Iviewit Rebuttal to Thomas Cahill - New York State Bar - Kenneth Rubenstein Bar Complaint

"REBUTTAL OF IVIEWIT TO THE NEW YORK STATE BAR OF
RESPONSE OF KENNETH RUBENSTEIN AUTHORED BY STEVEN KRANE"


P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
July 2, 2003

Re: Rebuttal of Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. Response
to Complaint of Iviewit Holdings, Inc., Docket 2003.0531

Dear Mr. Cahill:
By way of introduction, I am Chief Executive Officer (Acting) of Iviewit Holdings, Inc.
and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Company”) with a background of which the Company
invites you to view at http://www.iviewit.com/management.htm , and I write to rebutt all
those material feints, denials, and, therefore, inconsistencies in the response of Kenneth
Rubenstein, Esq. (“Respondent”) to the Company’s New York Bar Complaint of
February 26 (“Complaint”).

Moreover, the facts of the Complaint find Respondent so uncloaked that he resorts to
disingenuously traversing from tall tales of retaliation to some irrelevant litigation, to
stories of a “failed dotcom company looking for someone to blame,” and even to the
personal attacks on the founder and principal inventor of the Company, whose passion for
his inventions confounds the mind of Respondent whose personal, financial, and other
ambitions rise above all, to the detriment of his clients.

Furthermore, Respondent continues this transparent discourse and all the while maintaining “The only thing I did for Iviewit is I referred them to another patent lawyer,”1 which the Company shall incite in the minds of First Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee that such a statement by Respondent could not be farther from the truth, as evidenced by Section I to Section XII, infra.

Prior to Section I to Section XII, infra, however, the first feint we need to address, and as
Respondent has chosen to apprise you, is that the Company and Respondent’s employer,
Proskauer Rose LLP (“Proskauer”), are parties to that certain litigation titled Proskauer
Rose LLP v. Iviewit.com, Inc. et. al., Case No. CA 01-04671 AB (Circuit Court of the
15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida filed May 2, 2001)
(“Litigation”) that, as Respondent is aware, yet prefaces and attributes the Complaint to
said Litigation, bears not one iota of relevance to the specific allegations contained in the
Company’s Complaint.

Second, another important feint to correct, and wherein Respondent hopes that First
Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee fails to see the forest from the trees, is that the Company is not now nor has ever been a so called “dotcom” company, but rather is a designer and developer of video scaling and imaging technologies where, in combination and among other things, said technologies have the capability of “panning and zooming” on any image or any image within a video without degradation to the quality of that image (where degradation is termed “pixelation” to those skilled in the art).

Additionally, the Company technologies are targeted to device original equipment
manufacturers (“OEMs”) who, when individually, or in combination with other third
party hardware, firmware, and/or software, shall include them in OEM products such as,
but not limited to, cable set top boxes, satellite set top boxes, analog-to-digital converter
boxes, next generation DVD players, digital cameras, personal video recorders, and
personal computers; alternatively the Company has the option of exclusively contributing
said essential technologies to the multimedia patent pools known as MPEG 2 (digital
compression according the digital television standard), MPEG 4 (another compression
standard at a lower bit rate, and wherein interactive objects may be embedded), and DVD
(“digital video disc”) player-drive-codec and the discs themselves.

Third, and most disingenuously, Respondent attempts to point to the two and one half
percent (2.5%) interest in, an interest that Proskauer paid a nominal, par value price for,
and that was supposedly in return for adoption by the MPEG 2 patent pool of the
Company’s essential inventions, the Company’s direct, 92.03% owned, subsidiary,
Iviewit Technologies, Inc., that more specifically translates into a one and ninety nine one
hundredths of a percent (1.99%) fully diluted interest in lower valued Class B Non-
Voting shares of the Company’s direct subsidiary, as a motivation for Proskauer Rose to see
the Company succeed, yet fails to apprise First Judicial Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee that in Respondent’s stewardship of the MPEG 2 patent pool,
which presently generates royalties in the nine figures, according to industry observers,
and that once digital television and the content there with assumes a penetration rate in
U.S. households akin to analog color television that said royalties from MPEG 2 shall rise
into the trillions of dollars, and much to the benefit of Respondent in his role as counsel,
by his admission2, and to the best of the Company’s knowledge, patent evaluator, and
Proskauer Rose, thereby dwarfing any potential realized gain from the nominally priced equity position in the Company’s direct subsidiary.

Clearly, by this analysis, the Company suggests that Respondent and his author, Steven C. Krane (“Author”), continue to apply their skills sets towards, physics and technology licensing, and legal ethics and dispute resolution, respectively, as their prospects of future careers as financial analysts have diminished as a result of this poorly attempted feint in the response of Respondent.

Fourth, and an equally poorly analyzed feint, is Respondent’s reference to a letter
presented in his deposition to that certain Litigation on November 20, 2002, wherein such
Litigation is wholly irrelevant to the Complaint, but is instructive for these purposes,
seemingly attempting to engage Respondent’s services future services, but by viewing an
electronic copy and right clicking the mouse of a IBM compatible personal computer and
selecting “properties” it is clear to Respondent that said letter’s date of creation was April
25, 2002, which was designed as a means for which to allow Respondent to “save his
soul” by reaffirming prior statements to potential licensees, and inapposite to
Respondent’s assumed intention (see Section IX Subsection A and Exhibit O – Statement
of CEO Lamont).

Lastly, Mr. Thomas Cahill, and as Respondent would have you believe, this is NOT the
Complaint of Eliot I. Bernstein, but of Iviewit Holdings, Inc. (a Delaware Corporation)
funded in total of approximately Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000) by prominent investors and entertainment professionals alike, including, but not limited to: Wayne Huizenga, Wayne Huizenga Jr., Alan Epstein, Esq. and Michele Mulrooney, Esq. of Armstrong
Hirsch Jackoway Tyerman & Wertheimer of Los Angeles. Cal., Kenneth Anderson, CPA,
Donald Kane (formerly Managing Director of Goldman Sachs), James Osterling, James
Armstrong, Ellen DeGenres, Alan Young, Allan Shapiro (Atlas Entertainment), Mitchell
Welsch (Vice President of UBS Paine Webber), and Jeffrey Friedstein (Vice President of
Goldman Sachs), Caroline P. Rogers, Esq. and many others.
p
Full Article - Full Rebuttal to Thomas Cahill. Part of the US Court Smackdown
on the Iviewit Inventors in the Trillion Dollar Patent Heist.
http://www.deniedpatent.com/2009/12/rebuttal-of-iviewit-to-new-york-state.html
p

Greg Caton - Alpha Omega Labs - Stand NOW against the Lies the FDA tells us to Keep us Sick ... Herbalists are NOT Criminals - the FDA Reign of Terror

As Some one Who LOVES Cancer Salves, and knows that for ME they work. I too have been threatened by the FDA, I guess Black Salve, Cancer Salve, or the like MUST work for some or why jail, harass and ruin peoples life over selling it or talking about it.

Though the Cancer Doctors will call it a "Spontaneous Cure" for Me I have seen miracles with Bloodroot, and whether I am shut down, stripped of Civil Rights, Jailed or Completely Ruined by the Corruption, Harassment and down right dangerous FDA - I will Still ALWAYS love Bloodroot, Cancer Salves for it has changed my life and in my opinion Saved my life.

Believe what you need to but Seriously the FDA's reign of terror over those whos Alleged CURE Cancer.. well it NEEDS to be OVER and Now. There has ALWAYS been a CURE for cancer it seems .. I mean look at History, those jailed, run out of the country and even killed if they tell you that you can Cure Cancer. We simply must have the FDA and Big Pharma involved or Else... so the FDA has a right to torture you if you don't approve of or believe in mutilating and radiating your body to use the "Traditional" tortous and well non-proven cure of body part removal - chemo and radiation.

Believe what you need but folks where was the FDA and the Big Drug Companies when the Natives Americans had cancer... Cancer is Natural and there are Natural Cures, there are tons of documents, reports, files and people that can tell you this ... but they don't dare.. CuZ the FDA will kill ya, jail ya, torture you.. all because you want to heal without Torture and Losing ALL your Money..

Your are NOT living in a FREE Country and well this topic is VERY dear to me and VERY sick indeed, you are NOT allowed to CURE CANCER so the FDA can keep you down, keep your tortured and keep you giving their Cronies MONEY...

It is all a Lie and A Hoax...

This Story was sent to me today and I would like to say if you don't Stand UP NOW then when. I Believe there has ALWAYS been a Cure for cancer and more then one... and the FDA is at the Helm of the ship that wants to keep you paying to die a tortorous death, Why?

well Here is the Greg Caton Story... if You Don't get behind this one then When will you Stand up to the FDA? When will it NOT be ok to torture our family, take all their money and LIE about known Cures... for ALL who have been jailed, shut down, ruined, and ran out of the country ... for Claiming to Cure Cancer... Stand up for them NOW .. speak OUT... On this...

Stop FDA Persecution of Innocent People.

p

Enough is Enough

p

End the Reign of Terror of the FDA

t

Time to Investigate the FDA

g

Time to STOP the Cruelty, false imprisonment,

Suppressing the Truth, Destroying Businesses,

and End the Free For All Crime Spree the FDA

has been on for Decades on top of Decades.

r

********
"(NaturalNews) The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today stands accused of taking part in the kidnapping and illegal extradition of a permanent resident of Ecuador, in violation of both international law and Ecuadorian law.

Greg Caton, owner and operator of Alpha Omega Labs ( http://www.altcancer.com/ ), an herbal products company that sells anti-cancer herbal remedies made with Ecuadorian medicinal herbs, was arrested at gunpoint at a road checkpoint in Ecuador, then transported to an Ecuadorian holding facility to await a hearing on December 14, 2009.

Greg Caton was expected to be set free by the Ecuadorian judge at that hearing based on the facts of the case which indicated Caton's permanent residency in Ecuador is legal and valid.

Three days before the hearing could take place, Greg Caton was taken from his holding facility and, with the help of U.S. State Department employees, involuntarily placed on an American Airlines plane headed for Miami.

An Ecuadorian judge rushed to the airport in Guayaquil and demanded that Caton be released from the plane, stating that the attempted deportation was illegal, but American Airlines employees reportedly refused to allow Caton to leave the plane, stating that the plane was "U.S. territory" and that Ecuadorian law did not apply there (even though the plane was still on the tarmac in Guayaquil and under the direction of the air traffic control tower there).

The plane then departed Guayaquil and continued its flight to Miami where Greg Caton was held in a federal detention facility to await trial in the U.S.

His crimes?

Selling herbal medicine and
daring to tell the truth
about those medicines on his website.

FDA vs. Greg Caton

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has, for many years, pursued Caton, accusing him of selling "unapproved drugs" -- herbal medicines that have never been, and will never be, approved by the FDA to treat anything.

He was convicted of these crimes in 2003
and served 33 months in federal prison.

After serving his term, Caton was on probation for another three years.

As Greg Caton's wife explained to me in an exclusive interview, eighteen months into that probation, Caton received word that a "rogue FDA agent" named John Armand was intimidating his ex-employees in an attempt to convince them to testify against Caton in order to have him convicted of further charges that would lead to more prison time.

After submitting a request to his presiding judge to ask that the remainder of his probation be excused, Caton moved to Ecuador and acquired permanent residency there, in part to escape persecution by what he saw as a rogue FDA agent violating the law in an effort to see Caton prosecuted yet again.

As you'll see below, this fear was not unfounded.

Selling anti-cancer herbs is no crime in Ecuador
In Ecuador, by the way, selling herbs and accurately describing
their medicinal properties is not a crime. It's common sense.

Every pharmacy, health food store, shaman and medicine man openly talks about the anti-cancer properties of various herbs. No one goes to prison for selling medicinal herbs in Ecuador -- the very idea seems silly.

Why would any nation want to lock up its healers?

So the "crimes" for which Caton was convicted in the USA aren't even considered crimes in more medicinally enlightened countries such as Ecuador. There, people like Caton are considered valuable members of society.

Back in the U.S., the only real crime Caton was now guilty of was failing to serve his last 18 months of probation. But even that probation sentence was based on the false crime of Caton selling medicinal herbs while accurately describing their health-related properties. In other words, if not for the FDA's persecution of all herbalists who sell anti-cancer herbs, Caton would never have had jail time nor probation to begin with.

The FDA invokes Interpol

When the FDA realized Greg Caton had moved to Ecuador, they went to work to try to have Caton arrested internationally. In order to accomplish this, they needed to have Greg Caton listed as a wanted fugitive with Interpol, the international police database headquartered in Lyon, France.

Interpol is normally reserved for listing serious criminals: Murderers, rapists, terrorists, international money launderers, war criminals and the like. NaturalNews contacted Interpol to inquire as to how Gregory Caton, an herbal formulator violating nothing more than probation, could have been listed with Interpol as a wanted international fugitive with a so-called "Red Notice" -- Interpol's highest alert level.

This is the kind of alert level someone l
ike Osama Bin Laden might normally merit with Interpol.

We were told by the U.S. Interpol office (under the DOJ), "those individuals placed on a Most Wanted List are the ones who have allegedly committed the most heinous of crimes for a very long period of time."

In other words, the Interpol "Red Notice" designation -- which was applied to Greg Caton's listing -- is never applied to people who merely skip probation. The Greg Caton listing with Interpol, NaturalNews learned, was off protocol.

Someone, it seemed, had managed to exploit the DOJ / Interpol system to get Caton listed as an international fugitive when he was merely guilty of skipping out on the last 18 months of his probation.

Exaggerating the information with Interpol

To make the Interpol listing sound more serious, paperwork was submitted to Interpol decision makers that listed Caton's offenses as "drugs related crimes, fraud."

This implies that Caton was engaged in some sort of serious drug operation: Drug smuggling, perhaps, or drug dealing. In reality, his only crime was selling medicinal herbs that the FDA mislabels "drugs" in its own bizarre regulatory language -- the same language that calls cherries "drugs" if they are sold alongside any words describing their benefits for relieving arthritis pain and inflammation.

To the FDA, even a bottle of water can be considered a "drug" if it's sold with the claim that it prevents dehydration, a medical condition.

The obvious question in all this, then, is: Who could have managed to exploit the Interpol system and get Greg Caton listed as an international fugitive?

Clues lead back to the FDA's Office of Criminal Investigation
The clue comes right from the Interpol listing itself,
where it describes the origin of the "arrest warrant" as Lafayette, Louisiana.

You can see the Interpol listing here:
http://www.interpol.int/public/data...

Lafayette, Louisiana is the former operating base of FDA criminal investigations officer John Armand, the agent who went after Caton in 1999 and who managed to get him convicted of a felony crime (selling medicinal herbs) in 2003.

NaturalNews attempted to contact John Armand to get his comments for this story. I called the FDA office in Lafayette, Louisiana, identified myself as a reporter for NaturalNews, and asked to speak with agent John Armand. I was told he had been relocated to Florida and could now be reached out of the Jacksonville office.

I called the FDA's Jacksonville office, identified myself and asked to speak with agent John Armand for his comments on this story. I was told that I must first speak to a "press officer" of the FDA, as only a press officer could offer public comment. The next day, I was able to reach FDA press officer Mike Kelly whose reply mirrors FDA official policy: "No comment."

The FDA, he explained, never comments on any "ongoing investigation." In all, I placed five phone calls to various offices of the FDA, each time asking to speak with John Armand to get his side of this story. In every case, I was stonewalled and either told to talk to someone else or given the "no comment" reply.

Recap

Just to make sure you're following the twisted details of this story, here's a quick recap:

Greg Caton, a U.S. citizen and legal Ecuadorian permanent resident operating a legal Ecuadorian business selling medicinal herbs to customers around the world, was arrested at a road checkpoint in Ecuador. A few days later, against the demands of an Ecuadorian judge, he was involuntarily placed onto an American Airlines commercial jet where he was flown to Miami and put in a federal holding facility.

As Cathryn Caton told me in a recent interview, "I blame American Airlines as much as I do the U.S. To me, they are part of this illegal kidnapping... to me it's a terrorist act. They helped and cooperated with illegally kidnapping my husband and flying him to the U.S. They were told repeatedly by this Ecuadorian federal judge that he is not to leave the country, and they cooperated with these U.S. officials to illegally remove Greg from the country, against Ecuadorian court order."

His arrest in Ecuador was made possible by the "Red Notice" listing with Interpol. That listing was submitted through the United States National Central Bureau (USNCB), under the DOJ (Department of Justice), and it was submitted to the USNCB by the FDA. Within the FDA, the source for the listing was the Lafayette office, where agent John Armand operated.

The "Red Notice" listing, however, was off-protocol because Greg Caton was only guilty of skipping out on probation, not engaging in the kind of "heinous crimes" normally required to achieve a Red Notice listing with Interpol, which is normally reserved for terrorists, mass murderers and war criminals.

The Interpol listing was the key to getting Greg Caton arrested and illegally deported from Ecuador, without the U.S. engaging in any sort of formal extradition process as required by international law. In essence, the United States of America kidnapped Greg Caton, denied him his civil liberties under Ecuadorian law (and even perhaps under U.S. law), and illegally transported him out of Ecuador against the demands of an Ecuadorian judge.

This entire charade was masterminded by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which managed to trick Interpol into flagging Caton with a "Red Notice" status even though his only outstanding crime was skipping out on probation to go seek a life of peace in a nation that welcomed his medicines instead of criminalizing them.

Does Cansema work?

Greg Caton's top-selling anti-cancer formulation is called Cansema, and it is sold by Alpha Omega Labs as an effective herbal treatment for topical cancers.

If you have skin cancer of any kind, I encourage you to learn about Cansema and how it has eliminated cancers in many people. Even though Greg is now imprisoned in the U.S., Alpha Omega Labs is still open for business, and you can purchase Cansema online right now at http://www.altcancer.com/ (note: NaturalNews has no financial relationship whatsoever with Alpha Omega Labs or Greg Caton).

Behind all the accusations, prosecutions and legal entanglements, the real question in all this seems to have been entirely avoided by U.S. health authorities. That question is, of course, does Cansema work? Does it really eliminate topical cancers?

If it works, then why all the criminal accusations against Greg Caton in the first place? Why the absurd labeling of his herbal products as "unapproved drugs" when even Caton himself doesn't call them drugs? He simply (and accurately) describes them as medicinal herbs, which is what they are. I find it fascinating that if I place a bottle of Cansema in my pocket when I board a plane in Ecuador, it's just "herbs," but when I exit the plane in Miami, suddenly those herbs have been transformed into "unapproved drugs" by the regulatory language police who operate in the U.S. much like the Ministry of Truth from George Orwell's novel 1984.

Regardless of what the product is called, the FDA isn't at all interested in whether Cansema actually works. The mere fact that the herbs were sold as a natural cancer treatment without FDA approval is enough to have Caton condemned as an international criminal. But in taking this stance, the FDA misses out on the thousands of satisfied customers who have successfully used Cansema to cure their own cancers.

Case in point: Dr. Brian O'Leary, a former NASA astronaut who has published over 100 scientific papers in peer-reviewed science literature ( http://www.brianoleary.info/about.html ). Dr. O'Leary is a customer of Greg Caton's. When he heard about Caton's illegal arrest and deportation from Ecuador, he issued this passionate statement:

Statement from Dr. Brian O'Leary

Greg Caton is a friend of mine and an extraordinary healer. I was shocked to hear about his kidnapping and illegal deportation to the U.S., regardless of perceptions of his legal status within the U.S., something I understand to be a mild violation at most. He is a legal resident of Ecuador and conducts a legal alternative health product [company] here. I thoroughly support his work in healing untold thousands of people of cancer and other serious diseases.

My own healing happened when Greg arrived at our home two years ago with his product Cansema. I had just been diagnosed with basal cell skin cancer after a biopsy had been taken from a very large and deep lesion on my back. I was scheduled for surgery the following week. I cancelled the surgery and applied the Cansema (a black salve consisting of a mixture of herbs and a bit of zinc chloride), and, in 3-4 weeks, a black scab formed that subsequently fell off. After three applications of the salve over 2-3 months, the cancer disappeared, leaving only a slight discoloration where the cancer had been.

An examination by a dermatologist at the St. Agustin clinic in Loja, Ecuador, showed that the cancer was completely gone. No new lesions have formed anywhere on my body, and diagnostic blood tests for any systemic cancers recently showed negatives, i.e., no cancer in my body.

On the larger issue of the suppression of alternative possibilities in the health, environmental and technology fields, we see a pattern emerging that the true geniuses of innovation are all too often violently suppressed by authorities who illegally, unethically and immorally punish these true pioneers of our time -- solely because of powerful vested interests that are far less effective in solving the problems presented.

This is an outrage, and I ask that, if justice has any meaning left, that Greg be released immediately from his current detention and flown back to his residence in Ecuador. This plea represents one of many coming from those of us who strongly feel that justice can only be served by supporting rather than condemning those of us willing and able to move humanity into a new paradigm of healing and sustainability.

If Mr. Caton is not immediately returned, and those who illegally bribed, kidnapped, deported and detained him are not held accountable, then many of us will need to take this issue to its next level for public airing.

- Brian O'Leary, Ph.D., former U.S. astronaut

Why healing is a crime in America

As these events clearly demonstrate, selling products that actually help people heal is a crime in America. There's a wonderful book on the topic, in fact, by author Kenny Ausubel, entitled, When Healing Becomes A Crime (http://www.amazon.com/When-Healing-...)

If you take a chance to read this book, you will discover that the kind of lawless tyranny, oppression and intimidation that has just been demonstrated against Greg Caton is nothing new for U.S. health authorities.

Similarly unscrupulous activities were being undertaken by the AMA in the first half of the 20th century in a desperate attempt to destroy the credibility (and livelihood) of Harry Hoxsey, a man who also manufactured and sold topical anti-cancer salves.

To this day, intimidation campaigns continue against companies selling anti-cancer remedies. It happens so often that one day when I was walking along the sidewalk in Boca Raton, I met a couple who, when they realized who I was, told me they had been forced to flee the United States to pursue their anti-cancer stem cell work in another country.

Mexico, the Bahamas, Central and South America are all full of expat scientists, alternative medicine doctors, herbalists and naturopaths who have been forced to flee the USA or face imprisonment for their "crimes" of treating cancer with things other than FDA-sanctioned chemotherapy, radiation or surgery. This is why Americans have virtually no access to cancer clinics that offer real hope for healing.

Instead, the American population is relegated to suffering the toxic side effects of chemotherapy and radiation under the "guidance" of nutritionally-ignorant oncologists who are poor doctors, but excellent followers of the FDA regime.

What Greg Caton's illegal arrest and deportation really represent is the ongoing war of tyranny against healers that's still pursued by the FDA and its "secret police" Office of Criminal Investigations (OCI).

This OCI, it turns out, operates with no oversight and no respect for the law of any land. Its employees and contractors openly engage in the intimidation of individuals engaged in the selling of natural products, routinely threatening them with imprisonment, armed raids, the seizure of their products and criminal prosecutions. Even Dr. Andrew Weil was recently threatened in this manner by the FDA. (http://www.naturalnews.com/027303_t...)

But NaturalNews asks the question: Who does the OCI answer to?

The answer is no one. There is no Congressional oversight, no judicial oversight and no civil rights protections for individuals targeted by the FDA's OCI. The U.S. Constitution and its Bill of Rights -- which are supposed to guarantee freedom of speech for herbalists as well as everyone else -- are thrown out the window by the OCI. Once you are targeted by the OCI, you have no rights to free speech.

You are considered an enemy of the state and can find yourself listed on Interpol alongside terrorists and war criminals even though your only crime might be selling herbal creams to natural health consumers.

The FDA claims its OCI office helps protect the American people from unscrupulous quacks and charlatans.

Certainly, there is a role for that function in any society, as many companies will inevitably try to cheat the public by selling health-related products that don't work (Tamiflu comes to mind, incidentally).

But do we really need to be protected from an herbal product that works?

How is Greg Caton's selling of herbal medicine harming anyone at all? His product really works, and if the FDA was interested in what works, you would think they might be interested in embracing herbalists instead of criminalizing them.

Anti-cancer herbs are common knowledge in Ecuador

That all this is going on in the USA is considered quite bizarre to locals in Ecuador, by the way. They are astonished at the idea that the United States of America would take a tax-paying, economy-boosting business person selling medicinal herbs and throw them in prison as criminals where the state must now foot the bill with taxpayer dollars. It

Keep in mind that Greg Caton was operating a perfectly legal business in Ecuador, with all necessary licensing, taxes and regulatory requirements. He was purchasing herbs from farmers, Shamans and land owners, then reformulating those herbs into long-proven anti-cancer remedies that were then sold to customers all over the world. He was breaking no laws in Ecuador, and in fact, he was contributing to the Ecuadorian economy by boosting exports and buying bulk herbs from all over Ecuador. Caton was a huge economic asset to the nation of Ecuador.

But he was a huge liability to the U.S. cancer industry which continues to base its business model on the intimidation and criminalization of anyone who offers cancer solutions outside the realm of pharmaceuticals, radiation and surgery.

The cancer industry's enforcement arm is the Food and Drug Administration, a dubious agency that follows no law (literally, there are no laws limiting the actions of the FDA) and operates with virtually no oversight whatsoever. Essentially, the FDA operates like the mob, respecting no law while using tactics of intimidation to assert its power and authority over others.

The failure of Interpol

Interpol, for its part, is already shrouded in corruption controversy. It's top chief now stands accused of maintaining links to organized crime, accepting bribes, and maintaining a relationship with a convicted smuggler of real drugs (not herbal medicines) -- a man named Glen Agliotti. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8...)

NaturalNews has learned that Interpol is routinely abused by profit-seekers in India, who use India's arcane "dowry laws" to label innocent spouses as international fugitives in order to blackmail them for payoff money. Interpol has openly participated in this blackmail scam for many years, allowing its website to be used as a point of leverage for "dowry scammers" (http://www.merinews.com/article/abu...)

We also found complaints about the abuse of Interpol by corporations in Dubai that are using the flimsy judicial system there to blame foreigners for corporate embezzlement when, in reality, people in Dubai are walking away with the cash. (http://detainedindubai.org/Detained...)

In fact, if you begin to dig into this story, you'll find that Interpol is frequently used by scammers to red-flag innocent victims, so it's not much of a surprise to learn that the FDA rigged Interpol to list Greg Caton as a criminal mastermind in order to have him arrested, kidnapped and illegally deported to the United States.

Certainly, Interpol has some useful function in the world, as the sharing of police intelligence about truly dangerous, violent criminals seems a worthy goal. But when the system is used to destroy the lives of innocent victims who are guilty of no such heinous crimes, it becomes a tool of the destruction of human rights.

Rather than protecting the innocent, in this case Interpol was used by the FDA to persecute the innocent. And that speaks strongly about the lack of credibility at Interpol.

Its "Red Notice" listings apparently carry no more credibility
than a plastic police badge found in a box of Cracker Jack.

About the term "kidnapping"

Some may question my use of the term "kidnapping" to describe the illegal arrest and deportation of Greg Caton from Ecuador. But if you carefully examine the definition of the word, you'll find it applies quite precisely to this situation:

Kidnapping: To abduct by force or fraud.
(Random House Dictionary)

As in, to involuntarily remove someone from their own home or property, with the threat of force (firearms), without the due process of law.

The United States of America, under this definition, is guilty of kidnapping an Ecuadorian resident. In no way did the USA engage in any legal extradition processes, nor did the USA even acknowledge any Ecuadorian law. Greg Caton was simply hauled away without a fair hearing and without any opportunity to defend himself against the charges being leveled against him.

This is not merely a violation of Greg Caton's civil rights,
it is a violation of international law.

Action items: What you can do right now
You have the power to help rights these wrong
and bring the FDA's actions in this matter to light.

As the editor of NaturalNews, I urge you to forward this story to your Senators and Congressional representatives. Someone please also make sure this story gets into the hands of Sen. Charles Grassley.

Protest this action with your elected representatives. In your own words, tell them why you think this kidnapping of Greg Caton is a great injustice that needs to be corrected.

Ask them to investigate the FDA's Office of Criminal Investigations and determine how it is that FDA agents are able to exploit Interpol listings to achieve the illegal kidnapping and deportation of U.S. citizens living abroad.

Why this truth must be told

People will ask me, upon this publication of this story, why I'm willing to speak out against the FDA, the DOJ and Interpol.

Actually, I have nothing against any of these organizations as long as they serve the People rather than the interests of domineering corporations. The FDA, DOJ and Interpol all have an important place in a just society -- but only if they stick to their original charter and use their resources to serve the greater good.

What this story on Natural News reveals is that each of these organizations has, in one way or another, been hijacked by corporate interests in order to suppress the actions of one individual whose products threaten the profits of the pharmaceutical industry.

In essence, Interpol has now been used to enforce the profit aims of Big Pharma, and that's not what Interpol is supposed to be used for. It's supposed to be about protecting the innocent, not allowing itself to be subjugated by Big Business (because, of course, the pharmaceutical industry virtually runs the FDA these days).

When Big Business runs the regulatory offices, the criminal investigation offices and the police organizations, the world is no longer safe for anyone who threatens the status quo. When the police intelligence community is used as law enforcement puppets by the corporate puppet masters, anyone who acts in competition with the established profit centers of corporate America (and cancer is a huge profit center) is immediately targeted for criminalization, prosecution and incarceration.

These are not the traits of a free society.

They are not the actions of a justice system. They aren't even what you would expect to find in a western nation that claims to operate under a free market enterprise system.

And yet this is exactly what we are seeing in the United States of America today, where this nation of regulatory tyrants is now openly engaged in the international kidnapping of innocents who have, for understandable reasons, chosen to reside in countries that do not consider herbalists to be criminals.

Free Greg Caton. "
r
Source
http://snardfarker.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=2649739%3ABlogPost%3A135385&commentId=2649739%3AComment%3A135393&xg_source=activity
r

Time to Demand Accountability....
Say NO to the Suppression of Cancer Cures
it is way Past Time for this..

r

The FDA's Job is to make sure you Die Suffering
and Pay the Drug Cartel, the Big Pharma and the Power Elite
on your way out..
r
r

JP Morgan involved in Stealing Millions of Bankruptcy Assets - Rubber-Stamped by Judge Beatty..and Between Alan Nisselson and Marc Goldberg

Again the US Trustee was Advised in Wrong Doing, Corruption
and Illegal Behavior and they Did nothing...

The US Department of Justice Bankruptcy Trustee system has serious flaws... room for Error and lots of Room for Corruption with No Accountability. Where is the Attorney General, where is the Law, is there No Checks and Balances what so ever - has there EVER been?
r
This Story Sent in Today to our Whistleblower Network
Exposing the Corruption in the US Bankruptcy Courts.
r
a Woman - a Family Suffering, fighting injustice in the US Department of Justice Bankruptcy Courts and US Trustee System for 20 Years. Have We as Tax Paying Citizens of the US .. no Rights What So Ever?
r
Here is Today's Story..
though 20 years in the making
we just got it Today...
r
"Bankruptcy Fraud Involving JP MORGAN’S Theft of Millions of Bankruptcy Assets and Collusive Settlement Between Alan Nisselson (the Bankruptcy Trustee of Bernard Madoff) AND MARC GOLDBERG

TO FRAUDULENTLY STEAL ASSETS
IS RUBBER-STAMPED BY JUDGE BEATTY
OF THE US BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
NEW YORK, NY

On Thursday October 28, 2009, The Law Offices of David H. Relkin, on behalf of Donna A. Sturman, applied to retiring Bankruptcy Judge Prudence Beatty, to have the Court “finally do justice” and order JP Morgan and the Trustee to turn over Millions of Dollars of stolen assets—which the Judge flatly denied by claiming Donna “had no standing.”

This case is virtually a tale ripped from the pages of the Trustee’s Manual of Bankruptcy Fraud and Abuse.

On Thursday, the Court having never required an accounting of his collections and distributions in the case, the Trustee finally disclosed that he had taken in over $41 Million Dollars, still leaving the mystery of where the money went, although most of it found its way into the coffers of JP Morgan.

Prior to the Bankruptcy, the Bank chased after Donna’s brothers to lend them Millions for a hostile takeover of The Cooper Companies, Inc. and, due to its theft of assets, JP Morgan is now one of Cooper’s largest shareholders.

Once the Bank became aware that, what the brothers called their silent partner, Donna Sturman, had commenced an action against them for waste, dissipation and fraudulent transfers of the Sturman Family properties, which were being used by the brothers as their private piggy bank, the Bank frantically began illegally acquiring security interests in the Family assets to secure the brothers’ personal loans with property owned by their sister, including the Southeast Corner of 86th Street, leaving the properties empty shells.

In furtherance of its unlawful conspiracy, the Bank then filed Bankruptcy Petitions against Donna’s three brothers, and installed its handpicked Trustee and law firms, who were counsel the Bank as well as all the other major creditors in the Bankruptcy—which conflict of interest, under the Bankruptcy Code, requires disgorgement of the attorneys’ enormous fees.
Thus, the Bank was able to play both sides of the table by making all the major decisions in the Bankruptcy, while its own officers negligently left a trail of brazen correspondence of the Bank’s collusive and corrupt instructions to the Trustee.

Judge Beatty repeatedly approved the Bank’s unlawful acquisition and sale of non-debtor assets, allowing her Court to satisfy fraudulent claims over a 20 year period.

Under her supervision, the Bank, the Trustee and his law firms were able to rape the assets of the Sturman Family—none of which were in bankruptcy—and to line their pockets with millions of dollars of stolen money.

Judge Beatty blatantly and improperly dismissed Ms. Sturman’s action against the Bank for “lack of prosecution,” after the action was fully briefed, while keeping in place an injunction prohibiting Donna from taking any discovery of the Banks.

The complicity in fraudulent conduct did not stop there during this 20 year old case (perhaps the longest running bankruptcy in New York).

Although the US Trustee was repeatedly advised and supplied with evidence of these crimes, it inexplicably sat on its hands, despite its legal obligation to supervise and investigate Trustee misconduct.

To force the brothers to help the Bank go along with its embezzlement, it threatened the brothers with criminal prosecution, and after the Bank got it, had the brothers indicted anyway for submitting false financials, spending thirteen months in federal prison. Unsurprisingly, the Bank officers testified with immunity.

Despite Orders obtained by Donna preventing sales of the properties, the Trustee was allowed by Judge Beatty to simply ignore them, allowing one of the most valuable assets of the Sturman Family Enterprises to be “abandoned” so the Bank could acquire the property for free without using up any of its debt—a lender fraud called “double dipping.”

The Bank and its hand-picked Trustee then took control over the other non-bankrupt properties, used them as cash cows, and after bleeding them dry, sold them for the asking to third parties (including one by the Trustee to his own employee) while the Trustee took in $1.0 Million Dollars a year for seven years on just one property.

Where the money went is still a mystery.

The United States Trustee Program is a component of the Department of Justice that, according to its website, “seeks to act as the watchdog over the bankruptcy process to protect the integrity of the Federal bankruptcy system.”

In addition the Department of Justice has the responsibility to ensure compliance with applicable laws and procedures and to identify and investigate bankruptcy fraud and abuse in coordination with United States Attorneys and the FBI.

The Attorney General is charged with the appointment of United States Trustees and Assistant United States Trustees.

On Thursday, after Judge Beatty awarded the Trustee a cumulative amount of over $8 Million Dollars in fees to him and his law firms (which Judge Beatty fittingly called “Blood Money”), Judge Beatty characterized the negligent failure of the Trustee to do anything in the Bankruptcy case for the last ten years by saying, “I understand how busy people can get.”

It is counsel’s opinion that such award of fees was a transfer of stolen money.

In attempting to fight Judge Beatty’s indifference to the criminal activities committed in her Court, Donna retained Helen Chaitman, who coined the phrase “lender liability” but who, like so many of Donna’s attorneys walked away when Donna’s money ran out.

So “successful” in their control of the Bankruptcy, the Bank and the Trustee blocked all of Donna’s income, forcing the heiress to be locked in handcuffs by Judge Beatty, evicted over seven times with her three young children, once in the middle of a winter blizzard, and then thrown into a fraudulent bankruptcy by one of her own law firms whose debt to the Bank was wiped off the books.

Once forced into Bankruptcy, Alan Nisselson, who now supervises the Madoff Bankruptcy, was appointed as Donna’s Trustee to clean up Ms. Sturman’s dangerous claims once and for all.

Without any notice to Ms. Sturman, he settled all of Donna’s claims in the brothers’ bankruptcy in a collusive and illegal agreement in which the Trustees even released each other—a violation of law and the Code of Professional Responsibility—which settlement was immediately rubber-stamped by Judge Beatty.

Mr. Relkin is now analyzing the case in order to determine what appropriate actions to take to vindicate Ms. Sturman’s rights.

For further information contact:
David H. Relkin, Esq.
Law Offices of David H. Relkin
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018

David@RelkinLaw.com

212.244.8722

Links: www.DavidRelkinLaw.com
r
Click Here For Press Release PDF Document
r
More on the Corruption of US Bankruptcy Attorneys, US Bankruptcy Department of Justice Trustees and the Whole Liquidation Process....
r
www.ObsidianFinanceSuck.com
r
www.LiquidatingTrustee.com
r
www.Summit1031BkJustice.com
r

Raymond A. Joao Complaint

" Raymond A. Joao, (hereinafter "Joao"), believed to be a resident of the State of New
York, and who at various times relevant hereto was initially misrepresented to the
Company as a partner of Proskauer Rose LLP (hereinafter “Proskauer”) and was factually
a partner of Meltzer Lippe Goldstein and Schlissel, and who provided legal services to
the Company.

Moreover, beginning on or about September of 1998, the Company, through its agent and
principal, Eliot I. Bernstein ("Bernstein"), began negotiations with Proskauer with regard
to Proskauer providing legal services to the Company the purpose of which was to
develop and market specific technologies developed by Bernstein and two others, which
technologies allowed for the scaling, enlargement, panning and zooming of digital
images and video without degradation to the quality of the digital image due to what is
commonly referred to as “pixelation”, the delivery of digital video using proprietary

scaling techniques, a combination of the image pan and zoom techniques and video
scaling techniques, and the remote control of video and image applications.

Furthermore, Bernstein engaged the services of Proskauer and in turn Joao, among
others, through an engagement letter a true copy of which I attach herein as Exhibit “A”,
to obtain multiple patents and oversee US and foreign filings for such technologies
including the provisional filings for the technologies as described above, and such other
activities as were necessary to protect the intellectual property.

Additionally, upon information and belief, Raymond Joao upon viewing the technologies developed by Eliot Bernstein and the Iviewit Company, and held by the Company, realized the significance of the technologies, its various applications to communication networks for distributing video data and images and for existing digital processes, including, but not limited to digital cameras, digital video disks (DVD), digital imaging technologies for medical purposes and digital video.

And that Kenneth Rubenstein designed and executed, sometimes for himself or others similarly situated, deceptions, improprieties, and, even in certain circumstances, outright malfeasances by the disingenuous insertion of his own interests or the interests of third parties, who were other clients of Proskauer Rose and/or Meltzer Lippe Goldstein and Schlissel, between the Company, as his client and together with its disclosed techniques, and the ultimate end users of its future OEM and other licensees, to the detriment and
damage of the Company.

Many of the malfeasances against the Company have also
involved fraud against the US Patent and Trademark Office.

Specifics of General Complaint

Where the Company employed Raymond Joao, Proskauer Rose and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Schlissel for purposes of representing the Company to obtain multiple patents and oversee foreign filings for such technologies including the provisional filings for the technologies as
described above, and that pursuant to such employment, Raymond Anthony Joao, Proskauer Rose and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Schlissel owed a duty to ensure that the rights and interests of the Company were protected, Raymond Joao, Proskauer Rose LLP and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Schlissel neglected that reasonable duty of care in the performance of legal services in that they:
r
a. Failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that the intellectual property of the Company
was protected; and,

r
b. Failed to and/or inadequately completed work regarding patents, copyrights and
trademarks; and,

r
c. Failed to list proper inventors of the technologies based on improper legal advise by
Proskauer, and in turn Joao in his lead technological role, that foreign inventors could not
be listed until their immigration status was adjusted leading to further erroneous billings
by Proskauer for frivolous immigration work. This resulted in the failure of the patents to
include their rightful and lawful inventors; and,

r

d. Failed to ensure that the patent applications for the technologies, contained all
necessary and pertinent information relevant to the technologies and as required by law;
and,
r

e. Falsified billing statements and transmitted documents, and,
r
f. Falsified patent documents and changed the contents of patents prior to filing so as to
make the Company patents weak and inaccurate, so as to file patents in his own name
that would succeed upon the Companies patents failing. That Mr. Joao who was
contracted to procure patents for the Company has now applied for 70+ patents in his
own name, many of which appear to be ideas learned while representing the Company.
r
g. That due to the discovery of many of the above described events the Company’s lead
investor Crossbow Ventures (a referral of Proskauer Rose) of West Palm Beach, Fla.,
pulled funding on the Company.
e
Lastly, the negligent actions of Raymond Anthony Joao, MLGS and Proskauer Rose resulted in and were the proximate cause of loss to the Company; today, the Company’s processes are believed to be on digital camera’s, DVD’s and virtually all Internet and Broadcast streams of video; true copies of exhibits and witnesses are available on request and/or I will, on behalf of the Company, present them according to proof at commencement of investigation into
this General Complaint.

Due to the highly sensitive nature of the patent and copyright materials, exhibits and
witnesses will be provided once formal protections have been established in regard to this
complaint. "
r
Eliot Bernstein
Iviewit.com, Inc

Source of Post
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2003%2002%2025%20Joao%209th%20district%20original%20complaint.pdf

t

www.DeniedPatent.com

r

r

Iviewit Letter to New York Senate Judiciary Committee and Chairman, Senator John L. Sampson Regarding US Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit (07cv09599)

by Eliot Bernstein...
w

Re: Whistleblower Allegations of Criminal Activity at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Exposed in US Federal Court Requiring The Judiciary Committee’s Immediate Action; Response of Roy Reardon to the Request of Chairman, John L. Sampson Regarding Disciplinary Complaints Filed a the First Department, including but not limited to;
w
w
A.
February 09, 2009 New Complaints ~ February 09, 2009 Iviewit Complaint Against Reardon and Friedberg @ http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090209%20FINAL%20Iviewit%20Response%20to%20First%20Department%20Re%20Conflict%20Foley%20Proskauer%20attorneys%20SIGNED.doc.pdf

w

Introduction

I write to you as a follow up to the Committee request to Alan W. Friedberg ( Friedberg ), Chief Counsel of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department ( First Dept ) Departmental Disciplinary Committee ( DDC ) to provide the Committee with status and information regarding Concealed Disciplinary Complaints requested from Friedberg at the September 24, 2009 Judiciary Committee hearing. Friedberg has responded to me, instead of the Committee, which causes further problems defined herein.
w

At the beginning of my testimony at the September Committee hearing on Court Corruption in New York, Senator Sampson asked Friedberg to provide the Committee with information regarding what happened to complaints filed against Friedberg himself and Roy L. Reardon ( Reardon ), Chairman of the DDC.
w

Complaints filed by me almost 8 months earlier, that I informed Senator Sampson in my opening statement had been CONCEALED for months inapposite the First Department’s own procedural rules and in violation of law....
w

Senator Sampson, I was stunned to get a direct reply from Reardon on October 07, 2009 attached herein as Exhibit 1, skirting your request for information and without even a courtesy carbon copy of the letter to the Judiciary Committee, a letter regarding what happened to the CONCEALED complaints against Reardon and Friedberg.
g

This letter again has Reardon handling his own complaint and attempting to dismiss the complaint against himself and other DDC members, a violation of Attorney Conduct Codes, the Rules Regulating the DDC and Law, in a multiplicity of ways, including the obvious conflict created by one reviewing ones own complaint and acting upon it.
r

As you may remember from my testimony at the September 24, 2009 Judiciary Committee hearing and my prepared statement for the Judiciary Committee, the DDC is a defendant in my Twelve Trillion Dollar Lawsuitmarked legally related to the Whistleblower case of Christine C. Anderson ( Anderson ) v the State of New York ( 07cv09599 ) and the DDC as a defendant in that lawsuit has representative counsel, the New York Attorney General ( NYAG ).
r

The DDC as a named defendant in my lawsuit, which the filed complaints directly relate to, makes it inappropriate, highly unethical and illegal for the DDC to be directly contacting me or handling the complaints versus having the matters handled through their retained counsel, Monica Connell ( Connell ) of the NYAG.
r

As it is inappropriate for me, acting as Pro Se legal counsel, to be contacting parties directly who have counsel, I worked with DDC counsel the NYAG to have the complaints transferred to NON-CONFLICTED investigators.
r

Connell directed me to file the complaints with the DDC stating the complaints would be moved once filed and that no First Dept or DDC members would even review the materials due to their OBVIOUS CONFLICTS but that procedurally the complaints initially had to be filed at the DDC.
r

Yet, defying ethics and their counsel’s arrangements with me, the DDC interceded and attempted to dismiss the complaints against other defendants in the lawsuit and now even themselves in what defies logic, ethics and law.
w

[ Iviewit Amended Complaint - RICO http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.pdf

CONCEALMENT OF OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS AND OTHER PUBLIC OFFICE VIOLATIONS - In Roy Reardon’s letter, he attempts to exculpate himself from the complaint against himself that he has CONCEALED since I filed it in February 2009, himself claiming the COMPLAINTS were not deemed complaints against him and Friedberg.
q

Further, Roy Reardon attempts to deny he was even aware of the FORMAL COMPLAINT, although referencing the FORMAL COMPLAINT filed against him in February in his own letter?
e

Reardon’s letter attempts to dismiss the complaints he CONCEALED against himself and others since my February 09, 2009 FORMAL COMPLAINT, saying that he did not feel that it was a FORMAL COMPLAINT against Friedberg and himself.
r

This action on his FORMAL COMPLAINT defies a mass of Rules Regulating the DDC, the Attorney Conduct Code, including but not limited to, DR (Disciplinary Rule) 1-102A 4 and 5, NY Penal Laws (see below) and Law.
r

The attempt is to make it look like he has not CONCEALED the complaints, merely did not see my FORMAL COMPLAINT for what it was, as CONCEALMENT of Public Documents is further a crime as later defined herein. See [ February 09, 2009 Iviewit Complaint Against Reardon and Friedberg.
r

@ http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090209%20FINAL%20Iviewit%20Response%20to%20First%20Department%20Re%20Conflict%20Foley%20Proskauer%20attorneys%20SIGNED.doc.pdf ]

Source of Post and Lots More information.
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=209
Click Above and Learn a Whole Lot More
r
r
www.DeniedPatent.com
r
r

William J. Dick Knowing and willful misrepresentations to Iviewit

1. Knowing and willful misrepresentations to the company with regard to
his past involvement in patent malfeasances with Brian G. Utley at
Utley’s past employer, Diamond Turf Lawnmower.

a. Brian Utley was a past President of the company and formerly a President
of Diamond Turf Lawnmower and had referred William Dick without
reference to their past patent disputes at Utley’s prior employer,
which led to the termination of Brian Utley and the closing of Diamond Turf
Lawnmower.

b. These misrepresentations and frauds have led to similar damage to
the Company, as a result of the stolen inventions by Brian G. Utley, aided and
abetted by William J. Dick, Boehm and Becker.

Moreover, the company found patents written into Brian Utley’s name, not disclosed or assigned to the company, and that William J. Dick was fully aware that inventors Eliot Bernstein, Schirajee, Rosario, and Friedstein had developed the inventions.

Blakely Sokoloff Taylor and Zafman LLP discovered these patents,
and then attempted to re-assign said falsely filed and stolen patent
applications to the company.

2. Perpetrating a fraud on the USPTO, by submitting applications with false
information and wrong inventors.

3. Knowing and willful misrepresentations to the company’s investors,
including Wachovia Securities, a unit of Wachovia Corp., a registered
bank holding company in Charlotte, N.C., by William J. Dick and Brian Utley of patent
applications filed and inventions covered.

4. Knowingly committing fraud of USPTO, company shareholders, and
potential investors by switching inventors and invention disclosures.

5. Participation in a civil and criminal conspiracy to bury patent
applications and inventions.

6. Not reporting information to proper tribunals regarding Kenneth Rubenstein and
Joao malfeasances.

7. Furthering work of Kenneth Rubenstein and Raymond Anthony Joao to not capture inventions and identify inventors;

8. Knowing and willful destruction of company records

9. Aiding and abetting Brian G. Utley in filing patents in Brian G. Utley’s name disclosed to
William J. Dick under attorney-client privilege.

Source and Full Document:
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2003%2009%2023%20VIRGINIA%20BAR%20COMPLAINT%20WILLIAM%20DICK.pdf
r
www.DeniedPatent.com
r

End Corruption in the Courts!

"Court employee, judge or citizen - Report Corruption in any Court Today !! As of December 7, 2009, we've received over 89,100 tips...KEEP THEM COMING !!

CorruptCourts@gmail.com

The Next New York State Senate Court Corruption Hearing will NOT be held on December 16th .... A new date will be announced in a few weeks.

Monday, August 20, 2007
Brooke Astor Judge Knew Lawyer Pal Was Publicizing Coziness
on Internet and Law Firm Website

It would take more than 5 years after Judge Anthony Scarpino took the Surrogate Court bench before finally addressing his lawyer-friend's internet advertising of his law firm's implied favoritism with the court. "I suggest you speak to a 15-year old. They tend to know how to do that," said Judge Scarpino. (August 3, 2005 Westchester Surrogate's Court transcript, page 32, lines 17-19) (See transcript to the right: "Scarpino & Streng on Internet")...

It was recently reported on this forum that the Manhattan based legal powerhouse Paul Weiss had engaged the small White Plains, New York firm McCarthy Fingar to handle proceedings in the Estate of Brooke Astor in the Westchester County Surrogate's Court.

The lone Westchester Surrogate, Anthony A. Scarpino,Jr., does not, however, explain why it took so long--nearly five years--for him to address the issue of any lawyer advertising over the internet, or on their law firm website, the implied inside connections with the Scarpino court that would further suggest favored treatment by the court.

But it is now revealed in an August 3, 2005 transcript that Judge Scarpino knew about the advertising. The Surrogate confirms that he had prior knowledge of the advertising,
"Mr. Streng, I feel that this Web site to the general public and…has caused difficulty for the Court, and this is not the first time I've heard it, and I'm glad to hear that you have taken steps to remove it from your Web site, and I'm requesting that you take whatever steps you can to try to have it removed from other Web sites whatever else is out there if you can do that." (Transcript page 31, line 25 thru page 32, lines 1-12)


The August 3, 2005 transcript makes clear that Surrogate Scarpino acknowledged that he knew his personal and political friend had been advertising their close association on his law firm website and on the internet. And in one of the advertising sections, it mentions that attorney Frank Streng was on Judge Scarpino's election transition committee from "2001-present", suggesting that the inside connection to the court was an on-going event.

And though he mentions it, Judge Scarpino failed to correct, or take any other required action, concerning the fact that financial sanctions had been twice granted by him (the judge) to the advertising friend of the court, Mr. Streng and his firm McCarthy Fingar-- financial sanctions simultaneously with the "closeness to the court" advertising.

Such advertisements, which strongly imply favoritism and partiality by any court, are strongly frowned upon by the Commission on Judicial Conduct and the Attorney Disciplinary Committees.

Most observers, though, are alarmed that it took Judge Scarpino over 5 years from his being elected Surrogate in 2000 to even address the troubling issue with his close associate Frank Streng who was, at all times relevant, the person at the McCarthy Fingar law firm in charge of the content on the firm website.

Attorney Frank W. Streng and the law firm McCarthy Fingar continue to regularly appear before Westchester County Surrogate Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., and have done so, quite successfully, at all times since the Surrogate election in 2000.

End Note: In that same estate, attorney Frank Streng and McCarthy Fingar have been accused of filing a fraudulent "assignment" designed to prevent any claim to recover approximately $100,000.00 stolen from the Red Cross in 9/11 donation monies. Surrogate Scarpino denied any of the relief sought against Mr. Streng and McCarthy Fingar, without prejudice. But in the same "without prejudice" order, Surrogate Scarpino, sua sponte ("on his own") ordered a prohibition of any motions- thus, barring anyone from filing any motions.

Oddly, McCarthy Fingar advised all parties in November of 2003 that they had filed the "assignment" papers, but only in July of 2007 was the newly-installed Surrogate's Chief Court Clerk, Charles T. Scott, Esq., able to correct the three and one-half year "administrative oversight." And, according to Chief Clerk Scott, when his office finally filed and entered the 2003 dated "assignment" documents in July 2007, they backdated the entry date to show November of 2003.

Source of Post and Lots more Information
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2007/08/brooke-astor-judge-knew-lawyer-pal-was.html
p