLTW. I wanted to add this perspective as we consider if there is an option to pursue with iviewit -- they are facing continued financial pressure right now. There are many other threads to our interaction with iviewit and I would be happy to discuss.
Thanx,
David "
Source of Post
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2002%2001%2015%20AOLTW%20RUBENSTEIN%20OPINION%20comments.pdf
So Warner Bros. Signed a Confidentiality Agreement with Iviewit, John Calkins, Chuck Dages and the Others mentioned above knew full well that that were using the Iviewit Coding and What Have they Done in all these years to Make This Right?
My guess is to Line Their Pockets with Gold. Now the Author of this Email seems to have a conscience, seems to be a good guy... why he was not listened to is a Serious Unanswered Question.
Warner Bros., Warner Brothers, Warner Home Video, WB Online - they Use this Stolen Technology after they Signed a Confidentiality agreement and were Shown this Technology by the Iviewit Company.
Well Stay Tuned as Our Industry Whistleblower Network Explores and Exposes ALL the Boys in this Post... Email me your Story Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Do you Have Any Information on Any of These Names and Players. Seriously Email Me your Story, it is Time to STOP Mega-Corporations from STOMPING on the Rights of Inventors.
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
John Calkins - McKinsey and Company - Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc. - Lieberfarb and Associates - Senior Vice President SONY Pictures Entertainment
Who Made Money From Sony, AOL, Time Warner, Intel or IBM Stocks in the Last 6 Years and What Does this Have to Do with John Calkins? So with John Calkins Mis-Hap, Error, Lie ... Whatever you Want To Call it, well Warner Brothers Videos were far superior in quality then ever before and took much less bandwidth to create. Time Warner Inc. made a whole lot of Money from This Stolen Technology, no Doubt about it.
Back to Connecting the Dots on John Calkins Role in All This.
Did John Calkins Get the Credit for this "discovery" HE STOLE, then did John Calkins use this on his Resume to be the Head Honcho at Lieberfarb and Associates, Started by DVD Mega-Man Warren Lieberfarb ? And did John Calkins Use this Lie to to Getting Heavy Hitters in the IT business to be Clients at Warren Lieberfarb's Lieberfarb and Associates?
At what Point did Lieberfarb and Associates start 'Consulting' Intel Corp. as Now the Sony Big Shot John Calkins Brags about in Press Releases as Part of his Delusional Resume? Which he did not Brag about in the First Year of Lieberfarb and Associates Press Releases.
How did John Calkins get Intel to NEED tech Consulting from a Guy from Warner Bros. now at Lieberfarb and Associates ? My Guess is John Calkins had something that Intel Corp. wanted. Or John Calkins knew something Intel Corp. was Doing and Threatened to Expose Intel Corporation.
Ok so Now Where Did John Calkins Work at Before his Technology Stealing Job at Warner Brothers And Before his Job of " Senior Vice President of Corporate Development for Sony Pictures Entertainment " ?
Well John Calkins Press Release For his Super Duper Sony Job Says "Prior to joining Warner Bros, Calkins was with McKinsey & Company, as an Associate Principal in its Los Angeles office." So it Seems John Calkins has his Hands in All Kinds of Trouble, moving from Billion Dollar Company to Billion Dollar Company, Secrets and Propiertary information in hand.
And certainly lacking in Morals and Ethics, it is no Wonder Sony Wanted John Calkins or he Forced them Hire Him ... hmmmm... a Guy Like John Calkins Could Come in Handin...willing to Steal Technology, Possibly involved in Inside secrets that affect Stock Prices, has Heavy Hitter IT connections (not because of what he coudl to for them .. but my guess in title only as he had something on them.. just a guess)... a Guy who had all the Big IT Companies, Connected Attorneys and Industry Big Whigs eating out of his hand os he would not expose the Iviewit Situation that would Send Stocks Plummeting...
Ok So now about John Calkins and his Connections to McKinsey and Company
So in October of 2009 there was This Headline, "SEC Charges Intel, IBM, McKinsey & Company and Galleon Management for Insiders Trading". So We Know that Galleon is the Guy who CEO Paul Otellini was "Surprised" was involved with Insider Trading.
Now Intel and IBM are Both Using the Iviewit Stolen Technology, and both above the Law. Keep in mind that the Head of the USPTO (the US Patent Office) was a BIG patent Guy at IBM - so he will, no doubt insure IBM's best interest and Protect IBM. Ok So what do all these companies involved in Insider Trader have in Common ?
Well Knowledge of, and Use of the Iviewit Invention, they knew it was a Holy Grail Invention before they Stole it and with this, Economics 101 would say that if you knew any of this... knew that companies would soon have access to this Stolen Technology that would change the Internet Forever, change videos forever, be used in Simulators and so much more... well with this knowledge how in the WORLD could you RESIST not BUYING Stocks, share Secrets to other insiders so that when this Stolen Technology hit the market, the Stocks would Soar. And you would be Richer then you every Imagined you would be...
And being above the law and having connection in the USPTO, the Supreme Court, Political Power, Huge .. well Connected Law Firms in Your Pocket and Billions Upon Billions of Dollars at your Disposal YOU know that you will never be Held accountable for the Trillion Dollar Accounting Mistake made within these companies that would literally plummet the stock prices. So to keep this from happening, you would have to PAY off a lot of people in a lot of places...
There Would Be One Little Problem... Those Pesky Iviewit Inventors. However Controlling Judges, the State Bar, the SEC, the Patent Office, the Courts, the Attorney.. well this will be helpful in that. And WELL it may get Messy you may even have to Kill the Inventor to Keep this All QUIET... maybe say with a Car Bomb... if NOT Trillions in Stocks would be Worthless and the Secrets would Financially Bury Long Established Huge, Heavy Hitting, Billion Dollar Tech Companies World Wide, and We can't Have that.
So John Calkins and his Connections with McKinsey and Company and all these Names and Players, Surely the SEC is looking into John Calkins Connection to all this, he seems like the guy that has the most information and the most power in all this. I mean a Big Wig at Warner Brothers, then head of a Major IT Consulting Firm, now a Big Wig at Sony and Use to Work at McKinsey and Company, as an Associate Principal for 4 Years - Boy I sure Hope the SEC Connects All these Dots.
Stay Tuned for How this all Connects to H. Hickman Powell of Crossbow Ventures ...
www.DeniedPatent.com for More Information on the Iviewit Stolen Technology Scandal Involving all the Heavy Hitting IT Companies, and the Silencing of Inventors Rights.
John Calkins
Sunday, January 3, 2010
Letter from AOL Time Warner Regarding - January of 2002 and Where is AOL - Time Warner on All this Now? Do they Care?
nd Issues Surrounding the Iviewit Stolen Patent...
Now Keep in Mind As you Read this...
Ken Rubenstein Patent Attorney for Proskauer the AOLTW/WB checked with... is who Iviewit is Accusing of Major Fraud on the USPTO - of Which the USPTO does not seem to have issue with and Proskaur Rose seems to Have No Problem with Either. Kenneth Rubenstein claimed under deposition and to a civil court that he does not know anything about the Iviewit Companies, the Iviewit Patents, or the Inventor Eliot Bernstein.
"From: David.Colter@warnerbros.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:51 AM
To: John.calkins@warnerbros.com
Cc: CHuck.dages@warnerbros.com;
Alan.Bell@warnerbros.com
Subject: iviewit
Page 1 of 2
3/26/2003
John,
In all the review we have done with ivieiwit it seems to boil down to the status of the patents and their inherent value. At that point it is a risk-reward evaluation -- without awarded patents it is difficult to completely assess the value.
I would suggest that we consider one other perspective... Prior to ivieiwit (approx Feb 2000) the video we (WB Online) delivered on the web was QCIF (160x120) or smaller and was below full frame rate. At the time of our first meeting we also identified On2 along with ivieiwit as two solid players who could deliver full screen full frame rate web video. All who saw it were impressed.
Greg and I visited ivieiwit in August and reported back that they had filed patents on scaling techniques that hinged upon a visual 'trick' which allowed the human eye to accept 320x240 video scaled to 640x480 at 30 fps as close to VHS quality.
We checked with Ken Rubenstein and others who provided some solid support for ivieiwit, and Chris Cookson asked Greg and I to continue to work with Ivieiwit in an R&D capacity.
In the fall of 2000 iviewit also met with a number of folks at WB Online (in September and October) and demonstrated their process and techniques to Sam Smith, Houston, Joe Annino and others.
Sam contacted ivieiwit a number of times and requested the patents, along with specifics of the ivieiwit process to evaluate what they were doing. I was not part of these meetings, but was aware they had occured, as Jack Scanlon kept me up to date.
When I sat down with Morgan and Houston in March 2001 to see what technology they were using to encode video, it was clear that they were using some of the techniques that would overlap with iviewit's filed process patents (still pending), but it is not clear that these were all learned from Iviewit -- we may wish to explore this a little.
This meeting was to determine what equipment we would get for our lab at 611 Brand.
This same information was also provided to ivieiwit by Morgan as they were establishing the company as an outsourcing facility for encoding our content.
I am aware of several meeting held between ivieiwit and WB Online to share information of techniques and process, and was invited to a few of them.
We all signed ivieiwit's confidentiality agreement.
So to the other perspective....
We have an opportunity to establish a license with Ivieiwit for a modest fee at this time, and establish a MFN. In good faith we signed the confidentiality agreement, iviewit revealed their processes and techniques, and we now use those techniques in encoding.
As we have discussed on a few occasions, these techniques now appear in the public domain to some extent in documentation for Real Producer, WMP Developer Guides, Media Cleaner Pro, etc, but they were not available in 2000.
I would not suggest we learned the techniques completely from Iviewit (I actually do not know the answer), but a modest licensing fee may be appropriate and honorable considering our good faith relationship in signing the confidentiality doc.
If we choose to pass at this time the risk is primarily from iviewit's main investor, Crossbow Ventures, gaining control of the IP and approaching WB later for a license -- I do not believe they will be as friendly considering their dealings with ivieiwit and it's employees since Feb of 2001. It is estimated that the patents will be completed in 8-12 months.
As you are all aware I have a personal relationship with Eliot Bernstein, the founder of iviewit, and as a result, I left the evaluations and decisions to Greg, and others, and only assisted iviewit to get to the correct people in WB and AOLTW.
I wanted to add this perspective as we consider if there is an option to pursue with iviewit -- they are facing continued financial pressure right now. There are many other threads to our interaction with iviewit and I would be happy to discuss.
Thanx,
David "
Source of Post
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2002%2001%2015%20AOLTW%20RUBENSTEIN%20OPINION%20comments.pdf
So Warner Bros. Signed a Confidentiality Agreement with Iviewit, John Calkins and the Others mentioned above knew full well that that were using the Iviewit Coding and What Have they Done in all these years to Make This Right? My guess is to Line Their Pockets with Gold. Now the Author of this Email seems to have a conscience, seems to be a good guy... why he was not listened to is a Serious Unanswered Question.
Warner Bros., Warner Brothers, Warner Home Video, WB Online - they Use this Stolen Technology after they Signed a Confidentiality agreement and were Shown this Technology by the Iviewit Company. They Stole this Technology plain and Simple, they knowingly stole it, even one of their own questioned them on it and Warner Bros. Entertainment did NOTHING about it. Doesn't this Put Warner Bros. Entertainment shareholders at Risk? Isn't the Company Liable? Or is Warner Bros. Entertainment simply NOT worried because they know they are Above the Law with their Political and Court Connections and they are in the "Who You Know" Club?
Well Stay Tuned as Our Industry Whistleblower Network Explores and Exposes ALL the Boys in this Post... Email me your Story Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Kenneth Rubbenstein, above the Law Proskauer Rose -
There is No Denying that Kenneth Rubenstein Was Involved, oh Unless of Course you Own the New York and Florida Court System.
Jorge Labarga was Given Evidence that Proved the GUILT of Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose and he Ignored this VERY important Incriminating informtion...
When you Scour www.Iviewit.TV there is a Taped Message proving the Fact that Kenneth Rubenstein Lied "Under Deposition" which of course is further evidence proving that Kenneth Rubenstein was involved with Iviewit .. This was Given to Florida Supreme Court Jorge Labarga and Well here we are in 2010 and Still Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP is Above the Law.
Kenneth Rubenstein committed direct perjury and the courts do not care. Why? Well because he is a Proskauer Rose ABOVE the Law Lawyer...
Kenneth Rubenstein tells the court in writing that he does not know Iviewit and then admits different in deposition, then there is this tape... the Evidence in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case is Piled a Mile High, a Monkey Could Figure this One OUT... Read and You shall see that the Courts are Controlled by the Elite Law Firms like Proskauer Rose, who are Connected to ALL the Political and Financial Super Powers and You Have No Rights What So Ever.
Christopher Wheeler gave information that Showed Kenneth Rubenstein getting the patents sent direct to him, there were notes with rubenstein’s name all over them and there was a taped message proving this and the Florida Supreme Court Justice Jorge Labarga did not seem to think it was of any real importance, Why?
So Proskauer Rose drops off documents that completely contradict their own stories, the Iviewit Attorneys Cannot Believe it and Well.. the Florida Supreme Court PROTECTS Proskauer Rose, Why? Was it Favors Owed, what was the Real Reason to Let this Happen?
Why was Iviewit Denied Due Process by the Florida Supreme Court ? Why did the Florida Supreme Court deny the evidence from being submitted at trial, by throwing the case and preventing a trial ... Is this Legal?
Can a Florida Supreme Court Justice deliberatley suppress evidence showing who was involved in this Trillion Dollar Patent Theft, and No One Cares ?
How Can the Florida Supreme Court tolerate such a blatant obvious attack on a US Citizen?
So the Florida Supreme Court protecting a Proskauer Rose Attorney over Protecting the United States Patent and Trademark Office. How did This Come About and I wonder How much it Cost.
Link to Taped Message:
Attorney Steve Selz, Esq. taped message regarding having the goods on Rubenstein, evidence showing that he falsified statements under sworn deposition, the "holy grail" evidence against Ruby and MPEGLA
Kenneth Rubenstein
Notice of Conflict Filings at the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals
"I Notice this committee that currently pending at the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals is a Motion to Compel15 that court to Adhere to the Judicial Cannons, Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Rules and Regulations and Law regarding regulating the MASSIVE conflicts existing in that court in violation of their own rules in my Lawsuit.
The Motion outlines multiple layers of Conflicts and Mass of Violations described herein and in the Motion, which I incorporate by reference in its entirety herein. Conflicts, which despite repeated formal conflict disclosure requests, a fundamental requirement to insure due process, similar to the one attached in the Prepared Statement for the Senate Judiciary Committee Members to sign herein, have not been addressed or resolved by Members of the Bar or Courts who are regulated by the First Department and others to provide full disclosure upon request of any and all conflicts, in order to avoid the Appearance of Impropriety.
In fact, I have made a citizen’s arrest of the court members of the US District Court and the US Court of Appeals in the Motion to Compel, as the conflicts act to block due process through creating a wall of Obstruction to Justice and where Obstruction is a Title 18 Federal Offense and also State Laws also make such activities illegal.
Anderson providing irrefutable supporting evidence that such criminal acts were taking place in the First Department, I submit to the Committee a recent statement from Christine Anderson and I will read into the record this most riveting statement:
Christine C. Anderson
Attorney at Law
227 Riverside Drive, Ste. 2N
New York, New York 10025
September 13, 2009 (via Confirmed Overnight Delivery)
The Hon. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Attorney General of the United States
Office of the Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001
The Hon. Preet Bharara
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York
United States Department of Justice
One St. Andrews Plaza
New York, New York 10007
Hon. William M. Welch II
Chief, Public Integrity Unit
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001
The Hon. John L. Sampson,Chairman
New York State Senate Judiciary Committee
409 Legislative Office Building
Albany, NY 12247
Re: Request for Federal Investigation Into Allegations of Corruption and Witness Intimidation and Appointment of Federal Monitor
Gentlemen:
My name is Christine C. Anderson.
For six and one-half years, I was a Principal Attorney of the New York State Appellate Division, First Department’s Departmental Disciplinary Committee (the “DDC”).
The DDC is responsible for investigating and disciplining attorneys found guilty of misconduct in representing the public in the Bronx and Manhattan. After discovering and reporting of acts of misconduct and corruption at the DDC, which acts constituted an abuse of power and a fraud upon the public, my employment was summarily terminated in June, 2007.
Prior to my employment with the DDC, I was in private practice for over twenty years. Before that, I worked for the Human Resources Administration of New York City. In other words, I am a thoroughly seasoned attorney, with a broad based knowledge of general practice.
As a result of my wrongful termination in retaliation for my reporting misconduct in violation of my First Amendment rights, I instituted a lawsuit captioned Anderson v. State of New York, et al., 07 Civ. 9599 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). (A copy of my complaint in this action is attached hereto as Exhibit A.) Specifically, I discovered and reported that employees of the DDC had engaged in, inter alia, the “whitewashing” [of] complaints of misconduct leveled against certain “select” attorneys and law firms.
This “whitewashing” sometimes involved burying cases or destroying evidence, so that certain complaints were inevitably, unavoidably, dismissed.
I witnessed this destruction of evidence myself. Other reported misconduct involves victimizing attorneys lacking privileged positions or connections.
Although the then Chief Counsel of the DDC, Thomas Cahill, stepped down in 2007, evidence clearly establishes that under the leadership of Alan Friedberg, the current Chief Counsel, the same practice of corruption and whitewashing of complaints continues. Such practice robs the public of any hope at justice; it also works to the detriment of the very public the DDC is duty-bound to serve.
During the course of my litigation against the DDC, a former colleague of mine, who still works as a Principal Attorney at the DDC, agreed to testify on my behalf at a deposition. This former colleague, Nicole Corrado, has been employed by the DDC for approximately eight years, prior to which she worked as a prosecutor for New York State. On the morning of her deposition, however, while en route to her deposition, Ms. Corrado was approached on the street by a supervisor at the DDC, who threatened and intimidated her with respect to her upcoming deposition testimony. Although terribly shaken, Ms. Corrado nonetheless sat for her deposition and testified truthfully.
Following her deposition, however, Ms. Corrado has been subjected to further harassment and intimidation at the hands of the DDC. She has been forced to take a leave of absence as a result.
On June 8, 2009, I testified at a hearing convened by John L. Sampson, New York State Senator and Chairman of the New York State Standing Committee On The Judiciary. (A copy of my affidavit submitted to the Committee is attached hereto as Exhibit B.)
At that hearing, several witnesses testified as to their shocking experiences with the grievance and judiciary committees in New York State.
Shockingly, within days of my testimony, in my lawsuit, my sealed medical and psychiatric records were filed and posted publicly on the court’s Internet filing system by counsel for the defendants – i.e., the New York State Attorney General’s Office.
I regard those actions as horrifically unethical and malicious, and taken in deliberate retaliation for my testifying at the Senate hearing.
The detailed testimony presented by innumerable witnesses at the June 8th Senate hearing reveals the manifold reports of corruption and abuse by the State’s Disciplinary Committees. (A copy of the transcript of this hearing is attached hereto as Exhibit C.)
Charges included concealment of evidence, obstruction of justice, extortionate sexual threats by attorneys, pilfering of estates by attorneys, abuse of power, fraud, conspiracy and repeated violations of state and federal constitutional rights.
In light of the foregoing, it is plain that the enduring practice of allowing attorneys in this state to police themselves is fundamentally flawed. With the numerous reports of abuse by both attorneys and state officials, the corruption in the court system has reached a critical stage.
Accordingly, I respectfully request that you authorize the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to investigate the epidemic of honest services fraud in the New York state court system, and the appointment of a Federal Monitor, to oversee the lawful operation of the same.
Thank you for your time and attention. I look forward to your response.
Very truly yours,
Christine C. Anderson
cc w/o enc:
The Hon. David A. Paterson
New York State Governor
Office of the Governor of New York State
State Capitol
Albany, New York 12224
The Hon. Boyd M. Johnson III
Deputy United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York
Public Corruption Unit
United States Department of Justice
One St. Andrews Plaza
New York, New York 10007
The Hon. Loretta A. Preska
Chief U.S. District Judge
United States Courthouse
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York 10007-1312
The Hon. Andrew M. Cuomo
New York State Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General of New York State
The Capitol
Albany, New York 12224-0341
The Hon. Luis A. Gonzalez
Presiding Justice, New York State Appellate Division,1st Department
27 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10010
The Hon. Joseph M. Demarest, Jr.
Assistant Director in Charge, New York Division
26 Federal Plaza, 23rd Floor
New York, New York 10278-0004
The Committee should take URGENT notice of the following information exposed by the Internet Legal Site, Expose Corrupt Courts, in relation to Anderson’s claims perhaps of Targeting Federal Witnesses for Harassment, I again quote and read into the record @ http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2008/11/breaking-news.html : """
Source:
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+question&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
RSS Feed (xml)
