The Truth - NOT the LIE
so NOT about Party but about Quality of Life
for Every Citizen and NOT about the Rich Getting Richer
and Keeping you Terrorized and without Rights
L
Look Deeper Folks.
L
Sunday, February 28, 2010
No President Can Save Us, Who cares Who is President. The Sheriff is the law of the Land, we need to STOP Corruption and Stand up For Citizens Rights
We Need to Stop Focusing on the Presidency, who ever is President is run by other groups - banks - money - elite ... it does not matter who it is. Now More Games from the Presidential Candidate Game while americans are losing homes and jobs, and have lost their rights in local courts. We have no accountability and Sarah Palin simply blames Obama and now is trying to silence the Libertarians into joining Republicans.. Games .. Illusions... Smoke and Mirrors..
Monday, February 22, 2010
Judge approves SEC-BofA settlement on Merrill deal
Check out this Article.. Warner Bros. - AOL - Intel -SGI - Lockheed Martin - SGI .. Your Next... as you have been misleading shareholders on a Trillion Dollar Liability for around a decade... Need Proof Shareholders - Well there is over 1200 documents of Proof at www.Iviewit.TV - there is information at www.DeniedPatent.com including a Federal RICO Lawsuit and SEC Complaints that Being Ignored - Shareholder YOU LOSE.
You will suffer from this Massive Shareholder Fraud and Intel Corp. - Warner Bros. - AOL - Lockheed Martin - Proskauer Rose - Foley and Lardner and the other alleged Criminals in this Trillion Dollar Technology Heist .. WELL they will get their insurance companies and shareholders to pay for their blatant, obvious, fraudulent "Mistake" and their happy lives with HUGE paychecks will continue to go on as before... Your life as a Shareholder of these companies who lose everything to do their Blatant Ignoring of Fraud, of Signed Contracts of Theft.. well your life will change for ever as your financial portfolio drowns in their "mistakes"...
Here is Todays News on Merrill Deal...
"" NEW YORK – A federal judge said Monday he would reluctantly approve an amended $150 million settlement between the Securities and Exchange Commission and Bank of America to end civil charges accusing the bank of misleading shareholders when it acquired Merrill Lynch.
But U.S. District Court Judge Jed S. Rakoff called the revised pact "half-baked justice at best" and said the court approved it "while shaking its head." The dispute had been scheduled for trial next week.
The judge last year rejected a $33 million settlement stemming from the early 2009 acquisition, calling it a breach of "justice and morality."
Rakoff said Monday in his written order approving the revised settlement that it was "considerably improved" but "far from ideal."
He said the new deal's greatest defect "is that it advocates very modest punitive, compensatory and remedial measures that are neither directed at the specific individuals responsible for the nondisclosures nor appear likely to have more than a very modest impact on corporate practices or victim compensation."
He added: "While better than nothing, this is half-baked justice at best."
The SEC had accused Bank of America of failing to disclose to shareholders before they voted on the Merrill deal that it had authorized Merrill to pay up to $5.8 billion in bonuses to its employees in 2008 even though the investment bank lost $27.6 billion that year.
He said his approval depends on both sides formally ratifying the amended agreement by Thursday, including a change he had recommended — that an independent auditor be fully acceptable to the SEC with the judge having final say if the two sides cannot agree.
The new deal also requires that the independent auditor assess over the next three years whether the bank's accounting controls and procedures are adequate to assure proper public disclosures. And it calls for the bank to begin submitting executive compensation recommendations to shareholders for a nonbinding vote of approval or disapproval over the next three years.
"Given that the apparent working assumption of the bank's decision-makers and lawyers involved in the underlying events at issue here was not to disclose information if a rationale could be found for not doing so, the proposed remedial steps should help foster a healthier attitude of `when in doubt, disclose,'" the judge wrote.
The judge said he would have rejected the revised settlement, which he said provides shareholders a few pennies per share, if he were deciding the issue solely on the merits but he said the law requires him to give substantial deference to the SEC's view and he believed it was an instance when judicial restraint was appropriate.
Bank of America spokesman Robert Stickler said the bank was "very pleased" that the settlement was approved.
The SEC did not immediately respond to a message for comment.
At a recent hearing, Rakoff had questioned why the SEC's agreement with Bank of America was not as critical as recent charges brought by the New York attorney general's office that were more suggestive of intentional fraud by bank executives.
He said he has since reviewed the underlying facts before the SEC and the inferences the agency had drawn and found them "not to be irrational."
He said he was most troubled by the fact that a penalty package that essentially consists of a $150 million fine "appears paltry."
He said he was also bothered that the fine penalizes the shareholders for what was, "in effect if not in intent, a fraud by management on the shareholders."
The irony, he said, was that it is an acquisition that "may yet turn out well but that could have been a bank-destroying disaster if the U.S. taxpayer had not saved the day.""
Link to Source
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100222/ap_on_bi_ge/us_bank_of_america_merrill_lynch
One more NOTE here, how are Banks who let the Real Estate Collapse happen going to recover ?? well the Real Estate Victims who the banks are now seizing their properties left and right whether they are "under water" or not... this is how the banks will Recover from their Fraud on Shareholders, Fraud on the Real Estate Consumer - the will Take YOUR HOME..
Crystal L. Cox
Industry Whistleblower
You will suffer from this Massive Shareholder Fraud and Intel Corp. - Warner Bros. - AOL - Lockheed Martin - Proskauer Rose - Foley and Lardner and the other alleged Criminals in this Trillion Dollar Technology Heist .. WELL they will get their insurance companies and shareholders to pay for their blatant, obvious, fraudulent "Mistake" and their happy lives with HUGE paychecks will continue to go on as before... Your life as a Shareholder of these companies who lose everything to do their Blatant Ignoring of Fraud, of Signed Contracts of Theft.. well your life will change for ever as your financial portfolio drowns in their "mistakes"...
Here is Todays News on Merrill Deal...
"" NEW YORK – A federal judge said Monday he would reluctantly approve an amended $150 million settlement between the Securities and Exchange Commission and Bank of America to end civil charges accusing the bank of misleading shareholders when it acquired Merrill Lynch.
But U.S. District Court Judge Jed S. Rakoff called the revised pact "half-baked justice at best" and said the court approved it "while shaking its head." The dispute had been scheduled for trial next week.
The judge last year rejected a $33 million settlement stemming from the early 2009 acquisition, calling it a breach of "justice and morality."
Rakoff said Monday in his written order approving the revised settlement that it was "considerably improved" but "far from ideal."
He said the new deal's greatest defect "is that it advocates very modest punitive, compensatory and remedial measures that are neither directed at the specific individuals responsible for the nondisclosures nor appear likely to have more than a very modest impact on corporate practices or victim compensation."
He added: "While better than nothing, this is half-baked justice at best."
The SEC had accused Bank of America of failing to disclose to shareholders before they voted on the Merrill deal that it had authorized Merrill to pay up to $5.8 billion in bonuses to its employees in 2008 even though the investment bank lost $27.6 billion that year.
He said his approval depends on both sides formally ratifying the amended agreement by Thursday, including a change he had recommended — that an independent auditor be fully acceptable to the SEC with the judge having final say if the two sides cannot agree.
The new deal also requires that the independent auditor assess over the next three years whether the bank's accounting controls and procedures are adequate to assure proper public disclosures. And it calls for the bank to begin submitting executive compensation recommendations to shareholders for a nonbinding vote of approval or disapproval over the next three years.
"Given that the apparent working assumption of the bank's decision-makers and lawyers involved in the underlying events at issue here was not to disclose information if a rationale could be found for not doing so, the proposed remedial steps should help foster a healthier attitude of `when in doubt, disclose,'" the judge wrote.
The judge said he would have rejected the revised settlement, which he said provides shareholders a few pennies per share, if he were deciding the issue solely on the merits but he said the law requires him to give substantial deference to the SEC's view and he believed it was an instance when judicial restraint was appropriate.
Bank of America spokesman Robert Stickler said the bank was "very pleased" that the settlement was approved.
The SEC did not immediately respond to a message for comment.
At a recent hearing, Rakoff had questioned why the SEC's agreement with Bank of America was not as critical as recent charges brought by the New York attorney general's office that were more suggestive of intentional fraud by bank executives.
He said he has since reviewed the underlying facts before the SEC and the inferences the agency had drawn and found them "not to be irrational."
He said he was most troubled by the fact that a penalty package that essentially consists of a $150 million fine "appears paltry."
He said he was also bothered that the fine penalizes the shareholders for what was, "in effect if not in intent, a fraud by management on the shareholders."
The irony, he said, was that it is an acquisition that "may yet turn out well but that could have been a bank-destroying disaster if the U.S. taxpayer had not saved the day.""
Link to Source
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100222/ap_on_bi_ge/us_bank_of_america_merrill_lynch
One more NOTE here, how are Banks who let the Real Estate Collapse happen going to recover ?? well the Real Estate Victims who the banks are now seizing their properties left and right whether they are "under water" or not... this is how the banks will Recover from their Fraud on Shareholders, Fraud on the Real Estate Consumer - the will Take YOUR HOME..
Crystal L. Cox
Industry Whistleblower
Saturday, February 20, 2010
"President Letter from Roy P. Pilkey was banned from the Bitterroot Public Library as well as the requestor " Hamilton Montana News
hamilton news
More Excerpts from the Real News Coming Out of Hamilton Montana.
"" The President Letter from Roy P. Pilkey was banned from the Bitterroot Public Library as well as the requestor recently. Upon finding the American Library Association (ALA) they have a "Library Bill of Rights" which apparently Gloria Langstaff (director) feels does not apply to her library. Ms. Langstaff will make an appointment with the public, then ban them from the library, so to not uphold the meeting scheduled.
Montana Law is very specific: a library director has no power to take library access from a patron. Only in Hamilton, Montana does the Police and the Library director work together to commit crime.
according to Justice Brennan former US Supreme Court Justice: "Even the slightest redeeming social importance--unorthodox ideas, controversial ideas hateful to the prevailing climate of opinion..." was protected by the first amendment. BUT NOT AT THE BITTERROOT PUBLIC LIBRARY!
In the Bitteroot valley, you will be prosecuted for protected rights of free speech, going against the Montana Constitution and the US Constitution....we have no rights.....see GITMO press release at www.mtjustice.info or on this page (see index at top of home page).
No policies regarding behavior are listed on the website: http://www.bitterrootpubliclibrary.org/ nor was any requests made to leave the library, or stop behavior.
Perhaps they are protecting the public officials who are violating our rights, and the public needs to take back their library, as well as local government, and law enforcement. We do this by running for & holding public office.
Please note: The Bitterroot Public Library will open late October 29, 2009 due to the need to train the staff on appropirate interactions with the public. They plan on learning on when not to call the police when a patron is peacefully assembled on the public property.
The director will learn Montana Law, knowing that an advanced degree is required (which she does not have).
UPDATE: We had a sighting of Gloria Langstaff, it looked like she did not see the light of day much. It comes at no wonder that the board lets her do as she pleases, she looks like one mean Bat. The other librarians in tow, looking extra special "going after" someone who was minding their own business, speaking or bothering no one, did not get asked to leave the library, and the director did a "positive identification" on the offender, executed a call into the Select Committee on Election: The Hamilton Police Department.
This is not a joke. We ask that those who wish to test their luck with fate, like the running of the bulls in Italy, ask for the President's letter from the front desk. If you can survive for 8 seconds, you can have a membership at this wonderful 1 room library. Embezzlement is amongst the fun we have in Hamilton, Montana at the "free" library.
Free to tax the county excessively, use volunteer labor, take estate gifts, and get free accounting, and lease (sorry, $1/yr) from the City of Hamilton. Maybe they should have been friendlier to a candidate for the office of Mayor. Once again, please stand by for our feature film documentary due out in September. BPL is toast. This of ccourse is a figurative statement.
Thank you for the defamatory comments on the August minutes Ms. Langstaff; these were published for 5 days on the BPL homepage. We wonder why you pulled them after our letter was delivered to the NEW chairman. Ask Donald Trump: YOU'RE FIRED!
see the letters page for our BPL letter to the chairman of the library board.
Did we mention that Michael Spreadbury has a great relationship with Stevensville (including their board)? We'll show you in our feature film on justice.
63% of total budget is spent on Administrator salaries, benefits, and pension.
only 1 in 9 dollars are spent on collection materials. (source: 09-10 budget)
Site of arrest attempt: Bittterroot Public Library commons, Hamilton, MT
The ACLU of Montana says that Librarians are tougher than the FBI (see http://www.aclumontana.org/ ) One look at Gloria Langstaff, and no terrorist would want to see that again! At least the ACLU has something right!
We the People of Montana have made initial steps to request ACLU vacate the State of Montana. False advertising claiming to stand up for first amendment rights on Montana Public Radio advertisements. ACLU-MONTANA can find some other boobs to believe them. In another state.
freedom of speech was violated by the Bitterroot Public Library
Peaceful assembly at this gazebo on public property violated
threats to websites by public officials (civil, and criminal threats)
right to recall, not following Montana Law (right to petition government)
More updates: A prison library was set up by a church in Arizona within 6 months which had more books (donated), and a bigger space than the BPL; with volunteers!
The Bitterroot Public Library violates right to assemble, speak, to read, and enjoy a state sponsored right of a "free" library. The "5-year plan" includes:
expanding the 'program area' (this is the "romper room" area) for the children
is signed by departed chair Ellyn Jones and Gloria Langstaff on 2/17/07
The Bitterroot Public Library seems to not be interested in books, or adult learning.
The State of Montana has a library governing document which states that all policies are available to the public as per Administrative Law. Ms. Langstaff informs the Hamilton Police and brings banned books to them.
As per the ALA guidelines, no librarian can censure material from a viewer, or potential reader if not profane nor obscene. The "right" to read, the "right" to view (see http://www.ala.org/ ) has been violated by the Bitterroot Public Library Director.
If the first amendment is not important to our library director, we have found a new area to request our rights. Freedom of speech is being taken by our own public officials in a manner that is consistent with "organized" crime; prearranged understanding and involvement with local law enforcement.
The Bitterroot Public Library would rather keep their '08-09 budgeted $611,000 in the bank of taxpayer money (budget year '09-'10 has $513,000--so where did $100,000 go?).
The Bitterroot Public Library would rather not uphold their own policies, not provide any policies to the public, and be exclusive about what materials come into the library. No public service standards apply, nor any American Library Association guidelines and procedures. The public in the Bitterroot Valley deserve better, it will be so soon. Please run for County office----see the ELECTIONS PAGE for details.
These are our public officials, not answering to the public; making their policies public nor accessable, and not using our tax dollars appropiately. This is why we need to change our Valley by electing public officials who will work for us, instead of a "group", or themselves.
upon further research....we are proud to put up the American Library Association paragraph which supports our cause:
"We state these propositions neither lightly nor as easy generalizations. We here stake out a lofty claim for the value of the written word.
We do so because we believe that it is possessed of enormous variety and usefulness, worthy of cherishing and keeping free. We realize that the application of these propositions may mean the dissemination of ideas and manners of expression that are repugnant to many persons.
We do not state these propositions in the comfortable belief that what people read is unimportant. We believe rather that what people read is deeply important; that ideas can be dangerous; but that the suppression of ideas is fatal to a democratic society......
...Freedom itself is a dangerous way of life, but it is ours."
We the People will gladly add the Bitterroot Public Library as an entity that has refused to uphold freedom of speech, or Montana Law.
These are specifically spelled out in a Montana Library guidance document says must happen. An exemple of public officials acting outside the law. We will clean up our community, one vote at a time. ""
For Source of Quote and the REAL
Hamilton Montana News Click Below
http://www.bitterroot-rising.org/index.html
Posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
www.HamiltonMontanaNews.net
Hamilton Montana - the Land of
NO Civil Right
Hamilton News
Hamilton Montana News
crystal cox montana
More Excerpts from the Real News Coming Out of Hamilton Montana.
"" The President Letter from Roy P. Pilkey was banned from the Bitterroot Public Library as well as the requestor recently. Upon finding the American Library Association (ALA) they have a "Library Bill of Rights" which apparently Gloria Langstaff (director) feels does not apply to her library. Ms. Langstaff will make an appointment with the public, then ban them from the library, so to not uphold the meeting scheduled.
Montana Law is very specific: a library director has no power to take library access from a patron. Only in Hamilton, Montana does the Police and the Library director work together to commit crime.
according to Justice Brennan former US Supreme Court Justice: "Even the slightest redeeming social importance--unorthodox ideas, controversial ideas hateful to the prevailing climate of opinion..." was protected by the first amendment. BUT NOT AT THE BITTERROOT PUBLIC LIBRARY!
In the Bitteroot valley, you will be prosecuted for protected rights of free speech, going against the Montana Constitution and the US Constitution....we have no rights.....see GITMO press release at www.mtjustice.info or on this page (see index at top of home page).
No policies regarding behavior are listed on the website: http://www.bitterrootpubliclibrary.org/ nor was any requests made to leave the library, or stop behavior.
Perhaps they are protecting the public officials who are violating our rights, and the public needs to take back their library, as well as local government, and law enforcement. We do this by running for & holding public office.
Please note: The Bitterroot Public Library will open late October 29, 2009 due to the need to train the staff on appropirate interactions with the public. They plan on learning on when not to call the police when a patron is peacefully assembled on the public property.
The director will learn Montana Law, knowing that an advanced degree is required (which she does not have).
UPDATE: We had a sighting of Gloria Langstaff, it looked like she did not see the light of day much. It comes at no wonder that the board lets her do as she pleases, she looks like one mean Bat. The other librarians in tow, looking extra special "going after" someone who was minding their own business, speaking or bothering no one, did not get asked to leave the library, and the director did a "positive identification" on the offender, executed a call into the Select Committee on Election: The Hamilton Police Department.
This is not a joke. We ask that those who wish to test their luck with fate, like the running of the bulls in Italy, ask for the President's letter from the front desk. If you can survive for 8 seconds, you can have a membership at this wonderful 1 room library. Embezzlement is amongst the fun we have in Hamilton, Montana at the "free" library.
Free to tax the county excessively, use volunteer labor, take estate gifts, and get free accounting, and lease (sorry, $1/yr) from the City of Hamilton. Maybe they should have been friendlier to a candidate for the office of Mayor. Once again, please stand by for our feature film documentary due out in September. BPL is toast. This of ccourse is a figurative statement.
Thank you for the defamatory comments on the August minutes Ms. Langstaff; these were published for 5 days on the BPL homepage. We wonder why you pulled them after our letter was delivered to the NEW chairman. Ask Donald Trump: YOU'RE FIRED!
see the letters page for our BPL letter to the chairman of the library board.
Did we mention that Michael Spreadbury has a great relationship with Stevensville (including their board)? We'll show you in our feature film on justice.
63% of total budget is spent on Administrator salaries, benefits, and pension.
only 1 in 9 dollars are spent on collection materials. (source: 09-10 budget)
Site of arrest attempt: Bittterroot Public Library commons, Hamilton, MT
The ACLU of Montana says that Librarians are tougher than the FBI (see http://www.aclumontana.org/ ) One look at Gloria Langstaff, and no terrorist would want to see that again! At least the ACLU has something right!
We the People of Montana have made initial steps to request ACLU vacate the State of Montana. False advertising claiming to stand up for first amendment rights on Montana Public Radio advertisements. ACLU-MONTANA can find some other boobs to believe them. In another state.
freedom of speech was violated by the Bitterroot Public Library
Peaceful assembly at this gazebo on public property violated
threats to websites by public officials (civil, and criminal threats)
right to recall, not following Montana Law (right to petition government)
More updates: A prison library was set up by a church in Arizona within 6 months which had more books (donated), and a bigger space than the BPL; with volunteers!
The Bitterroot Public Library violates right to assemble, speak, to read, and enjoy a state sponsored right of a "free" library. The "5-year plan" includes:
expanding the 'program area' (this is the "romper room" area) for the children
is signed by departed chair Ellyn Jones and Gloria Langstaff on 2/17/07
The Bitterroot Public Library seems to not be interested in books, or adult learning.
The State of Montana has a library governing document which states that all policies are available to the public as per Administrative Law. Ms. Langstaff informs the Hamilton Police and brings banned books to them.
As per the ALA guidelines, no librarian can censure material from a viewer, or potential reader if not profane nor obscene. The "right" to read, the "right" to view (see http://www.ala.org/ ) has been violated by the Bitterroot Public Library Director.
If the first amendment is not important to our library director, we have found a new area to request our rights. Freedom of speech is being taken by our own public officials in a manner that is consistent with "organized" crime; prearranged understanding and involvement with local law enforcement.
The Bitterroot Public Library would rather keep their '08-09 budgeted $611,000 in the bank of taxpayer money (budget year '09-'10 has $513,000--so where did $100,000 go?).
The Bitterroot Public Library would rather not uphold their own policies, not provide any policies to the public, and be exclusive about what materials come into the library. No public service standards apply, nor any American Library Association guidelines and procedures. The public in the Bitterroot Valley deserve better, it will be so soon. Please run for County office----see the ELECTIONS PAGE for details.
These are our public officials, not answering to the public; making their policies public nor accessable, and not using our tax dollars appropiately. This is why we need to change our Valley by electing public officials who will work for us, instead of a "group", or themselves.
upon further research....we are proud to put up the American Library Association paragraph which supports our cause:
"We state these propositions neither lightly nor as easy generalizations. We here stake out a lofty claim for the value of the written word.
We do so because we believe that it is possessed of enormous variety and usefulness, worthy of cherishing and keeping free. We realize that the application of these propositions may mean the dissemination of ideas and manners of expression that are repugnant to many persons.
We do not state these propositions in the comfortable belief that what people read is unimportant. We believe rather that what people read is deeply important; that ideas can be dangerous; but that the suppression of ideas is fatal to a democratic society......
...Freedom itself is a dangerous way of life, but it is ours."
We the People will gladly add the Bitterroot Public Library as an entity that has refused to uphold freedom of speech, or Montana Law.
These are specifically spelled out in a Montana Library guidance document says must happen. An exemple of public officials acting outside the law. We will clean up our community, one vote at a time. ""
For Source of Quote and the REAL
Hamilton Montana News Click Below
http://www.bitterroot-rising.org/index.html
Posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
www.HamiltonMontanaNews.net
Hamilton Montana - the Land of
NO Civil Right
Hamilton News
Hamilton Montana News
crystal cox montana
Friday, February 19, 2010
a Documentary on the Court Corruption, Judicial Favortisms, Set Ups, NIH Coverups, Baucaus Conflicts of Interest, Corrupt Law Enforcement and More....
a Deeper Look at Montana Courts, Montana Judicial Process, Denial of Due Process, Montana Politics and Issues, NIH Hamilton Montana, Baucus Conflicts of Interest and More...
new Documentary talking about what is going on beneath the beauty in the Bitterroot Valley, Hamilton, Montana - Ravalli County. And in Montana in General.
Crystal Cox Eureka
new Documentary talking about what is going on beneath the beauty in the Bitterroot Valley, Hamilton, Montana - Ravalli County. And in Montana in General.
Crystal Cox Eureka
Montana Documentary
Buy this Full Documentary at
www.BeneathTheBeauty.com
Posted Here by
Montana Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
little bitty Question
Who Funds the Corruption in Hamilton?
besides the Tax Paying Citizens ?
NIH - who is NIH, why are they so Powerful
that you have No Civil or Human Rights
In Hamilton Montana ?
more on NIH coming to My Industry Whistleblower Network Soon
Intel Executives Make Decisions that Shareholders Take the Hit On? Looks like a RICO Pattern and History to ME. Massive Shareholder Liability Alert.
Funny Intel Shareholders don't even Know what CEO Paul Otellini is hiding from them and has been for many - MANY years on the Biggest Liability that Intel Corp. has ever seen.
Way before the Legal Issues with Advanced Micro Devices, and Billions in Fines .. there was and Still is the Trillion Dollar Liability of the Iviewit Technologies Company and the Stolen Technology that has made Billions on top of Billions and still is for Intel Corp. and many others involved in this High Finance Liability that shareholders will one day soon be FORCED to looked at AND that will be a Very Jagged Pill to Swallow.
November 2009 Article - Charles A. Gilman Got Moxy and Charles Gilman is VERY right in this request, Intel Executives are not Playing fair and NOT disclosing KNOWN Liabilities to this Day.
It is NOT the Intel Shareholder's Fault, they were no part of the Decisions and SHOULD not take the Financial Hit for It.
"" Intel shareholder wants execs to pay $2.7B in fines
He doesn't want the company on the hook for antitrust fines, settlement
By Sharon Gaudin.
Computerworld -
An Intel Corp. investor, frustrated that the chip maker has been hit with $2.7 billion in fines and settlement payments, has filed suit in U.S. District Court in Delaware against the company and its top executives.
Charles A. Gilman wants the court to force company executives, including Intel President and CEO Paul Otellini, to fork over money for the fines and payments so shareholders don't take a financial hit.
The lawsuit was filed the same week Intel reached a settlement with Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) to end all antitrust litigation between the two companies. As part of the deal, Intel agreed to pay rival AMD $1.25 billion.
That followed a ruling in May by the European Commission in which Intel was found guilty of antitrust violations in the market for PC microprocessors and fined it $1.44 billion.
Gilman, who refers to himself in court documents as a "long-time shareholder," doesn't think the company and its shareholders should suffer for Intel's actions.
In a document filed in court, Gilman's attorneys contend that shareholder attempts to influence Intel's board of directors have "proved fruitless. ...Indeed, shareholder demands have been met with outright hostility, which can only bespeak bad faith."
The document also contends that Intel's board refused to investigate the antitrust charges against the company or to appoint an independent committee to review the charges and take remedial action, if needed.
" The antagonism of Intel's Board of Directors to the shareholders' demand is readily explained by growing evidence that the antitrust scheme, which spanned three continents, and which has so far led to over $1 billion in fines, was personally directed by CEO Otellini and by Intel's former board chairman, Craig R. Barrett," the document alleges.
Ezra Gottheil, an analyst with Technology Business Research, Inc., said he's not surprised by the suit. "Someone always sues," he said, adding that he's never heard of company executives being forced to pay for any fines or settlements.
One of Gilman's attorneys, Roy Jacobs, of the firm Law Offices of Roy Jacobs in Manhattan, declined to comment on the suit. So did another Gilman attorney, Robert Goldberg, who is with Biggs and Battaglia, a Delaware law firm.
For its part, Intel promised to fight the suit. "We disagree with the plaintiff in the matter and we are planning a vigorous defense," said Chuck Mulloy, an Intel spokesman
In addition to Otellini, those named in the suit include: former CEO and ex-Chairman of the Board Barrett; directors James Plummer and Susan Decker; and former directors Carol Bartz, D. James Guzy Sr., David Pottruck, Jane Shaw, David Yoffie, Charlene Barshefsky, John Donahoe and Frank Yeary. ""
Source of Post and Article Link
http://www.computerworld.com/
s/article/9141168/Intel_shareholder_wants_execs_to_pay_2.7B_in_fines
Posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
More on the Intel Liability with the Iviewit Technologies
Stolen Patent at www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV
Also Check out www.CEOPaulOtellini.com and www.BruceSewell.com
for Intel Corp's Role in this Massive Shareholder Fraud.
Intel CEO Paul Otellini
Durward Bruce Sewell
Shareholder Activism, Advocate - Shareholder watch
Way before the Legal Issues with Advanced Micro Devices, and Billions in Fines .. there was and Still is the Trillion Dollar Liability of the Iviewit Technologies Company and the Stolen Technology that has made Billions on top of Billions and still is for Intel Corp. and many others involved in this High Finance Liability that shareholders will one day soon be FORCED to looked at AND that will be a Very Jagged Pill to Swallow.
November 2009 Article - Charles A. Gilman Got Moxy and Charles Gilman is VERY right in this request, Intel Executives are not Playing fair and NOT disclosing KNOWN Liabilities to this Day.
It is NOT the Intel Shareholder's Fault, they were no part of the Decisions and SHOULD not take the Financial Hit for It.
"" Intel shareholder wants execs to pay $2.7B in fines
He doesn't want the company on the hook for antitrust fines, settlement
By Sharon Gaudin.
Computerworld -
An Intel Corp. investor, frustrated that the chip maker has been hit with $2.7 billion in fines and settlement payments, has filed suit in U.S. District Court in Delaware against the company and its top executives.
Charles A. Gilman wants the court to force company executives, including Intel President and CEO Paul Otellini, to fork over money for the fines and payments so shareholders don't take a financial hit.
The lawsuit was filed the same week Intel reached a settlement with Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) to end all antitrust litigation between the two companies. As part of the deal, Intel agreed to pay rival AMD $1.25 billion.
That followed a ruling in May by the European Commission in which Intel was found guilty of antitrust violations in the market for PC microprocessors and fined it $1.44 billion.
Gilman, who refers to himself in court documents as a "long-time shareholder," doesn't think the company and its shareholders should suffer for Intel's actions.
In a document filed in court, Gilman's attorneys contend that shareholder attempts to influence Intel's board of directors have "proved fruitless. ...Indeed, shareholder demands have been met with outright hostility, which can only bespeak bad faith."
The document also contends that Intel's board refused to investigate the antitrust charges against the company or to appoint an independent committee to review the charges and take remedial action, if needed.
" The antagonism of Intel's Board of Directors to the shareholders' demand is readily explained by growing evidence that the antitrust scheme, which spanned three continents, and which has so far led to over $1 billion in fines, was personally directed by CEO Otellini and by Intel's former board chairman, Craig R. Barrett," the document alleges.
Ezra Gottheil, an analyst with Technology Business Research, Inc., said he's not surprised by the suit. "Someone always sues," he said, adding that he's never heard of company executives being forced to pay for any fines or settlements.
One of Gilman's attorneys, Roy Jacobs, of the firm Law Offices of Roy Jacobs in Manhattan, declined to comment on the suit. So did another Gilman attorney, Robert Goldberg, who is with Biggs and Battaglia, a Delaware law firm.
For its part, Intel promised to fight the suit. "We disagree with the plaintiff in the matter and we are planning a vigorous defense," said Chuck Mulloy, an Intel spokesman
In addition to Otellini, those named in the suit include: former CEO and ex-Chairman of the Board Barrett; directors James Plummer and Susan Decker; and former directors Carol Bartz, D. James Guzy Sr., David Pottruck, Jane Shaw, David Yoffie, Charlene Barshefsky, John Donahoe and Frank Yeary. ""
Source of Post and Article Link
http://www.computerworld.com/
s/article/9141168/Intel_shareholder_wants_execs_to_pay_2.7B_in_fines
Posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
More on the Intel Liability with the Iviewit Technologies
Stolen Patent at www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV
Also Check out www.CEOPaulOtellini.com and www.BruceSewell.com
for Intel Corp's Role in this Massive Shareholder Fraud.
Intel CEO Paul Otellini
Durward Bruce Sewell
Shareholder Activism, Advocate - Shareholder watch
Thursday, February 18, 2010
End Discrimination - Stop Judicial Bias - Expose Corrupt Judges and Attorneys - STOP Judicial Corruption with TRUTH
Another Great Site.. Exposing Corruption
posted by
Crystal L. Cox
Truth Seeker
in our Judicial System and Giving Voice to Victims...
"" Our purpose is to raise awareness of discrimination in the workplace and to ensure that judicial and legal authorities who are charged with upholding our nation's anti-discrimination laws enforce these laws and do not make "political" decisions. We also seek to use this website as an exchange for learning and assistance to victims of discrimination and those in a position to help them. ""
www.EndDiscriminationNow.com
Support the Truth...
"" Our purpose is to raise awareness of discrimination in the workplace and to ensure that judicial and legal authorities who are charged with upholding our nation's anti-discrimination laws enforce these laws and do not make "political" decisions. We also seek to use this website as an exchange for learning and assistance to victims of discrimination and those in a position to help them. ""
www.EndDiscriminationNow.com
Support the Truth...
Silence is Betrayal...
posted by
Crystal L. Cox
Truth Seeker
Monday, February 15, 2010
David Aman - Tonkon Torp Oregon - Tonkon Torp LLP - Tonkon Torp Law Firm - David S. Aman
Do you have any Information on David Aman,
Tonkon Torp - Oregon - if so email me,
Crystal L. Cox - Investigative Blogger
Tonkon Torp - Oregon - if so email me,
Crystal L. Cox - Investigative Blogger
Industry Whistleblower
Saturday, February 13, 2010
Marc S. Dreier SEC Investigation and Conviction - Excerpts from Eliot Bernsteins SEC Complaint.
"" The SEC Indictment and Conviction of Marc S. Dreier as it relates to Proskauer, comes from the connection to Patent Attorney Raymond A. Joao.
Joao initially introduced to Iviewit as a Proskauer partner by Wheeler, along with Rubenstein, when they were actually with Meltzer at that time.
Once investors in Iviewit learned Rubenstein and Joao were not with Proskauer as represented, Proskauer partner Christopher C. Wheeler (“Wheeler”) claimed they were transferring to Proskauer shortly.
Rubenstein then transferred almost overnight and Joao was to follow after he finished work at Meltzer but since he was actually writing the patent applications under Rubenstein’s direction for Iviewit, Iviewit had to take an additional retainer to Proskauer’s with Meltzer until Joao transferred.
However, Joao never transferred to Proskauer Rose and during his first year of work for Iviewit, it was discovered that Joao allegedly was not filing timely and correct patent applications and patenting inventions in his own name.
Joao now under ongoing investigation at the US Patent Office and FBI, ordered for by the First Dept and yet to be completed and more. Wheeler then claimed that Proskauer was beginning an investigation of Joao, ironically, and ignoring the conflicts this presented, as Joao was Proskauer, Wheeler and Rubenstein’s referral.
Christopher Wheeler then suggested his good friend William Dick (“Dick”) of Foley to replace Joao for filing the patents and reviewing Joao’s work, continuing under Rubenstein’s oversight, as described in the Wachovia Private Placement already exhibited herein.
What Christopher Wheeler failed to disclose to Iviewit is that Dick had been involved immediately prior to being retained by Iviewit, with both Wheeler and another Proskauer/Wheeler referral to Iviewit, Brian G. Utley, formerly employed by IBM and working with Dick, Utley then becoming President of Iviewit, in another allegedly failed Intellectual Property theft.
The prior attempted Intellectual Property heist was against another Florida businessperson, Philanthropist Monte Friedkin of Diamond Turf Equipment Co. and whereby all those addressed herein should take note of the Prior History of these alleged patent thieves, clearly indicating that this is an organized and repeated crime against inventors.
The SEC should note that Wheeler presented a falsified resume for his friend Utley to Iviewit that not only failed to disclose the attempted theft but also failed to disclose, and in fact materially falsified Utley’s resume concealing the facts by claiming Utley left the company Diamond Turf a success due to his innovations.
Factually, the attempted IP theft, according to Friedkin, led to the firing of Utley by Friedkin and Friedkin’s immediately closing the business and taking a multimillion-dollar loss directly due to the scheme perpetrated by Utley, Dick and Wheeler. Dick also failed to disclose this fact when joining Iviewit.
In both Utley and Wheeler’s depositions, already exhibited herein, both Utley and Wheeler contradict each other’s statements when confronted with the Friedkin information and Dick in his Virginia Bar Response to a complaint filed against him further contradicts both Wheeler and Utley regarding the Friedkin events. Supplementary evidence confirming these claims can be found on the Iviewit homepage at www.iviewit.tv .
When Dick replaced Joao, the press reported that Joao claimed he now had 90+ patents in his own name, many allegedly directly lifted from Iviewit.
Joao then joined the Marc S. Dreier law firm of Dreier & Baritz. This new information should be cause for the SEC to reanalyze the entire Dreier Ponzi Scheme in light of this new evidence, and in fact, the monies of the Dreier Ponzi allegedly directly relate to royalties from sales and licensing of Joao’s stolen Intellectual Properties.
The Dreier Ponzi is alleged to be another money-laundering scheme concocted by the Defendants in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit.
The SEC should also cease distribution of assets in the Dreier Ponzi, especially where the Trustee appears conflicted with Proskauer and again the court actions may be further attempts by these all too clever law firms to abscond with funds in further illegal legal actions and Fraud on the Court. ""
Where is the SEC and Mary Schapiro In All This ?
Click Here for Full SEC Complaint by Iviewit Technologies, Eliot I. Bernstein.
posted here by
investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Joao initially introduced to Iviewit as a Proskauer partner by Wheeler, along with Rubenstein, when they were actually with Meltzer at that time.
Once investors in Iviewit learned Rubenstein and Joao were not with Proskauer as represented, Proskauer partner Christopher C. Wheeler (“Wheeler”) claimed they were transferring to Proskauer shortly.
Rubenstein then transferred almost overnight and Joao was to follow after he finished work at Meltzer but since he was actually writing the patent applications under Rubenstein’s direction for Iviewit, Iviewit had to take an additional retainer to Proskauer’s with Meltzer until Joao transferred.
However, Joao never transferred to Proskauer Rose and during his first year of work for Iviewit, it was discovered that Joao allegedly was not filing timely and correct patent applications and patenting inventions in his own name.
Joao now under ongoing investigation at the US Patent Office and FBI, ordered for by the First Dept and yet to be completed and more. Wheeler then claimed that Proskauer was beginning an investigation of Joao, ironically, and ignoring the conflicts this presented, as Joao was Proskauer, Wheeler and Rubenstein’s referral.
Christopher Wheeler then suggested his good friend William Dick (“Dick”) of Foley to replace Joao for filing the patents and reviewing Joao’s work, continuing under Rubenstein’s oversight, as described in the Wachovia Private Placement already exhibited herein.
What Christopher Wheeler failed to disclose to Iviewit is that Dick had been involved immediately prior to being retained by Iviewit, with both Wheeler and another Proskauer/Wheeler referral to Iviewit, Brian G. Utley, formerly employed by IBM and working with Dick, Utley then becoming President of Iviewit, in another allegedly failed Intellectual Property theft.
The prior attempted Intellectual Property heist was against another Florida businessperson, Philanthropist Monte Friedkin of Diamond Turf Equipment Co. and whereby all those addressed herein should take note of the Prior History of these alleged patent thieves, clearly indicating that this is an organized and repeated crime against inventors.
The SEC should note that Wheeler presented a falsified resume for his friend Utley to Iviewit that not only failed to disclose the attempted theft but also failed to disclose, and in fact materially falsified Utley’s resume concealing the facts by claiming Utley left the company Diamond Turf a success due to his innovations.
Factually, the attempted IP theft, according to Friedkin, led to the firing of Utley by Friedkin and Friedkin’s immediately closing the business and taking a multimillion-dollar loss directly due to the scheme perpetrated by Utley, Dick and Wheeler. Dick also failed to disclose this fact when joining Iviewit.
In both Utley and Wheeler’s depositions, already exhibited herein, both Utley and Wheeler contradict each other’s statements when confronted with the Friedkin information and Dick in his Virginia Bar Response to a complaint filed against him further contradicts both Wheeler and Utley regarding the Friedkin events. Supplementary evidence confirming these claims can be found on the Iviewit homepage at www.iviewit.tv .
When Dick replaced Joao, the press reported that Joao claimed he now had 90+ patents in his own name, many allegedly directly lifted from Iviewit.
Joao then joined the Marc S. Dreier law firm of Dreier & Baritz. This new information should be cause for the SEC to reanalyze the entire Dreier Ponzi Scheme in light of this new evidence, and in fact, the monies of the Dreier Ponzi allegedly directly relate to royalties from sales and licensing of Joao’s stolen Intellectual Properties.
The Dreier Ponzi is alleged to be another money-laundering scheme concocted by the Defendants in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit.
The SEC should also cease distribution of assets in the Dreier Ponzi, especially where the Trustee appears conflicted with Proskauer and again the court actions may be further attempts by these all too clever law firms to abscond with funds in further illegal legal actions and Fraud on the Court. ""
Where is the SEC and Mary Schapiro In All This ?
Click Here for Full SEC Complaint by Iviewit Technologies, Eliot I. Bernstein.
posted here by
investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Where there is Billions Lost by Investors and Trillion Dollar Patent Thefts, there is Proskauer Rose LLP and the US Second Circuit Court.
US Second Circuit Court Seems to Ignore Emergency Request
to Investigate Proskauer Rose LLP.
Information from March 2009 included in Eliot Bernstein's Complaint to the SEC On Proskauer Rose... Time Warner, Warner Bros., Intel Corp, SGI, Lockheed Martin and More...
Was anyone listening to Eliot I. Bernstein? Or was the Madoff Liquidation of Assets just simply another layer to an already corruption Multi-Billion Dollar investment scheme...
From Eliot Bernstein's Blog on his SEC Complaint listing Warner Bros., AOL, Time Warner, Ernst Young, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin and explaining a whole lot more about the names and players of the Trillion Dollar Stolen Iviewit Patent, and the Involvement and Cover Ups for and by Proskauer Rose LLP - Meg Law Firm.
" " March 02, 2009 “EMERGENCY MOTION TO INVESTIGATE PROSKAUER ROSE DEFENDANTS INVOLVEMENT IN THE ALLEN STANFORD FINANCIAL, THE BERNARD MADOFF AND THE MARC DRIER FRAUD SCANDALS.
REMOVE PROSKAUER FROM SELF REPRESENTATION IN THESE MATTERS UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE FBI REMOVES THEM FROM THE ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE STANFORD FINANCIAL FRAUD”
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090302%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20Re%20Proskauer%20Stanford%20Madoff%20Dreier%20Scandals4017.pdf
I filed Motions at the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals and US District Court, already exhibited herein, with similar claims of regulatory failures of the prior Presidential administration. Failures allegedly directly related to the Madoff case and I have reported this to Federal Authorities.
The Motions also discuss Conflicts centering on the Madoff saga where Proskauer publicly identified their firm as having the most clients in the Madoff Ponzi and now it is revealed in the press that many Madoff clients are the subject of ongoing SEC investigations.
The Motion at the US Second Circuit is to Compel that court to address the Conflicts of Interest and other matters according to law, laws being ignored while the Court and the Defendants perpetuate never ending Conflicts and Crimes. Note here that the handling of the Madoff Ponzi is by the same courts handling my RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and that the same courts were notified for months of the correlations between the Madoff Ponzi and my Lawsuit and have failed to notify the proper authorities, including the SEC and instead attempted to bury my lawsuit and motions.
The SEC should further note that in the courts handling my Lawsuit, many of the judges and clerks are also Defendants in the Lawsuit and despite the obvious conflicts, they continue to handle the matters, as if no rules or laws apply to them.
These illegal actions by members of the courts should also be cause for the SEC, FBI and others addressed herein to investigate the members of the courts involved for possible collusion and aiding and abetting these schemes through Fraud on the Courts.
Following this Formal Complaint, for the courts failures to address the conflicts and misprision of a felony, the three Second Circuit Judges involved in my appeal will be filed on for Criminal Obstruction and other crimes, as exhibited already in the Motion to Compel.
The SEC should note here that the US Second Circuit has recently attempted to evade the Motion to Compel, by attempting to dismiss the Appeal as baseless, while the related Whistleblower case remains ongoing.
Sneaky as it sounds, by dismissing the case, the court has evaded addressing the criminal charges levied against them and the request for oversight of their criminal actions, as set forth in the Motion to Compel. This brilliant but failed attempt to evade the Motion to Compel, without having to rule on their conflicts or answer the charges against them, despite factual and material conflicts of interests in the court, further evidences their continued criminal obstruction.
All those addressed herein, should therefore immediately begin investigation of the Second Circuit and US District Court for the Southern District of New York court officials involved. Especially concerning their concealment from authorities of these material facts relating to these Schemes, again which may be a Misprision of Felony and whereby had the courts acted within law they could have prevented injury to many victims in these Schemes years earlier, when I initially reported Proskauer’s misdeeds to them.
This information should be cause for the SEC to reanalyze the entire Madoff Scheme in light of this new evidence. All asset sales and other distributions should instantly be halted until these material facts can be reviewed to determine if these funds are also relating to the Iviewit stolen patents. " "
Click here for Source of this Post and the Entire SEC Complaint
Wake Up Mary Schapiro - this is and has been a Financial EMERGENCY for a VERY long time..
Posted Here by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
If you have any information on Proskauer Rose's further involvement in the Standford Affair, the Madoff Scheme or any dirty deeds or favors owed that would make it so that Proskauer Rose LLP can seem to hold no accountability for Billions of Dollars of Shareholder Loss... Please Email Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox at Crystal@CrytalCox.com
blog
crystal cox
to Investigate Proskauer Rose LLP.
Information from March 2009 included in Eliot Bernstein's Complaint to the SEC On Proskauer Rose... Time Warner, Warner Bros., Intel Corp, SGI, Lockheed Martin and More...
Was anyone listening to Eliot I. Bernstein? Or was the Madoff Liquidation of Assets just simply another layer to an already corruption Multi-Billion Dollar investment scheme...
From Eliot Bernstein's Blog on his SEC Complaint listing Warner Bros., AOL, Time Warner, Ernst Young, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin and explaining a whole lot more about the names and players of the Trillion Dollar Stolen Iviewit Patent, and the Involvement and Cover Ups for and by Proskauer Rose LLP - Meg Law Firm.
" " March 02, 2009 “EMERGENCY MOTION TO INVESTIGATE PROSKAUER ROSE DEFENDANTS INVOLVEMENT IN THE ALLEN STANFORD FINANCIAL, THE BERNARD MADOFF AND THE MARC DRIER FRAUD SCANDALS.
REMOVE PROSKAUER FROM SELF REPRESENTATION IN THESE MATTERS UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE FBI REMOVES THEM FROM THE ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE STANFORD FINANCIAL FRAUD”
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090302%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20Re%20Proskauer%20Stanford%20Madoff%20Dreier%20Scandals4017.pdf
I filed Motions at the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals and US District Court, already exhibited herein, with similar claims of regulatory failures of the prior Presidential administration. Failures allegedly directly related to the Madoff case and I have reported this to Federal Authorities.
The Motions also discuss Conflicts centering on the Madoff saga where Proskauer publicly identified their firm as having the most clients in the Madoff Ponzi and now it is revealed in the press that many Madoff clients are the subject of ongoing SEC investigations.
The Motion at the US Second Circuit is to Compel that court to address the Conflicts of Interest and other matters according to law, laws being ignored while the Court and the Defendants perpetuate never ending Conflicts and Crimes. Note here that the handling of the Madoff Ponzi is by the same courts handling my RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and that the same courts were notified for months of the correlations between the Madoff Ponzi and my Lawsuit and have failed to notify the proper authorities, including the SEC and instead attempted to bury my lawsuit and motions.
The SEC should further note that in the courts handling my Lawsuit, many of the judges and clerks are also Defendants in the Lawsuit and despite the obvious conflicts, they continue to handle the matters, as if no rules or laws apply to them.
These illegal actions by members of the courts should also be cause for the SEC, FBI and others addressed herein to investigate the members of the courts involved for possible collusion and aiding and abetting these schemes through Fraud on the Courts.
Following this Formal Complaint, for the courts failures to address the conflicts and misprision of a felony, the three Second Circuit Judges involved in my appeal will be filed on for Criminal Obstruction and other crimes, as exhibited already in the Motion to Compel.
The SEC should note here that the US Second Circuit has recently attempted to evade the Motion to Compel, by attempting to dismiss the Appeal as baseless, while the related Whistleblower case remains ongoing.
Sneaky as it sounds, by dismissing the case, the court has evaded addressing the criminal charges levied against them and the request for oversight of their criminal actions, as set forth in the Motion to Compel. This brilliant but failed attempt to evade the Motion to Compel, without having to rule on their conflicts or answer the charges against them, despite factual and material conflicts of interests in the court, further evidences their continued criminal obstruction.
All those addressed herein, should therefore immediately begin investigation of the Second Circuit and US District Court for the Southern District of New York court officials involved. Especially concerning their concealment from authorities of these material facts relating to these Schemes, again which may be a Misprision of Felony and whereby had the courts acted within law they could have prevented injury to many victims in these Schemes years earlier, when I initially reported Proskauer’s misdeeds to them.
This information should be cause for the SEC to reanalyze the entire Madoff Scheme in light of this new evidence. All asset sales and other distributions should instantly be halted until these material facts can be reviewed to determine if these funds are also relating to the Iviewit stolen patents. " "
Click here for Source of this Post and the Entire SEC Complaint
Wake Up Mary Schapiro - this is and has been a Financial EMERGENCY for a VERY long time..
Posted Here by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
If you have any information on Proskauer Rose's further involvement in the Standford Affair, the Madoff Scheme or any dirty deeds or favors owed that would make it so that Proskauer Rose LLP can seem to hold no accountability for Billions of Dollars of Shareholder Loss... Please Email Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox at Crystal@CrytalCox.com
blog
crystal cox
Iviewit Stolen Patent, Hall and Bernstein calls to Time Warner Inc. and Warner Bros. executives
"" December 29, 2009 ~ Hall and Bernstein calls to Time Warner Inc. and Warner Bros. executives.
o Further, I hereby complain that such recent elusive conduct involves the CEO, CFO and General Counsel at Time Warner, Inc., even hiding and dodging professional phone calls, in fact wholly ignoring them, simply to confirm messages and communications were received and seeking responsibly to address the mass of liabilities described herein.
Instead, quite shockingly, both Hall and I were intentionally passed along to extensions whereby the employees refused to give their names and several times just hung up on us.
Then, unidentified employees transferred us to Security personnel, personnel who would claim to be proper members of the company to receive and deliver messages to the Senior Executives regarding the massive potential Shareholder liabilities, yet they too would offer no confirmation of the delivery of the matters to the Executives and several refused to give their proper names or oversight.
Security for Time Warner instead then took messages with a promise only to deliver the message and since there has been absolutely no call back from Senior Management, Counsel, Outside Counsel or an Auditor since those calls, we presume that avoidance equals concealment. This stands as additional cause for the SEC to investigate and find out more information regarding the failure to return these calls and address liabilities properly by either Officers, Directors, Auditors, Outside Counsel, etc. and further determine if they have reported the liabilities their offices have been notified about to Auditors and Shareholders. ""
Full SEC Complaint Name Time Warner Click HERE
and Source of Above Post
posted on this blog by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
blogger crystal cox
o Further, I hereby complain that such recent elusive conduct involves the CEO, CFO and General Counsel at Time Warner, Inc., even hiding and dodging professional phone calls, in fact wholly ignoring them, simply to confirm messages and communications were received and seeking responsibly to address the mass of liabilities described herein.
Instead, quite shockingly, both Hall and I were intentionally passed along to extensions whereby the employees refused to give their names and several times just hung up on us.
Then, unidentified employees transferred us to Security personnel, personnel who would claim to be proper members of the company to receive and deliver messages to the Senior Executives regarding the massive potential Shareholder liabilities, yet they too would offer no confirmation of the delivery of the matters to the Executives and several refused to give their proper names or oversight.
Security for Time Warner instead then took messages with a promise only to deliver the message and since there has been absolutely no call back from Senior Management, Counsel, Outside Counsel or an Auditor since those calls, we presume that avoidance equals concealment. This stands as additional cause for the SEC to investigate and find out more information regarding the failure to return these calls and address liabilities properly by either Officers, Directors, Auditors, Outside Counsel, etc. and further determine if they have reported the liabilities their offices have been notified about to Auditors and Shareholders. ""
Full SEC Complaint Name Time Warner Click HERE
and Source of Above Post
posted on this blog by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
blogger crystal cox
Warner Bros. Signed Non Disclosure Agreements with Iviewit, Warner Violated those Agreements. Warner Signed License and Service Agreements.. .
Warner Bros. - has broke the Law and in the process put shareholders at HUGE risk, why is Jeffrey Bewkes ignoring this blatant proof of Fraud.
Warner Bros signed multiple Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements and Warner Bros. Signed License and Service Agreements with the Iviewit Company. 9 years have passed and Warner Bros. Blatantly and Illegally Violated those agreements long ago, why?
And Now Eliot Bernstein Founder and one of the Inventors it the Iviewit Stolen Patent has filed a very informative, incredibly detailed SEC Complaint. One that for Now Mary Schapiro and the SEC seems to be ignoring... I am not sure why just yet.. but hope to get tips on this soon...
Some of the Warner Bros' Iviewit Timeline and more details
of the Warner Bros. Relationship with the Iviewit Company.
" " TIMELINE OF WARNER BROS ET AL. RELATIONSHIP WITH IVIEWIT
The following Timelines are presented to give a factual timeline to the allegations herein, the exhibits are linked online and all Uniform Resource Locators (“URL”) and Exhibited Links throughout this document are hereby incorporated, in entirety by reference herein, including over 1000 evidentiary links on the homepage at www.iviewit.tv with exhibits that contain thousands of pages of factual evidence[5].
The timeline will also reveal facts regarding the relationships between many of the Defendants in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and Warner Bros et al., including relations to the main perpetrator of the alleged crimes, the law firm Proskauer Rose.
*Note Warner Bros et al. relevant mergers, acquisitions and breakups to these matters in the timeline below are in bold italics.
1998-2002
Relevant Communications Between Iviewit and Warner Bros et al.
· 1998-2001
Inventions in Imaging and Video Discovered and Intellectual Property Filings begin in 1998. Proskauer Rose was retained Intellectual Property counsel for Iviewit for filing of Intellectual Properties.
· 2000-2002
Warner Bros et al. signs multiple Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements.
Non-Disclosure Agreements @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Confidentialities/confidentialities%20total.pdf
Pages 1-5, 10, 61-62, 80, 108-109, 234
· November 02, 2000 ~ Letter to GS regarding Warner Bros. Technological Calls to Iviewit Investors by Warner Bros. employees, describing the efficacy of the Inventions and the results of the review by Warner Bros., including the anticipated uses by Warner Bros et al.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20001101%20Goldman%20Friedstein%20Letter%20from%20Buchsbaum%20re%20AOLTW%20Colter%20meetings.pdf
· January 11, 2001 ~ America Online and Time Warner Complete Merger to Create AOL Time Warner
http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,668364,00.html
· February 08, 2001 ~ Letter from David J. Colter (“Colter”) ~ Vice President Technology - Technological Operations Warner Bros. to Founder of AOL, Ted Leonsis (“Leonsis”), regarding the efficacy of the Iviewit technologies.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010208%20Colter%20to%20Leonsis%20Warner%20Bros%20AOL.pdf
· February 15, 2001 EFFECTIVE DATE - Signed Warner Bros. License And Service Agreement @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010822%20-%20SIGNED%20Warner%20Bros%20Agreement%20AOL.pdf
August 15, 2001 Irell & Manella LLP Bills for Services for Warner Bros et al. and Sony Licensing Agreements @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Paul%20Allen/old%20patent/LEGAL/Irell%20&%20Manella/Bills/2001%2008%2029%20-%20Irell%20Bill.pdf
It is imperative for the SEC to note that after the Signed Licensing and Service Agreement, Iviewit opened a California Office inside a Warner Bros. building, in order to take over encoding operations for their online content, and more.
Iviewit began billing according to the Licensing and Service agreement. Please note the language in the Licensing and Service agreement pertaining to the Proprietary nature and Confidentiality of the Iviewit inventions.
Suddenly, after the agreements were signed and operations were underway, Wayne M. Smith ~ Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel at Warner Bros. began seeking a re-review of Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein ’s (“Rubenstein”) prior patent opinions regarding the Iviewit inventions to Warner Bros. employees.
Smith then claimed to Colter that he found problems while reviewing Rubenstein’s opinion with the patents on file at the US Patent Office[6]. At this point, allegedly, a coordinated conspiratorial effort between Smith, Rubenstein and others began to derail the already signed Iviewit agreements with Warner Bros et al.
Allegedly, former “Acting CEO” of Iviewit, P. Stephen Lamont, (a referral emanating from AOL’s Leonsis) Smith and Rubenstein then worked to derail the Licensing and Service Agreement. Warner Bros. then further attempted to deny the existence of this BINDING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION as further evidenced in letters exhibited herein, whereby the Signed and Binding agreement is wholly denied.
The amount owed in service fees since the signing of the contracts would be an enormous amount over the almost 10 years of use and where Warner Bros et al. have never notified Iviewit they were cancelling such contract, it may still be considered effective. Yet, it would difficult to cancel what one tries to deny the existence of and perhaps the reason no cancellation was formally completed.
o The emails forward from this point in the timeline begin to attempt to hide from the fact that Licensing and Service Agreements were already in place while also hiding these facts and liabilities from Shareholders and Auditors.
The alleged fraud may again have catastrophic effect on these highly traded stocks, reaching back to this point in time and possibly further back.
· April 04, 2001 Letter from Colter to William J. "Bill" Raduchel (“Raduchel”) ~ Chief Technology Officer and Executive Vice President at AOL. AOL’s Leonsis referred Raduchel to do further due diligence for an investment in the Iviewit companies, in addition to the Licensing and Encoding deal already signed.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010404%20Colter%20to%20Raduchel%20Leonsis%20referral%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
· May 25, 2001 Letters to and from Douglas Chey (“Chey”), Senior Vice President of Technology for Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment and Divisional CIO, Motion Pictures and Television Productions of Sony Pictures Entertainment. Chey, formerly with Warner Bros. was working with Iviewit at Sony (also under Signed Agreements) together with Warner to do a Five Studio Movie Download Project, Movielink, where the Iviewit inventions were to be the backbone enabling technologies to make digital download and streaming possible as a commercial endeavor.
Since that time, Warner Bros et al. and Sony have both done similar digital downloading projects, in violation of Signed Agreements with Iviewit.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010525%20Sony%20Doug%20Chey%20Endorsement%20of%20Tech%20and%20Advisory%20Board%20Option%20letter.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100120%20Douglas%20Chey%20Sony%20Bio.pdf
The SEC should also begin FORMAL INVESTIGATION of Sony’s involvement in these matters. Similar calls to those described herein to Warner Bros et al. for sound business discussions to attempt to alleviate shareholder liabilities have gone wholly ignored by Sony’s In House Counsel, Executives and Auditors.
I will be filing a more formal complaint shortly with the SEC but this should not delay immediate investigation by the SEC, in order to preclude Massive Liabilities to Shareholders of Sony.
The SEC and all other investigators and committees addressed herein, can take this Formal Complaint additionally as a FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SONY. ""
Source of Post and of Warner Bros SEC Complaint
jeffrey bewkes
Warner Bros signed multiple Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements and Warner Bros. Signed License and Service Agreements with the Iviewit Company. 9 years have passed and Warner Bros. Blatantly and Illegally Violated those agreements long ago, why?
And Now Eliot Bernstein Founder and one of the Inventors it the Iviewit Stolen Patent has filed a very informative, incredibly detailed SEC Complaint. One that for Now Mary Schapiro and the SEC seems to be ignoring... I am not sure why just yet.. but hope to get tips on this soon...
Some of the Warner Bros' Iviewit Timeline and more details
of the Warner Bros. Relationship with the Iviewit Company.
" " TIMELINE OF WARNER BROS ET AL. RELATIONSHIP WITH IVIEWIT
The following Timelines are presented to give a factual timeline to the allegations herein, the exhibits are linked online and all Uniform Resource Locators (“URL”) and Exhibited Links throughout this document are hereby incorporated, in entirety by reference herein, including over 1000 evidentiary links on the homepage at www.iviewit.tv with exhibits that contain thousands of pages of factual evidence[5].
The timeline will also reveal facts regarding the relationships between many of the Defendants in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and Warner Bros et al., including relations to the main perpetrator of the alleged crimes, the law firm Proskauer Rose.
*Note Warner Bros et al. relevant mergers, acquisitions and breakups to these matters in the timeline below are in bold italics.
1998-2002
Relevant Communications Between Iviewit and Warner Bros et al.
· 1998-2001
Inventions in Imaging and Video Discovered and Intellectual Property Filings begin in 1998. Proskauer Rose was retained Intellectual Property counsel for Iviewit for filing of Intellectual Properties.
· 2000-2002
Warner Bros et al. signs multiple Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements.
Non-Disclosure Agreements @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Confidentialities/confidentialities%20total.pdf
Pages 1-5, 10, 61-62, 80, 108-109, 234
· November 02, 2000 ~ Letter to GS regarding Warner Bros. Technological Calls to Iviewit Investors by Warner Bros. employees, describing the efficacy of the Inventions and the results of the review by Warner Bros., including the anticipated uses by Warner Bros et al.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20001101%20Goldman%20Friedstein%20Letter%20from%20Buchsbaum%20re%20AOLTW%20Colter%20meetings.pdf
· January 11, 2001 ~ America Online and Time Warner Complete Merger to Create AOL Time Warner
http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,668364,00.html
· February 08, 2001 ~ Letter from David J. Colter (“Colter”) ~ Vice President Technology - Technological Operations Warner Bros. to Founder of AOL, Ted Leonsis (“Leonsis”), regarding the efficacy of the Iviewit technologies.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010208%20Colter%20to%20Leonsis%20Warner%20Bros%20AOL.pdf
· February 15, 2001 EFFECTIVE DATE - Signed Warner Bros. License And Service Agreement @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010822%20-%20SIGNED%20Warner%20Bros%20Agreement%20AOL.pdf
August 15, 2001 Irell & Manella LLP Bills for Services for Warner Bros et al. and Sony Licensing Agreements @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Paul%20Allen/old%20patent/LEGAL/Irell%20&%20Manella/Bills/2001%2008%2029%20-%20Irell%20Bill.pdf
It is imperative for the SEC to note that after the Signed Licensing and Service Agreement, Iviewit opened a California Office inside a Warner Bros. building, in order to take over encoding operations for their online content, and more.
Iviewit began billing according to the Licensing and Service agreement. Please note the language in the Licensing and Service agreement pertaining to the Proprietary nature and Confidentiality of the Iviewit inventions.
Suddenly, after the agreements were signed and operations were underway, Wayne M. Smith ~ Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel at Warner Bros. began seeking a re-review of Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein ’s (“Rubenstein”) prior patent opinions regarding the Iviewit inventions to Warner Bros. employees.
Smith then claimed to Colter that he found problems while reviewing Rubenstein’s opinion with the patents on file at the US Patent Office[6]. At this point, allegedly, a coordinated conspiratorial effort between Smith, Rubenstein and others began to derail the already signed Iviewit agreements with Warner Bros et al.
Allegedly, former “Acting CEO” of Iviewit, P. Stephen Lamont, (a referral emanating from AOL’s Leonsis) Smith and Rubenstein then worked to derail the Licensing and Service Agreement. Warner Bros. then further attempted to deny the existence of this BINDING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION as further evidenced in letters exhibited herein, whereby the Signed and Binding agreement is wholly denied.
The amount owed in service fees since the signing of the contracts would be an enormous amount over the almost 10 years of use and where Warner Bros et al. have never notified Iviewit they were cancelling such contract, it may still be considered effective. Yet, it would difficult to cancel what one tries to deny the existence of and perhaps the reason no cancellation was formally completed.
o The emails forward from this point in the timeline begin to attempt to hide from the fact that Licensing and Service Agreements were already in place while also hiding these facts and liabilities from Shareholders and Auditors.
The alleged fraud may again have catastrophic effect on these highly traded stocks, reaching back to this point in time and possibly further back.
· April 04, 2001 Letter from Colter to William J. "Bill" Raduchel (“Raduchel”) ~ Chief Technology Officer and Executive Vice President at AOL. AOL’s Leonsis referred Raduchel to do further due diligence for an investment in the Iviewit companies, in addition to the Licensing and Encoding deal already signed.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010404%20Colter%20to%20Raduchel%20Leonsis%20referral%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
· May 25, 2001 Letters to and from Douglas Chey (“Chey”), Senior Vice President of Technology for Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment and Divisional CIO, Motion Pictures and Television Productions of Sony Pictures Entertainment. Chey, formerly with Warner Bros. was working with Iviewit at Sony (also under Signed Agreements) together with Warner to do a Five Studio Movie Download Project, Movielink, where the Iviewit inventions were to be the backbone enabling technologies to make digital download and streaming possible as a commercial endeavor.
Since that time, Warner Bros et al. and Sony have both done similar digital downloading projects, in violation of Signed Agreements with Iviewit.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010525%20Sony%20Doug%20Chey%20Endorsement%20of%20Tech%20and%20Advisory%20Board%20Option%20letter.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100120%20Douglas%20Chey%20Sony%20Bio.pdf
The SEC should also begin FORMAL INVESTIGATION of Sony’s involvement in these matters. Similar calls to those described herein to Warner Bros et al. for sound business discussions to attempt to alleviate shareholder liabilities have gone wholly ignored by Sony’s In House Counsel, Executives and Auditors.
I will be filing a more formal complaint shortly with the SEC but this should not delay immediate investigation by the SEC, in order to preclude Massive Liabilities to Shareholders of Sony.
The SEC and all other investigators and committees addressed herein, can take this Formal Complaint additionally as a FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SONY. ""
Source of Post and of Warner Bros SEC Complaint
jeffrey bewkes
Immediate Attention to TWX, AOL, Warner Brothers, and Time Inc. Shareholders. SEC Complaint Against AOL,TWX, Time Warner... Pay Attention.
Eliot Bernsteing of Iviewit Technologies Filed and SEC Complaint Regarding Time Warner, Jeffrey Bewkes, Wayne Smith and YOUR MONEY...
This Complaint Alleges and Seems to Prove Massive Shareholder Fraud, and Could Lead to a Total Financial Collapse of Time Warner and AOL.
"" Time Sensitive Urgency to this Complaint; Potential Catastrophic Effects to the Shareholders of Warner Bros et al.; Fraud could Trigger Rescissory Shareholder Rights
To further establish the urgency and Time Sensitive nature of this FORMAL COMPLAINT, please note that the criminal fraud and other crimes described herein will likely trigger Rescissory Rights of Shareholders at all of the respective and related companies of Warner Bros et al., which likely will have Catastrophic impact on both the companies and its Shareholders.
Therefore, the SEC must instantly investigate these matters and instantly bring the matters to the attention of the Warner Bros et al. Shareholders, Auditors, Financial Institutions and all other parties with potential liabilities resulting from the allegations herein and whereby if the companies and their Executives fail to notify Shareholders and Regulators, the SEC must act quickly to notify them.
The SEC must begin immediate investigation of the Securities Frauds described herein and prevent ongoing and future fraudulent corporate transactions from further harming Shareholders of Warner Bros et al.
Further, I point out to the SEC herein what looks like a recent pattern of Shareholder Fraud and Deceit done with Scienter, beginning on or about March 2009, by Officers, Directors, Counsel and Auditors for Warner Bros et al., which are alleged to have been done in order to commit further fraud upon the Warner Bros et al. Shareholders. That these recent corporate restructurings may be the result of Key Executives of Warner Bros et al. attempting to abscond with corporate assets through a series of recent complex corporate breakups.
The breakups began immediately after I contacted Warner Bros. in March 2009 with my business consultant Kevin Hall, Esq. (“Hall”), regarding massive unreported liabilities to their Shareholders[4].
Liabilities resulting from Warner Bros et. al’s involvement in my Twelve Count Twelve Trillion Dollar Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and additional liabilities resulting from the knowing infringement of my Intellectual Properties and for their failure to report these liabilities under FASB No.5 and other laws.
This Formal Complaint for Investigation of Warner Bros et al. on this day, Friday, February 12, 2010comes after Hall and I made repeated Good Faith attempts since March 2009 to address the Business and Corporate Responsibility issues with Executives, Officers, Board Members and Auditors at the respective companies.
Warner Bros et al. was contacted in order to find possible solutions to avoid catastrophic events from occurring to their Shareholders, if possible, prior to further actions with investigators, including the SEC.
The following timeline of events will establish the correlations between the allegations of fraud described herein, in relation to the timing of the corporate restructurings of Warner Bros et al. Correlations in time with both the 2001 merger and now in the 2009 breakup with the frauds described herein, will provide the SEC a basis, mired in factual evidence, to begin immediate investigation of this complaint for massive securities fraud, in order to protect Shareholders from further possible related losses in these highly traded blue chip stocks. ""
Full Warner Brothers, Jeffrey Bewkes SEC Complaint Click Here
Who is Looking out for AOL and Warner Brothers Shareholders? Well we know it is not Mary Schapiro of the SEC.
This Complaint Alleges and Seems to Prove Massive Shareholder Fraud, and Could Lead to a Total Financial Collapse of Time Warner and AOL.
"" Time Sensitive Urgency to this Complaint; Potential Catastrophic Effects to the Shareholders of Warner Bros et al.; Fraud could Trigger Rescissory Shareholder Rights
To further establish the urgency and Time Sensitive nature of this FORMAL COMPLAINT, please note that the criminal fraud and other crimes described herein will likely trigger Rescissory Rights of Shareholders at all of the respective and related companies of Warner Bros et al., which likely will have Catastrophic impact on both the companies and its Shareholders.
Therefore, the SEC must instantly investigate these matters and instantly bring the matters to the attention of the Warner Bros et al. Shareholders, Auditors, Financial Institutions and all other parties with potential liabilities resulting from the allegations herein and whereby if the companies and their Executives fail to notify Shareholders and Regulators, the SEC must act quickly to notify them.
The SEC must begin immediate investigation of the Securities Frauds described herein and prevent ongoing and future fraudulent corporate transactions from further harming Shareholders of Warner Bros et al.
Further, I point out to the SEC herein what looks like a recent pattern of Shareholder Fraud and Deceit done with Scienter, beginning on or about March 2009, by Officers, Directors, Counsel and Auditors for Warner Bros et al., which are alleged to have been done in order to commit further fraud upon the Warner Bros et al. Shareholders. That these recent corporate restructurings may be the result of Key Executives of Warner Bros et al. attempting to abscond with corporate assets through a series of recent complex corporate breakups.
The breakups began immediately after I contacted Warner Bros. in March 2009 with my business consultant Kevin Hall, Esq. (“Hall”), regarding massive unreported liabilities to their Shareholders[4].
Liabilities resulting from Warner Bros et. al’s involvement in my Twelve Count Twelve Trillion Dollar Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and additional liabilities resulting from the knowing infringement of my Intellectual Properties and for their failure to report these liabilities under FASB No.5 and other laws.
This Formal Complaint for Investigation of Warner Bros et al. on this day, Friday, February 12, 2010comes after Hall and I made repeated Good Faith attempts since March 2009 to address the Business and Corporate Responsibility issues with Executives, Officers, Board Members and Auditors at the respective companies.
Warner Bros et al. was contacted in order to find possible solutions to avoid catastrophic events from occurring to their Shareholders, if possible, prior to further actions with investigators, including the SEC.
The following timeline of events will establish the correlations between the allegations of fraud described herein, in relation to the timing of the corporate restructurings of Warner Bros et al. Correlations in time with both the 2001 merger and now in the 2009 breakup with the frauds described herein, will provide the SEC a basis, mired in factual evidence, to begin immediate investigation of this complaint for massive securities fraud, in order to protect Shareholders from further possible related losses in these highly traded blue chip stocks. ""
Full Warner Brothers, Jeffrey Bewkes SEC Complaint Click Here
Who is Looking out for AOL and Warner Brothers Shareholders? Well we know it is not Mary Schapiro of the SEC.
Iviewit Founder and Inventor Eliot Bernstein Files SEC Complaint on Trillion Dollar Patent Liability.
Proskauer Rose Named in SEC Complaint
" April 27, 1999 letter from Richard R. Rosman, Esq. to Hassan Miah regarding the Iviewit inventions and Proskauer Rose Partner Rubenstein’s opinion on the technologies. Note that Rubenstein and Miah know each other through MPEG and Miah’s former employer XING. Immediately after learning of the Iviewit inventions, Miah sold XING to Real Networks as indicated above.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/1999%2004%2026%20Wheeler%20Letter%20to%20Rosman%20re%20Rubenstein%20opinion.pdf "
Click here for SEC Complaint Naming Proskaur Rose LLP
" This FORMAL OFFICIAL COMPLAINT is filed with the Official SEC Complaint Intake Email Address: enforcement@sec.gov & CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov and also filed with all investigators or committees the letter is addressed to, please make this Formal Complaint a part of all ongoing investigations or committees’ records regarding Iviewit companies and Eliot I, Bernstein, Inventor.
Re: Official Formal Complaint sent by Official SEC Email and Official Email Addresses to Other Investigatory Agencies and Committees addressed herein, Against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc. and Time Warner, regarding Trillion Dollar alleged fraud on Shareholders; FASB No. 5 and other SEC, accounting violations and Violations of State, Federal and International Laws; Rescissory rights of Shareholders; Evidence and Important Information for the SEC regarding ongoing SEC Investigations of Bernard L. Madoff, Marc S. Dreier, Allen Stanford, Proskauer Rose, Galleon Enron Broadband, Enron, Arthur Andersen, and more.
Complaint filed against, including but not limited to;
Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. Chairman and CEO: Barry M. Meyer; President and COO: Alan F. Horn; EVP and CFO: Edward A. Romano; Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel: Wayne M. Smith
AOL, Inc. Chairman and CEO: Tim Armstrong; General Counsel and Executive Vice President, Corporate Development: Ira Parker; Assistant General Counsel - Patent Litigation, Prosecution, and Licensing: Christopher Day; Executive Escalation Team: Jerry McKinley
Time Warner, Inc. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer: Jeffrey L. Bewkes; Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Time Warner Inc.: Paul T. Cappuccio "
Source of Post and Full SEC Complaint Click HERE
Where is Mary Schapiro ?
Posted Here by Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
" April 27, 1999 letter from Richard R. Rosman, Esq. to Hassan Miah regarding the Iviewit inventions and Proskauer Rose Partner Rubenstein’s opinion on the technologies. Note that Rubenstein and Miah know each other through MPEG and Miah’s former employer XING. Immediately after learning of the Iviewit inventions, Miah sold XING to Real Networks as indicated above.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/1999%2004%2026%20Wheeler%20Letter%20to%20Rosman%20re%20Rubenstein%20opinion.pdf "
Click here for SEC Complaint Naming Proskaur Rose LLP
" This FORMAL OFFICIAL COMPLAINT is filed with the Official SEC Complaint Intake Email Address: enforcement@sec.gov & CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov and also filed with all investigators or committees the letter is addressed to, please make this Formal Complaint a part of all ongoing investigations or committees’ records regarding Iviewit companies and Eliot I, Bernstein, Inventor.
Re: Official Formal Complaint sent by Official SEC Email and Official Email Addresses to Other Investigatory Agencies and Committees addressed herein, Against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc. and Time Warner, regarding Trillion Dollar alleged fraud on Shareholders; FASB No. 5 and other SEC, accounting violations and Violations of State, Federal and International Laws; Rescissory rights of Shareholders; Evidence and Important Information for the SEC regarding ongoing SEC Investigations of Bernard L. Madoff, Marc S. Dreier, Allen Stanford, Proskauer Rose, Galleon Enron Broadband, Enron, Arthur Andersen, and more.
Complaint filed against, including but not limited to;
Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. Chairman and CEO: Barry M. Meyer; President and COO: Alan F. Horn; EVP and CFO: Edward A. Romano; Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel: Wayne M. Smith
AOL, Inc. Chairman and CEO: Tim Armstrong; General Counsel and Executive Vice President, Corporate Development: Ira Parker; Assistant General Counsel - Patent Litigation, Prosecution, and Licensing: Christopher Day; Executive Escalation Team: Jerry McKinley
Time Warner, Inc. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer: Jeffrey L. Bewkes; Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Time Warner Inc.: Paul T. Cappuccio "
Source of Post and Full SEC Complaint Click HERE
Where is Mary Schapiro ?
Posted Here by Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Friday, February 12, 2010
Time Warner SEC Fraud? Was the AOL Spin OFF Fraud? Why is TWX Hiding the Iviewit Liability?
Who Was sent a Copy of the SEC - FBI Complaint against Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.,AOL ?
What Will the People Who received Eliot Bernstein's Complaint Do with it?
Below is a link to an FBI - SEC Complaint about AOL and Time Warner, there are over a Thousand Documents of Proof at www.iViewit.TV and years pile on top of years and NO One seems to be paying attention or they are paid to deliberate look away, deny due process, and stall justice. What Will the Folks Below Do about the Blatant Shareholder Fraud in the Link Below, Will they ALL dismiss it as Nothing?
Like they did with Madoff, with Standford and as Time Warner Inc. has blatantly done for all the YEARS they have ignored the HUGE Liability that Iviewit has brought to their attention time after time ?
Click Here for the FBI, SEC Complaint against
Warner Bros. Entertainment, AOL. Inc. , Time Warner Inc.
Below is a List of Who NOW For Sure Knows about this Trillion Dollar Shareholder Liability .. the Question is Will Anybody Do Anything..?
With this Request:
"" To all addressed parties in the TO field of the Email,
Please take this Formal Written Complaint and immediately begin formal investigative procedures and docket this complaint as such.
If you are already investigating the Iviewit matters, please include this complaint in your ongoing file for the Iviewit companies complaint and those of Inventor, Eliot I. Bernstein.
I have attached a signed PDF file that is fingerprinted as the formal complaint to docket and have attached a Word document unsigned and unprinted for reading convenience only and to access the hyperlinked exhibits with greater ease.
Due to Whistleblower allegations of document destruction regarding prior complaints filed with certain departments, as evidenced in the complaint, please print each and every exhibit referenced via URL’s in the attached document as part of the permanent record to this complaint.
As these matters and investigations are part of an ongoing US Patent Office investigation and central to protecting the inventors’ rights please maintain this Formal Complaint and all Exhibits for a period of no less than twenty years or until the issues have been fully resolved by all investigatory agencies and courts worldwide.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me directly, my personal contact information below.
Please confirm receipt of this message and all attachments, formally docket the complaint and please note to sign the conflict of interest disclosure embedded in the document as Exhibit 2, prior to any action on your part.
Thank you in advance for your time, effort and consideration of the Time Sensitive Matters ~ Eliot Bernstein "
The Honorable President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama II (president@whitehouse.gov);
Mary L. Schapiro, Chairman @ U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov);
Enforcement @ U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (enforcement@sec.gov);
H. David Kotz ~ Inspector General @ Securities Exchange Commission Inspector General Office (oig@sec.gov);
The Honorable Glenn Fine - Inspector General Department of Justice; The Honorable Glenn Fine ~ Inspector General @ United States Department of Justice (glenn.a.fine@usdoj.gov); The Honorable Madam Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (sf.nancy@mail.house.gov); The Honorable Shira A. Scheindlin @ United States District Court ~ Southern District of New York (shira_a._scheindlin@NYSD.uscourts.gov);
The Honorable Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General @ US DOJ (inspector.general@usdoj.gov);
The Honorable Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General @ US DOJ (AskDOJ@usdoj.gov); Miami Division @ Federal Bureau of Investigation (Miami@ic.fbi.gov);
The Honorable John Conyers Jr. (D-MI 14th) - Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee (john.conyers@mail.house.gov);
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (Complaints@tigta.treas.gov);
David Gouvaia @ Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (david.gouvaia@tigta.treas.gov); Daniel O'Rourke - Small Business Administration Inspector General Office;
The Honorable Inspector General Todd J. Zinser @ Department of Commerce (TZinser@OIG.DOC.GOV);
David Kappos ~ Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO (david.kappos@USPTO.gov);
Sharon Barner ~ Deputy Director @ United States Patent & Trademark Office (sharon.barner@uspto.gov);
Harry I. Moatz ~ Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office - Office of Enrollment & Discipline; Mail Stop OED-Ethics Rules (ethicsrules.comments@uspto.gov);
'sampson@senate.state.ny.us'; 'onorato@senate.state.ny.us'; 'schneiderman@schneiderman.org'; 'schneiderman@senate.state.ny.us';
'hassellt@senate.state.ny.us'; 'diaz@senate.state.ny.us'; 'jdklein@senate.state.ny.us';
'eadams@senate.state.ny.us'; 'espada@senate.state.ny.us'; 'breslin@senate.state.ny.us';
'dilan@senate.state.ny.us'; 'savino@senate.state.ny.us'; 'perkins@senate.state.ny.us';
'maziarz@senate.state.ny.us'; 'jdefranc@senate.state.ny.us';
'volker@senate.state.ny.us';
'saland@senate.state.ny.us'; '
lavalle@senate.state.ny.us'; 'bonacic@senate.state.ny.us';
'winner@senate.state.ny.us'; '
nozzolio@senate.state.ny.us'; 'lanza@senate.state.ny.us';
'ranz@senate.state.ny.us';
Timothy Spotts Esq. ~ Counsel @ Senate Standing Committeeon the Judiciary (spotts@senate.state.ny.us)
Frank Brady @ Expose Corrupt Courts (CorruptCourts@gmail.com);
Rachel Maddow @ MSNBC (rachel@msnbc.com);
Michael Moore (mike@michaelmoore.com)
More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case at
www.DeniedPatent.com and www.iViewit.TV
They will NEVER be able to Say that they DID not KNOW the HUGE Liability that AOL and Time Warner Put onto their Shareholders, and have SEEMINGLY concealled for a VERY long time... More on the Warner Brothers Blatant Ignoring of this Liability at www.JeffreyBewkes.com .
What Will the People Who received Eliot Bernstein's Complaint Do with it?
Below is a link to an FBI - SEC Complaint about AOL and Time Warner, there are over a Thousand Documents of Proof at www.iViewit.TV and years pile on top of years and NO One seems to be paying attention or they are paid to deliberate look away, deny due process, and stall justice. What Will the Folks Below Do about the Blatant Shareholder Fraud in the Link Below, Will they ALL dismiss it as Nothing?
Like they did with Madoff, with Standford and as Time Warner Inc. has blatantly done for all the YEARS they have ignored the HUGE Liability that Iviewit has brought to their attention time after time ?
Click Here for the FBI, SEC Complaint against
Warner Bros. Entertainment, AOL. Inc. , Time Warner Inc.
Below is a List of Who NOW For Sure Knows about this Trillion Dollar Shareholder Liability .. the Question is Will Anybody Do Anything..?
With this Request:
"" To all addressed parties in the TO field of the Email,
Please take this Formal Written Complaint and immediately begin formal investigative procedures and docket this complaint as such.
If you are already investigating the Iviewit matters, please include this complaint in your ongoing file for the Iviewit companies complaint and those of Inventor, Eliot I. Bernstein.
I have attached a signed PDF file that is fingerprinted as the formal complaint to docket and have attached a Word document unsigned and unprinted for reading convenience only and to access the hyperlinked exhibits with greater ease.
Due to Whistleblower allegations of document destruction regarding prior complaints filed with certain departments, as evidenced in the complaint, please print each and every exhibit referenced via URL’s in the attached document as part of the permanent record to this complaint.
As these matters and investigations are part of an ongoing US Patent Office investigation and central to protecting the inventors’ rights please maintain this Formal Complaint and all Exhibits for a period of no less than twenty years or until the issues have been fully resolved by all investigatory agencies and courts worldwide.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me directly, my personal contact information below.
Please confirm receipt of this message and all attachments, formally docket the complaint and please note to sign the conflict of interest disclosure embedded in the document as Exhibit 2, prior to any action on your part.
Thank you in advance for your time, effort and consideration of the Time Sensitive Matters ~ Eliot Bernstein "
The Honorable President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama II (president@whitehouse.gov);
Mary L. Schapiro, Chairman @ U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov);
Enforcement @ U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (enforcement@sec.gov);
H. David Kotz ~ Inspector General @ Securities Exchange Commission Inspector General Office (oig@sec.gov);
The Honorable Glenn Fine - Inspector General Department of Justice; The Honorable Glenn Fine ~ Inspector General @ United States Department of Justice (glenn.a.fine@usdoj.gov); The Honorable Madam Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (sf.nancy@mail.house.gov); The Honorable Shira A. Scheindlin @ United States District Court ~ Southern District of New York (shira_a._scheindlin@NYSD.uscourts.gov);
The Honorable Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General @ US DOJ (inspector.general@usdoj.gov);
The Honorable Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General @ US DOJ (AskDOJ@usdoj.gov); Miami Division @ Federal Bureau of Investigation (Miami@ic.fbi.gov);
The Honorable John Conyers Jr. (D-MI 14th) - Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee (john.conyers@mail.house.gov);
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (Complaints@tigta.treas.gov);
David Gouvaia @ Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (david.gouvaia@tigta.treas.gov); Daniel O'Rourke - Small Business Administration Inspector General Office;
The Honorable Inspector General Todd J. Zinser @ Department of Commerce (TZinser@OIG.DOC.GOV);
David Kappos ~ Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO (david.kappos@USPTO.gov);
Sharon Barner ~ Deputy Director @ United States Patent & Trademark Office (sharon.barner@uspto.gov);
Harry I. Moatz ~ Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office - Office of Enrollment & Discipline; Mail Stop OED-Ethics Rules (ethicsrules.comments@uspto.gov);
'sampson@senate.state.ny.us'; 'onorato@senate.state.ny.us'; 'schneiderman@schneiderman.org'; 'schneiderman@senate.state.ny.us';
'hassellt@senate.state.ny.us'; 'diaz@senate.state.ny.us'; 'jdklein@senate.state.ny.us';
'eadams@senate.state.ny.us'; 'espada@senate.state.ny.us'; 'breslin@senate.state.ny.us';
'dilan@senate.state.ny.us'; 'savino@senate.state.ny.us'; 'perkins@senate.state.ny.us';
'maziarz@senate.state.ny.us'; 'jdefranc@senate.state.ny.us';
'volker@senate.state.ny.us';
'saland@senate.state.ny.us'; '
lavalle@senate.state.ny.us'; 'bonacic@senate.state.ny.us';
'winner@senate.state.ny.us'; '
nozzolio@senate.state.ny.us'; 'lanza@senate.state.ny.us';
'ranz@senate.state.ny.us';
Timothy Spotts Esq. ~ Counsel @ Senate Standing Committeeon the Judiciary (spotts@senate.state.ny.us)
Frank Brady @ Expose Corrupt Courts (CorruptCourts@gmail.com);
Rachel Maddow @ MSNBC (rachel@msnbc.com);
Michael Moore (mike@michaelmoore.com)
More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case at
www.DeniedPatent.com and www.iViewit.TV
They will NEVER be able to Say that they DID not KNOW the HUGE Liability that AOL and Time Warner Put onto their Shareholders, and have SEEMINGLY concealled for a VERY long time... More on the Warner Brothers Blatant Ignoring of this Liability at www.JeffreyBewkes.com .
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Eliot Bernstein - Iviewit Technologies Reporting Stephen Lamont to the New York Attorney General
on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case
posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
To Steven Michael Cohen
Counselor and Chief of Staff
New York Attorney General
Dated: June 18th, 2009
Re: First Department Obstruction of Justice
Letter to Steven M. Cohen, NYAG
From Eliot I. Bernstein Founder and Inventor
I~view~it Technologies, INC
I~view~it Holdings,Inc
This Letter is About Obstruction of Justice, Conflicts of Interest and More.. This Letter to the NYAG also includes information on Eliot Bernstein, Founder and One of the Inventors of the Iviewit Technologies Inc. - Complaining to the NYAG that Stephen Lamont has been requested to cease making representations of behalf of Iviewit and its Share Holders... Read FULL Document Below - and Decide the Truth for Yourself.
Click Here for Document
Counselor and Chief of Staff
New York Attorney General
Dated: June 18th, 2009
Re: First Department Obstruction of Justice
Letter to Steven M. Cohen, NYAG
From Eliot I. Bernstein Founder and Inventor
I~view~it Technologies, INC
I~view~it Holdings,Inc
This Letter is About Obstruction of Justice, Conflicts of Interest and More.. This Letter to the NYAG also includes information on Eliot Bernstein, Founder and One of the Inventors of the Iviewit Technologies Inc. - Complaining to the NYAG that Stephen Lamont has been requested to cease making representations of behalf of Iviewit and its Share Holders... Read FULL Document Below - and Decide the Truth for Yourself.
Click Here for Document
posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Industry Whistleblower
More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent at
Senator John L. Sampson - US Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit - Anderson v The State of New York
US Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit - Anderson v The State of NewYork, et al.
Letter from Eliot I. Bernstein, Founder and Inventor - I-view-it Technologies to Senator John L. Sampson Chairman and to ALL members of the New York Judiciary Committe.
Oct. 2009
Click Here for the Document
... US Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit (07cv09599)
Anderson v The State of New York, et al.
Criminal Allegations Requiring
Senator John L. Sampson's Immediate Attention.
In Judge Shira A. Scheindlin's US Federal Court
Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson Reveals
a "Cleaner", Naomi Goldstein, at the
New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
First Department ETHICS Committee allegedly
Whitewashing Complaints for US Attorneys, DA's and more,
Inventor Eliot Bernstein's Family Minivan Bombed in US
Patent Office Fraud files Twelve Trillion Dollar RICO Suit legally "related"
by Judge Scheindlin to the Whistleblower case (08-4873-cv US Court of
Appeals Second Circuit) and US District Court (07cv11196).
Where was the Press through all this, the Right Arm of Anarchy, not a single
report in over five years regarding a Car Bombing so powerful it blew up
three cars next to it in Boynton Beach Florida and not a single press story?
Where was the Press for the Whistleblower revelations of Whitewashing of
Complaints by the New York Supreme Court for US Attorneys and District
Attorneys, a Cleaner at the Ethics Department that regulates Wall Street
Lawyers? ....
more at www.Iviewit.TV and at
www.DeniedPatent.com
Crystal L. Cox
Letter from Eliot I. Bernstein, Founder and Inventor - I-view-it Technologies to Senator John L. Sampson Chairman and to ALL members of the New York Judiciary Committe.
Oct. 2009
Click Here for the Document
... US Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit (07cv09599)
Anderson v The State of New York, et al.
Criminal Allegations Requiring
Senator John L. Sampson's Immediate Attention.
In Judge Shira A. Scheindlin's US Federal Court
Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson Reveals
a "Cleaner", Naomi Goldstein, at the
New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
First Department ETHICS Committee allegedly
Whitewashing Complaints for US Attorneys, DA's and more,
Inventor Eliot Bernstein's Family Minivan Bombed in US
Patent Office Fraud files Twelve Trillion Dollar RICO Suit legally "related"
by Judge Scheindlin to the Whistleblower case (08-4873-cv US Court of
Appeals Second Circuit) and US District Court (07cv11196).
Where was the Press through all this, the Right Arm of Anarchy, not a single
report in over five years regarding a Car Bombing so powerful it blew up
three cars next to it in Boynton Beach Florida and not a single press story?
Where was the Press for the Whistleblower revelations of Whitewashing of
Complaints by the New York Supreme Court for US Attorneys and District
Attorneys, a Cleaner at the Ethics Department that regulates Wall Street
Lawyers? ....
more at www.Iviewit.TV and at
www.DeniedPatent.com
Crystal L. Cox
Iviewit Stolen Patent Case - Need to Know More about Iviewit Technologies and Who has the authority to do What?
Internal Iviewit Document ... Proskauer Rose LLP, Christopher Wheeler - Proskauer Rose Attorney, Billing, Incorporation, Investment and Shareholder information and well, a Mega Need to Know Document... to help you to understand WHO has the authority to do what in regard to and on behalf of the Iviewit Company ... who billed what to whom and ... well, Lot's of Information.
Click Here for Document
Click Here for Document
it is Rather Large - Give it a Few ... to Load..
Posted by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Michael Prieto Ex-CEO sues Bell over firing - Bell Helicopter Textron Inc
Friday, October 23, 2009
" The former CEO of a unit of Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. is alleging he was fired because he refused to do what would have been tantamount to committing criminal acts by stopping his investigation into whether the company had dealt fraudulently in its contracts with the federal government, according to court documents.
Michael Prieto, who ran Bedford-based Bell Aerospace Services Inc. from 2004 until his dismissal last year, charges in a suit filed in state district court in Tarrant County that he was looking into “mischarging” on government contracts when he was let go on June 5, 2008.
He is seeking unspecified monetary damages, including lost compensation, benefits and punitive damages, the lawsuit says.
Prieto’s suit does not go into detail about the company’s alleged fraud. But court records show that Prieto is seeking documents from the federal government through the Freedom of Information Act concerning certain investigations and audits involving a unit of Bell Aerospace called US Helicopter.
Named as defendants in Prieto’s lawsuit are Bell Aerospace, Fort Worth-based Bell Helicopter and their corporate parent, Rhode Island’s Textron Inc.
All three defendants have denied wrongdoing in court records. A spokesman for all three of those businesses declined to comment.
Outside experts say Prieto’s suit is unusual because high-ranking company officials rarely let this kind of dispute go public, let alone become the focus of a lawsuit and the unwanted attention that follows.
In a related development, Bell Aerospace is going to court in an attempt to stop the aeronautical systems division of the federal Defense Contract Management Agency from releasing to Prieto’s attorneys records related to “investigations” into unspecified contracts with a division of Bell Aerospace from the last three years.
Prieto’s attorneys at Dallas’ Gillespie, Rozen and Watsky sought those records under the federal Freedom of Information Act, along with “any audits that revealed potential mischarging on government contracts,” Bell’s lawsuit said.
Filed earlier this month in federal district court in Fort Worth, Bell’s suit said the records in question contain “trade secrets and/or confidential commercial information” that would harm the business if released under the FOIA.
According to a resume Prieto posted online, Bell Aerospace had 700 employees and $110 million in revenue when he was there.
In his lawsuit, Prieto — who now runs a management consultancy called Leading Edge Associates Inc. — says that in November 2004 he was
“hired in the wake of compliance and ethics violations at (Bell Aerospace) and Bell Helicopter. The previous president and two directors were demoted for compliance and ethics violations on (federal) contracts.”
Textron has paid fines for not following the letter of government contracts before.
In 2005, a Bell Helicopter subsidiary called Edwards and Associates paid the government $15 million after being accused of “defective pricing” on a federal contract. And, in 2007, Textron paid a $4.6 million fine to the federal government to absolve its role in issues related to the broader United Nations Oil-for-Food program scandal.
Prieto’s own purported probe into issues at Bell Aero started in April 2008, when he claims to have “uncovered potential fraud and ethics violations” of an unspecified nature, according to court documents.
As he tried to do his investigation, court records state he ran into a problem with senior Bell Helicopter executives who, according to Prieto’s suit, were doing a separate investigation.
For instance, Lee Tait, senior vice president quality and chief compliance officer at Bell Helicopter, told Prieto in a May 12, 2008 e-mail that it was “inappropriate and unnecessary for you to be conducting any ancillary investigation. (A)nd if you are so doing, I must ask you to immediately cease,” court records say.
Tait, who is not a defendant in Prieto’s Lawsuit, could not be reached for comment.
Prieto’s lawsuit maintains that he felt Tait had “attempted to placate and intimidate him, keep him quiet and inactive on any real investigation, and to pressure him to cover up fraud against the government of the United States.”
Prieto decided to do his own probe because Tait and Bell Helicopter “were either doing no investigation, failing to conduct a proper investigation, and/or were dragging their feet and delaying any investigation,” court documents allege. He also felt that if he failed to do a “real” inquiry, “he would be committing a criminal act,” court records say. "
Source of Post:
http://dallas.bizjournals.com/dallas/stories/2009/10/26/story3.html?b=1256529600%5E2309841
If you Have any Information on Textron Businesses, Textron Inc., Bell Helicopter Textron Inc or why they may be searching my sites on the Iviewit Stolen Patent as it relates to P. Stephen Lamont, On the Petters Bankruptcy or any information as to the Firing of Michael Prieto - President & CEO of Bell Aerospace Services ... Please Email Me, Crystal L. Cox - Investigative Blogger at Crystal@CrystalCox.com ...
Crystal L. Cox
IndustryWhistleblower
" The former CEO of a unit of Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. is alleging he was fired because he refused to do what would have been tantamount to committing criminal acts by stopping his investigation into whether the company had dealt fraudulently in its contracts with the federal government, according to court documents.
Michael Prieto, who ran Bedford-based Bell Aerospace Services Inc. from 2004 until his dismissal last year, charges in a suit filed in state district court in Tarrant County that he was looking into “mischarging” on government contracts when he was let go on June 5, 2008.
He is seeking unspecified monetary damages, including lost compensation, benefits and punitive damages, the lawsuit says.
Prieto’s suit does not go into detail about the company’s alleged fraud. But court records show that Prieto is seeking documents from the federal government through the Freedom of Information Act concerning certain investigations and audits involving a unit of Bell Aerospace called US Helicopter.
Named as defendants in Prieto’s lawsuit are Bell Aerospace, Fort Worth-based Bell Helicopter and their corporate parent, Rhode Island’s Textron Inc.
All three defendants have denied wrongdoing in court records. A spokesman for all three of those businesses declined to comment.
Outside experts say Prieto’s suit is unusual because high-ranking company officials rarely let this kind of dispute go public, let alone become the focus of a lawsuit and the unwanted attention that follows.
In a related development, Bell Aerospace is going to court in an attempt to stop the aeronautical systems division of the federal Defense Contract Management Agency from releasing to Prieto’s attorneys records related to “investigations” into unspecified contracts with a division of Bell Aerospace from the last three years.
Prieto’s attorneys at Dallas’ Gillespie, Rozen and Watsky sought those records under the federal Freedom of Information Act, along with “any audits that revealed potential mischarging on government contracts,” Bell’s lawsuit said.
Filed earlier this month in federal district court in Fort Worth, Bell’s suit said the records in question contain “trade secrets and/or confidential commercial information” that would harm the business if released under the FOIA.
According to a resume Prieto posted online, Bell Aerospace had 700 employees and $110 million in revenue when he was there.
In his lawsuit, Prieto — who now runs a management consultancy called Leading Edge Associates Inc. — says that in November 2004 he was
“hired in the wake of compliance and ethics violations at (Bell Aerospace) and Bell Helicopter. The previous president and two directors were demoted for compliance and ethics violations on (federal) contracts.”
Textron has paid fines for not following the letter of government contracts before.
In 2005, a Bell Helicopter subsidiary called Edwards and Associates paid the government $15 million after being accused of “defective pricing” on a federal contract. And, in 2007, Textron paid a $4.6 million fine to the federal government to absolve its role in issues related to the broader United Nations Oil-for-Food program scandal.
Prieto’s own purported probe into issues at Bell Aero started in April 2008, when he claims to have “uncovered potential fraud and ethics violations” of an unspecified nature, according to court documents.
As he tried to do his investigation, court records state he ran into a problem with senior Bell Helicopter executives who, according to Prieto’s suit, were doing a separate investigation.
For instance, Lee Tait, senior vice president quality and chief compliance officer at Bell Helicopter, told Prieto in a May 12, 2008 e-mail that it was “inappropriate and unnecessary for you to be conducting any ancillary investigation. (A)nd if you are so doing, I must ask you to immediately cease,” court records say.
Tait, who is not a defendant in Prieto’s Lawsuit, could not be reached for comment.
Prieto’s lawsuit maintains that he felt Tait had “attempted to placate and intimidate him, keep him quiet and inactive on any real investigation, and to pressure him to cover up fraud against the government of the United States.”
Prieto decided to do his own probe because Tait and Bell Helicopter “were either doing no investigation, failing to conduct a proper investigation, and/or were dragging their feet and delaying any investigation,” court documents allege. He also felt that if he failed to do a “real” inquiry, “he would be committing a criminal act,” court records say. "
Source of Post:
http://dallas.bizjournals.com/dallas/stories/2009/10/26/story3.html?b=1256529600%5E2309841
If you Have any Information on Textron Businesses, Textron Inc., Bell Helicopter Textron Inc or why they may be searching my sites on the Iviewit Stolen Patent as it relates to P. Stephen Lamont, On the Petters Bankruptcy or any information as to the Firing of Michael Prieto - President & CEO of Bell Aerospace Services ... Please Email Me, Crystal L. Cox - Investigative Blogger at Crystal@CrystalCox.com ...
Crystal L. Cox
IndustryWhistleblower
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Was Mary Shapiro - SEC Chairman a KNOWN Risk to Investors and Shareholders - What in Mary Shapiro's past SHOULD have been a Red Flag?
Securities and Exchange Commission - News Archives
"" [The Financial Meltdown]
President-elect Barack Obama's choice of Mary Schapiro as Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission may go down as his worst appointment.
Schapiro, in her capacity as President of NASD Regulation and later CEO of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), was directly responsible for ensuring that Bernie Madoff's firm, BLM Securities, obeyed federal securities laws.
Schapiro in her capacity as Commissioner and acting-Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission and later as President of NASD Regulation, has covered up more violations of federal securities law than Madoff has violated.
And yes, Bernie Madoff pulled off his scam when Schapiro was President of NASD Regulation and Chairperson of FINRA, which regulates NASD!
Schapiro never investigated Madoff, probably because Madoff was a powerful individual, a former Chairman of NASD.
I’m privy to this information because I was a trader on Wall Street many years ago. Beginning in 1991 I had written to Steven Lister, Senior Vice President of Compliance at the American Stock Exchange (AMEX).
I requested that, as a former member of the American Stock Exchange, I be granted access to my records.
The American Stock Exchange never replied.
Whenever I saw Lister, I asked him when he would grant me access to my records, Lister would simply state: "No."
Little background. Members of the board of AMEX had told other members that I had been evicted from AMEX for refusing to pass through a metal detector; in reality I had exposed the fact that another member of the Board had been apprehended with an unregistered pistol after he went through metal detectors at AMEX. I wanted to see whether the false information about me was in my AMEX files.
On July 26, 1993, I wrote to Mary Schapiro and requested that the Securities and Exchange Commission order the American Stock Exchange to permit me access to my files after Lister again refused to grant me access to my records. Of course this is a violation of federal securities laws, but that did not matter to Schapiro.
And SEC attorney, GayLa D. Sessoms, in a letter dated August 23, 1993 claimed "the Commission does not have the authority to compel the AMEX to produce records to you."
Schapiro knew that AMEX was a hotbed of illegal activity by the Italian Mafia-but Schapiro always looked to greener pastures.
I did not expect this lack of support from Schapiro. After all, I executed orders for Frost & Sullivan, a trading firm, on the floor of the AMEX.
When the inside trading scandal in Motel 6 was exposed –a foreign company was planning to bid on Motel 6, which was a nationwide chain of budget motels, but the information leaked and Frost & Sullivan traded illegally on it— I was investigated by the SEC.
I was the only individual who was connected to the three firms involved in this insider trading scandal that did not trade on Motel 6 insider information and thereby profit illegally. I was also the only individual who possessed knowledge of the extent of the insider trading in Motel 6 who was not subpoenaed by the SEC.
Why? Because according to Joseph Greenwald, a trader with another firm, who pleaded guilty to insider trading in Motel 6, James Breeden, at the time Chairman of the SEC, and Mary Schapiro, who was then an SEC Commissioner, had ordered the SEC to limit the scope of the investigation. The intent was to protect senior members of the AMEX and Bear Stearns who had knowledge of the Motel 6 insider information.
On September 13, 1993 I met with Assistant United States Attorney Frances Fragos (who later, as Frances Fragos-Townsend was to become George W. Bush’s Homeland Security adviser) at 1 Saint Andrew Plaza, in Manhattan, to discuss the Italian Mafia's penetration of the AMEX; the insider trading scandal in Motel 6; payoffs to AMEX Compliance Attorneys by the Italian Mafia; payoffs by the Italian Mafia to members of the Board of the American Stock Exchange; the theft of $500,000 by a vice president of the AMEX; the stock fraud at a company named PNF; involvement of members of the Board of the AMEX in the stock fraud at PNF; and, a host of other crimes.
I had first approached the FBI to expose these crimes and the agency then arranged for me to meet with Frances Fragos.
(When I showed Fragos the letter from Sessoms, she told me that Sessoms had lied and that in fact the SEC had the authority to order the AMEX to grant me access to my records.
I was convinced that the SEC and AMEX knew that once I obtained my records, I could have forced investigations that would have exposed other major crimes; yet I needed my records as a launching point).
Of course the SEC had powers over the AMEX.
For example, in 1977 the AMEX gave mild disciplinary sanctions against about 20 members for posting fictitious options trades.
The SEC overruled the AMEX disciplinary actions and suspended the 20 or so members of the AMEX involved in this fraud, including future members of the Board of the AMEX, such as William Silver, Louis Miceli, and Robert VanCaneghan..
In 1995 when Schapiro was a Commissioner of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a huge illegal trading scandal erupted at the AMEX.
Pat Schettino, a rogue trader and managing director of Spear Leeds and Kellogg, falsified trades; marked options positions; produced fictitious trading records; stole money from AMEX members; violated the net capital rule (the type of offense for which Ivan Boesky later went to prison); and, even entered trades at fictitious prices.
When I wrote numerous letters to the SEC and members of the Board of the AMEX about Schettino's illegal trading, he hired Eric Levine, an attorney at Proskauer Rose and sued me for defamation. The SEC did nothing; even after I had written to the SEC, including Schapiro, about Schettino's massive illegal trading.
By taking no action, the SEC countenanced Schettino's actions against me. The AMEX delayed investigating Schettino for years. Two attorneys for the AMEX, Steven Lister and Phil Axelrod, who were supposed to be investigating Schettino even taunted me about Schettino's defamation lawsuit and told me that they hoped that I would lose.
In 1998 NASD purchased the American Stock Exchange. At the time Schapiro was President of NASD Regulation, which was technically overseeing AMEX regulation.
Then in 1999 when Schapiro was President of NASD Regulation, major violations of federal securities laws at the AMEX were exposed in a seminal article, "Scandal On Wall Street," on the front page of Business Week and it was noted that Schettino had not been disciplined four years after he had violated federal securities laws. Schettino subsequently dropped his lawsuit against me.
Schapiro did nothing, but covered up these crimes. And what has all this have to do with Bernard Madoff, the Ponzi King? Madoff, like Schettino, had also produced fictitious trading records; falsified trades; and. stolen money.
Where was Schapiro, the nominal overseer of Madoff?
Now she is to become Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission?
(Schapiro did not return a phone message seeking comment; her aide said she was meeting with President Elect Obama in Chicago). ""
Source of Post
http://blackstarnews.com/?c=135&a=5221
Question: Mary Shapiro KNOWS of the Iviewit Technologies Inc. and is very aware according to what I have read.. about the implications to Shareholders that will be Billions upon Billions per Company in my Opinion. So when the SEC and Mary Shapiro Says she did not have prior Knowledge on the iViewit Scandal and all the Major Law Firms and Tech Companies involved.. ...
You Savvy Internet Investigators
will KNOW that she most Certainly DID...
How Come our Great Country is paying no attention to what seems in the above article to be decades of indescretions leading to Billions upon Billions and the Shareholders, Investors Seem to be the Ones to Take the Heat.. and Not Only is Mary Shapiro NEVER held Accountable, She is Constantly put back into some authoritative position that allows for the Same Over Looking of Tips - Not Looking into Facts and Creating or Shall I say ALLOWING huges Liabilities to Innocent Investors and Shareholders... ???
posted By
Crystal L. Cox
Industry Whistleblower
.... Got a Tip .. Email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Investigative Blogger
"" [The Financial Meltdown]
President-elect Barack Obama's choice of Mary Schapiro as Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission may go down as his worst appointment.
Schapiro, in her capacity as President of NASD Regulation and later CEO of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), was directly responsible for ensuring that Bernie Madoff's firm, BLM Securities, obeyed federal securities laws.
Schapiro in her capacity as Commissioner and acting-Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission and later as President of NASD Regulation, has covered up more violations of federal securities law than Madoff has violated.
And yes, Bernie Madoff pulled off his scam when Schapiro was President of NASD Regulation and Chairperson of FINRA, which regulates NASD!
Schapiro never investigated Madoff, probably because Madoff was a powerful individual, a former Chairman of NASD.
I’m privy to this information because I was a trader on Wall Street many years ago. Beginning in 1991 I had written to Steven Lister, Senior Vice President of Compliance at the American Stock Exchange (AMEX).
I requested that, as a former member of the American Stock Exchange, I be granted access to my records.
The American Stock Exchange never replied.
Whenever I saw Lister, I asked him when he would grant me access to my records, Lister would simply state: "No."
Little background. Members of the board of AMEX had told other members that I had been evicted from AMEX for refusing to pass through a metal detector; in reality I had exposed the fact that another member of the Board had been apprehended with an unregistered pistol after he went through metal detectors at AMEX. I wanted to see whether the false information about me was in my AMEX files.
On July 26, 1993, I wrote to Mary Schapiro and requested that the Securities and Exchange Commission order the American Stock Exchange to permit me access to my files after Lister again refused to grant me access to my records. Of course this is a violation of federal securities laws, but that did not matter to Schapiro.
And SEC attorney, GayLa D. Sessoms, in a letter dated August 23, 1993 claimed "the Commission does not have the authority to compel the AMEX to produce records to you."
Schapiro knew that AMEX was a hotbed of illegal activity by the Italian Mafia-but Schapiro always looked to greener pastures.
I did not expect this lack of support from Schapiro. After all, I executed orders for Frost & Sullivan, a trading firm, on the floor of the AMEX.
When the inside trading scandal in Motel 6 was exposed –a foreign company was planning to bid on Motel 6, which was a nationwide chain of budget motels, but the information leaked and Frost & Sullivan traded illegally on it— I was investigated by the SEC.
I was the only individual who was connected to the three firms involved in this insider trading scandal that did not trade on Motel 6 insider information and thereby profit illegally. I was also the only individual who possessed knowledge of the extent of the insider trading in Motel 6 who was not subpoenaed by the SEC.
Why? Because according to Joseph Greenwald, a trader with another firm, who pleaded guilty to insider trading in Motel 6, James Breeden, at the time Chairman of the SEC, and Mary Schapiro, who was then an SEC Commissioner, had ordered the SEC to limit the scope of the investigation. The intent was to protect senior members of the AMEX and Bear Stearns who had knowledge of the Motel 6 insider information.
On September 13, 1993 I met with Assistant United States Attorney Frances Fragos (who later, as Frances Fragos-Townsend was to become George W. Bush’s Homeland Security adviser) at 1 Saint Andrew Plaza, in Manhattan, to discuss the Italian Mafia's penetration of the AMEX; the insider trading scandal in Motel 6; payoffs to AMEX Compliance Attorneys by the Italian Mafia; payoffs by the Italian Mafia to members of the Board of the American Stock Exchange; the theft of $500,000 by a vice president of the AMEX; the stock fraud at a company named PNF; involvement of members of the Board of the AMEX in the stock fraud at PNF; and, a host of other crimes.
I had first approached the FBI to expose these crimes and the agency then arranged for me to meet with Frances Fragos.
(When I showed Fragos the letter from Sessoms, she told me that Sessoms had lied and that in fact the SEC had the authority to order the AMEX to grant me access to my records.
I was convinced that the SEC and AMEX knew that once I obtained my records, I could have forced investigations that would have exposed other major crimes; yet I needed my records as a launching point).
Of course the SEC had powers over the AMEX.
For example, in 1977 the AMEX gave mild disciplinary sanctions against about 20 members for posting fictitious options trades.
The SEC overruled the AMEX disciplinary actions and suspended the 20 or so members of the AMEX involved in this fraud, including future members of the Board of the AMEX, such as William Silver, Louis Miceli, and Robert VanCaneghan..
In 1995 when Schapiro was a Commissioner of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a huge illegal trading scandal erupted at the AMEX.
Pat Schettino, a rogue trader and managing director of Spear Leeds and Kellogg, falsified trades; marked options positions; produced fictitious trading records; stole money from AMEX members; violated the net capital rule (the type of offense for which Ivan Boesky later went to prison); and, even entered trades at fictitious prices.
When I wrote numerous letters to the SEC and members of the Board of the AMEX about Schettino's illegal trading, he hired Eric Levine, an attorney at Proskauer Rose and sued me for defamation. The SEC did nothing; even after I had written to the SEC, including Schapiro, about Schettino's massive illegal trading.
By taking no action, the SEC countenanced Schettino's actions against me. The AMEX delayed investigating Schettino for years. Two attorneys for the AMEX, Steven Lister and Phil Axelrod, who were supposed to be investigating Schettino even taunted me about Schettino's defamation lawsuit and told me that they hoped that I would lose.
In 1998 NASD purchased the American Stock Exchange. At the time Schapiro was President of NASD Regulation, which was technically overseeing AMEX regulation.
Then in 1999 when Schapiro was President of NASD Regulation, major violations of federal securities laws at the AMEX were exposed in a seminal article, "Scandal On Wall Street," on the front page of Business Week and it was noted that Schettino had not been disciplined four years after he had violated federal securities laws. Schettino subsequently dropped his lawsuit against me.
Schapiro did nothing, but covered up these crimes. And what has all this have to do with Bernard Madoff, the Ponzi King? Madoff, like Schettino, had also produced fictitious trading records; falsified trades; and. stolen money.
Where was Schapiro, the nominal overseer of Madoff?
Now she is to become Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission?
(Schapiro did not return a phone message seeking comment; her aide said she was meeting with President Elect Obama in Chicago). ""
Source of Post
http://blackstarnews.com/?c=135&a=5221
Question: Mary Shapiro KNOWS of the Iviewit Technologies Inc. and is very aware according to what I have read.. about the implications to Shareholders that will be Billions upon Billions per Company in my Opinion. So when the SEC and Mary Shapiro Says she did not have prior Knowledge on the iViewit Scandal and all the Major Law Firms and Tech Companies involved.. ...
You Savvy Internet Investigators
will KNOW that she most Certainly DID...
How Come our Great Country is paying no attention to what seems in the above article to be decades of indescretions leading to Billions upon Billions and the Shareholders, Investors Seem to be the Ones to Take the Heat.. and Not Only is Mary Shapiro NEVER held Accountable, She is Constantly put back into some authoritative position that allows for the Same Over Looking of Tips - Not Looking into Facts and Creating or Shall I say ALLOWING huges Liabilities to Innocent Investors and Shareholders... ???
posted By
Crystal L. Cox
Industry Whistleblower
.... Got a Tip .. Email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Investigative Blogger
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
RSS Feed (xml)
