Jim Biegel CEO - St. Charles Medical Center, Dr. Joseph Barrett - St. Charles Medical Center, Dr. Ben Elison - Dr. Jeffrey Gray - St. Charles Medical Center ..
Dr. Kevin McCarty, and more conspirators coming soon.. Stephanie Deyoung has been Kidnapped by St. Charles Medical Center in Bend Oregon - Cascade Healthcare Community in Bend Oregon.
Urgent Request and Statement from
Eliot Bernstein, Iviewit
"" From: Eliot Bernstein
Sent: Sun, April 18, 2010 1:50:52 AM
Subject: URGENT HELP NEEDED - KIDNAPPED WHISTLEBLOWER: St. Charles Medical Center in Bend Oregon
Any help that anyone can give to this KIDNAPPED WHISTLEBLOWER would beappreciated. I spoke to Stephanie and while her will is strong, despite drugging by the hospital, her sons 13th bday was yesterday and being ripped from her children despite her will, is killing her and me too.
So if you have a contact in any fed departments etc. please feel free to contact Crystal Cox or myself and we will get her info forwarded.
Any blogs posts etc. of the info will also help.
They are a step away from killing Whistleblowers and this loss of freedom is outrageous, in fact, kidnappingis just about equal to murder.
Not only are they holding her against will, they have tried to bribe Crystal that if she stops blogging they will release her or something to that effect, which puts them as extorting Crystal using Stephanie as bait or hostage.
If Stephanie had been in a mental institution and then told me about a conspiracy I would think her nuts but since she whistleblew first and then they put her in, their actions further confirm her story against those who have had a hand in imprisoning her while having interest in the outcome, like going to jail.
So, please help if you can.
Eliot Bernstein ""
St. Charles Medical Center - Bend Oregon News
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Monday, April 12, 2010
Eliot Spitzer DiD not Resign Due to a Call Girl. Follow Andrew Cuomo and Eliot Spitzer's Money Trail.
"following Cuomo's role model, Spitzer, and Spitzer's money trail"
""Follow Cuomo's and Spitzer's Money Trails Pursuing "The Ring."
First, following Cuomo's role model, Spitzer, and Spitzer's money trail (Or How the People of NY lost big):
If you believe Eliot Spitzer resigned only because of a whore, please contact me for a three life or 99 year lease on a bridge. Spitzer funded his Governor's campaign with a shakedown that damaged NY finances.
Here's a quote from Great Britain on the election of Eliot Spitzer:
"Barring the most astonishing electoral upset in history, Eliot Spitzer will, by the time you read this, be governor-elect of New York.
History will come to view him as one of the most damaging figures in the history of the state. It is difficult to imagine that he will, as governor, do anything to counter the damage he has already done to American business, or even that he would wish to do so.
As governor, he will probably continue to make things much worse."
Read the whole article at http://www.quentinlangley.net/article.php?ex=-1&id=290
Was Spitzer worth his cost to the People of NY? Should Spitzer have become our first Jewish President?
NYT's Wake Up Call: Did Clinton resign because of Monica? Did Spitzer resign because his moral standing was eroded? Did Spitzer have a moral standard? Did Spitzer resign, because there was a more to hide, and he got a deal, he couldn't refuse from federal prosecutors? If federal prosecutors offered a deal, do the People have to accept it, also?
Second, following Cuomo's money trail:
Is Cuomo like Spitzer, a Gollum, obsessed with the "Ring," and becoming Governor and our first Italian president?
Do the People of NY benefit when Cuomo shakes down lawyers for his campaign treasury, instead of Spitzer shaking down Wall Street? Cuomo built a 16 million dollar campaign fund with payoffs by lawyers with cases against NY State.
In the end don't the payoffs made to Cuomo's treasury come at the expense of the People of NY whose interests were compromised? Was the salary paid by the People of NY insufficient for Cuomo' needs?
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a0OvxJSr7EbU
Matthew 6:24 "No man can serve two masters" nor can the People's attorney.
Here is the applicable Disciplinary Rule copied from the NY State's Codes, Rules and Regulations:
DR 5-101 [1200.20] Conflicts of Interest - Lawyer's Own Interests.
A lawyer shall not accept or continue employment if the exercise of professional judgment on behalf of the client will be or reasonably may be affected by the lawyer’s own financial, business, property, or personal interests, unless a disinterested lawyer would believe that the representation of the client will not be adversely affected thereby and the client consents to the representation after full disclosure of the implications of the lawyer’s interest.
Questions in regard the blue text above for Andrew Cuomo:
1. Did you obtain the consent of the People after full disclosure of the implications before you took the money for your own personal campaign interests? Answer -NO.
2. A special prosecutor?
3. Is your defense, Spitzer did it first? ""
Source of Post
http://cuomotarp.blogspot.com/2010/04/follow-cuomos-and-spitzers-money-trails.html
Posted here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
""Follow Cuomo's and Spitzer's Money Trails Pursuing "The Ring."
First, following Cuomo's role model, Spitzer, and Spitzer's money trail (Or How the People of NY lost big):
If you believe Eliot Spitzer resigned only because of a whore, please contact me for a three life or 99 year lease on a bridge. Spitzer funded his Governor's campaign with a shakedown that damaged NY finances.
Here's a quote from Great Britain on the election of Eliot Spitzer:
"Barring the most astonishing electoral upset in history, Eliot Spitzer will, by the time you read this, be governor-elect of New York.
History will come to view him as one of the most damaging figures in the history of the state. It is difficult to imagine that he will, as governor, do anything to counter the damage he has already done to American business, or even that he would wish to do so.
As governor, he will probably continue to make things much worse."
Read the whole article at http://www.quentinlangley.net/article.php?ex=-1&id=290
Was Spitzer worth his cost to the People of NY? Should Spitzer have become our first Jewish President?
NYT's Wake Up Call: Did Clinton resign because of Monica? Did Spitzer resign because his moral standing was eroded? Did Spitzer have a moral standard? Did Spitzer resign, because there was a more to hide, and he got a deal, he couldn't refuse from federal prosecutors? If federal prosecutors offered a deal, do the People have to accept it, also?
Second, following Cuomo's money trail:
Is Cuomo like Spitzer, a Gollum, obsessed with the "Ring," and becoming Governor and our first Italian president?
Do the People of NY benefit when Cuomo shakes down lawyers for his campaign treasury, instead of Spitzer shaking down Wall Street? Cuomo built a 16 million dollar campaign fund with payoffs by lawyers with cases against NY State.
In the end don't the payoffs made to Cuomo's treasury come at the expense of the People of NY whose interests were compromised? Was the salary paid by the People of NY insufficient for Cuomo' needs?
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a0OvxJSr7EbU
Matthew 6:24 "No man can serve two masters" nor can the People's attorney.
Here is the applicable Disciplinary Rule copied from the NY State's Codes, Rules and Regulations:
DR 5-101 [1200.20] Conflicts of Interest - Lawyer's Own Interests.
A lawyer shall not accept or continue employment if the exercise of professional judgment on behalf of the client will be or reasonably may be affected by the lawyer’s own financial, business, property, or personal interests, unless a disinterested lawyer would believe that the representation of the client will not be adversely affected thereby and the client consents to the representation after full disclosure of the implications of the lawyer’s interest.
Questions in regard the blue text above for Andrew Cuomo:
1. Did you obtain the consent of the People after full disclosure of the implications before you took the money for your own personal campaign interests? Answer -NO.
2. A special prosecutor?
3. Is your defense, Spitzer did it first? ""
Source of Post
http://cuomotarp.blogspot.com/2010/04/follow-cuomos-and-spitzers-money-trails.html
Posted here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Andrew Cuomo Follows In Eliot Spitzer’s Footprints In Pursuit of “The Ring” and Governorship Ignoring The Law And Rules.
"Andrew Cuomo Follows In Eliot Spitzer’s Footprints In Pursuit of “The Ring” and Governorship Ignoring The Law And Rules To Amass A 16 Million Dollar Treasury.
Can Andrew Cuomo follow Eliot Spitzer’s example pursuing the Governorship and fund his campaign treasury with payments from opposing attorneys with actions against NY State?.
For_Immediate_Release:
Terence Finnan reports on his blog CuomoTARP.blogspot.com , that one can follow Cuomo’s and Spitzer’s Money Trails pursuing for themselves “The Ring,” specifically the Governorship and, ultimately, the Presidency. Mr. Finnan reports of the joy in London over Spitzer’s role in taking money out of the NY Financial Markets, ” History will come to view him (Spitzer) as one of the most damaging figures in the history of the state. It is difficult to imagine that he will, as governor, do anything to counter the damage he has already done to American business, or even that he would wish to do so. ”Mr. Finnan asks, “Is Cuomo like Spitzer, a Gollum, obsessed with the ‘Ring,’ and becoming Governor and our first Italian president?” Mr. Finnan further asks, ” Do the People of NY benefit when Cuomo shakes down lawyers for his campaign treasury, instead of Spitzer shaking down Wall Street? What benefit to the People of NY accrues when Cuomo builds a 16 million dollar campaign fund with payoffs by lawyers with cases against NY State. In the end, weren’t the payoffs made to Cuomo’s treasury only passed on as an expense of the People of NY whose interests were compromised?”Following the advice in Matthew 6:24 “No man can serve two masters,” Mr. Finnan asks whether Andrew Cuomo can serve as the People’s attorney and at the same time collect payments from opposing lawyers?Mr. Finnan quotes the applicable Disciplinary Rule DR 5-101 [1200.20] concerning “Conflicts of Interest” and asks whether Andrew Cuomo obtained permission from the People of NY to take money from opposing attorneys?Finally, Mr. Finnan asks three questions of Andrew Cuomo:1. Did you obtain the consent of the People after full disclosure of the implications before you took the money for your own personal campaign interests?2. A special prosecutor?3. Is your defense, Spitzer did it first?
Earlier posts had asked Andrew Cuomo to support making “Official Misconduct” a felony, instead of a misdemeanor and presented criminal complaints to facilitate Andrew Cuomo to prosecute several State Judges and Senators for criminal conduct..
####
For more information:Keywords: Andrew Cuomo,Eliot Spitzer,Cuomo Corruption
Tags: Andrew Cuomo, christine c. anderson, eliot bernstein, Eliot Spitzer, eric holder, First Department, first department disciplinary, JUDITH KAYE, mario cuomo, ny senate judiciary committee, proskauer, SHIRA SCHEINDLIN, thomas cahill ""
Source of Post
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=295
Can Andrew Cuomo follow Eliot Spitzer’s example pursuing the Governorship and fund his campaign treasury with payments from opposing attorneys with actions against NY State?.
For_Immediate_Release:
Terence Finnan reports on his blog CuomoTARP.blogspot.com , that one can follow Cuomo’s and Spitzer’s Money Trails pursuing for themselves “The Ring,” specifically the Governorship and, ultimately, the Presidency. Mr. Finnan reports of the joy in London over Spitzer’s role in taking money out of the NY Financial Markets, ” History will come to view him (Spitzer) as one of the most damaging figures in the history of the state. It is difficult to imagine that he will, as governor, do anything to counter the damage he has already done to American business, or even that he would wish to do so. ”Mr. Finnan asks, “Is Cuomo like Spitzer, a Gollum, obsessed with the ‘Ring,’ and becoming Governor and our first Italian president?” Mr. Finnan further asks, ” Do the People of NY benefit when Cuomo shakes down lawyers for his campaign treasury, instead of Spitzer shaking down Wall Street? What benefit to the People of NY accrues when Cuomo builds a 16 million dollar campaign fund with payoffs by lawyers with cases against NY State. In the end, weren’t the payoffs made to Cuomo’s treasury only passed on as an expense of the People of NY whose interests were compromised?”Following the advice in Matthew 6:24 “No man can serve two masters,” Mr. Finnan asks whether Andrew Cuomo can serve as the People’s attorney and at the same time collect payments from opposing lawyers?Mr. Finnan quotes the applicable Disciplinary Rule DR 5-101 [1200.20] concerning “Conflicts of Interest” and asks whether Andrew Cuomo obtained permission from the People of NY to take money from opposing attorneys?Finally, Mr. Finnan asks three questions of Andrew Cuomo:1. Did you obtain the consent of the People after full disclosure of the implications before you took the money for your own personal campaign interests?2. A special prosecutor?3. Is your defense, Spitzer did it first?
Earlier posts had asked Andrew Cuomo to support making “Official Misconduct” a felony, instead of a misdemeanor and presented criminal complaints to facilitate Andrew Cuomo to prosecute several State Judges and Senators for criminal conduct..
####
For more information:Keywords: Andrew Cuomo,Eliot Spitzer,Cuomo Corruption
Tags: Andrew Cuomo, christine c. anderson, eliot bernstein, Eliot Spitzer, eric holder, First Department, first department disciplinary, JUDITH KAYE, mario cuomo, ny senate judiciary committee, proskauer, SHIRA SCHEINDLIN, thomas cahill ""
Source of Post
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=295
Friday, April 9, 2010
New York OCFS denied thousands accused of child abuse the chance to clear their name
"" By John O’Brien / The Post-Standard
March 22, 2010, 6:00AM
Syracuse, NY – The State Office of Children and Family Services in 2004 had a backlog of requests for hearings from people accused of mistreating children.
Three women had recently sued the agency over the delays that were costing them jobs working with kids because they couldn’t get their names cleared.
The agency had a solution to the thousands of pending written requests that would come under scrutiny by the lawsuit, according to sworn testimony from state workers: Shred.
For a month in 2004, the workers were under orders to take carts of the requests for name-clearing hearings and shred them after hours in their Albany offices, according to the testimony. They shredded about a thousand a day for a month, one OCFS worker testified.
The revelation came in a proposed settlement of a class-action lawsuit last month that could affect 25,000 people across the state who are listed in a statewide database as reported child abusers. Under the settlement, anyone who requested a hearing on child abuse or maltreatment charges but never got it regained the right to the hearing.
Employers such as day care centers check the database to see if a job applicant was ever accused of child abuse. Those accused could request a hearing with OCFS to clear their names. More than half of those challenges result in the accused person being cleared, according to Thomas Hoffman, a lawyer for the three women who sued the state over the lengthy delays.
Those women claimed they lost opportunities for jobs working with children because the state took up to two years to give them a name-clearing hearing. By then, the potential employer had filled the job opening.
Four years after the suit was filed, a whistleblower who works for OCFS called Hoffman, he said.
She told him how the agency was getting rid of the written requests for hearings, then marking the case “waived” or “withdrawn” on the database, court papers said.
The state never told the accused. To the inquiring employer, it would appear that the person had given up on their request for a hearing, and the child abuse accusation stood.
The backlog of hearing requests was much longer than two years — some requests had been sitting around for seven years, court papers said.
The whistleblower came forward in February 2009.
Hoffman then took testimony of 18 or 19 OCFS workers about the handling of the requests for hearings, he said.
In some cases, workers called the prospective employers with whom the accused person had applied for a job, according to the workers’ testimony.
If the employer was no longer interested, the state workers were told to mark the file “waived,” according to the testimony of six OCFS workers.
The accused person was never notified in those cases.
The written requests were shredded or thrown in the garbage,
at least three of the workers testified.
If the whistleblower hadn’t come forward about the shredded cases, Hoffman would never have known the extent of the backlog, he said.
Cathy Dufty, a clerical worker in the office, testified that Supervisor David Peters ordered her to gather a bunch of temp workers and start shredding.
“I would go down to his office about 3:30 and I would take the cart back, and it would be, ‘These are to be shredded, and these over here are to be refiled,’” Dufty testified last year.
Peters was then the director of the statewide Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment.
He has since retired. In his deposition for the lawsuit, Peters denied that his agency did anything improper, Hoffman said. Peters could not be reached for comment.
The assistant state attorney general who represented the state in the lawsuit, Robert Kraft, refused to comment.
A spokeswoman for OCFS, Pat Cantiello, said no one from the agency could comment because the settlement has not yet been approved by a federal judge.
The whistleblower, who still works for OCFS, also would not comment.
Under the proposed settlement, the state would have to send notices to the 25,000 people on the central register whose requests for hearings were ignored between 2003 and 2007.
U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin will hold a hearing in April in Manhattan, then decide whether to approve the settlement.
As part of the settlement, the state agreed to stop the practice of calling potential employers to see if they still wanted to hire the person accused of child abuse.
The state agreed that the accused person has a right to a hearing whether the employer is interested or not, Hoffman said.
The settlement only applies to people who requested a hearing and never got one. It doesn’t affect anyone who never requested a hearing or who withdrew his or her hearing request.
Once the settlement is approved, Hoffman will submit a bill for legal services to the court. The state will pay those costs, but will not pay damages under the proposed settlement.
Anyone who might be affected should check Hoffman’s Web site on the case: www.RegistryClassAction.com .
The state gets about 350,000 inquiries a year from prospective employers, including child care centers, foster care agencies, juvenile detention centers and other employers who work with children. The register is accessible only to employers who are required to check a job applicant’s background.
"The employer doesn’t know why you’re on the list,” Hoffman said.
“You could be a pedophile or it could be something benign.” """
Full Document and Source
http://nobidcontracts.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/ny-ocfs-denied-thousands-accused-of-child-abuse-the-chance-to-clear-their-name/
March 22, 2010, 6:00AM
Syracuse, NY – The State Office of Children and Family Services in 2004 had a backlog of requests for hearings from people accused of mistreating children.
Three women had recently sued the agency over the delays that were costing them jobs working with kids because they couldn’t get their names cleared.
The agency had a solution to the thousands of pending written requests that would come under scrutiny by the lawsuit, according to sworn testimony from state workers: Shred.
For a month in 2004, the workers were under orders to take carts of the requests for name-clearing hearings and shred them after hours in their Albany offices, according to the testimony. They shredded about a thousand a day for a month, one OCFS worker testified.
The revelation came in a proposed settlement of a class-action lawsuit last month that could affect 25,000 people across the state who are listed in a statewide database as reported child abusers. Under the settlement, anyone who requested a hearing on child abuse or maltreatment charges but never got it regained the right to the hearing.
Employers such as day care centers check the database to see if a job applicant was ever accused of child abuse. Those accused could request a hearing with OCFS to clear their names. More than half of those challenges result in the accused person being cleared, according to Thomas Hoffman, a lawyer for the three women who sued the state over the lengthy delays.
Those women claimed they lost opportunities for jobs working with children because the state took up to two years to give them a name-clearing hearing. By then, the potential employer had filled the job opening.
Four years after the suit was filed, a whistleblower who works for OCFS called Hoffman, he said.
She told him how the agency was getting rid of the written requests for hearings, then marking the case “waived” or “withdrawn” on the database, court papers said.
The state never told the accused. To the inquiring employer, it would appear that the person had given up on their request for a hearing, and the child abuse accusation stood.
The backlog of hearing requests was much longer than two years — some requests had been sitting around for seven years, court papers said.
The whistleblower came forward in February 2009.
Hoffman then took testimony of 18 or 19 OCFS workers about the handling of the requests for hearings, he said.
In some cases, workers called the prospective employers with whom the accused person had applied for a job, according to the workers’ testimony.
If the employer was no longer interested, the state workers were told to mark the file “waived,” according to the testimony of six OCFS workers.
The accused person was never notified in those cases.
The written requests were shredded or thrown in the garbage,
at least three of the workers testified.
If the whistleblower hadn’t come forward about the shredded cases, Hoffman would never have known the extent of the backlog, he said.
Cathy Dufty, a clerical worker in the office, testified that Supervisor David Peters ordered her to gather a bunch of temp workers and start shredding.
“I would go down to his office about 3:30 and I would take the cart back, and it would be, ‘These are to be shredded, and these over here are to be refiled,’” Dufty testified last year.
Peters was then the director of the statewide Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment.
He has since retired. In his deposition for the lawsuit, Peters denied that his agency did anything improper, Hoffman said. Peters could not be reached for comment.
The assistant state attorney general who represented the state in the lawsuit, Robert Kraft, refused to comment.
A spokeswoman for OCFS, Pat Cantiello, said no one from the agency could comment because the settlement has not yet been approved by a federal judge.
The whistleblower, who still works for OCFS, also would not comment.
Under the proposed settlement, the state would have to send notices to the 25,000 people on the central register whose requests for hearings were ignored between 2003 and 2007.
U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin will hold a hearing in April in Manhattan, then decide whether to approve the settlement.
As part of the settlement, the state agreed to stop the practice of calling potential employers to see if they still wanted to hire the person accused of child abuse.
The state agreed that the accused person has a right to a hearing whether the employer is interested or not, Hoffman said.
The settlement only applies to people who requested a hearing and never got one. It doesn’t affect anyone who never requested a hearing or who withdrew his or her hearing request.
Once the settlement is approved, Hoffman will submit a bill for legal services to the court. The state will pay those costs, but will not pay damages under the proposed settlement.
Anyone who might be affected should check Hoffman’s Web site on the case: www.RegistryClassAction.com .
The state gets about 350,000 inquiries a year from prospective employers, including child care centers, foster care agencies, juvenile detention centers and other employers who work with children. The register is accessible only to employers who are required to check a job applicant’s background.
"The employer doesn’t know why you’re on the list,” Hoffman said.
“You could be a pedophile or it could be something benign.” """
Full Document and Source
http://nobidcontracts.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/ny-ocfs-denied-thousands-accused-of-child-abuse-the-chance-to-clear-their-name/
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Jame E. Pelzer - Second Department - New York Reported to Be Issuing Unethical and UnLawful Suspensions on Lawful Ethical New York Attorneys
In the Matter of Ruth M. Pollack - James Edward Pelzer
Sources say that Ruth M. Pollack was Illegally and Unethical Suspended as a New York Attorney, her Civil Rights have been violated and sources say that she is not taking it laying down.
So the question .... is James Pelzer - Clerk of Court handing out Attorney Suspensions for Political Favors, Pay Offs, OR are they actually based in Law, Truth and What Really Happened?
Does James Edward Pelzer have to Prove that an Attorney actually committed a crime or did something unlawful or does James E. Pelzer just hand out suspensions like candy...???
See in New York.. My Whistleblower Network talks about an incredible, historic Wall of Corruption.. it is said that Attorneys all know each other and they are above the Law. So the Big Law Firms are protected to committ Billion Dollar Crimes and no one seems to have the Moxy to hold them accountable for anything...
I am seeing in Court Corruption across the United States in Big and Small Courts, that the Law is irrelevant and that the Truth is No Defense. However, the law is forced, faked, staged to set up those who know to much, or speak out against corruption or injustice.. it happens the same in small towns and the biggest of cities... the Game is the Same... easily set up the "Good Guy" for a Text Message, a Faked Incident.. and well you would be shocked.. this to run them out of business and bring the Ol' Economic Terrorism, take their livelihood - take their credibility and ruin their life all to protect some unethical behavior that some Well Connected Attorney or Politician has done... it is Wrong Folks.. Flat out Wrong..
Those of you Who Follow My Blogs.. know that .. it is simple.. the Truth is Criminal.. and the courts, the clerks and corrupt attorneys will make sure you go down for it.. that simple.. I have now seen it over and over again..
Below is a Suspension Letter to New York Attorney Ruth M. Pollack, I found it online.. it is My Opinion that this Letter from James E. Pelzer is Illegal, Not Based in Fact, Not Based in Truth, Not Based in Law and that this Letter is a Civil Violation of Ruth Pollack's Rights.
Stay Tuned to Our Blog Network for More on the Ruth M. Pollack Story, as we uncover More TRUTH out of the Second Departmet - www.SecondDepartment.com
Got a Tip
Email Me at
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
"" In the Matter of Ruth M. Pollack, admitted
as Ruth Marie Pollack, an attorney and
counselor-at-law.
Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, petitioner;
Ruth M. Pollack, respondent.
(Attorney Registration No. 1892660)
By letter dated January 27, 2009, the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial
District informed the court that the respondent was convicted on September 26, 2008, of criminal contempt pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure rule 42 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York.
She was sentenced by the Honorable Allyne R. Ross to unsupervised probation for a period of two years and suspended from the practice of law in the Eastern District of New York for a period of 45 days.
The Grievance Committee submitted certified copies of the judgment dated September 26, 2008, the memorandum and verdict dated September 19, 2008, and the sentencing minutes dated September 26, 2008, and took the position that the respondent’s conviction qualifies as a serious crime within the meaning of Judiciary Law § 90(4)(d) and 22 NYCRR 691.7(b). Notwithstanding that order of suspension, the respondent continued to practice law in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York.
Accordingly, by order dated December 31, 2008, the Committee on Grievances for the Eastern District of New York suspended the respondent from the practice of law before that court for a period of two years.
The Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District also submitted a certified copy of that order to the court and served the respondent with a notice pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3 informing her of her right to file a verified statement setting forth defenses to the imposition of reciprocal discipline.
The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on October 26, 1983, under the name Ruth Marie Pollack.
Upon the papers submitted to the court, it is ORDERED that on the court’s own motion, the respondent Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, is immediately suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(f) as a result of her conviction of a serious crime, continuing until further order of this court;
and it is further, ORDERED that the respondent, Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, shall promptly comply with this court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, during the period of suspension and
until further order of this court, the respondent, Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, is commanded to desist and refrain from
(1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk, or employee of another,
(2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority,
(3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and
(4) holding herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,
ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the Grievance Committee for the Tenth
Judicial District is hereby authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding in this court, as petitioner, against the said Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, based on her conviction of a serious crime; and it is further,
ORDERED that Rita E. Adler, Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, 150 Motor Parkway, Suite 102, Hauppauge, N.Y. 11788, is hereby appointed as attorney for the petitioner in such proceeding; and it is further,
ORDERED that the petitioner Grievance Committee shall serve upon the respondent and the Special Referee and file with this court a petition within 30 days after receipt of a copy of this decision and order on motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent shall serve an answer to the petition upon the petitioner and the Special Referee and file the original answer with this court within 20 days after service upon her of the petition; and it is further,
ORDERED that the issues raised by the petition and any answer thereto are referred
to the Honorable James A. Gowan, a retired Justice of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, 90 Sequams Lane East, West Islip, N.Y. 11795, as Special Referee to expeditiously hear and report, together with his findings on the issues, and to submit a report within 60 days after the conclusion of the hearing or the submission of post-hearing memoranda; and it is further,
ORDERED that if the respondent, Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack,
has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in her affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10(f); and it is further,
ORDERED that the Grievance Committee’s application pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3
to impose reciprocal discipline upon the respondent is denied as academic.
PRUDENTI, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, SPOLZINO and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court ""
Source of Post
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/ad2/calendar/webcal/motions/2009/M88523.pdf
Do you have a Tip on Jame E. Pelzer ?
We are getting information on James Edward Pelzer - Clerk of the Court - Second Judicial Department - Appellate Division ... it is said that Jame E. Pelzer is possibly... simply handing out suspensions as the one above without approval, not based in law or fact but instead based on the New York Attorney Fraternity and the Culture of Corruption that we hear so much about out of New York - Especially the "Second Department.
If you have any Knowledge of Possible Unethical or Corrupt actions from or by James Edward Pelzer - Please Email your Whistleblower Tip to me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com
More Facts and the TRUTH about Ruth M. Pollack Coming Soon to my New Investigative Blog - www.SecondDepartment.com
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Sources say that Ruth M. Pollack was Illegally and Unethical Suspended as a New York Attorney, her Civil Rights have been violated and sources say that she is not taking it laying down.
So the question .... is James Pelzer - Clerk of Court handing out Attorney Suspensions for Political Favors, Pay Offs, OR are they actually based in Law, Truth and What Really Happened?
Does James Edward Pelzer have to Prove that an Attorney actually committed a crime or did something unlawful or does James E. Pelzer just hand out suspensions like candy...???
See in New York.. My Whistleblower Network talks about an incredible, historic Wall of Corruption.. it is said that Attorneys all know each other and they are above the Law. So the Big Law Firms are protected to committ Billion Dollar Crimes and no one seems to have the Moxy to hold them accountable for anything...
I am seeing in Court Corruption across the United States in Big and Small Courts, that the Law is irrelevant and that the Truth is No Defense. However, the law is forced, faked, staged to set up those who know to much, or speak out against corruption or injustice.. it happens the same in small towns and the biggest of cities... the Game is the Same... easily set up the "Good Guy" for a Text Message, a Faked Incident.. and well you would be shocked.. this to run them out of business and bring the Ol' Economic Terrorism, take their livelihood - take their credibility and ruin their life all to protect some unethical behavior that some Well Connected Attorney or Politician has done... it is Wrong Folks.. Flat out Wrong..
Those of you Who Follow My Blogs.. know that .. it is simple.. the Truth is Criminal.. and the courts, the clerks and corrupt attorneys will make sure you go down for it.. that simple.. I have now seen it over and over again..
Below is a Suspension Letter to New York Attorney Ruth M. Pollack, I found it online.. it is My Opinion that this Letter from James E. Pelzer is Illegal, Not Based in Fact, Not Based in Truth, Not Based in Law and that this Letter is a Civil Violation of Ruth Pollack's Rights.
Stay Tuned to Our Blog Network for More on the Ruth M. Pollack Story, as we uncover More TRUTH out of the Second Departmet - www.SecondDepartment.com
Got a Tip
Email Me at
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
"" In the Matter of Ruth M. Pollack, admitted
as Ruth Marie Pollack, an attorney and
counselor-at-law.
Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, petitioner;
Ruth M. Pollack, respondent.
(Attorney Registration No. 1892660)
By letter dated January 27, 2009, the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial
District informed the court that the respondent was convicted on September 26, 2008, of criminal contempt pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure rule 42 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York.
She was sentenced by the Honorable Allyne R. Ross to unsupervised probation for a period of two years and suspended from the practice of law in the Eastern District of New York for a period of 45 days.
The Grievance Committee submitted certified copies of the judgment dated September 26, 2008, the memorandum and verdict dated September 19, 2008, and the sentencing minutes dated September 26, 2008, and took the position that the respondent’s conviction qualifies as a serious crime within the meaning of Judiciary Law § 90(4)(d) and 22 NYCRR 691.7(b). Notwithstanding that order of suspension, the respondent continued to practice law in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York.
Accordingly, by order dated December 31, 2008, the Committee on Grievances for the Eastern District of New York suspended the respondent from the practice of law before that court for a period of two years.
The Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District also submitted a certified copy of that order to the court and served the respondent with a notice pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3 informing her of her right to file a verified statement setting forth defenses to the imposition of reciprocal discipline.
The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on October 26, 1983, under the name Ruth Marie Pollack.
Upon the papers submitted to the court, it is ORDERED that on the court’s own motion, the respondent Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, is immediately suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(f) as a result of her conviction of a serious crime, continuing until further order of this court;
and it is further, ORDERED that the respondent, Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, shall promptly comply with this court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, during the period of suspension and
until further order of this court, the respondent, Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, is commanded to desist and refrain from
(1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk, or employee of another,
(2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority,
(3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and
(4) holding herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,
ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the Grievance Committee for the Tenth
Judicial District is hereby authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding in this court, as petitioner, against the said Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, based on her conviction of a serious crime; and it is further,
ORDERED that Rita E. Adler, Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, 150 Motor Parkway, Suite 102, Hauppauge, N.Y. 11788, is hereby appointed as attorney for the petitioner in such proceeding; and it is further,
ORDERED that the petitioner Grievance Committee shall serve upon the respondent and the Special Referee and file with this court a petition within 30 days after receipt of a copy of this decision and order on motion; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent shall serve an answer to the petition upon the petitioner and the Special Referee and file the original answer with this court within 20 days after service upon her of the petition; and it is further,
ORDERED that the issues raised by the petition and any answer thereto are referred
to the Honorable James A. Gowan, a retired Justice of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, 90 Sequams Lane East, West Islip, N.Y. 11795, as Special Referee to expeditiously hear and report, together with his findings on the issues, and to submit a report within 60 days after the conclusion of the hearing or the submission of post-hearing memoranda; and it is further,
ORDERED that if the respondent, Ruth M. Pollack, admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack,
has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in her affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10(f); and it is further,
ORDERED that the Grievance Committee’s application pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3
to impose reciprocal discipline upon the respondent is denied as academic.
PRUDENTI, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, SPOLZINO and FISHER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court ""
Source of Post
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/ad2/calendar/webcal/motions/2009/M88523.pdf
Do you have a Tip on Jame E. Pelzer ?
We are getting information on James Edward Pelzer - Clerk of the Court - Second Judicial Department - Appellate Division ... it is said that Jame E. Pelzer is possibly... simply handing out suspensions as the one above without approval, not based in law or fact but instead based on the New York Attorney Fraternity and the Culture of Corruption that we hear so much about out of New York - Especially the "Second Department.
If you have any Knowledge of Possible Unethical or Corrupt actions from or by James Edward Pelzer - Please Email your Whistleblower Tip to me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com
More Facts and the TRUTH about Ruth M. Pollack Coming Soon to my New Investigative Blog - www.SecondDepartment.com
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Not Much Bounty for SEC Whistleblower Program - SEC's Enforcement Division - Peter Sivere - Whistleblowers Are Ignored
"" For more than 20 years, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has had a program in place to reward whistleblowers who provide the agency with information about insider trading. But a new audit by the SEC Office of Inspector General (OIG) reveals that the program has almost never been used, is barely recognized inside or outside the SEC, and has fundamental design flaws.
It turns out the SEC has received very few applications in the past two decades for bounties under the program -- and only five people have actually received payments since the program first began:
Design Flaws in the Bounty Program
The OIG also found that the program suffers from the following deficiencies: it's poorly recognized by the public and even within the SEC; the criteria for judging bounty applications is overly vague; the SEC does not have good internal policies to guide staff in reviewing bounty applications; the SEC rarely provides whistleblowers with status reports on their applications (a problem we've also heard about at other IG offices); once the applications are passed on, there are no systems in place to ensure that they are processed in an adequate and timely fashion; and the documentation for bounty referrals is often incomplete.
Many Whistleblowers Are Ignored or Even Subjected to Retaliation
POGO previously reported on anecdotal evidence of the problems described by the SEC OIG.
Writing for Politics Daily, we described how one whistleblower was retaliated against after inquiring whether he would be eligible to receive a bounty payment under the SEC's program. Peter Sivere, who at the time was working as a compliance officer at JPMorgan, first approached the SEC with evidence showing that his employer had failed to disclose documents sought in a wide-ranging SEC probe into a practice known as market timing. He was told that he didn't qualify for a bounty payment, but he provided the information anyway.
But instead of protecting Peter Sivere, the SEC enforcement attorney investigating the matter told JPMorgan's counsel about Peter Sivere's initial inquiry about a cash payment. JPMorgan's counsel then used this information to disparage Peter Sivere's whistleblower credentials at a proceeding before the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, in which Peter Sivere had contended that JPMorgan retaliated against him after he went to the SEC.
A subsequent investigation by the SEC OIG found that the enforcement attorney, George Demos , had violated agency rules by disclosing non-public information in an ongoing investigation, and recommended that disciplinary action be taken. George Demos left the SEC shortly thereafter and is now running for Congress.
OIG's Recommendations
To help correct the many deficiencies in the whistleblower bounty program, the OIG's latest audit recommended that the SEC's Enforcement Division develop a communications plan to publicize its existence; post the application on its website with clear instructions for the whistleblower; establish better policies to follow up with the whistleblower once the complaint is received; develop specific criteria for recommending bounty awards; improve its internal controls for tracking tips and complaints; require that a bounty file with minimum documentation be created for each application; and incorporate best practices from comparable programs run by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Internal Revenue Services (IRS).
Congressional Reforms and Problems with Other Bounty Programs
In the meantime, Congress is also considering legislation to improve the SEC's whistleblower bounty program. The financial regulatory overhaul bill passed by the House last fall included a provision to authorize the SEC to award bounty payments tied to any judicial or administrative action brought by the SEC (i.e., not just insider trading cases) that results in monetary sanctions of over $1 million.
The provision also enables the whistleblower to receive up to 30 percent of the amount recovered (the current limit is 10 percent).
Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd's (D-CT) bill would go even further, ensuring that the whistleblower receives no less than 10 percent of the monetary sanctions, and allowing the whistleblower to appeal any aspect of the SEC's decision, including whether, to whom, and in what amount to make the award.
We applaud these legislative fixes and hope that the final bill reflects the stronger language proposed by the Senate. However, the SEC should also learn from the shortcomings in comparable whistleblower reward programs run by other agencies.
While the False Claims Act has resulted in over $20 billion in recoveries since 1986, the IRS's program to reward whistleblowers who spot tax problems in their workplace shares some of the same problems uncovered by the SEC OIG.
The IRS program, which was established under the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, enables whistleblowers to receive between 15 and 30 percent of the collected proceeds.
However, a recent audit by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration found that the IRS's Whistleblower Office does not have a good system in place to manage and track cases, and that no awards have actually been paid out under the new program, in part because the claims can take over a decade to process.
One well-known whistleblower who's still waiting to hear whether he will receive an award is former UBS employee Brad Birkenfeld, who was sentenced to 40 months in prison after he attempted to inform the IRS and DOJ about his role in soliciting wealthy Americans to evade taxes through services provided by the Swiss bank.
Although his ordeal isn't necessarily a reflection on the IRS program, it does highlight the dangers often faced by individuals who blow the whistle on corporate wrongdoing.
In any event, the SEC could use all the help it can get when it comes to handling whistleblower complaints, and we hope that the OIG's recommendations and Congress's legislation will finally enable the SEC to give whistleblowers the protection and recognition they deserve.
-- Michael Smallberg ""Sourcehttp://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2010/04/if-the-sec-has-a-whistleblower-program-but-nobody-ever-uses-it-does-it-really-exist.html
It turns out the SEC has received very few applications in the past two decades for bounties under the program -- and only five people have actually received payments since the program first began:
Design Flaws in the Bounty Program
The OIG also found that the program suffers from the following deficiencies: it's poorly recognized by the public and even within the SEC; the criteria for judging bounty applications is overly vague; the SEC does not have good internal policies to guide staff in reviewing bounty applications; the SEC rarely provides whistleblowers with status reports on their applications (a problem we've also heard about at other IG offices); once the applications are passed on, there are no systems in place to ensure that they are processed in an adequate and timely fashion; and the documentation for bounty referrals is often incomplete.
Many Whistleblowers Are Ignored or Even Subjected to Retaliation
POGO previously reported on anecdotal evidence of the problems described by the SEC OIG.
Writing for Politics Daily, we described how one whistleblower was retaliated against after inquiring whether he would be eligible to receive a bounty payment under the SEC's program. Peter Sivere, who at the time was working as a compliance officer at JPMorgan, first approached the SEC with evidence showing that his employer had failed to disclose documents sought in a wide-ranging SEC probe into a practice known as market timing. He was told that he didn't qualify for a bounty payment, but he provided the information anyway.
But instead of protecting Peter Sivere, the SEC enforcement attorney investigating the matter told JPMorgan's counsel about Peter Sivere's initial inquiry about a cash payment. JPMorgan's counsel then used this information to disparage Peter Sivere's whistleblower credentials at a proceeding before the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, in which Peter Sivere had contended that JPMorgan retaliated against him after he went to the SEC.
A subsequent investigation by the SEC OIG found that the enforcement attorney, George Demos , had violated agency rules by disclosing non-public information in an ongoing investigation, and recommended that disciplinary action be taken. George Demos left the SEC shortly thereafter and is now running for Congress.
OIG's Recommendations
To help correct the many deficiencies in the whistleblower bounty program, the OIG's latest audit recommended that the SEC's Enforcement Division develop a communications plan to publicize its existence; post the application on its website with clear instructions for the whistleblower; establish better policies to follow up with the whistleblower once the complaint is received; develop specific criteria for recommending bounty awards; improve its internal controls for tracking tips and complaints; require that a bounty file with minimum documentation be created for each application; and incorporate best practices from comparable programs run by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Internal Revenue Services (IRS).
Congressional Reforms and Problems with Other Bounty Programs
In the meantime, Congress is also considering legislation to improve the SEC's whistleblower bounty program. The financial regulatory overhaul bill passed by the House last fall included a provision to authorize the SEC to award bounty payments tied to any judicial or administrative action brought by the SEC (i.e., not just insider trading cases) that results in monetary sanctions of over $1 million.
The provision also enables the whistleblower to receive up to 30 percent of the amount recovered (the current limit is 10 percent).
Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd's (D-CT) bill would go even further, ensuring that the whistleblower receives no less than 10 percent of the monetary sanctions, and allowing the whistleblower to appeal any aspect of the SEC's decision, including whether, to whom, and in what amount to make the award.
We applaud these legislative fixes and hope that the final bill reflects the stronger language proposed by the Senate. However, the SEC should also learn from the shortcomings in comparable whistleblower reward programs run by other agencies.
While the False Claims Act has resulted in over $20 billion in recoveries since 1986, the IRS's program to reward whistleblowers who spot tax problems in their workplace shares some of the same problems uncovered by the SEC OIG.
The IRS program, which was established under the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, enables whistleblowers to receive between 15 and 30 percent of the collected proceeds.
However, a recent audit by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration found that the IRS's Whistleblower Office does not have a good system in place to manage and track cases, and that no awards have actually been paid out under the new program, in part because the claims can take over a decade to process.
One well-known whistleblower who's still waiting to hear whether he will receive an award is former UBS employee Brad Birkenfeld, who was sentenced to 40 months in prison after he attempted to inform the IRS and DOJ about his role in soliciting wealthy Americans to evade taxes through services provided by the Swiss bank.
Although his ordeal isn't necessarily a reflection on the IRS program, it does highlight the dangers often faced by individuals who blow the whistle on corporate wrongdoing.
In any event, the SEC could use all the help it can get when it comes to handling whistleblower complaints, and we hope that the OIG's recommendations and Congress's legislation will finally enable the SEC to give whistleblowers the protection and recognition they deserve.
-- Michael Smallberg ""Sourcehttp://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2010/04/if-the-sec-has-a-whistleblower-program-but-nobody-ever-uses-it-does-it-really-exist.html
Speaking Up and Blowing the Whistle is NOT Really Rewarded, You Risk ALL - it Should NOT Be that Way.
" Imagine being in a situation in which you knew you had to be quiet in order to advance your own personal career, rather than speaking up and blowing the whistle on irregularities and improprieties within your firm.
This message is consistently relayed by many a whistleblower who has suffered from having tried to do the right thing. What is the result?
Firms tout their virtuous values of integrity, respect, and excellence while effectively muzzling those who would blow the whistle on crimes and illegal practices.
I believe this reality is all too present in many, if not most, industries in our society today. There is absolutely no doubt it is present on Wall Street. Why do I write this?
A recently released report from the SEC’s Office of Inspector General David Kotz highlights the fact that the ‘whistles on Wall Street’ have been largely silent for a long time.
The Project on Government Oversight highlights this report in a recent commentary,
Not Much Bounty for SEC Whistleblower Program:
For more than 20 years, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has had a program in place to reward whistleblowers who provide the agency with information about insider trading.
But a new audit by the SEC Office of Inspector General (OIG) reveals that the program has almost never been used, is barely recognized inside or outside the SEC, and has fundamental design flaws.
It turns out the SEC has received very few applications in the past two decades for bounties under the program — and only five people have actually received payments since the program first began:"
Source and Full article with Additional Documents
http://www.senseoncents.com/2010/04/wall-streets-code-of-silence/#comments
Some Comments from On SEC Whistleblowers Above Link
"Does America truly think that a career regulator with longstanding ties within the financial industry can break Wall Street’s “code of silence”? "
" .... make sure America knows that there really is no pretense of investor protection so they can move forward accordingly. "
"Better not to even have the whistleblower program, though, than to pretend it exists. Lastly, the heads of all the banks should be called on the carpet and mandated to outline whistleblower protection programs within their organizations."
"Well, I I guess I thought it has been proven painfully obvious that we had no investor protection from FINRA and that obviously holds true for the SEC as well, but I guess you are right.. the public needs to hear about it again and again until they get it and insist that their representatives take meaningful action to fix things. "
Other Links on Peter Sivere SEC, JP Morgan Whistleblower
SEC IG Report: George Demos Pimped Peter Sivere; (January 28, 2010)
Posted here By
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
This message is consistently relayed by many a whistleblower who has suffered from having tried to do the right thing. What is the result?
Firms tout their virtuous values of integrity, respect, and excellence while effectively muzzling those who would blow the whistle on crimes and illegal practices.
I believe this reality is all too present in many, if not most, industries in our society today. There is absolutely no doubt it is present on Wall Street. Why do I write this?
A recently released report from the SEC’s Office of Inspector General David Kotz highlights the fact that the ‘whistles on Wall Street’ have been largely silent for a long time.
The Project on Government Oversight highlights this report in a recent commentary,
Not Much Bounty for SEC Whistleblower Program:
For more than 20 years, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has had a program in place to reward whistleblowers who provide the agency with information about insider trading.
But a new audit by the SEC Office of Inspector General (OIG) reveals that the program has almost never been used, is barely recognized inside or outside the SEC, and has fundamental design flaws.
It turns out the SEC has received very few applications in the past two decades for bounties under the program — and only five people have actually received payments since the program first began:"
Source and Full article with Additional Documents
http://www.senseoncents.com/2010/04/wall-streets-code-of-silence/#comments
Some Comments from On SEC Whistleblowers Above Link
"Does America truly think that a career regulator with longstanding ties within the financial industry can break Wall Street’s “code of silence”? "
" .... make sure America knows that there really is no pretense of investor protection so they can move forward accordingly. "
"Better not to even have the whistleblower program, though, than to pretend it exists. Lastly, the heads of all the banks should be called on the carpet and mandated to outline whistleblower protection programs within their organizations."
"Well, I I guess I thought it has been proven painfully obvious that we had no investor protection from FINRA and that obviously holds true for the SEC as well, but I guess you are right.. the public needs to hear about it again and again until they get it and insist that their representatives take meaningful action to fix things. "
Other Links on Peter Sivere SEC, JP Morgan Whistleblower
SEC IG Report: George Demos Pimped Peter Sivere; (January 28, 2010)
Posted here By
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Ruth M. Pollack - Judge Harold Baer, Jr. - US District Court For the Southern District - New York. Re: Pollack and Chesney V. State of New York.
A Cover up of New York State and of Federal Crimes - Andrew Cuomo
"" Dear Judge Baer
I am a plaintiff in the above action filed in this court and assigned by "wheel" to you. Also plaintiffs in this action are Kevin G. and Lorraine Chesney. This Letter is written to notify you of the fraudulent representations made by New York State defendants and to seek "reconsideration" and reversal of an endorsed "order" relaying our case to Judge Paul Crotty. ""
Source and Full Letter Click Here.
Ruth M. Pollack - Kevin G. Chesney
"" Dear Judge Baer
I am a plaintiff in the above action filed in this court and assigned by "wheel" to you. Also plaintiffs in this action are Kevin G. and Lorraine Chesney. This Letter is written to notify you of the fraudulent representations made by New York State defendants and to seek "reconsideration" and reversal of an endorsed "order" relaying our case to Judge Paul Crotty. ""
Source and Full Letter Click Here.
Ruth M. Pollack - Kevin G. Chesney
Monday, April 5, 2010
Cardio Cocktail Sucks - Cardio Cocktail Scam - Formor International Fraud and Deception. Formor International Bait and Switch Kings. Cardio Cocktail
A Lot of Folks are Out there Googling "Cardio Cocktail Sucks" and "Cardio Cocktail Scam" - So I Thought I Would Give Them a Cardio Cocktail Scam to Look at.
My name is Crystal L. Cox and I am an Ex - Formor International Distributor. I was taking Cardio Cocktail a few years back, and tried to build an online business selling Cardio Cocktail, however Formor International had different ideas and prevented me, at every turn in the road from make money selling Cardio Cocktail on my Cardio Cocktail Websites.
I still stuck in there selling Cardio Cocktail with Formor International even though they were constantly hurting my Cardio Cocktail Business and keeping me from succeeding at Selling Cardio Cocktail.
When Formor International Brought Dan Hobbs on board it became and even worse nightmare trying to do anything to get ahead. Plus Formor International Changed the Cardio Cocktail Pay Plan. Dan Hobbs is a very discriminating and judgemental man and even did a Formor International Video that was directing hate at people he did not "approve" of. It was a real turn off, that on top of the Cardio Cocktail pay Slash...
Well the Cardio Cocktail Scam was becoming undeniably obvious.
We were on top of the search engines for "Cardio Cocktail" within 5 weeks of joining Formor International selling Cardio Cocktail. Formor International did not like that so they quietly broker our Cardio Cocktail links and re-directed our Cardio Cocktail internet Traffic.
When We Complained to Formor International about our Cardio Cocktail links and told Formor International what was happening when our customers clicked on our Cardio Cocktail links.. well
Formor International would Flat Out Lied and tell us that we were not allowed to have Cardio Cocktail websites and that no one at Formor International had a Cardio Cocktail Website.
Yet Our Upline and their Upline certainly did have a Cardio Cocktail Website and even advertised their Formor International Cardio Cocktail in Google Adwords.
Apparently it was a Cardio Cocktail Secret ... like Not being able to sign up your spouse but they do anyway. Turns out the Real Cardio Cocktail - Formor International secret was they steal your BV, another words your Cardio Cocktail Money.
Formor International steals your internet traffic in selling Cardio Cocktail and breaks your Cardio Cocktail links constantly.
If you Complain about Formor International's Cardio Cocktail Scam - they break out the good ol' policies and procedures to say that your not allowed to have a Cardio Cocktail website, yet Formor International knows full well that ALL the Formor International Distributor's do in Fact have a Cardio Cocktail Website.
Formor International just lets their Formor International Distributor's get lots of money and business coming in and then they pull out the Lord Formor Rule Book and Bring the Hammer Down, meanwhile they let you build up an awesome Cardio Cocktail business for them, You Lose... and 3 years later at Formor International - this Cardio Cocktail Scam is still going on.
Since quitting Formor International in Selling Cardio Cocktail and Yes I did Quit Selling Cardio Cocktail by Formor International but Formor International would not release me.. so I put up FormorSucks.com and they fired me.. gee Can't Quit but they love to Fire Their Formor International Distributors.
Anyway since quitting selling Cardio Cocktail I found out that Dr. Joseph Prendergast left Formor International years ago because he found out that Formor International did not really put 5 Grams of L-Arginine in Cardio Cocktail, as Formor International stated that was and is in Cardio Cocktail.
I have also Learned that Cardio Cocktail has Ace-K, which I believe to be a dangerous Cardio Cocktail Ingredient that is in the BeFlora Plus.
Policies and Procedures at ForMor International are changed often to benefit Formor International and to prevent Cardio Cocktail - Formor International Distributor's from getting ahead or doing better in the Search Engines then the Formor International Mafia.
So all in all the Cardio Cocktail Scam at , Formor International has made , Formor International very rich on the backs of Formor International Distributor's who never had a chance at getting ahead with selling Cardio Cocktail.
I have sinced moved to Good Life International Selling Mega Cardio Health Plus. Mega Cardio Health Plus is a Better Product. Good Life International has a Way Better Play Plan and Good Life International is ALL for their Good Life International Distributors having websites and getting a strong eCommerce business going.
Click Here to Join Me at Good Life International and
Avoid the Formor International - Cardio Cocktail Scam
More on My Cardio Cocktail Scam story at
www.FormorSucks.com
or you can email me at
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
to find out more on what I think
about the Formor International Mafia.
Much More Coming Soon on the Formor International Cardio Cocktail Scam - Plus tons of research on Advanced Products, Formor International, and their affiliation..
Posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger and
Ex - Formor International Cardio Cocktail Distributor
PS - this is Not Bait and Switch - it is Quit Formor - it is SWITCH..
it is DO Not Join the Formor International Mafia...
My name is Crystal L. Cox and I am an Ex - Formor International Distributor. I was taking Cardio Cocktail a few years back, and tried to build an online business selling Cardio Cocktail, however Formor International had different ideas and prevented me, at every turn in the road from make money selling Cardio Cocktail on my Cardio Cocktail Websites.
I still stuck in there selling Cardio Cocktail with Formor International even though they were constantly hurting my Cardio Cocktail Business and keeping me from succeeding at Selling Cardio Cocktail.
When Formor International Brought Dan Hobbs on board it became and even worse nightmare trying to do anything to get ahead. Plus Formor International Changed the Cardio Cocktail Pay Plan. Dan Hobbs is a very discriminating and judgemental man and even did a Formor International Video that was directing hate at people he did not "approve" of. It was a real turn off, that on top of the Cardio Cocktail pay Slash...
Well the Cardio Cocktail Scam was becoming undeniably obvious.
We were on top of the search engines for "Cardio Cocktail" within 5 weeks of joining Formor International selling Cardio Cocktail. Formor International did not like that so they quietly broker our Cardio Cocktail links and re-directed our Cardio Cocktail internet Traffic.
When We Complained to Formor International about our Cardio Cocktail links and told Formor International what was happening when our customers clicked on our Cardio Cocktail links.. well
Formor International would Flat Out Lied and tell us that we were not allowed to have Cardio Cocktail websites and that no one at Formor International had a Cardio Cocktail Website.
Yet Our Upline and their Upline certainly did have a Cardio Cocktail Website and even advertised their Formor International Cardio Cocktail in Google Adwords.
Apparently it was a Cardio Cocktail Secret ... like Not being able to sign up your spouse but they do anyway. Turns out the Real Cardio Cocktail - Formor International secret was they steal your BV, another words your Cardio Cocktail Money.
Formor International steals your internet traffic in selling Cardio Cocktail and breaks your Cardio Cocktail links constantly.
If you Complain about Formor International's Cardio Cocktail Scam - they break out the good ol' policies and procedures to say that your not allowed to have a Cardio Cocktail website, yet Formor International knows full well that ALL the Formor International Distributor's do in Fact have a Cardio Cocktail Website.
Formor International just lets their Formor International Distributor's get lots of money and business coming in and then they pull out the Lord Formor Rule Book and Bring the Hammer Down, meanwhile they let you build up an awesome Cardio Cocktail business for them, You Lose... and 3 years later at Formor International - this Cardio Cocktail Scam is still going on.
Since quitting Formor International in Selling Cardio Cocktail and Yes I did Quit Selling Cardio Cocktail by Formor International but Formor International would not release me.. so I put up FormorSucks.com and they fired me.. gee Can't Quit but they love to Fire Their Formor International Distributors.
Anyway since quitting selling Cardio Cocktail I found out that Dr. Joseph Prendergast left Formor International years ago because he found out that Formor International did not really put 5 Grams of L-Arginine in Cardio Cocktail, as Formor International stated that was and is in Cardio Cocktail.
I have also Learned that Cardio Cocktail has Ace-K, which I believe to be a dangerous Cardio Cocktail Ingredient that is in the BeFlora Plus.
Policies and Procedures at ForMor International are changed often to benefit Formor International and to prevent Cardio Cocktail - Formor International Distributor's from getting ahead or doing better in the Search Engines then the Formor International Mafia.
So all in all the Cardio Cocktail Scam at , Formor International has made , Formor International very rich on the backs of Formor International Distributor's who never had a chance at getting ahead with selling Cardio Cocktail.
I have sinced moved to Good Life International Selling Mega Cardio Health Plus. Mega Cardio Health Plus is a Better Product. Good Life International has a Way Better Play Plan and Good Life International is ALL for their Good Life International Distributors having websites and getting a strong eCommerce business going.
Click Here to Join Me at Good Life International and
Avoid the Formor International - Cardio Cocktail Scam
More on My Cardio Cocktail Scam story at
www.FormorSucks.com
or you can email me at
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
to find out more on what I think
about the Formor International Mafia.
Much More Coming Soon on the Formor International Cardio Cocktail Scam - Plus tons of research on Advanced Products, Formor International, and their affiliation..
Posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger and
Ex - Formor International Cardio Cocktail Distributor
PS - this is Not Bait and Switch - it is Quit Formor - it is SWITCH..
it is DO Not Join the Formor International Mafia...
Sunday, April 4, 2010
EDNY & Valley Stream FOIA / Both Destroyed all original case file and documents. Kevin Chesney Whistleblower - Ruth Pollack Attorney.
" FEDERAL COURT AND CONFIRMED CRIMINAL AND CORRUPT SCHOOL DISTRICT DESTROY CASE FILE, DOCUMENTS AND ALL EVIDENCE TO TRY TO AVOID CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AND FORENSIC EVALUATION!!! "
Coming Soon To Our Industry Whistleblower and Expose Court Corruption Network - the Story of Kevin Chesney Whistleblower.
Coming soon.. "Proof of the theft and misappropriation of Hundreds of Millions of LOCAL, STATE and FEDERAL TAX DOLLARS!!! "
" NEW YORK STATE IS BROKE!!! "
"Where is our Attorney General???
This is not only a crime but a cover up. "
Stay Tuned as We Explore all the Parts and Pieces of
www.ConcealingDocuments.com will Soon Explore the Depth the - Pollack and Chesney V. EDNY et al on SDNY, New York Judiciary Committee Hearing First Dept , Plaintiffs Kevin Chesney, Kevin Chesney Whistle Blower, Ruth Pollock, Ruth M. Pollack, Esq., Andrew Cuomo, Cuomo Family Secrets, Human Rights Laws, Judge Hurley, Hundreds of millions of tax dollars misappropriated / stolen, and more..
"" CUOMO and the Crotty family, are close friends and political allies.
Our federal judge Harold Baer was illegally taken off the case to cover up mammoth state and federal judicial scandal involving school districts and bribes and payoffs we have not yet proven.
But they can't hide it forever!!!
The state of new york is broke and Cuomo has an enormous amount of $$$ in his campaign coffers!!! We need the F.B.I. and an independent investigation .. ""
Research Links
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29297423/Kevin-Chesney-Whistle-Blower
http://www.websupp.org/data/EDNY/2:05-cv-05106-78-EDNY.pdf
Got a Tip on This Story ?
Email Me at
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Coming Soon To Our Industry Whistleblower and Expose Court Corruption Network - the Story of Kevin Chesney Whistleblower.
Coming soon.. "Proof of the theft and misappropriation of Hundreds of Millions of LOCAL, STATE and FEDERAL TAX DOLLARS!!! "
" NEW YORK STATE IS BROKE!!! "
"Where is our Attorney General???
This is not only a crime but a cover up. "
Stay Tuned as We Explore all the Parts and Pieces of
www.ConcealingDocuments.com will Soon Explore the Depth the - Pollack and Chesney V. EDNY et al on SDNY, New York Judiciary Committee Hearing First Dept , Plaintiffs Kevin Chesney, Kevin Chesney Whistle Blower, Ruth Pollock, Ruth M. Pollack, Esq., Andrew Cuomo, Cuomo Family Secrets, Human Rights Laws, Judge Hurley, Hundreds of millions of tax dollars misappropriated / stolen, and more..
"" CUOMO and the Crotty family, are close friends and political allies.
Our federal judge Harold Baer was illegally taken off the case to cover up mammoth state and federal judicial scandal involving school districts and bribes and payoffs we have not yet proven.
But they can't hide it forever!!!
The state of new york is broke and Cuomo has an enormous amount of $$$ in his campaign coffers!!! We need the F.B.I. and an independent investigation .. ""
Research Links
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29297423/Kevin-Chesney-Whistle-Blower
http://www.websupp.org/data/EDNY/2:05-cv-05106-78-EDNY.pdf
Got a Tip on This Story ?
Email Me at
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Friday, April 2, 2010
Summit 1031 Exchange, Summit Accommodators Principle Mark Neuman Rats out Lane Lyons and the "others" and Mark Neuman SAYS they "deserve it".
Bend Oregon News
Mark Neuman Summit 1031 Principle Confesses to Bankruptcy Whistleblower Daughter, Stephanie Studebaker-Deyoung that he indeed knew that Lane Lyons, Summit 1031 Principal Lied about his REAL role at Summit Accommodators - Summit 1031 out of Bend Oregon.
Was this the First that Bankruptcy Whistleblower Stephanie DeYoung Knew?
The Summit 1031 Exchange Bankruptcy has 106 victims and their families that are devasted for over 15 months now from the White Collar Crime and Corruption of what I Call the Bend Oregon Mafia - Summit Accommodators, Summit 1031 Exchange - Summit Principals: Tim Larkin, Mark Neuman, Lane Lyons, and Brian Stevens.
Here is the Email from Daddy, Mark Neuman to Daughter Stephanie DeYoung.
She Sent it to Me.. to Defend the Creditors..
March 7, 2010
9:48:47 PM
" I know very well what Lane did in his tenure is not in line with how he's trying to portray his role. I have the list- yes, an actual list and it gets longer as I review emails and such.
So tell me this.
Do you think that your blogs will expose it and somebody from the DOJ will just show up someday and charge them?
This is how I pictured it. "
Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox has This Email Conversation,
Complete with headers, IP addresses, Forwards and All.
Funny Mark Neuman, this Indeed is How I pictured it.
So Let's See How it Works as the Next Few Days and Weeks paints a Very Different Side to the Summit 1031 Bankrupty out of Bend Oregon.
Will the DOJ just show up and Charge them
as Mark Neuman Summit 1031 Principle "Pictured It" ?
more on This Confession Email at
http://www.summit1031sucks.com/2010/04/so-per-email-linked-below-what-did-lane.html
For More on this Breaking Summit 1031 Scandal
GO to www.Summit1031Sucks.com
Over the Next Few Weeks Tons will Come out
on the Behind the Scenes of the Summit 1031
Bankruptcy Corruption Scandal.
Lots More Emails and Secrets Coming Soon !!!
Posted Here by Industry Whistleblower
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Mark Neuman Summit 1031 Principle Confesses to Bankruptcy Whistleblower Daughter, Stephanie Studebaker-Deyoung that he indeed knew that Lane Lyons, Summit 1031 Principal Lied about his REAL role at Summit Accommodators - Summit 1031 out of Bend Oregon.
Was this the First that Bankruptcy Whistleblower Stephanie DeYoung Knew?
The Summit 1031 Exchange Bankruptcy has 106 victims and their families that are devasted for over 15 months now from the White Collar Crime and Corruption of what I Call the Bend Oregon Mafia - Summit Accommodators, Summit 1031 Exchange - Summit Principals: Tim Larkin, Mark Neuman, Lane Lyons, and Brian Stevens.
Here is the Email from Daddy, Mark Neuman to Daughter Stephanie DeYoung.
She Sent it to Me.. to Defend the Creditors..
March 7, 2010
9:48:47 PM
" I know very well what Lane did in his tenure is not in line with how he's trying to portray his role. I have the list- yes, an actual list and it gets longer as I review emails and such.
So tell me this.
Do you think that your blogs will expose it and somebody from the DOJ will just show up someday and charge them?
This is how I pictured it. "
Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox has This Email Conversation,
Complete with headers, IP addresses, Forwards and All.
Funny Mark Neuman, this Indeed is How I pictured it.
So Let's See How it Works as the Next Few Days and Weeks paints a Very Different Side to the Summit 1031 Bankrupty out of Bend Oregon.
Will the DOJ just show up and Charge them
as Mark Neuman Summit 1031 Principle "Pictured It" ?
more on This Confession Email at
http://www.summit1031sucks.com/2010/04/so-per-email-linked-below-what-did-lane.html
For More on this Breaking Summit 1031 Scandal
GO to www.Summit1031Sucks.com
Over the Next Few Weeks Tons will Come out
on the Behind the Scenes of the Summit 1031
Bankruptcy Corruption Scandal.
Lots More Emails and Secrets Coming Soon !!!
Posted Here by Industry Whistleblower
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
RSS Feed (xml)
