James B. Comey Ignoring Phone Calls from Iviewit - Eliot Bernstein.
James B. Comey, Assitant Stephanie Doherty On April 03, 2009 - Informed Iviewit that James B. Comey of Lockheed Martin Corporation would NOT Take Eliot Bernstein's Calls on a Trillion Dollar Intellectual Properties Infringement Liability Relating to Iviewit Intellectual Property and a Lawsuit Naming Lockheed Martin Corporation as a named Defendant.
James B. Comey, Lockheeds General Counsel has Refused Phone Calls and has Not Responded to Written Requests from Eliot Bernstein on Behalf of himself, the other Iviewit Inventors and the Iviewit Technologies Shareholders.
As Pro Se Counsel, it is Shocking that James B. Comey can Legally, It Seems get away with simply ignoring Trillion Dollar Lawsuits. And refusing sound business practice to resolve the Lawsuit and Intellectual Property Infringements and to Comply with Proper Accountancy Rules and Regulations.
It Appears that Lockheed is another Player in this Trillion Dollar Heist that is, for Some Reason Protected by the US Courts, Why - We are unsure of.
So James B. Comey, General Council of Lockheed Martin Corporation was notified of Intellectual Property Infringement / Cease and Desist and Lawsuit in Writing after a Phone Conversation with James B. Comey's Assistant Stephanie Doherty and James B. Comey Can Simply Do Nothing?
Is this How the United States Justice System Works?
Here is the Document I am Discussing in This Post, Read it all and see that the Proof in the Iviewit Stolen Patent, Patent Infringement, Stolen Technology Case is Overwhelming, and these Corporations can Simply Ignore it.
James B. Comey, Lockheed Martin Corporation
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090416%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20Demand%20Letter%20to%20Lockheed%20Comey4841clow.pdf
James B. Comey, Lockheed Martin Corporation
More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent at
www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV
James B. Comey, Lockheed Martin Corporation
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Gerald Walpin - The Firing of Gerald Walpin for the Corporation for National and Community Service
"' On January 6, 2007, following nomination by the President and confirmation by the Senate, I assumed my position as Inspector General of the Corporation for National and Community Service (“Corporation”).
I was fortunate to inherit a career non-partisan, able and experienced staff of mostly investigators and auditors, whose sole motivation was to root out fraud, waste and abuse in the spending of close to one billion dollars of taxpayers’ money.
My staff was very successful in its work, resulting in both criminal and civil prosecutions and recovery of millions of dollars from wrongdoers.
I considered it my responsibility to support my staff whenever, after review of their findings, they discovered wrongdoing without regard to the politics or position of the wrongdoer.
Yet, on June 10, 2009, with no prior notice or opportunity to be heard, I was fired by a White House staff person purporting to act on behalf of the President, after I was given one hour to resign or be fired.
Why? The obvious reason is that I supported my staff’s well-documented findings of wrongdoing in two separate matters.
I need only discuss here my staff’s investigation of the mis-use of an $850,000 grant to St. HOPE Academy in Sacramento, California, of which one Kevin Johnson was the Chief Executive Officer and the prime wrongdoer.
Evidence developed by my staff established that Johnson had used those funds and the AmeriCorps members (essentially volunteers) for personal purposes, such as chauffeuring him, washing his car, and political campaigning, instead of for the purposes of the grant, which were primarily mentoring underserved students.
After Johnson was elected and assumed his position as Mayor of Sacramento, media and political pressure was applied to end my staff’s investigation of, and actions against, Johnson, a self-asserted friend and supporter of the new President.
The result: over my and my staff’s objection, the Corporation and the Acting U.S. Attorney in Sacramento settled the case, without any judgment or penalty against Johnson.
Indeed, the settlement rescinded the suspension of Johnson’s ability to receive further Federal funds in the future – a suspension ordered by the Corporation’s Hearing Office based on the facts establishing Johnson’s wrongdoing.
The firing of me, without notice, ignored and violated a statute enacted in 2008 – cosponsored by then Senator Obama – to ensure the independence of Inspectors General, which prohibited removal or transfer of an Inspector General unless at least 30 days advance notice with reasons was provided to both Houses of Congress.
More facts are detailed in the documents that follow.
I commenced a lawsuit to be reinstated. You may ask why am I, one individual citizen, engaging in this battle with a Goliath Government. The answer is simple. It is not that I “needed” the job as Inspector General; indeed, I had left a 41-year successful legal practice because the White House had asked me to provide this service to the Country.
In response, I decided that it furnished me an opportunity to give back a little to this Country that had given me so much.
I recognized that, if I merely rolled over and accepted my removal because I had done my job as it was supposed to be done, it would be a message to all other Inspectors General that they had to be careful not to proceed against wrongdoers who had friends in high places or were politically connected. I could not in good conscience do so.
I knew, when I rejected the demand that I quietly resign and quietly fade away, that the battle that I had begun would not be easy on me.
The public false smearing of me, that I assumed would occur, has occurred. And the financial and time burden that comes with this lawsuit is heavy, particularly for me with a loving family of a wife of 52 years, three children and six grandchildren.
But I have been steeled in continuing to fight this battle by hundreds on hundreds of people – many of whom I have never met – who have communicated their support by writing me and by sending contributions to help finance the lawsuit.
In this regard, I would be thankful to any reader who wishes to contribute (or contribute again). A Trust Fund has been established for this purpose, of which two highly respected attorneys, Thomas J. Kavaler, a partner in Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, and William F. Kuntz II, a partner in Baker & Hostetler LLP, have volunteered their service as Trustees. Checks can be sent to the Walpin Legal Defense Trust, 875 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10075.
If you have any questions, suggestions or comments, I would welcome them at GeraldWalpinig@Gmail.com .
Following are some documents and, where useful, further recitation of relevant facts, for your information, if you are interested. (As further events occur, they will be added.) While you can google Gerald Walpin to see a large number of articles, you will find at the end of this site links that will give you a reasonable sample of media coverage.
A. The Complaint Against Me By The Acting U.S. Attorney in Sacramento
One primary “reason” belatedly provided by the White House for my removal (only after various members of Congress had pointed out the absence of any reason) was a complaint against me by the Acting U.S. Attorney in Sacramento, whom I had criticized for settling the case against Johnson as he had done.
Although using that complaint as a “reason,” the White House never did any investigation of the factual basis for the complaint, never talked with me, and never talked to members of my staff who were personally involved in the investigation and thus had personal knowledge of the falsity of the complaint.
Most important, the White House did not await determination of the complaint by the Integrity Committee, the body assigned by Congress with the responsibility to hear and determine complaints against an Inspector General. On October 19, 2009, the Integrity Committee, after careful review of all facts, rendered its decision finding no merit to the complaint:
Integrity Committee Decision
B. The Smear On Me That I Was “Disoriented, Confused And Unable To Answer Questions”
The other primary “reason” that the White House belatedly offered for my firing was that I had acted “disoriented, confused and unable to answer questions.”
Anyone who has listened to me, freely answering questions during various television and radio appearances, knows that this smear is untrue (you can google me to hear for yourself).
Almost immediately after that smear was made public, six prominent New York attorneys circulated the following letter among fellow prominent members of that Bar, fixed a 24-hour limit to obtain signers, and quickly obtained almost 150 signers, in order to communicate their rejection of any validity to that smear.
Lawyers' Letter of Support for Gerald Walpin
C. My Complaint Which Commenced The Law Suit For Reinstatement
On July 20, 2009, my complaint was filed, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, by my distinguished attorneys, Joe D. Whitley and Sanford M. Saunders, Jr., of the law firm Greenberg Traurig, who have agreed to provide a substantial discount from their normal fees. The Amended Complaint, filed one week later and containing only minor changes, is as follows:
Amended Complaint
D. Government’s Motion To Dismiss
On October 26, 2009, the Government, instead of answering the Amended Complaint, filed a motion to dismiss my case. Following are the Government’s submission, our opposing submission, and the Government’s reply submission:
The Government's Motion to Dismiss
Walpin's Opposing Submission
The Government's Reply Submission
E. Our Motion For Summary Judgment Ordering My Reinstatement
On December 16, 2009, we filed a motion for Summary Judgment, ordering my reinstatement as Inspector General:
01 Motion.pdf
02 Statement of Facts.pdf
03 Memo.pdf
04 Walpin Declaration.pdf
05 Exhibit A.pdf
06 Exhibit B.pdf
07 Exhibit C.pdf
08 Exhibit D.pdf
09 Exhibit E.pdf
10 Exhibit F.pdf
11 Exhibit G.pdf
12 Exhibit H.pdf
13 Exhibit I.pdf
14 Exhibit J.pdf
15 Exhibit K.pdf
16 Exhibit L.pdf
17 Exhibit M.pdf
18 Exhibit N.pdf
19 Exhibit O.pdf
20 Exhibit P.pdf
21 Exhibit Q.pdf
22 Exhibit R.pdf
23 Exhibit S.pdf
24 Exhibit T.pdf
25 Exhibit U.pdf
26 Exhibit V.pdf
27 Exhibit W.pdf
28 Exhibit X.pdf
29 Exhibit Y.pdf
30 Exhibit Z.pdf
31 Exhibit AA.pdf
32 Exhibit BB.pdf
33 Exhibit CC.pdf
34 Exhibit DD.pdf
35 Exhibit EE.pdf
36 Exhibit FF.pdf
37 Proposed Order.pdf
F. Government’s Motion To Stay Our Summary Judgment Motion
Instead of answering our motion for summary judgment, the Government, on December 23, 2009, filed a motion to stay consideration of our summary judgment motion. Following is the Government’s motion and our opposition submission:
Government's Motion to Stay
Our Opposition to the Motion to Stay
G. Joint Staff Report from U.S. Congress
On November 20, 2009, a 61-page report, entitled “The Firing of the Inspector General for the Corporation for National and Community Service” was issued as a Joint Staff Report, 111th Congress, under the names of Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Sen. Charles E. Grassley, and House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Ranking Member Rep. Darrell Issa:
Report
Annexed Documents
Examples of Media Reports:
Washington Examiner, June 14, 2009
Washington Times, June 15, 2009
Wall Street Journal, June 17, 2009
Washington Times, June 17, 2009
Fox News (TV Appearance), June 18, 2009
Fox News (Second TV Appearance), June 18, 2009
Washington Times, June 22, 2009
Progressive Review Online Report
Washington Times, July 16, 2009
Hogue News, July 21, 2009
Village Voice, July 28, 2009
Washington Times, October 8, 2009
Los Angeles Times, November 20, 2009
Washington Examiner, November 20, 2009 "'
Link to Source of Post in Gerald Walpin' Words
http://sites.google.com/site/iggeraldwalpin/
Gerald Walpin
Other Links
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124511811033017539.html
Gerald Walpin
I was fortunate to inherit a career non-partisan, able and experienced staff of mostly investigators and auditors, whose sole motivation was to root out fraud, waste and abuse in the spending of close to one billion dollars of taxpayers’ money.
My staff was very successful in its work, resulting in both criminal and civil prosecutions and recovery of millions of dollars from wrongdoers.
I considered it my responsibility to support my staff whenever, after review of their findings, they discovered wrongdoing without regard to the politics or position of the wrongdoer.
Yet, on June 10, 2009, with no prior notice or opportunity to be heard, I was fired by a White House staff person purporting to act on behalf of the President, after I was given one hour to resign or be fired.
Why? The obvious reason is that I supported my staff’s well-documented findings of wrongdoing in two separate matters.
I need only discuss here my staff’s investigation of the mis-use of an $850,000 grant to St. HOPE Academy in Sacramento, California, of which one Kevin Johnson was the Chief Executive Officer and the prime wrongdoer.
Evidence developed by my staff established that Johnson had used those funds and the AmeriCorps members (essentially volunteers) for personal purposes, such as chauffeuring him, washing his car, and political campaigning, instead of for the purposes of the grant, which were primarily mentoring underserved students.
After Johnson was elected and assumed his position as Mayor of Sacramento, media and political pressure was applied to end my staff’s investigation of, and actions against, Johnson, a self-asserted friend and supporter of the new President.
The result: over my and my staff’s objection, the Corporation and the Acting U.S. Attorney in Sacramento settled the case, without any judgment or penalty against Johnson.
Indeed, the settlement rescinded the suspension of Johnson’s ability to receive further Federal funds in the future – a suspension ordered by the Corporation’s Hearing Office based on the facts establishing Johnson’s wrongdoing.
The firing of me, without notice, ignored and violated a statute enacted in 2008 – cosponsored by then Senator Obama – to ensure the independence of Inspectors General, which prohibited removal or transfer of an Inspector General unless at least 30 days advance notice with reasons was provided to both Houses of Congress.
More facts are detailed in the documents that follow.
I commenced a lawsuit to be reinstated. You may ask why am I, one individual citizen, engaging in this battle with a Goliath Government. The answer is simple. It is not that I “needed” the job as Inspector General; indeed, I had left a 41-year successful legal practice because the White House had asked me to provide this service to the Country.
In response, I decided that it furnished me an opportunity to give back a little to this Country that had given me so much.
I recognized that, if I merely rolled over and accepted my removal because I had done my job as it was supposed to be done, it would be a message to all other Inspectors General that they had to be careful not to proceed against wrongdoers who had friends in high places or were politically connected. I could not in good conscience do so.
I knew, when I rejected the demand that I quietly resign and quietly fade away, that the battle that I had begun would not be easy on me.
The public false smearing of me, that I assumed would occur, has occurred. And the financial and time burden that comes with this lawsuit is heavy, particularly for me with a loving family of a wife of 52 years, three children and six grandchildren.
But I have been steeled in continuing to fight this battle by hundreds on hundreds of people – many of whom I have never met – who have communicated their support by writing me and by sending contributions to help finance the lawsuit.
In this regard, I would be thankful to any reader who wishes to contribute (or contribute again). A Trust Fund has been established for this purpose, of which two highly respected attorneys, Thomas J. Kavaler, a partner in Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, and William F. Kuntz II, a partner in Baker & Hostetler LLP, have volunteered their service as Trustees. Checks can be sent to the Walpin Legal Defense Trust, 875 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10075.
If you have any questions, suggestions or comments, I would welcome them at GeraldWalpinig@Gmail.com .
Following are some documents and, where useful, further recitation of relevant facts, for your information, if you are interested. (As further events occur, they will be added.) While you can google Gerald Walpin to see a large number of articles, you will find at the end of this site links that will give you a reasonable sample of media coverage.
A. The Complaint Against Me By The Acting U.S. Attorney in Sacramento
One primary “reason” belatedly provided by the White House for my removal (only after various members of Congress had pointed out the absence of any reason) was a complaint against me by the Acting U.S. Attorney in Sacramento, whom I had criticized for settling the case against Johnson as he had done.
Although using that complaint as a “reason,” the White House never did any investigation of the factual basis for the complaint, never talked with me, and never talked to members of my staff who were personally involved in the investigation and thus had personal knowledge of the falsity of the complaint.
Most important, the White House did not await determination of the complaint by the Integrity Committee, the body assigned by Congress with the responsibility to hear and determine complaints against an Inspector General. On October 19, 2009, the Integrity Committee, after careful review of all facts, rendered its decision finding no merit to the complaint:
Integrity Committee Decision
B. The Smear On Me That I Was “Disoriented, Confused And Unable To Answer Questions”
The other primary “reason” that the White House belatedly offered for my firing was that I had acted “disoriented, confused and unable to answer questions.”
Anyone who has listened to me, freely answering questions during various television and radio appearances, knows that this smear is untrue (you can google me to hear for yourself).
Almost immediately after that smear was made public, six prominent New York attorneys circulated the following letter among fellow prominent members of that Bar, fixed a 24-hour limit to obtain signers, and quickly obtained almost 150 signers, in order to communicate their rejection of any validity to that smear.
Lawyers' Letter of Support for Gerald Walpin
C. My Complaint Which Commenced The Law Suit For Reinstatement
On July 20, 2009, my complaint was filed, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, by my distinguished attorneys, Joe D. Whitley and Sanford M. Saunders, Jr., of the law firm Greenberg Traurig, who have agreed to provide a substantial discount from their normal fees. The Amended Complaint, filed one week later and containing only minor changes, is as follows:
Amended Complaint
D. Government’s Motion To Dismiss
On October 26, 2009, the Government, instead of answering the Amended Complaint, filed a motion to dismiss my case. Following are the Government’s submission, our opposing submission, and the Government’s reply submission:
The Government's Motion to Dismiss
Walpin's Opposing Submission
The Government's Reply Submission
E. Our Motion For Summary Judgment Ordering My Reinstatement
On December 16, 2009, we filed a motion for Summary Judgment, ordering my reinstatement as Inspector General:
01 Motion.pdf
02 Statement of Facts.pdf
03 Memo.pdf
04 Walpin Declaration.pdf
05 Exhibit A.pdf
06 Exhibit B.pdf
07 Exhibit C.pdf
08 Exhibit D.pdf
09 Exhibit E.pdf
10 Exhibit F.pdf
11 Exhibit G.pdf
12 Exhibit H.pdf
13 Exhibit I.pdf
14 Exhibit J.pdf
15 Exhibit K.pdf
16 Exhibit L.pdf
17 Exhibit M.pdf
18 Exhibit N.pdf
19 Exhibit O.pdf
20 Exhibit P.pdf
21 Exhibit Q.pdf
22 Exhibit R.pdf
23 Exhibit S.pdf
24 Exhibit T.pdf
25 Exhibit U.pdf
26 Exhibit V.pdf
27 Exhibit W.pdf
28 Exhibit X.pdf
29 Exhibit Y.pdf
30 Exhibit Z.pdf
31 Exhibit AA.pdf
32 Exhibit BB.pdf
33 Exhibit CC.pdf
34 Exhibit DD.pdf
35 Exhibit EE.pdf
36 Exhibit FF.pdf
37 Proposed Order.pdf
F. Government’s Motion To Stay Our Summary Judgment Motion
Instead of answering our motion for summary judgment, the Government, on December 23, 2009, filed a motion to stay consideration of our summary judgment motion. Following is the Government’s motion and our opposition submission:
Government's Motion to Stay
Our Opposition to the Motion to Stay
G. Joint Staff Report from U.S. Congress
On November 20, 2009, a 61-page report, entitled “The Firing of the Inspector General for the Corporation for National and Community Service” was issued as a Joint Staff Report, 111th Congress, under the names of Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Sen. Charles E. Grassley, and House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Ranking Member Rep. Darrell Issa:
Report
Annexed Documents
Examples of Media Reports:
Washington Examiner, June 14, 2009
Washington Times, June 15, 2009
Wall Street Journal, June 17, 2009
Washington Times, June 17, 2009
Fox News (TV Appearance), June 18, 2009
Fox News (Second TV Appearance), June 18, 2009
Washington Times, June 22, 2009
Progressive Review Online Report
Washington Times, July 16, 2009
Hogue News, July 21, 2009
Village Voice, July 28, 2009
Washington Times, October 8, 2009
Los Angeles Times, November 20, 2009
Washington Examiner, November 20, 2009 "'
Link to Source of Post in Gerald Walpin' Words
http://sites.google.com/site/iggeraldwalpin/
Gerald Walpin
Other Links
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124511811033017539.html
Gerald Walpin
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Expose Corruption - Kenneth Rubenstein, Steven Krane, Proskauer Rose, Time Warner Inc., Bruce Sewell, Intel Corp., Gerald Lewin, MPEGLA, and More.
Who is Allowing the Corruption To Continue?
When the Sleeping Giant Awakens the Corruption Will End.
You are the Sleeping Giant ~ Once you Awaken to the Truth, there is NOTHING they can do. When you all truly wake up - they are the Minority and Truth, Justice for ALL and Doing the Right Thing Once Again Becomes Simply Just the Way things Are.
We the People Do have a Voice in saying NO MORE to Corporate Greed, Enough is Enough to Court Corruption and Favortism to Big Legal Firms at the Expense of YOUR life... your livlihood and your very Life. We the People Need to stand Up and STOP all these Elite Super Powers from Being Above the Law, Immune to Human Rights and Seemingly having No Morals or Ethics of any Kind. They will NOT STOP until you NOTICE and say Enough.
We the People Can Begin to Do That by Standing Up for the Iviewit Inventors in this Blatant, Obvious Attorney Protection, Court Corruption, USTPO Fraud, Attempted Murder, and the US Justice System Boldly standing for the Criminal just because they are Billionaires and Have amazing connections and Political Power.
We intend to File in the Criminal Code in Each State and County, with the Department of Justice, within the State and Federal Courts against EVERY criminal In this Blog. All the Tech Companies, Attorneys, Judges ... who have thus far been above the law - they NOW answer to We the People. Time For Accountability at Every Level.
To do this you Do not have to be Part of a Lawsuit, you simply have to be someone that knows the facts. All these guys who have Legally side stepped the Legal System and have controlled the State Bar Associations in Multiple States, these Patent Attorneys Committing Fraud, the Head of the Patent Office, the Intel Boys, all the Attorneys who Lied and Committed Fraud, the Politicians Involved, the Cheneys, Lockhead, MPEGLA, and All the Companies and Individual People, Judges, Attorneys On this Website.
We, in Mass will complain to State Boards everywhere they are licensed, file Legal Complaints that when the "Cleaners" and the Clerks of Court throw them in the ROUND FILE, we then file again For Obstruction of Justice.
In the United States, All Due Process has been Stripped from the Iviewit Inventors. Their Patent was Stolen by their Patent Attorney. The Department of Justice, Supreme Court, Patent Office, SEC, and State Bar Associations involved are doing Nothing About it. They seem to be ignoring this Blatant Crime and Some Courts have even simply dismissed it for no good reason at all. This Attack on Citizens Rights of the United States is nothing NEW, what Can Be NEW is that WE THE PEOPLE make a Stand and Demand Justice, Demand Accountability.
Those who brag about protecting Intellectual property rights, they are No Where to Be Found. You See they only protect the rights of patents they don't want and protect the patent thieves to Legally Get Away with Patenting Other Peoples inventions for their gain.
I understand wanting to Silence, Rob, Kill, and Keep these inventors down... and well Reasons to Ignore the Iviewit Shareholders... you see when the Cheneys, Lockheed Martin, IBM, Intel, Proskauer Rose, and the Biggest and the Richest are involved.. Shutting Up, bankrupting and Quieting the Voice of the Real Inventors, well this is the only way to Stay in Power....
So why not honor contracts, and why not set this right?
Real The Documents on this Site, ( www.DeniedPatent.com ) Read the Iviewit Site and Blog and if you have time the THOUSANDS of documents at www.Iviewit.TV and you SEE the TRUTH is blatantly being ignored by the United States Justice System in Order to Protect the Power Elite.
Folks These Criminals, these True Evil Doers, these Economic Terrorists and attempted murders.. they answer to YOU.
If you sit Silent they keep doing this to People Over and Over.
We the People must say NO, and one way to do this is Talk about this Story and to Name Names. Reprint anything from this site, please link to www.DeniedPatent.com and to www.Iviewit.TV And Share this Story of a Trillion Dollar Patent Heist - These Patent Theives, these Corrupt Judges - Corrupt Attorneys and the Supreme Courts that Deny Due Process they NEED to Be Exposed.
Please Share the Iviewit Story on ALL your Blogs and Websites. Post links to documents and Get ALL Eyes on all this Big Corporations for What they have Done.
Expose the New York and Florida Supreme Court and State Attorney Bar for the blatant ignoring of Viable Proven Crimes and Ethics Violations by Attorneys Licensed in their State.
Expose the USPTO, the United States Patent and Trademark Office for their part in Denying these Inventors their Rights. Expose Companies Such as Time Warner Inc. , AOL, Sony, for Contracts they Denied and for VIOLATING Confidentiality Agreements.
Expose Major Tech Companies for Signing Non-Disclosure agreements and for Using Stolen technology with No Compensation for Inventors Rights. IBM, Intel, Sony, and all the Big Players on this Blog - Time to Tell On them. Post These Stories on Your Blogs and Websites and Link Back to Us.
Help Us Expose Corporate Greed, Corrupt Courts, Corrupti Judges, Attorney Favortism and the Power Elite Ruining Lives and Even Killing Inventors to Keep - Use and Profit from their Inventions.
Expose Major Law Firms that have side deals, connections, conflicts of interests and big money to make sure that Real Justice and the TRUTH or the Real Facts of a Case Do not actually even get into court. Stop Favortism among high profile attorneys with Total disregard for the Truth.
Stand With Eliot Bernstein and the REAL inventors of the Iviewit Technology and be a Part of Changing The World. We the People have the Power.
Make videos and talk about any of the names and players in this blog. Tell us anything you know anything about any of the Companies, Judges, Courts, Attorneys on this BLOG, send me a Link - Crystal@CrystalCox.com Or Email your "Tip" - the Truth is No longer Taboo, the Truth is what we crave and the TRUTH is what We Seek.
Is this ALL about Money for the Inventors ?
Yes Iviewit Inventors deserve the Patent and The Royalties that Criminals IBM, Intel, MPEGLA and more are reeping the REWARDS from, however it is bigger then that.
If we let them get away with this then which one of you is next?
If your not in the "Club" not one of THE Rich - Powerful - Elite and you invent something GREAT... something life changing .. something they themselves call the Holy Grail... well you are Powerless.. without Money - BILLIONS and Connections Globally - You Never get the Rights to What you Really Invented, and the Shareholders never get what is owed to them for their courage in investing in an Unknown Group of Inventors.
Now with Years upon Year of Proof.. .. business plans .. .bank statements .. letters, emails, court documents... Thousands of Documents proving that all the courts, attorneys, judges involved seemed to just MAKE IT GO AWAY... and so here we are Case Proven COURTS refusing TRUTH - Refusing Due Process and the Rights of the Citizens.
And EVEN with Contracts in Place with Intel, Sony, Warner Bros. and way more that they are denying exist.. still The Department of Justice, the US Patent Office, the New York Supreme Court, the New York Bar Association, the Florida Supreme Court, the Florida Bar Association, the SEC, and all those who govern intellection property.. and the FBI.. how can they all Do NOTHING when the Rights of the Iviewit Inventors and Shareholders have been violated to such an Extreme?
My guess is the Courts are afraid of IBM's Money, afraid of Cheney and Lockheed, afraid of Proskauer Rose.. and the Courts - the Highest law of the land in every state involved and The United States Justices System as Well as Congress and Our New President.. well they are Afraid of these Super Powers.
And therefore Contracts with inventors - this does not matter, the Rights of Shareholders Does not matter, the Quality of Life of the Inventors themselves certainly Does not matter for THEY fear the Power Elite more then Some Guy that they Can Easily Bankrupt, Silence, Put on the Run and Ruin his life so much that Surely he Will Just Shut Up and Slink Away.
Please Post On your Blog, your Website, your Forum and STOP the Power Elite, Stop the Bilderber Cronies, Stop the Above the Law Proskauer Rose. POST their Secrets on your Site and Start a Revolution... one that Says We the People HOLD you Accountable for What you Have Done. We are Watching you, Everyone one YOU involved in this Trillion Dollar Heist and RUINING families, Stealing Lives, and Standing Firm in the Kind of Corruption that Denies Us All Quality of Life, Freedom of Opportunity and Real Justice and Liberty For All.
Take Back Your Country.
Start Now with Standing Firm against the Elitist Tyranny of IBM, Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Intel Corp., Sony, Warner Bros., and all the Tyrants on this Blog ( www.DeniedPatent.com )
Demand Accountablity from The Department of Justice, the US Patent Office, the New York Supreme Court, the New York Bar Association, the Florida Supreme Court, the Florida Bar Association, the SEC, the FBI and All those your Tax Dollars Pay to Let this Happen to Guys Like YOU...
Eliot Bernstein is just a Guy, he has a Wife and Kids.. a family.. he works toward making this world a better place for all of us and even in the Face of Car Bombs, Economic Terror and 8 years of being put on the run by these Super Powers.
You can still find him on Forums, on Chats, Commenting on News articles and Speaking up to Protect the Iviewit Inventors, To Fight for the Original Iviewit Shareholder Rights, to Fight for his families right for a Real Life again and he Stands Penniless, Tattered, Silenced again and Again... and this is a Stand for All of us in hopes that the Dark Does not Win.
Those who are part of this Trillion Dollar Patent theft, they are Secret Society People, Bullies, Connected to Bilderbergs, Politicians, Connected To Congress, Control the US Patent Office, they are Corrupt Supreme Court Judges, Bar Association that look the other way when Injustice is Served up to those Out of "the Attorney Fraternity". These "Bad Guys" are ruining the Peaceful way of Life that we All Want.
When we make this stand for Iviewit, For Eliot Bernstein - for the Inventors of the Iview Technology and for the Iviewit Shareholders, WE The People Stand and We Say ENOUGH is ENOUGH.
We do NOT stand with the Criminal.
We the People stand with the Victim.
Corrruption in the Courts, Corruption in the US Patent Office, Corrupt Supreme Court Judges, Mega-Rich Technology Companies, Favored Attorneys, and All those allowing this Corruption at every Level - Expose them - Write about them, Tell US What you Know about them, Blog about them ... it is Time for Accountability - Time to Tell the Truth.
They DO NOT Win.
WE the People WIN.
We the People Say No to the Stealing of the Iviewit Patents by the Patent Attorney and his Cronies and we VOW to Fight all those involved.
Fight for Boycotts of ALL Companies, Fight the US Patent Office, Fight that State Courts, the Federal Courts and all who WILL NOT look at this.
For if we do not, then each one of us can be next in line for Set ups, Car Bombs, Jailing, Beating, Theft, and Severe Life Altering Economic Terror.
Read Through www.DeniedPatent.com
Iviewit
And Check out www.Iviewit.TV
We will be adding more Soon, We will Teach you how to Play by Play File Criminal Complaints against each person and we will Expose each top level Person Responsible for the People under them that Committed this Heinous Crime.
Expose the TRUTH on any Player in the Game of Treason, this High Finance Crime Game Seemingly LEGAL in the United States of America. Email me your blog on these people, politicians, courts, patent office or email me your story on These Judges, USPTO Kappos, IBM, Steven Krane, Intel, Bruce Sewell, Brian Utley, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, Roy Reardon, Florida Bar and Court System, New York Bar and Court System, Silicon Graphics, MPEGLA and all those on the www.DeniedPatent.com that have been involved in this Theft and are STILL actively participating in Sweeping it Under the Rug of Silence ... of Corruption...
Speak Up Folks Join the Iviewit Revolution To STOP those in Power from Keeping us Down, Keeping us Silent, Telling Us to Sit Down and Shut Up, Keeping Us in Court til' we Give up on the Truth or Starve to death .. taking our children with us.
Speak Up and lend your Voice
to STOP this From GOING on ONE Day Longer.
Read the document on this Site and Join as we become Millions Strong of We the People ... Legal Minds ... Bloggers .. People Who Know the Court System .. People who Know How to Make Noise in Congress ... People who Know the Secret of Why this Happen...
We Will be Filing Complaints and EXPOSING All the Companies on this Blog that Let this Happen... So Are Ya In? Post our Stories, Steal my Content - Give us a Link and EXPOSE this Crime at Every Level.
Stop Corruption
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Stop Court Corruption
When the Sleeping Giant Awakens the Corruption Will End.
You are the Sleeping Giant ~ Once you Awaken to the Truth, there is NOTHING they can do. When you all truly wake up - they are the Minority and Truth, Justice for ALL and Doing the Right Thing Once Again Becomes Simply Just the Way things Are.
We the People Do have a Voice in saying NO MORE to Corporate Greed, Enough is Enough to Court Corruption and Favortism to Big Legal Firms at the Expense of YOUR life... your livlihood and your very Life. We the People Need to stand Up and STOP all these Elite Super Powers from Being Above the Law, Immune to Human Rights and Seemingly having No Morals or Ethics of any Kind. They will NOT STOP until you NOTICE and say Enough.
We the People Can Begin to Do That by Standing Up for the Iviewit Inventors in this Blatant, Obvious Attorney Protection, Court Corruption, USTPO Fraud, Attempted Murder, and the US Justice System Boldly standing for the Criminal just because they are Billionaires and Have amazing connections and Political Power.
We intend to File in the Criminal Code in Each State and County, with the Department of Justice, within the State and Federal Courts against EVERY criminal In this Blog. All the Tech Companies, Attorneys, Judges ... who have thus far been above the law - they NOW answer to We the People. Time For Accountability at Every Level.
To do this you Do not have to be Part of a Lawsuit, you simply have to be someone that knows the facts. All these guys who have Legally side stepped the Legal System and have controlled the State Bar Associations in Multiple States, these Patent Attorneys Committing Fraud, the Head of the Patent Office, the Intel Boys, all the Attorneys who Lied and Committed Fraud, the Politicians Involved, the Cheneys, Lockhead, MPEGLA, and All the Companies and Individual People, Judges, Attorneys On this Website.
We, in Mass will complain to State Boards everywhere they are licensed, file Legal Complaints that when the "Cleaners" and the Clerks of Court throw them in the ROUND FILE, we then file again For Obstruction of Justice.
In the United States, All Due Process has been Stripped from the Iviewit Inventors. Their Patent was Stolen by their Patent Attorney. The Department of Justice, Supreme Court, Patent Office, SEC, and State Bar Associations involved are doing Nothing About it. They seem to be ignoring this Blatant Crime and Some Courts have even simply dismissed it for no good reason at all. This Attack on Citizens Rights of the United States is nothing NEW, what Can Be NEW is that WE THE PEOPLE make a Stand and Demand Justice, Demand Accountability.
Those who brag about protecting Intellectual property rights, they are No Where to Be Found. You See they only protect the rights of patents they don't want and protect the patent thieves to Legally Get Away with Patenting Other Peoples inventions for their gain.
I understand wanting to Silence, Rob, Kill, and Keep these inventors down... and well Reasons to Ignore the Iviewit Shareholders... you see when the Cheneys, Lockheed Martin, IBM, Intel, Proskauer Rose, and the Biggest and the Richest are involved.. Shutting Up, bankrupting and Quieting the Voice of the Real Inventors, well this is the only way to Stay in Power....
So why not honor contracts, and why not set this right?
Well now they have to "Save Face" and NEVER admit that this really happened, so they will keep Iviewit in Court and Make them jump hoop after hoop, .. Trillions OFF Dollars they have to use in Fighting against the now penniless inventors... well you do the math... Add to it Death Threats, Car Bombings and Economic Terror and well the Power Elite Wins.
We the People Cannot ALLOW this.
We the People Cannot ALLOW this.
Real The Documents on this Site, ( www.DeniedPatent.com ) Read the Iviewit Site and Blog and if you have time the THOUSANDS of documents at www.Iviewit.TV and you SEE the TRUTH is blatantly being ignored by the United States Justice System in Order to Protect the Power Elite.
Folks These Criminals, these True Evil Doers, these Economic Terrorists and attempted murders.. they answer to YOU.
If you sit Silent they keep doing this to People Over and Over.
We the People must say NO, and one way to do this is Talk about this Story and to Name Names. Reprint anything from this site, please link to www.DeniedPatent.com and to www.Iviewit.TV And Share this Story of a Trillion Dollar Patent Heist - These Patent Theives, these Corrupt Judges - Corrupt Attorneys and the Supreme Courts that Deny Due Process they NEED to Be Exposed.
Please Share the Iviewit Story on ALL your Blogs and Websites. Post links to documents and Get ALL Eyes on all this Big Corporations for What they have Done.
Expose the New York and Florida Supreme Court and State Attorney Bar for the blatant ignoring of Viable Proven Crimes and Ethics Violations by Attorneys Licensed in their State.
Expose the USPTO, the United States Patent and Trademark Office for their part in Denying these Inventors their Rights. Expose Companies Such as Time Warner Inc. , AOL, Sony, for Contracts they Denied and for VIOLATING Confidentiality Agreements.
Expose Major Tech Companies for Signing Non-Disclosure agreements and for Using Stolen technology with No Compensation for Inventors Rights. IBM, Intel, Sony, and all the Big Players on this Blog - Time to Tell On them. Post These Stories on Your Blogs and Websites and Link Back to Us.
Help Us Expose Corporate Greed, Corrupt Courts, Corrupti Judges, Attorney Favortism and the Power Elite Ruining Lives and Even Killing Inventors to Keep - Use and Profit from their Inventions.
Expose Major Law Firms that have side deals, connections, conflicts of interests and big money to make sure that Real Justice and the TRUTH or the Real Facts of a Case Do not actually even get into court. Stop Favortism among high profile attorneys with Total disregard for the Truth.
Stand With Eliot Bernstein and the REAL inventors of the Iviewit Technology and be a Part of Changing The World. We the People have the Power.
Make videos and talk about any of the names and players in this blog. Tell us anything you know anything about any of the Companies, Judges, Courts, Attorneys on this BLOG, send me a Link - Crystal@CrystalCox.com Or Email your "Tip" - the Truth is No longer Taboo, the Truth is what we crave and the TRUTH is what We Seek.
Is this ALL about Money for the Inventors ?
Yes Iviewit Inventors deserve the Patent and The Royalties that Criminals IBM, Intel, MPEGLA and more are reeping the REWARDS from, however it is bigger then that.
If we let them get away with this then which one of you is next?
If your not in the "Club" not one of THE Rich - Powerful - Elite and you invent something GREAT... something life changing .. something they themselves call the Holy Grail... well you are Powerless.. without Money - BILLIONS and Connections Globally - You Never get the Rights to What you Really Invented, and the Shareholders never get what is owed to them for their courage in investing in an Unknown Group of Inventors.
Now with Years upon Year of Proof.. .. business plans .. .bank statements .. letters, emails, court documents... Thousands of Documents proving that all the courts, attorneys, judges involved seemed to just MAKE IT GO AWAY... and so here we are Case Proven COURTS refusing TRUTH - Refusing Due Process and the Rights of the Citizens.
And EVEN with Contracts in Place with Intel, Sony, Warner Bros. and way more that they are denying exist.. still The Department of Justice, the US Patent Office, the New York Supreme Court, the New York Bar Association, the Florida Supreme Court, the Florida Bar Association, the SEC, and all those who govern intellection property.. and the FBI.. how can they all Do NOTHING when the Rights of the Iviewit Inventors and Shareholders have been violated to such an Extreme?
My guess is the Courts are afraid of IBM's Money, afraid of Cheney and Lockheed, afraid of Proskauer Rose.. and the Courts - the Highest law of the land in every state involved and The United States Justices System as Well as Congress and Our New President.. well they are Afraid of these Super Powers.
And therefore Contracts with inventors - this does not matter, the Rights of Shareholders Does not matter, the Quality of Life of the Inventors themselves certainly Does not matter for THEY fear the Power Elite more then Some Guy that they Can Easily Bankrupt, Silence, Put on the Run and Ruin his life so much that Surely he Will Just Shut Up and Slink Away.
Please Post On your Blog, your Website, your Forum and STOP the Power Elite, Stop the Bilderber Cronies, Stop the Above the Law Proskauer Rose. POST their Secrets on your Site and Start a Revolution... one that Says We the People HOLD you Accountable for What you Have Done. We are Watching you, Everyone one YOU involved in this Trillion Dollar Heist and RUINING families, Stealing Lives, and Standing Firm in the Kind of Corruption that Denies Us All Quality of Life, Freedom of Opportunity and Real Justice and Liberty For All.
Take Back Your Country.
Start Now with Standing Firm against the Elitist Tyranny of IBM, Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Intel Corp., Sony, Warner Bros., and all the Tyrants on this Blog ( www.DeniedPatent.com )
Demand Accountablity from The Department of Justice, the US Patent Office, the New York Supreme Court, the New York Bar Association, the Florida Supreme Court, the Florida Bar Association, the SEC, the FBI and All those your Tax Dollars Pay to Let this Happen to Guys Like YOU...
Eliot Bernstein is just a Guy, he has a Wife and Kids.. a family.. he works toward making this world a better place for all of us and even in the Face of Car Bombs, Economic Terror and 8 years of being put on the run by these Super Powers.
You can still find him on Forums, on Chats, Commenting on News articles and Speaking up to Protect the Iviewit Inventors, To Fight for the Original Iviewit Shareholder Rights, to Fight for his families right for a Real Life again and he Stands Penniless, Tattered, Silenced again and Again... and this is a Stand for All of us in hopes that the Dark Does not Win.
Those who are part of this Trillion Dollar Patent theft, they are Secret Society People, Bullies, Connected to Bilderbergs, Politicians, Connected To Congress, Control the US Patent Office, they are Corrupt Supreme Court Judges, Bar Association that look the other way when Injustice is Served up to those Out of "the Attorney Fraternity". These "Bad Guys" are ruining the Peaceful way of Life that we All Want.
When we make this stand for Iviewit, For Eliot Bernstein - for the Inventors of the Iview Technology and for the Iviewit Shareholders, WE The People Stand and We Say ENOUGH is ENOUGH.
We do NOT stand with the Criminal.
We the People stand with the Victim.
Corrruption in the Courts, Corruption in the US Patent Office, Corrupt Supreme Court Judges, Mega-Rich Technology Companies, Favored Attorneys, and All those allowing this Corruption at every Level - Expose them - Write about them, Tell US What you Know about them, Blog about them ... it is Time for Accountability - Time to Tell the Truth.
They DO NOT Win.
WE the People WIN.
We the People Say No to the Stealing of the Iviewit Patents by the Patent Attorney and his Cronies and we VOW to Fight all those involved.
Fight for Boycotts of ALL Companies, Fight the US Patent Office, Fight that State Courts, the Federal Courts and all who WILL NOT look at this.
For if we do not, then each one of us can be next in line for Set ups, Car Bombs, Jailing, Beating, Theft, and Severe Life Altering Economic Terror.
Read Through www.DeniedPatent.com
Iviewit
And Check out www.Iviewit.TV
We will be adding more Soon, We will Teach you how to Play by Play File Criminal Complaints against each person and we will Expose each top level Person Responsible for the People under them that Committed this Heinous Crime.
Your Voice is Important.
court corruption
You Can Make a Difference.
Expose the TRUTH on any Player in the Game of Treason, this High Finance Crime Game Seemingly LEGAL in the United States of America. Email me your blog on these people, politicians, courts, patent office or email me your story on These Judges, USPTO Kappos, IBM, Steven Krane, Intel, Bruce Sewell, Brian Utley, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, Roy Reardon, Florida Bar and Court System, New York Bar and Court System, Silicon Graphics, MPEGLA and all those on the www.DeniedPatent.com that have been involved in this Theft and are STILL actively participating in Sweeping it Under the Rug of Silence ... of Corruption...
Speak Up Folks Join the Iviewit Revolution To STOP those in Power from Keeping us Down, Keeping us Silent, Telling Us to Sit Down and Shut Up, Keeping Us in Court til' we Give up on the Truth or Starve to death .. taking our children with us.
Speak Up and lend your Voice
to STOP this From GOING on ONE Day Longer.
Read the document on this Site and Join as we become Millions Strong of We the People ... Legal Minds ... Bloggers .. People Who Know the Court System .. People who Know How to Make Noise in Congress ... People who Know the Secret of Why this Happen...
We Will be Filing Complaints and EXPOSING All the Companies on this Blog that Let this Happen... So Are Ya In? Post our Stories, Steal my Content - Give us a Link and EXPOSE this Crime at Every Level.
Stop Corruption
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Stop Court Corruption
Saturday, January 9, 2010
Goldstein Lewin Company - Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. - CBIZ .. Why did They NOT tell Shareholders of a Trillion Dollar Liability or did they? CBIZ
Thousands of Pages of Proof, and CBIZ still found Goldstein Lewin & Company to be a Good Investment. Maybe Jerry Lewin - Gerald R. Lewin did not Disclose this Trillion Dollar Liability, this Trillion Dollar Lawsuit or the RICO Complaint Lawsuit that includes Goldstein Lewin & Company. Or Mayby CBIZ just thinks that the Iviewit Complaint is Gibberish and Has no Merit.
Thought there is HUGE evidence pointing to the inevitable Conviction and Accountability of Goldstein Lewin & Company, CBIZ thought a Goldstein merger was a good idea.
CBIZ, Inc. (NYSE: CBZ) - is a Publicly Traded Company Right, Good think all these Criminals on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case have SEC Connections, because if Goldstein Lewin & Company and CBIZ Corporate did not disclose a Trillion Dollar Liability - the Shareholders of CBZ, well they may be a bit upset at this Blatant non-Disclosure. If I was a CBIZ shareholder I would wonder if CBIZ new ANYTHING about this new fangled Internet Thing, because all you had to do was google any of this stuff as you would do in merging with, buy a mult-million dollar company - I mean wouldn't your Due Dilegence at least include a 5 Second Googling Session, and there it would be Documents of Proof of the Pending Liability that Goldstein Lewin & Company brings to CBIZ - yet this little goldstein cbiz merger seems to have No Issues with any of it.
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C., CBIZ - You Certainly Have stepped in it and all you would have had to do was hire someones grandkids to show them how to use Google.
Gerald, Jerry Lewin stated, "We are very excited for our associates and our clients to take our business to the next level. We look forward to joining CBIZ and having the opportunity better serve our clients with the additional resources and expertise that the CBIZ organization can provide." Now of Course Gerald Lewin is VERY EXCITED - now he has someone to Share the Liability with.
Thought there is HUGE evidence pointing to the inevitable Conviction and Accountability of Goldstein Lewin & Company, CBIZ thought a Goldstein merger was a good idea.
CBIZ, Inc. (NYSE: CBZ) - is a Publicly Traded Company Right, Good think all these Criminals on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case have SEC Connections, because if Goldstein Lewin & Company and CBIZ Corporate did not disclose a Trillion Dollar Liability - the Shareholders of CBZ, well they may be a bit upset at this Blatant non-Disclosure. If I was a CBIZ shareholder I would wonder if CBIZ new ANYTHING about this new fangled Internet Thing, because all you had to do was google any of this stuff as you would do in merging with, buy a mult-million dollar company - I mean wouldn't your Due Dilegence at least include a 5 Second Googling Session, and there it would be Documents of Proof of the Pending Liability that Goldstein Lewin & Company brings to CBIZ - yet this little goldstein cbiz merger seems to have No Issues with any of it.
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C., CBIZ - You Certainly Have stepped in it and all you would have had to do was hire someones grandkids to show them how to use Google.
Gerald, Jerry Lewin stated, "We are very excited for our associates and our clients to take our business to the next level. We look forward to joining CBIZ and having the opportunity better serve our clients with the additional resources and expertise that the CBIZ organization can provide." Now of Course Gerald Lewin is VERY EXCITED - now he has someone to Share the Liability with.
goldstein cbiz merger, Goldstein Lewin Company
goldstein cbiz merger, Goldstein Lewin Company
Steven C. Krane of Proskauer Rose is NOT worth ANY Lawyer of the Year, Steven Krane is a Criminal.
Steven Krane is Connected to Judith Kaye, is Part of an Investigation over a Trillion Dollar Patent Theft andNow Lawyers USA Claims Steven Krane to Be Lawyer of the Year. Did Steven Krane pay Lawyers USA for this Grandeous Recognition?
Apparently Lawyers USA loved that Steven Krane can keep the FTC in their place and keep the FTC’s “red flags rule” from applying to the legal profession. Another Words Consumers, Victims ... you Lose and Lawyers win and have no accountability to how they treat you along the way.
The Question is Who is LawyersUSAOnline.com and does anyone even care who they name Lawyer of the Year. Well it seems that Dolan Media Company Owner of Lawyers USA does not Know that Steven Krane is a Trillion Dollar Liability to Proskauer Rose and is a VERY bad choice as Lawyer of the Year and Directly Questions the Credibility of Dolan Media Company - Jeff Saucier the registrant of the Lawyer USA Domain Name, and the Big Wigs at Dolan Media Company.
James P. Dolan
John C. Bergstrom
Anton J. Christianson
Jacques Massicotte
George Rossi
Arthur F. Kingsbury
Lauren Rich Fine
Proskauer Rose and Steven Krane in Particular must have a whole lot of connections some how to one or two of these folks, company connections, people connections... I mean can't they Google and Read the TRUTH about Steven Krane of Proskauer Rose, If they could they would NEVER have said Steven C. Krane was Lawyer of the Year. What a Joke.
Well We intend to find out the Connections with all this. If you have any information email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com there has to be way more to this Story.... anyway read the Following Post for more TRUTH on Steven C. Krane.
NEW YORK SUPREME COURT FIRST DEPARTMENT COURT ORDER FOR INVESTIGATION OF KRANE
KRANE COMPLAINT TO NEW YORK SUPREME COURT FIRST DEPARTMENT
Steven Krane - the Attorney's Attorney
Providing Legal Advice to the Proskaur Rose Law Firm.
NEW YORK SUPREME COURT FIRST DEPARTMENT COURT ORDER FOR INVESTIGATION OF KRANE
KRANE COMPLAINT TO NEW YORK SUPREME COURT FIRST DEPARTMENT
Steven Krane - the Attorney's Attorney
Providing Legal Advice to the Proskaur Rose Law Firm.
Steven Krane is the Kind of Guy that makes sure Victims, Inventors, and pretty much ever Non-Lawyer has NO Rights and he makes sure they get no Due Process.
Proskaur.com Bio in Part..
"Steven Krane is a Partner in the Litigation & Dispute Resolution Department, co-head of the Law Firm Practice Group, concentrating in the field of legal ethics and professional responsibility, and is Proskauer's General Counsel, responsible for providing professional legal advice to the firm.
Steven represents law firms and individual lawyers in a variety of professional matters, including rendering opinions and counseling them on a daily basis on a broad range of professional matters including conflicts of interest, client confidentiality, cross-border legal practice issues, partnership disputes, internal investigations, ancillary businesses and alternative business structures for law firms. In addition, he defends law firms in litigated proceedings involving legal malpractice and other civil claims, represents individual lawyers before grievance and disciplinary committees and assists lawyers in disputes concerning admission to the Bar.
For 14 years, he has led the New York State Bar Association committee that is responsible for formulating the ethical rules governing New York lawyers. In 2007, he was appointed by Chief Judge Kaye to be co-chair of the New York Judicial Institute on Professionalism in the Law. He served as vice-chair of the NYSBA Special Committee on the Law Governing Firm Structure and Operation (the “MacCrate Committee”), chaired the successor to that committee, the Special Committee on Multidisciplinary Practice, and was recently named Vice-Chair of the International Bar Association Committee on Multidisciplinary Practices. "
More Gibberish at Source of Link
http://www.proskauer.com/professionals/steven-krane/
The investigation has so far been thwarted, through further conflicts in New York, typical New York crooked politics but being from the Windy City, so named for corrupt politics, this will be New York's Greylord.
It was learned that conflict in New York led all the way to Chief Judge Judith Kaye, you guessed it, married to a Proskauer partner, a partner like Krane, Stephen Kaye, G0d now prancing upon his recently departed soul although he was soulless while living towards the end, a partner who was instantly added to newly formed Proskauer intellectual property department (formed instantly after learning of Iviewit inventions), although he had no history in IP law.
Judge Judy Kaye is also conflicted with Steven Krane, as he was her former Clerk.
Steven Krane attempts to use influence peddling like never before seen in Gotham to earn his Proskauer intellectual property partnership wings by blocking Iviewit never revealing his conflicts, until two years into the complaints when news of his conflicts surfaced.
Steven Krane and Judith Kaye (Judge Judy is now the proud conflicted owner of her late husband Stephen Kaye's Proskauer shares of Iviewit) then had to bury the New York Supreme Court ordered investigation against them and the Proskauer partners, and in a feat unsurpassed in the annals or anals of New York, he ass kisses or offers it for the taking widely, to evade the investigation without even having to give a statement in his defense.
After five Supreme Court Justices unanimously voted for an INVESTIGATION, Stephen Krane, Kenneth Rubenstein and Raymond Anthony Joao, did not even have to provide a response to that court, nor provide one to the department charged with the investigations.
Instead those disciplinary departments wrote Iviewit on how they were going to dismiss it without investigation based on that he was a nice guy basically.
It was as if the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department, was actually doing his defense, as they tendered all letters on his behalf, he did not answer a single question or put forth a statement in his defense.
You guessed it, the First Department and the Second Department are controlled by Proskauer attorneys, those charged with investigating the conflicts, upon a little scratch of the surface were also found in conflict with the matters, Steven Krane and Judith Kaye, and yet they continued handling the complaints against Proskauer and its partners.
So assured that top down control of the courts could never be penetrated with Judith Kaye and Stephen Krane controlling them that they acted as if they were above the law.
Perhaps they are above the law, in crime festered New York but it is time for We the People to Hold Steven Krane Accountable for What he has done and what it has cost the life, livliehood and quality of life of So Many.
It is time to file complaints, to file charges and to make Steven Krane of Proskauer Rose answer for his Illegal - UnEthical Behavior.
Why was Iviewit confronted to try and evade the investigations of the New York Courts and not the court that ordered it.
The answer, they could not answer the court with the results of the investigation, as no investigation was ever done and they tried to claim dismissing the case on review was equal to an investigation.
No witnesses were called, no evidence submitted tested,
these guys did not even have to tender a response.
How much payola do you think that it costs to buy off three court ordered investigations?
With the help of Judge Judy Kaye and some very large illegal gains from the stolen technologies to make people obfuscate their public office duties, they have succeeded but for the moment at evading charges.
Steven Krane stands as the most despicable man in the history of legal ethics, currently found trying to amend laws to protect him and others from prosecution.
Perhaps Ken Lay hired him to write some laws to prevent loss of his estate from death or the Bush group has him rewriting war codes to justify torture and protect from prosecution.
Either way, there may soon be a lot of Proskauer Rose and other corrupted lawyers who will answer to We the People. As Attorney Corruption, Court Payoffs, Dirty Lawyers BEING above the LAW because of their money and influence, those days are OVER.
Krane Complaint First Department Exposing Conflicts and Violations of Public Office.
Steven Krane wrote his own defense of his bar complaint, failing to disclose his conflicting positions at the disciplinary department and further concealing them in an effort to deny he was caught, this little lie cost him orders for investigation.
Lies and Gibberish of Steven C. Krane Proskauer Rose
Steven Krane was busted immediately following that letter, after Clerk of the Court, Catherine O’Hagan Wolf identified that Steven Krane was in fact a member of the disciplinary committee that his letter denied, in fact she sat on several committee’s with Steven Krane and was stunned that he would be handling a complaint against himself or his partners, she suggested Iviewit file the Motion with the Court that led to the unanimous ruling for investigation.
In November 2007 Steven Krane's buddy at the First Department, Thomas Cahill, former Chief Counsel of the Supreme Court of New York First Department, DDC. Thomas Cahill is busted for burying and whitewashing complaints against attorneys that he is charged with investigating.
It gets really bad for Steven Krane as the informant is an insider, a 62 yr old black female attorney, who is victimized, physically assaulted and terminated for her bravery to stand up to wrongdoings at the Department. In a $100M Federal Lawsuit, she names Iviewit in P. 97 of the complaint, as a cause of termination.
Thomas Cahill and Steven Krane and their scam exposed from the inside, Holy Cow Batman, Gotham Uppy Ups are going down, The New York Law Journal writes a story exposing Cahill and others for derailing complaints against attorneys, exactly what Iviewit is claiming to the Feds.
The New York Times follows with an even more devastating article and now New York is on fire, Kerik, the whole criminal political crime family composed of scumbag lawyers, judges and politicians is flaming downward, hell awaits, my smiling face to greet them.
All this started by an investigative reporter at Expose Corrupt Courts, a one ballsy Frank Brady, in a time of journalistic lack of integrity and complacency with the corruptions read by propaganda readers like Blitzer (whose his daddy), Sanchez (where did this guy get his journalistic wings) and other script readers, Brady emerges as something of a Ben Bradlee, a Woodward, a Bernstein.
Source:
http://www.iviewit.tv/
Eliot Bernstein Site on the Iviewit Stolent Patent
ALL of this And Dolan Media, Lawyers USA Claims
Steven Krane of Proskauer Rose to Be Lawyer of the Year.
What a Crock that is.
More on the Iviewit Story at
www.DeniedPatent.com
Steven C. Krane, Lawyer USA, Steven Krane, NY Supreme Court Complaint, Conflict of Interest, First Department Investigation, Whitewashing Complaints, Thomas Cahill
R
Khulumani optimistic ahead of apartheid court case - and the Greedy Evil IBM Connections to All This.
"" WITH the class action lawsuit brought against companies alleged to have collaborated with the apartheid regime due to resume in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Monday, support group Khulumani said last year had been a significant year for the case.
The last-ditch attempt by six corporations, including Daimler and Ford, to stop the application from continuing, will be heard.
If the corporations fail, the matter will proceed to a jury trial.
In April last year, the Southern District Court of New York dismissed some claims brought by Khulumani against corporations that had been identified merely for doing business with SA’s apartheid government.
The surviving claims are against companies accused of aiding and abetting serious crimes such as torture and extrajudicial killing, committed in violation of international law by the apartheid regime.
Khulumani national director Marjorie Jobson said yesterday the turning point was in April when Southern District of New York Judge Shira Scheindlin found that corporations could be found responsible for aiding and abetting human rights abuses that violated customary international law, through their relationships with rogue governments.
Scheindlin said litigation would contribute to the continuing process of truth recovery about apartheid, its causes and effects, and who might be found to bear responsibility.
The claimants then filed an amended application in May against Daimler, Ford, Fujitsu, General Motors, IBM and Rheinmetall.
They sought an order declaring that the companies aided and abetted the commission of apartheid, in violation of international law. They want the court to award the claimants punitive damages arising out of the unlawful behaviour .
Jobson said other positive developments included Justice Minister Jeff Radebe writing a letter to Judge Shira Scheindlin in August supporting the New York court as a forum for the case, and a brief by the US government which told the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in November that the appeal by the defendants, which wanted the case to be stopped, should be dismissed.
Jobson said the court had asked the parties to submit opinions on whether the violations of customary international law for which the Alien Tort Claims Act provided jurisdiction could encompass noncriminal conduct, and on whether customary international law recognised corporate criminal liability. ""
http://www.businessday.co.za/articles/Content.aspx?id=90867
Corporate Greed need to have their Dirty Deeds brought to Light. It is Not Ok to hurt people, Violate Peoples Rights, Kill People in the Name of IBM or Ford making more Paper - more Green Paper.
It is Seriously Time for Corporate Accountability.
Judge Shira Scheindlin seems to have a conscience and seems to be able to See through the Chronic Lies big Corporations tell along with the damage they do to Real People along the way, as their Attorneys Cover Up for them and seem to own most every court in the land somehow. Hopefully the Good Lawyers, and Good Judges can start speaking out and Doing the Right Thing and finally get some where in STOPPING the Evils of Corporations such as IBM, Ford, and Other Mega Corporations that deem profit more important then people.
Corporate Responsibility
Related Links
www.ibmTheWidowMaker.com
IBM
also Check Out Connection David Kappos of the USPTO has to IBM, Connections Kenneth Rubenstein of the Mega-Law Firm Proskauer Rose connections to IBM- and the connections that Proskauer Rose has to the New York Supreme Court and the New York Bar.
IBM
Also see www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV for what Corporations - IBM included have been able to do to the right of inventors, their human rights, civil rights, and quality of life. And for IBM connections to Judges, Patent Attorneys, USPTO and More Conflicts of Interest tha assist IBM in their behavior.
Ibm
The last-ditch attempt by six corporations, including Daimler and Ford, to stop the application from continuing, will be heard.
If the corporations fail, the matter will proceed to a jury trial.
In April last year, the Southern District Court of New York dismissed some claims brought by Khulumani against corporations that had been identified merely for doing business with SA’s apartheid government.
The surviving claims are against companies accused of aiding and abetting serious crimes such as torture and extrajudicial killing, committed in violation of international law by the apartheid regime.
Khulumani national director Marjorie Jobson said yesterday the turning point was in April when Southern District of New York Judge Shira Scheindlin found that corporations could be found responsible for aiding and abetting human rights abuses that violated customary international law, through their relationships with rogue governments.
Scheindlin said litigation would contribute to the continuing process of truth recovery about apartheid, its causes and effects, and who might be found to bear responsibility.
The claimants then filed an amended application in May against Daimler, Ford, Fujitsu, General Motors, IBM and Rheinmetall.
They sought an order declaring that the companies aided and abetted the commission of apartheid, in violation of international law. They want the court to award the claimants punitive damages arising out of the unlawful behaviour .
Jobson said other positive developments included Justice Minister Jeff Radebe writing a letter to Judge Shira Scheindlin in August supporting the New York court as a forum for the case, and a brief by the US government which told the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in November that the appeal by the defendants, which wanted the case to be stopped, should be dismissed.
Jobson said the court had asked the parties to submit opinions on whether the violations of customary international law for which the Alien Tort Claims Act provided jurisdiction could encompass noncriminal conduct, and on whether customary international law recognised corporate criminal liability. ""
http://www.businessday.co.za/articles/Content.aspx?id=90867
Corporate Greed need to have their Dirty Deeds brought to Light. It is Not Ok to hurt people, Violate Peoples Rights, Kill People in the Name of IBM or Ford making more Paper - more Green Paper.
It is Seriously Time for Corporate Accountability.
Judge Shira Scheindlin seems to have a conscience and seems to be able to See through the Chronic Lies big Corporations tell along with the damage they do to Real People along the way, as their Attorneys Cover Up for them and seem to own most every court in the land somehow. Hopefully the Good Lawyers, and Good Judges can start speaking out and Doing the Right Thing and finally get some where in STOPPING the Evils of Corporations such as IBM, Ford, and Other Mega Corporations that deem profit more important then people.
Corporate Responsibility
Related Links
www.ibmTheWidowMaker.com
IBM
also Check Out Connection David Kappos of the USPTO has to IBM, Connections Kenneth Rubenstein of the Mega-Law Firm Proskauer Rose connections to IBM- and the connections that Proskauer Rose has to the New York Supreme Court and the New York Bar.
IBM
Also see www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV for what Corporations - IBM included have been able to do to the right of inventors, their human rights, civil rights, and quality of life. And for IBM connections to Judges, Patent Attorneys, USPTO and More Conflicts of Interest tha assist IBM in their behavior.
Ibm
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Twelve Trillion Dollar, Federal RICO Lawsuit - Iviewit Stolen Patent Case.
The Florida Justice System is About as Corrupt as It Gets and the US Department of Justice, the USPTO, the SEC, the FBI, The Florida State Bar, the Florida Supreme Court and all the Corruption out of the New York Supreme Court that is protecting Proskauer Rose in all this.. well it all adds up to THERE is no Justice, and it DOES not matter how much evidence you have, the Corruption is so Thick and there is so many attorneys and judges covering up for those breaking the law and violating your rights that you don't stand a chance.
the Following is From www.Iviewit.TV and well it is some pretty sick stuff, it leaves me hopeless as to the United States Justice System doing anything but making the Rich RICHER and covering for the Criminals...
"The Cover-Up Crimes
The Twelve Trillion Dollar, Federal RICO Lawsuit “Legally Related” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin to the Whistleblower Anderson Lawsuit, exposes the original violations of federal, state, and international law committed to steal the technologies and additionally exposes a series of ongoing and continuous Cover-Up Crimes.
Cover-up Crimes designed to block due process through violations of Judicial Cannons, Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules and Regulations and Law, through Conflicts of Interest that act to Obstruct Justice, similar to that claimed by Anderson and committed by the many of the same Public Officials of the New York Supreme Court that Anderson fingers.
Wherever Iviewit and I filed complaints at the State Bars or disciplinary agencies under State Supreme Court aegis’ in New York, Florida and Virginia, each was later found to have MAJOR CONFLICTS OF INTEREST THROUGH VIOLATIONS OF JUDICIAL CANNONS, ATTORNEY CONDUCT CODES, PUBLIC OFFICE RULES AND REGULATIONS AND LAW, CREATING THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS.
Mind blowing conflicts, so outrageous as to find Steven C. Krane, former President of the New York Bar Association, Official at the First Department DDC and one, if not thee, leading ethics lawyer in New York and Nationally, found representing complaints against his Proskauer Partners and Himself in First Department complaints, while having an Official Role at the First Department DDC where the complaints were being investigated. How unethical but true and we will return to this matter further in a moment.
Fraudulent Patent applications and Patents fraudulently issued into the names of others are crimes directly against the United States and Foreign Agencies as there are sworn oaths on the US Patent Office applications by the inventors, so filing fraudulent patents in others names is a Fraud Directly Upon the United States Patent Office and Worldwide Patent Authorities.
Crimes committed by the attorneys directly against government agencies and in violation of Federal Patent Bar Rules, State Attorney Conduct Codes and Law.
The crimes also involve not only the creation of fraudulent shell patent filings but fraudulent shell companies for the fraudulent patents to walk out the back door in, all formed by Proskauer and others not properly authorized to create such similarly named entities by the Board of Directors, Investors or management.
All these corporate crimes were violations of hosts of state and federal securities regulations and state incorporation laws, more crimes of fraud against government agencies, again committed in violation of Attorney Conduct Codes and Law.
Further, the scheme involved a false and fraudulent Billing fraud using a Florida Civil Court ( ruled by recently elected Florida Supreme Court Judge Jorge Labarga and a Defendant in the Iviewit Lawsuit ), which was filed by Proskauer Rose to the tune of $500,000 plus in Wrongful Fraudulent bills, bills designed to create false debt to the fraudulent companies they created, which contained the fraudulent patent filings.
Using this complex legal scheme which is a Fraud on a Federal Bankruptcy Court, the fraudulent companies were then to be bankrupted, after being sued for the fraudulent bills whereby the law firm and lawyers would become the largest creditors in the bankruptcy and seize the fraudulent patents hidden inside the fraudulent companies.
A plan that went extremely wrong when Arthur Andersen and others discovered that there were possible crimes being committed and fraudulent companies created and that this false information was being distributed to investors including, Wayne Huizenga, Ellen DeGeneres, Alanis Morissette, Crossbow Ventures and the Small Business Administration.
The SBA through Crossbow’s SBA loans which were two thirds of the money Crossbow invested makes the US Government one of the most aggrieved investors in Iviewit.
The Proskauer Fraudulent Billing Scheme popped up on the horizon at or around the same time the Iviewit companies were in process to close the $25 Million Private Placement financing deal with Wachovia Securities.
No one other than the conspirators of the RICO crimes knew about these illegal legal actions.
The Involuntary Bankruptcy was another legal scheme involving this time, Fraud on a Federal Bankruptcy Court, orchestrated by Proskauer Rose referred management Brian Utley and Michael Reale both formerly with IBM and Real 3D Inc. ( Intel, SGI and Lockheed ) on a fraudulent company with fraudulent inventions inside it.
On or about this time, Intel, a minority 20% owner of Real 3D, suddenly bought Real 3D from Lockheed the 70% owner and SGI, a 10% owner, in a publicly undisclosed transaction, taking with it the Iviewit inventions which now are alleged to be on almost EVERY chip manufactured since 1998.
Through the bankruptcy the underlying IP for the inventions would have become owned by the largest creditors to the fraudulent companies, Proskauer Rose and Real 3D.
Again, neither of these illegal legal actions constituting frauds on the courts, the Fraud on the Florida State Court in The Proskauer Fraudulent Billing Lawsuit or the Fraud on the Federal Bankruptcy Court via the illegal Involuntary Bankruptcy were disclosed to Wachovia, Investors, Auditors, Investment Bankers, Shareholders or Management by Proskauer or Foley.
At first, upon learning of the billing lawsuit and Involuntary Bankruptcy, it was unclear why these ILLEGAL legal actions existed and what the motive was, still much of the conspiracy remains unknown but at that time very little was known.
Only later, while investigating the falsified patent applications with the US Patent Office was it discovered that there were fraudulent patents inside the fraudulent similarly named companies involved in the IB, a company that Proskauer created, then sued and then with their referred co-conspirators filed the Involuntary Bankruptcy against.
Companies created without authorization of Shareholders, the Board of Directors or the Investors, and, where the real owners of the fraudulent companies are still unknown and subject of ongoing investigations and calls for Acts of Congress from the US Patent Office to get information regarding the inventions that were involved in the illegal legal schemes and frauds on the courts.
Upon learning of the corporate crimes from Arthur Andersen and much of the information regarding the fraudulent legal schemes by AOLTW / Warner Bros. who were doing due diligence for the Wachovia PPM when they discovered the undisclosed actions, including information that patents filed at the USPTO were not those being given to prospective investors and more.
Immediately, Iviewit retained counsel to investigate if the Billing Lawsuit, the Involuntary Bankruptcy and the thefts of the IP were realities.
Counsel retained by Iviewit found that indeed there were these illegal legal actions and frauds and that the Board of Directors, Management, Investors, Investment Bankers had no knowledge and in fact were distributing the Wachovia PPM which neither mentions the Lawsuit, the Utley IP and other fraudulent IP or the Involuntary Bankruptcy.
Iviewit threw out counsel that was representing the matters without authorization or retainers from the Iviewit companies and that time it was still unknown these companies were fraudulent, as they were similarly and identically named to the legitimate companies and Iviewit counsel began representing the matters instantly.
The Involuntary Bankruptcy found that Brian Utley, Reale and Real 3d all had no employment contract or ANY binding agreement with the Iviewit company they filed against and that matter instantly went away, as soon as, it was discovered.
On the Fraudulent Billing Lawsuit, well Proskauer Rose was not so lucky, counsel retained filed a Counter Complaint exposing the basics of the fraud known at the time, I submit this Counter Complaint to this Committee for review, as it too is subject to ongoing federal investigations11.
Again, in this fraud, Proskauer Rose was found suing companies they had no retainers with and the bills were not even in the companies sued names but the judge, Jorge Labarga, refused to even acknowledge the Counter Complaint, filed by Competent Counsel, alleging that the lawyers in the Fraudulent Billing Lawsuit perhaps were involved in crimes against the United States and Foreign Nations.
Jorge Labarga refusing the Counter Complaint and then illegally throwing the Lawsuit out but ruling a default judgment against Iviewit for the entire amount of the fraudulent bill, for failure to retain replacement counsel. It should be noted that Labarga on the eve of trial, cancelled the trial with no notice to Iviewit who showed up with two law firms representing their interests.
At the rescheduling hearing, Jorge Labarga dismissed both of Iviewit’s counsel and forced Iviewit to get new counsel for this most complex case in just a few days.
In fact, I submit to this Committee evidence that Jorge Labarga was aware of Kenneth Rubenstein, Christopher C. Wheeler, William Dick and Brian Utley’s perjurious statements made to his court, under deposition and in response to Bar Complaints, whereby perjured statements were proven prior to his throwing the case.
In one instance, Iviewit Patent Counsel Kenneth Rubenstein makes representation that he is being harassed to come to deposition in the matter as he knows nothing about Iviewit or the Iviewit inventions and inventors and refused to be deposed.
Jorge Labarga had no legal basis to block the deposition so he ordered Rubenstein to deposition, where it became apparent that Kenneth Rubenstein had LIED and PERJURED HIMSELF to the Court and knew far more about Iviewit than his sworn statements12.
Despite this damning and irrefutable evidence of Perjury to his court, Jorge Labarga ruled against Iviewit and buried the case for an undisclosed amount.
Again, information relevant to the case fraud has been submitted to Federal and State authorities.
Who owns all these fraudulent companies remains under investigation and all relevant information pertaining to these crimes have also been submitted to Federal and State Authorities and evidence, witness statements, copies of the fraudulent IP and much more are available in the Evidence Section of the Iviewit Homepage with over 1000 exhibits and hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein for this Committee.
Crimes that if prosecuted would have taken down these powerful law firms overnight and put many of the perpetrators behind bars for more years than Madoff, as these crimes involved crimes directly against Federal, State and International Government Agencies, not merely Iviewit.
As soon as order is restored to the courts handling these matters in conflict and the corruption plaguing the New York Court system as further supported by Anderson regarding these matters is exterminated, these criminals cloaked as law firms and lawyers will be behind bars for eternity with loss of the entire partnerships assets in a successful RICO prosecution.
Knowing that it was all or nothing for the powerful law firms, they had to block due process at every venue at the highest levels, as if any of the complaints, court proceedings or investigations elevated the Billions of Dollars of revenue these firms generate would be gone and legal robes exchanged for prison garb.
Herein lies the motive for the Cover-Up Crimes and Mass of Conflicts of Interest and Violations of virtually all Attorney Conduct Codes, Judicial Cannons, Public Office Violations and Law that have infected these matters at present.
So thick are the Conflicts that not one person out of all of the courts, disciplinary agencies, law enforcement agencies, even this Committee have signed the requested Conflict of Interest Disclosure Forms provided prior to taking action in the matters.
I have provided a Conflict form for the Committee submitted with my Prepared Statement for the June 08, 2009 hearing that did not happen and again have submitted one accompanying this Prepared Statement for my testimony today, again I respectfully demand signing of this COI before the Committee takes action in anyway that may have any impact good or bad on my case.
New York Ethics Complaints Filed in 2003 and Dismissed Without Investigation; The Commissioner of Patents for the US Patent Office and Harry I. Moatz, Director of OED of the US Patent Office lead Federal Investigation of Same Attorneys State Bars and Disciplinary Agencies Dismissed without Investigation; West Palm Beach FBI Joins Patent Fraud Investigation Regarding Fraud Directly Upon the USPTO.
I filed complaints of professional misconduct instantly against Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Christopher Wheeler, Meltzer, Raymond Joao, Foley and William Dick and continuously since 2003 alleged a host of professional misconduct, adding new Defendants in my lawsuit who became involved in the Cover-Up Crimes such as Krane, Cahill, the First Department and more.
Copies of the complaints can be found on the homepage or in the written Prepared Statement submitted herein to the Committee and in the Exhibit Section at the end of the document and for inclusion into this Committees permanent record, as promised by members of this Committee in accepting this statement.
I also note for this Committee that I fully reported the Iviewit Frauds on the courts committed by those adjudicating the matters in conflicts in both the courts and state disciplinary agencies, to the West Palm Beach FBI office.
Special Agent Stephen Lucchesi of that office was already investigating the Iviewit companies’ allegations of Frauds, Fraud on the USPTO, Intellectual Property Theft, Death Threats and the Attempted Murder by Car Bombing of my Family Mini-Van in Boynton Beach, Florida.
According to the FBI, later, Lucchesi and the Iviewit files went, and remain missing at this time, although upon last speaking to Lucchesi, he was on his way to the US Patent Office to begin investigating the Fraud on the US Patent Office with investigators at the US Patent Office.
Moatz confirmed that Lucchesi was in fact working with the US Patent Office regarding the Frauds on the USPTO.
The reporting of these public office crimes to the FBI and the missing investigator, led the FBI West Palm Beach Office to direct me to speak only with the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility ( OPR ) the department responsible for handling misconduct complaints against DOJ & US attorneys. When OPR refused to speak with me, claiming they could not speak with private citizens, Inspector General of the DOJ, Glenn Fine’s Office interceded and the matters where then directed to Alberto Gonzales, then to Michael Mukasey both of them who failed to respond to formal written complaints prior to them fleeing or being forced out of office.
The matters have now been forwarded on to US Attorney General, Eric Holder, Jr. and while we await response from Holder at this time, we have not had a response yet.
Perhaps he is busy investigating the crimes of lawyers for war crimes or the crimes of lawyers in politicizing the DOJ, or the torture memo lawyers who violated international torture treatises and more or perhaps he is busy investigating the lawyers behind the financial market meltdown who have destroyed our economy for the benefit of a few, mostly criminals disguised as lawyers.
A Copy of the Letter to President Barack Obama and Holder can found on the Iviewit Homepage or @
http://Iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090213%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20LETTER%20OBAMA%20TO%20ENJOIN%20US%20ATTORNEY%20FINGERED%20ORIGINAL%20MAIL%20l.pdf
and http://Iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20080411%20Iviewit%20Response%20to%20FBI%20OPR%20letter%20signed%20sent%20and%20printed%20copy.pdf
Ultimately, Iviewit filed a Complaint of Professional Misconduct against NYS First Dept Disciplinary Committee Chief Counsel Cahill, when it was learned that Cahill had allowed Steven C. Krane of Proskauer, an active Official of the First Department to handle complaints against Proskauer Rose and Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein and ultimately himself, Iviewit filed further complaints for Violations of Public Office, Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes and Violations of Law against all of them.
Yes, Steven C Krane represented the complaints filed against his firm, partners and himself, all the while concealing multiple conflicts of interest and violations of public offices at the First Department which excluded from such twisted representation.
In Florida at the State Bar we find similarly
Proskauer partner Matthew Triggs
While Krane was handling the complaints he was a member of the First Department and kept this Conflict undisclosed while he levied responses on behalf of his clients Proskauer Rose and Kenneth Rubenstein that were attempts to smear the Iviewit companies and myself, claiming Iviewit was a failed dot com and that Kenneth Rubenstein never heard of Iviewit and that Proskauer knew nothing about the patents, all while failing to disclose his First Department Roles and CONFLICT.
Krane, also in his role at the time as immediate past PRESIDENT of the NYSBA had public office rules barring his handling of disciplinary complaints for a period of one year after his service.
His representations of his firm and Proskauer Rose falling within that blackout and Krane again fails to disclose this Public Office Rule and Regulation that prevented his representation.
It is interesting to note that without knowing of the concealed conflicts and violations of public offices at the time, how the complaints within the First Department, despite the overwhelming evidence presented to the State Bar and Disciplinary Committees and despite the fact that the Federal Patent Bar, USPTO, USPTO OED and FBI were investigating them, how the state complaints had been “Stalled” Indefinitely. It was not until discovering the conflicts that it became overwhelming apparent.
Iviewit has found Proskauer or Foley in every instance where there was dismissal with no investigation by a State Bar or Disciplinary, much later into the investigations, the Conflicts of Interest and Violations of Public Offices that acted as the glue that bound the Cover-Up causing the delays and dismissals without investigation, even as the First Department Court Unanimously Ordered Krane and the others for formal and procedural “INVESTIGATIONS” based on the Krane and Cahill conflict information.
It was only recently exposed in July 2007 that the underlying "Patentgate" inquiries were effectively buried, or derailed, under the leadership of Manhattan's top State ethics Chief Counsel, Thomas J. Cahill, Esq. Cahill's "retirement" was then quickly announced after his own ethical failings in the Patentgate matter and other unfolding scandal as Anderson began surfacing with Whistleblower allegations, along with other ethics complaints that were made, became known.
Then the Whistleblower Anderson came along to confirm ones worst nightmares about the Disciplinary Committees and Courts of New York. It should be noted that Cahill was later deposed in Anderson. From an article in Expose Corrupt Courts, I quote,
July 16 2007 DOJ Widens Patentgate Inquiry:
In a letter dated July 16, 2007, the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility, announced from its Washington, D.C. headquarters that it was expanding its investigation into a bizarrely stalled FBI investigation that involves an almost surreal story of the theft of nearly 30 U.S. Patents, and other intellectual property, worth billions of dollars.
The probe reaches some of New York's most prominent politicians and judges, and has already proven to be a stunning embarrassment to the State's ethics watchdog committees.
The Fox and the Hen House
It was only recently exposed in July that the underlying “Patentgate” inquiries were effectively buried, or derailed, under the leadership of Manhattan’s top State ethics Chief Counsel, Thomas J. Cahill, Esq. Mr. Cahill’s “retirement” was then quickly announced after his own ethical failings in the Patentgate matter, along with other ethics complaints that were made, became known.
While no one can exactly figure out how inquiries under Mr. Cahill’s charge went so awry, one thing is certain. At the same time the Patentgate probes were being secreted by state officials in New York, the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent bar increased their own investigation into the same matter implicating the same attorneys. (Note: Mr. Cahill’s replacement was recently decided, and an announcement is expected as early as next week by the Appellate Division, First Department Presiding Justice, Jonathan Lippman.)
Article @ http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2007/08/justice-dept-widens-patentgate-probe.html
The Damning Whistleblower Case of Christine C. Anderson –Allegations of Coercion, Assault, Title 18 and State Obstruction of Justice via Official Supreme Court Document Destruction Inside the First Department by Public Officials, for “Favored Law Firms”
Christine Anderson provides a pivotal link in her heroic Whistleblowing revelations that shed insight into the criminal behavior running rampant at the highest levels of the First Department, including Coercion, Obstruction, Tampering with Official Investigatory Files, Threatening Federal Witnesses, Document Destruction and Physical Assaults on a Whistleblower tying Iviewit to her own complaint.
Anderson’s original lawsuit filing discussed the impact of Iviewit on her situation relating to a Complaint filed against Cahill and others13, as part of her allegations. Anderson’s Original Complaint can be found at Iviewit Homepage, Evidence Link or @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/anderson/20071028%20Anderson%20Original%20Filing.pdf
Pages 24-25 contain references to the Iviewit Cahill, Krane et al. complaints.
Christine C. Anderson a former Staff Attorney at the First Dept filed WHISTLEBLOWER allegations in a Fed Whistleblower suit slated for trial Oct 13 in US District Court Southern District NY (USDC), Anderson v State of NY, 07cv09599.
http://iviewit.tv/press/press1.pdf
Anderson’s suit adjudicated by Judge Shira Scheindlin contains allegations of retaliation against Anderson for termination from her job of 6 years, after Anderson exposed systemic Whitewashing & Obstruction inside the First Dept, claiming favoritism by the First Dept for favored law firms & attorneys.
I have attached in my Prepared Statement links to several news articles relating to Anderson.
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2009/04/andersons-10-million-lawsuit-proceeds.html & http://iviewit.tv/press/press2.pdf
Anderson’s suit set to bring volcanic like testimony involving Public Office corruption & testimony by officials of the NY State Unified Court system, including Court of Appeals Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman, Presiding Judge at the First Dept during the firing of Anderson. Along with Lippman will be Defendants in Anderson, First Dept Supervisor Sherry Cohen, Former Chief Counsel Thomas J. Cahill, Hon John Buckley, David Spokony & Catherine O’Hagen Wolfe, Clerk @ US Second Circuit Court of Appeals (USCA), an initial Anderson defendant in her former job as Clerk for the First Dept, now witness in Anderson.
Anderson claims Physical Assault & Harassment by Cohen for her heroic WHISTLEBLOWING efforts, Anderson gave riveting testimony at the first of these hearings by the NY Senate Judiciary Committee headed by Hon. Senator John L. Sampson.
Anderson’s testimony found online and links again are provided in the written statement. Anderson’s testimony comes at 30min into the video found online at the NY State Senate Website or @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR8OX8uuAbw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fiviewit%2Etv%2F&feature=player_embedded
Prior to permitting Anderson to trial, Scheindlin marked 7 suits, including Iviewit’s Multi-Count Multi-Trillion Dollar suit http://iviewit.tv/press/press3.pdf legally “related” to Anderson.""
Source of POST
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+Reardon&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Iviewit
More on the Stolen Iviewit Patents at
www.DeniedPatent.com
RICO
Wachovia, Bankruptcy Corruption, Brian Utley
Senator John L. Sampson
the Following is From www.Iviewit.TV and well it is some pretty sick stuff, it leaves me hopeless as to the United States Justice System doing anything but making the Rich RICHER and covering for the Criminals...
"The Cover-Up Crimes
The Twelve Trillion Dollar, Federal RICO Lawsuit “Legally Related” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin to the Whistleblower Anderson Lawsuit, exposes the original violations of federal, state, and international law committed to steal the technologies and additionally exposes a series of ongoing and continuous Cover-Up Crimes.
Cover-up Crimes designed to block due process through violations of Judicial Cannons, Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules and Regulations and Law, through Conflicts of Interest that act to Obstruct Justice, similar to that claimed by Anderson and committed by the many of the same Public Officials of the New York Supreme Court that Anderson fingers.
Wherever Iviewit and I filed complaints at the State Bars or disciplinary agencies under State Supreme Court aegis’ in New York, Florida and Virginia, each was later found to have MAJOR CONFLICTS OF INTEREST THROUGH VIOLATIONS OF JUDICIAL CANNONS, ATTORNEY CONDUCT CODES, PUBLIC OFFICE RULES AND REGULATIONS AND LAW, CREATING THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS.
Mind blowing conflicts, so outrageous as to find Steven C. Krane, former President of the New York Bar Association, Official at the First Department DDC and one, if not thee, leading ethics lawyer in New York and Nationally, found representing complaints against his Proskauer Partners and Himself in First Department complaints, while having an Official Role at the First Department DDC where the complaints were being investigated. How unethical but true and we will return to this matter further in a moment.
Fraudulent Patent applications and Patents fraudulently issued into the names of others are crimes directly against the United States and Foreign Agencies as there are sworn oaths on the US Patent Office applications by the inventors, so filing fraudulent patents in others names is a Fraud Directly Upon the United States Patent Office and Worldwide Patent Authorities.
Crimes committed by the attorneys directly against government agencies and in violation of Federal Patent Bar Rules, State Attorney Conduct Codes and Law.
The crimes also involve not only the creation of fraudulent shell patent filings but fraudulent shell companies for the fraudulent patents to walk out the back door in, all formed by Proskauer and others not properly authorized to create such similarly named entities by the Board of Directors, Investors or management.
All these corporate crimes were violations of hosts of state and federal securities regulations and state incorporation laws, more crimes of fraud against government agencies, again committed in violation of Attorney Conduct Codes and Law.
Further, the scheme involved a false and fraudulent Billing fraud using a Florida Civil Court ( ruled by recently elected Florida Supreme Court Judge Jorge Labarga and a Defendant in the Iviewit Lawsuit ), which was filed by Proskauer Rose to the tune of $500,000 plus in Wrongful Fraudulent bills, bills designed to create false debt to the fraudulent companies they created, which contained the fraudulent patent filings.
Using this complex legal scheme which is a Fraud on a Federal Bankruptcy Court, the fraudulent companies were then to be bankrupted, after being sued for the fraudulent bills whereby the law firm and lawyers would become the largest creditors in the bankruptcy and seize the fraudulent patents hidden inside the fraudulent companies.
A plan that went extremely wrong when Arthur Andersen and others discovered that there were possible crimes being committed and fraudulent companies created and that this false information was being distributed to investors including, Wayne Huizenga, Ellen DeGeneres, Alanis Morissette, Crossbow Ventures and the Small Business Administration.
The SBA through Crossbow’s SBA loans which were two thirds of the money Crossbow invested makes the US Government one of the most aggrieved investors in Iviewit.
The Proskauer Fraudulent Billing Scheme popped up on the horizon at or around the same time the Iviewit companies were in process to close the $25 Million Private Placement financing deal with Wachovia Securities.
No one other than the conspirators of the RICO crimes knew about these illegal legal actions.
The Involuntary Bankruptcy was another legal scheme involving this time, Fraud on a Federal Bankruptcy Court, orchestrated by Proskauer Rose referred management Brian Utley and Michael Reale both formerly with IBM and Real 3D Inc. ( Intel, SGI and Lockheed ) on a fraudulent company with fraudulent inventions inside it.
On or about this time, Intel, a minority 20% owner of Real 3D, suddenly bought Real 3D from Lockheed the 70% owner and SGI, a 10% owner, in a publicly undisclosed transaction, taking with it the Iviewit inventions which now are alleged to be on almost EVERY chip manufactured since 1998.
Through the bankruptcy the underlying IP for the inventions would have become owned by the largest creditors to the fraudulent companies, Proskauer Rose and Real 3D.
Again, neither of these illegal legal actions constituting frauds on the courts, the Fraud on the Florida State Court in The Proskauer Fraudulent Billing Lawsuit or the Fraud on the Federal Bankruptcy Court via the illegal Involuntary Bankruptcy were disclosed to Wachovia, Investors, Auditors, Investment Bankers, Shareholders or Management by Proskauer or Foley.
At first, upon learning of the billing lawsuit and Involuntary Bankruptcy, it was unclear why these ILLEGAL legal actions existed and what the motive was, still much of the conspiracy remains unknown but at that time very little was known.
Only later, while investigating the falsified patent applications with the US Patent Office was it discovered that there were fraudulent patents inside the fraudulent similarly named companies involved in the IB, a company that Proskauer created, then sued and then with their referred co-conspirators filed the Involuntary Bankruptcy against.
Companies created without authorization of Shareholders, the Board of Directors or the Investors, and, where the real owners of the fraudulent companies are still unknown and subject of ongoing investigations and calls for Acts of Congress from the US Patent Office to get information regarding the inventions that were involved in the illegal legal schemes and frauds on the courts.
Upon learning of the corporate crimes from Arthur Andersen and much of the information regarding the fraudulent legal schemes by AOLTW / Warner Bros. who were doing due diligence for the Wachovia PPM when they discovered the undisclosed actions, including information that patents filed at the USPTO were not those being given to prospective investors and more.
Immediately, Iviewit retained counsel to investigate if the Billing Lawsuit, the Involuntary Bankruptcy and the thefts of the IP were realities.
Counsel retained by Iviewit found that indeed there were these illegal legal actions and frauds and that the Board of Directors, Management, Investors, Investment Bankers had no knowledge and in fact were distributing the Wachovia PPM which neither mentions the Lawsuit, the Utley IP and other fraudulent IP or the Involuntary Bankruptcy.
Iviewit threw out counsel that was representing the matters without authorization or retainers from the Iviewit companies and that time it was still unknown these companies were fraudulent, as they were similarly and identically named to the legitimate companies and Iviewit counsel began representing the matters instantly.
The Involuntary Bankruptcy found that Brian Utley, Reale and Real 3d all had no employment contract or ANY binding agreement with the Iviewit company they filed against and that matter instantly went away, as soon as, it was discovered.
On the Fraudulent Billing Lawsuit, well Proskauer Rose was not so lucky, counsel retained filed a Counter Complaint exposing the basics of the fraud known at the time, I submit this Counter Complaint to this Committee for review, as it too is subject to ongoing federal investigations11.
Again, in this fraud, Proskauer Rose was found suing companies they had no retainers with and the bills were not even in the companies sued names but the judge, Jorge Labarga, refused to even acknowledge the Counter Complaint, filed by Competent Counsel, alleging that the lawyers in the Fraudulent Billing Lawsuit perhaps were involved in crimes against the United States and Foreign Nations.
Jorge Labarga refusing the Counter Complaint and then illegally throwing the Lawsuit out but ruling a default judgment against Iviewit for the entire amount of the fraudulent bill, for failure to retain replacement counsel. It should be noted that Labarga on the eve of trial, cancelled the trial with no notice to Iviewit who showed up with two law firms representing their interests.
At the rescheduling hearing, Jorge Labarga dismissed both of Iviewit’s counsel and forced Iviewit to get new counsel for this most complex case in just a few days.
In fact, I submit to this Committee evidence that Jorge Labarga was aware of Kenneth Rubenstein, Christopher C. Wheeler, William Dick and Brian Utley’s perjurious statements made to his court, under deposition and in response to Bar Complaints, whereby perjured statements were proven prior to his throwing the case.
In one instance, Iviewit Patent Counsel Kenneth Rubenstein makes representation that he is being harassed to come to deposition in the matter as he knows nothing about Iviewit or the Iviewit inventions and inventors and refused to be deposed.
Jorge Labarga had no legal basis to block the deposition so he ordered Rubenstein to deposition, where it became apparent that Kenneth Rubenstein had LIED and PERJURED HIMSELF to the Court and knew far more about Iviewit than his sworn statements12.
Despite this damning and irrefutable evidence of Perjury to his court, Jorge Labarga ruled against Iviewit and buried the case for an undisclosed amount.
Again, information relevant to the case fraud has been submitted to Federal and State authorities.
Who owns all these fraudulent companies remains under investigation and all relevant information pertaining to these crimes have also been submitted to Federal and State Authorities and evidence, witness statements, copies of the fraudulent IP and much more are available in the Evidence Section of the Iviewit Homepage with over 1000 exhibits and hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein for this Committee.
Crimes that if prosecuted would have taken down these powerful law firms overnight and put many of the perpetrators behind bars for more years than Madoff, as these crimes involved crimes directly against Federal, State and International Government Agencies, not merely Iviewit.
As soon as order is restored to the courts handling these matters in conflict and the corruption plaguing the New York Court system as further supported by Anderson regarding these matters is exterminated, these criminals cloaked as law firms and lawyers will be behind bars for eternity with loss of the entire partnerships assets in a successful RICO prosecution.
Knowing that it was all or nothing for the powerful law firms, they had to block due process at every venue at the highest levels, as if any of the complaints, court proceedings or investigations elevated the Billions of Dollars of revenue these firms generate would be gone and legal robes exchanged for prison garb.
Herein lies the motive for the Cover-Up Crimes and Mass of Conflicts of Interest and Violations of virtually all Attorney Conduct Codes, Judicial Cannons, Public Office Violations and Law that have infected these matters at present.
So thick are the Conflicts that not one person out of all of the courts, disciplinary agencies, law enforcement agencies, even this Committee have signed the requested Conflict of Interest Disclosure Forms provided prior to taking action in the matters.
I have provided a Conflict form for the Committee submitted with my Prepared Statement for the June 08, 2009 hearing that did not happen and again have submitted one accompanying this Prepared Statement for my testimony today, again I respectfully demand signing of this COI before the Committee takes action in anyway that may have any impact good or bad on my case.
New York Ethics Complaints Filed in 2003 and Dismissed Without Investigation; The Commissioner of Patents for the US Patent Office and Harry I. Moatz, Director of OED of the US Patent Office lead Federal Investigation of Same Attorneys State Bars and Disciplinary Agencies Dismissed without Investigation; West Palm Beach FBI Joins Patent Fraud Investigation Regarding Fraud Directly Upon the USPTO.
I filed complaints of professional misconduct instantly against Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Christopher Wheeler, Meltzer, Raymond Joao, Foley and William Dick and continuously since 2003 alleged a host of professional misconduct, adding new Defendants in my lawsuit who became involved in the Cover-Up Crimes such as Krane, Cahill, the First Department and more.
Copies of the complaints can be found on the homepage or in the written Prepared Statement submitted herein to the Committee and in the Exhibit Section at the end of the document and for inclusion into this Committees permanent record, as promised by members of this Committee in accepting this statement.
I also note for this Committee that I fully reported the Iviewit Frauds on the courts committed by those adjudicating the matters in conflicts in both the courts and state disciplinary agencies, to the West Palm Beach FBI office.
Special Agent Stephen Lucchesi of that office was already investigating the Iviewit companies’ allegations of Frauds, Fraud on the USPTO, Intellectual Property Theft, Death Threats and the Attempted Murder by Car Bombing of my Family Mini-Van in Boynton Beach, Florida.
According to the FBI, later, Lucchesi and the Iviewit files went, and remain missing at this time, although upon last speaking to Lucchesi, he was on his way to the US Patent Office to begin investigating the Fraud on the US Patent Office with investigators at the US Patent Office.
Moatz confirmed that Lucchesi was in fact working with the US Patent Office regarding the Frauds on the USPTO.
The reporting of these public office crimes to the FBI and the missing investigator, led the FBI West Palm Beach Office to direct me to speak only with the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility ( OPR ) the department responsible for handling misconduct complaints against DOJ & US attorneys. When OPR refused to speak with me, claiming they could not speak with private citizens, Inspector General of the DOJ, Glenn Fine’s Office interceded and the matters where then directed to Alberto Gonzales, then to Michael Mukasey both of them who failed to respond to formal written complaints prior to them fleeing or being forced out of office.
The matters have now been forwarded on to US Attorney General, Eric Holder, Jr. and while we await response from Holder at this time, we have not had a response yet.
Perhaps he is busy investigating the crimes of lawyers for war crimes or the crimes of lawyers in politicizing the DOJ, or the torture memo lawyers who violated international torture treatises and more or perhaps he is busy investigating the lawyers behind the financial market meltdown who have destroyed our economy for the benefit of a few, mostly criminals disguised as lawyers.
A Copy of the Letter to President Barack Obama and Holder can found on the Iviewit Homepage or @
http://Iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090213%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20LETTER%20OBAMA%20TO%20ENJOIN%20US%20ATTORNEY%20FINGERED%20ORIGINAL%20MAIL%20l.pdf
and http://Iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20080411%20Iviewit%20Response%20to%20FBI%20OPR%20letter%20signed%20sent%20and%20printed%20copy.pdf
Ultimately, Iviewit filed a Complaint of Professional Misconduct against NYS First Dept Disciplinary Committee Chief Counsel Cahill, when it was learned that Cahill had allowed Steven C. Krane of Proskauer, an active Official of the First Department to handle complaints against Proskauer Rose and Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein and ultimately himself, Iviewit filed further complaints for Violations of Public Office, Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes and Violations of Law against all of them.
Yes, Steven C Krane represented the complaints filed against his firm, partners and himself, all the while concealing multiple conflicts of interest and violations of public offices at the First Department which excluded from such twisted representation.
In Florida at the State Bar we find similarly
Proskauer partner Matthew Triggs
While Krane was handling the complaints he was a member of the First Department and kept this Conflict undisclosed while he levied responses on behalf of his clients Proskauer Rose and Kenneth Rubenstein that were attempts to smear the Iviewit companies and myself, claiming Iviewit was a failed dot com and that Kenneth Rubenstein never heard of Iviewit and that Proskauer knew nothing about the patents, all while failing to disclose his First Department Roles and CONFLICT.
Krane, also in his role at the time as immediate past PRESIDENT of the NYSBA had public office rules barring his handling of disciplinary complaints for a period of one year after his service.
His representations of his firm and Proskauer Rose falling within that blackout and Krane again fails to disclose this Public Office Rule and Regulation that prevented his representation.
It is interesting to note that without knowing of the concealed conflicts and violations of public offices at the time, how the complaints within the First Department, despite the overwhelming evidence presented to the State Bar and Disciplinary Committees and despite the fact that the Federal Patent Bar, USPTO, USPTO OED and FBI were investigating them, how the state complaints had been “Stalled” Indefinitely. It was not until discovering the conflicts that it became overwhelming apparent.
Iviewit has found Proskauer or Foley in every instance where there was dismissal with no investigation by a State Bar or Disciplinary, much later into the investigations, the Conflicts of Interest and Violations of Public Offices that acted as the glue that bound the Cover-Up causing the delays and dismissals without investigation, even as the First Department Court Unanimously Ordered Krane and the others for formal and procedural “INVESTIGATIONS” based on the Krane and Cahill conflict information.
It was only recently exposed in July 2007 that the underlying "Patentgate" inquiries were effectively buried, or derailed, under the leadership of Manhattan's top State ethics Chief Counsel, Thomas J. Cahill, Esq. Cahill's "retirement" was then quickly announced after his own ethical failings in the Patentgate matter and other unfolding scandal as Anderson began surfacing with Whistleblower allegations, along with other ethics complaints that were made, became known.
Then the Whistleblower Anderson came along to confirm ones worst nightmares about the Disciplinary Committees and Courts of New York. It should be noted that Cahill was later deposed in Anderson. From an article in Expose Corrupt Courts, I quote,
July 16 2007 DOJ Widens Patentgate Inquiry:
In a letter dated July 16, 2007, the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility, announced from its Washington, D.C. headquarters that it was expanding its investigation into a bizarrely stalled FBI investigation that involves an almost surreal story of the theft of nearly 30 U.S. Patents, and other intellectual property, worth billions of dollars.
The probe reaches some of New York's most prominent politicians and judges, and has already proven to be a stunning embarrassment to the State's ethics watchdog committees.
The Fox and the Hen House
It was only recently exposed in July that the underlying “Patentgate” inquiries were effectively buried, or derailed, under the leadership of Manhattan’s top State ethics Chief Counsel, Thomas J. Cahill, Esq. Mr. Cahill’s “retirement” was then quickly announced after his own ethical failings in the Patentgate matter, along with other ethics complaints that were made, became known.
While no one can exactly figure out how inquiries under Mr. Cahill’s charge went so awry, one thing is certain. At the same time the Patentgate probes were being secreted by state officials in New York, the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent bar increased their own investigation into the same matter implicating the same attorneys. (Note: Mr. Cahill’s replacement was recently decided, and an announcement is expected as early as next week by the Appellate Division, First Department Presiding Justice, Jonathan Lippman.)
Article @ http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2007/08/justice-dept-widens-patentgate-probe.html
The Damning Whistleblower Case of Christine C. Anderson –Allegations of Coercion, Assault, Title 18 and State Obstruction of Justice via Official Supreme Court Document Destruction Inside the First Department by Public Officials, for “Favored Law Firms”
Christine Anderson provides a pivotal link in her heroic Whistleblowing revelations that shed insight into the criminal behavior running rampant at the highest levels of the First Department, including Coercion, Obstruction, Tampering with Official Investigatory Files, Threatening Federal Witnesses, Document Destruction and Physical Assaults on a Whistleblower tying Iviewit to her own complaint.
Anderson’s original lawsuit filing discussed the impact of Iviewit on her situation relating to a Complaint filed against Cahill and others13, as part of her allegations. Anderson’s Original Complaint can be found at Iviewit Homepage, Evidence Link or @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/anderson/20071028%20Anderson%20Original%20Filing.pdf
Pages 24-25 contain references to the Iviewit Cahill, Krane et al. complaints.
Christine C. Anderson a former Staff Attorney at the First Dept filed WHISTLEBLOWER allegations in a Fed Whistleblower suit slated for trial Oct 13 in US District Court Southern District NY (USDC), Anderson v State of NY, 07cv09599.
http://iviewit.tv/press/press1.pdf
Anderson’s suit adjudicated by Judge Shira Scheindlin contains allegations of retaliation against Anderson for termination from her job of 6 years, after Anderson exposed systemic Whitewashing & Obstruction inside the First Dept, claiming favoritism by the First Dept for favored law firms & attorneys.
I have attached in my Prepared Statement links to several news articles relating to Anderson.
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2009/04/andersons-10-million-lawsuit-proceeds.html & http://iviewit.tv/press/press2.pdf
Anderson’s suit set to bring volcanic like testimony involving Public Office corruption & testimony by officials of the NY State Unified Court system, including Court of Appeals Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman, Presiding Judge at the First Dept during the firing of Anderson. Along with Lippman will be Defendants in Anderson, First Dept Supervisor Sherry Cohen, Former Chief Counsel Thomas J. Cahill, Hon John Buckley, David Spokony & Catherine O’Hagen Wolfe, Clerk @ US Second Circuit Court of Appeals (USCA), an initial Anderson defendant in her former job as Clerk for the First Dept, now witness in Anderson.
Anderson claims Physical Assault & Harassment by Cohen for her heroic WHISTLEBLOWING efforts, Anderson gave riveting testimony at the first of these hearings by the NY Senate Judiciary Committee headed by Hon. Senator John L. Sampson.
Anderson’s testimony found online and links again are provided in the written statement. Anderson’s testimony comes at 30min into the video found online at the NY State Senate Website or @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR8OX8uuAbw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fiviewit%2Etv%2F&feature=player_embedded
Prior to permitting Anderson to trial, Scheindlin marked 7 suits, including Iviewit’s Multi-Count Multi-Trillion Dollar suit http://iviewit.tv/press/press3.pdf legally “related” to Anderson.""
Source of POST
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+Reardon&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Iviewit
More on the Stolen Iviewit Patents at
www.DeniedPatent.com
RICO
Wachovia, Bankruptcy Corruption, Brian Utley
Senator John L. Sampson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
RSS Feed (xml)
