"Everyone asks the question – How could Bernie Madoff get away with it for so long?
The simple answer is - he was not arrested from his bad faith conduct.
It is hard enough – as Mr. Markopolous can tell you – to get the SEC and Feds to even look at the complaints of fraud.
What does a citizen do when you report the fraud and good faith DOJ personnel attempt to address it – only to have other persons within the Dept of Justice become duplicitous?
Here is a real time example, directly on-point with Madoff/Markopolous that goes beyond being mindboggling and shocking ones conscience.
Laser Steven Haas Oath of verity
I, Steven Haas (better known as a/k/a Laser Haas) does state and affirm this the 12th day of July 2009 – Under Penalty of Perjury – that the following is True and Correct;
BACKGROUND
The perpetrators – being “Caught” red-handed – simply confessed to their minor criminal acts and then the Dept of Justice personnel circled the wagons and gave the perpetrators of Perjury & Fraud -
Illegal immunity given to Paul Traub’s firm
Unlawful, implied, blanket immunity and the implied promise of future willful blindness by the Dept of Justice US Trustee’s office.
See pages 8 & 9 of the PDF file drafted and hand signed by Mark Kenney http://petters-fraud.com/US_Trustee_Motion_Feb24_2005_2giveTBF_immunity.pdf
Attorney emails threat to Laser Haas to “Back off” or else!
In the fall of 2004 the Court approved company as Liquidation Consultant for eToys – Collateral Logistics Inc (CLI) received an email from its attorney Henry Heiman.
The email contained Threats from Susan Balaschak of the law firm Traub Bonacquist & Fox (TBF) stipulating that if Haas (the 100% sole owner of CLI) did not “Back Off” from investigating the issues of Barry Gold (President/CEO of eToys) and Paul Traub;
Not only would Haas and CLI not get paid, Laser Haas’s career would suffer and they might even come after Haas for payments previously received.
The email of this threat is a crime by extortion, threats/intimidation of Victim/Witness and most certainly Obstruction.
DOJ Trial Attorney Mark Kenney’s lapse linquae
When Laser informs the DOJ US Trustee’s office (Mark Kenney) of the emailed threat – Mark Kenney responded in anger with the following lapse linquae’s and faux pas;
Mark Kenney stipulated;
“All we had to do was make Traub a special counsel and all of this would have been avoided“as Mark Kenney continued and said ”the matters of Traub and Gold were addressed in Bonus Sales case"
The smoking gun!
The DOJ Trial Attorney in DE – Mark Kenney – did not know at the time that Laser Haas had become weary of parties doing deliberate harm as Haas had begun to study the DOJ website and bankruptcy Code/Rules and specifically the Professional rules, the US Trustee responsibility and the bankruptcy Fraud statutes;
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/41mcrm.htm
Apparently – inadvertently – Mark Kenney named a case that Laser had heard of before; prior to his reviews of the Dept of Justice US Trustee’s website
http://www.usdoj.gov/ust/eo/public_affairs/sig_guidance/index.htm
The newly acquired knowledge of the bankruptcy Code/Rules, along with the realization that the DE DOJ are the police of the Bankruptcy Courts and the fact that Haas had now learned how to search case pleadings sophisticatedly on PACER – led to the discovery of a pleading in the case of In re Bonus Sales03-12284 (DE Bankr 2003) where a vanity letter-head upon an Affidavit by Barry Gold stipulated that Barry Gold was a co-principal of Asset Disposition Advisors (“ADA”) and that Paul Traub was also a co-principal owner.
This was the smoking gun that brought the entire house of cards apart in the eToys fraud case. For Paul Traub’s firm had put in over 17 Affidavits over a period of years stipulating Under Penalty of Perjury (Bankr Rule(s) 2014/2016) that there was NO Conflict of Interest.
Conflict of Interest documentation by US Trustee
Being that Barry Gold was the President/CEO of eToys and placed there by Paul Traub’s firm (the Creditors attorney) – it was THE conflict of interest revelation!
Asst US Trustee Frank Perch
Motions to Disgorge TBF for $1.6 million.
The Director of the Executive Office of US Trustee’s (Lawrence Friedman) had emailed Laser Haas personally giving a promise to handle the situation. His promises appeared valid with the replacing of the Region 3 Trustee ( Roberta DeAngelis )
http://www.usdoj.gov/ust/eo/public_affairs/press/docs/stapleton_release2_12-04.htm
and the
Asst US Trustee Motion to Disgorge TBF
http://petters-fraud.com/DisgorgeMotion_TBF_1_6_Million.pdf
The Disgorge Motion states that the acts by TBF were Deliberate, rather than inadvertent.
While addressing only 3 bad faith acts the Disgorge Motion also concluded that Fraud on the Court had transpired.
Disgorge Motion states parties were Forewarned
The most heinous issue about the crimes and the efforts of Obstruction by Mark Kenney is the fact that the Disgorge Motion stipulates in parts 19 & 35 that the US Trustee’s office forewarned the parties – quoting part 19;
“More significantly, TBF was specifically aware in this matter, from discussions with the Office of the United States Trustee, of the UST’s concern about replacing corporate officers with individuals related to any of the retained professionals in the case. TBF Objection, ¶ 10″
By TBF and the law firm for the Debtor (MNAT) collaborating to plant Barry Gold within – without disclosing the connections to the Court – this was a deliberate perpetration of fraud on the court – vis-a-vis Perjury and made extensively egregious by the warning and the fact that Traub and MNAT were officers of the court.
Mark Kenney’s Obstruction of Justice
Less than ten (10) days after the Asst US Trustee put in the Disgorge Motion – Mark Kenney proffered the Stipulation to Settle which provided Traub’s firm with the illegitimate blanket immunity all summed up with this one specific clause;’
“WHEREAS the United States Trustee shall not seek to compel TBF to make additional disclosures –“
Paul Traub immediately commits another $100 million Fraud
We were extremely alarmed by the outrageous actions of the DE Dept of Justice Trial Attorney.
Apparently there were more serious issues that needed to be addressed and the clause of “shall not seek to compel” was obviously an effort to assure futures discoveries of fraud and perjury were of no benefit to Laser or the eToys shareholders who were investigating.
Haas then discovered that MNAT was representing Bain and that Barry Gold and Paul Traub had worked for Bain related issues prior to eToys – especially in Stage Stores bankruptcy in S Texas (00-35078).
The significance of the issues are MNAT, Traub and their plant – Barry Gold – negotiated the sale of eToys assets to Bain/KB Toys for discounts in the tens of millions of dollars.
This is Collusion to Defraud an Estate.
Digging deeper Laser also discovered that Michael Glazer, the CEO of KB Toys – was also a director and stockholder with other Bain parties at Stage Stores.
Haas discovered this Supplemental Affidavit in Stage Stores by Paul Traub – who apparently was trying to explain in that case – in the year 2000 – that he was not violate with his connections to Barry Gold.
http://petters-fraud.com/StageStores_TBF_Supplemental_Affidavit_BarryGold.pdf
Haas company – CLI – was hired because they were going to sell eToys to Bain/KB for $5.4 million.
The auction was halted, CLI was court approved and Laser helped get back over $45 million into the eToys bank accounts. This was also to include a $10 million dollar bid by Bain/KB for eToys.com; that was negotiated down by Traub and MNAT to only $3 million.
Mark Kenney Obstructs Justice in another case
Laser also discovered that Michael Glazer had paid himself and Bain $100 million prior to Kay Bee Toys filing for its own bankruptcy protection in Delaware (DE Bankr 04-10120).
MNAT had failed to disclose to that Court its conflict of interest issues of being an adversary to Bain as eToys Debtor’s counsel. At the same time Traub and Barry Gold worked the Kay Bee Toys bankruptcy – they failed also to inform the Court of their Conflict of Interest issues.
Paul Traub even had the unmitigated gall to petition the KB Toys bankruptcy court for the right to be the one to prosecute the Michael Glazer and Bain $100 million dollar payment.
Sort of like Capone asking to be prosecuted by Frank Nitti.
When we reported these fraud and perjury issues to that court – Mark Kenney once again aided and abeded the perpetrators of fraud and had the Court strike and expunge the proof of perjury.
http://petters-fraud.com/KenneyKB_Obstruction_2228.pdf
Akin to Madoff – Mark Kenney asks SEC to Back Off
We were in communication with Director Friedman of the Exec Office of US Trustee’s (EOUST) as well as the FBI, Delaware Dept of Justice and the SEC Bankruptcy Fraud Division in Atlanta – just to name a few.
Mark Kenney instructed Gordon Robinson of the SEC to refrain from sending in an Official Intergovernmental Letter recommending an Official Investigation!
Mark Kenney Obstructs Justice at Federal 3rd Circuit
The eToys shareholders and Laser Haas appealed the rulings that were permitting the Frauds to continue and the DE Bankruptcy Court’s blessing of the illicit immunity Stipulation of Mark Kenney.
Inexplicably – Mark Kenney and the Removed Region 3 Trustee (Roberta DeAngelis) (who was speciously promoted to Acting General Counsel) of the EOUST – where both parties Obstructed Justice and lied to the 3rd Circuit Court stating that Laser Haas did not have standing to appeal and that the eToys shareholder was not ill.
http://petters-fraud.com/US_Trustee_Obstruction_3rdCir_07_2360.pdf
DE DOJ refuses to investigate MNAT law firm
The footnote within that pleading gives an insight into places that even Mark Kenney and Roberta DeAngelis fear to tread – for it states in the very first footnote therein;
“11 The bankruptcy court order which was the subject of Mr. Alber’s district court appeal also ordered partial disgorgement of compensation by debtors’ counsel, Appellee Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell (“MNAT”) in connection with Mr . Alber’s January 25, 2005 motion alleging conflicts of interest by MNAT, and approved a settlement between the post-effective date committee of unsecured reditors and Goldman Sachs & Co .
The United States Trustee did not assert a position in the bankruptcy court or the district court appeal regarding those two matters and does not address them herei
3rd Cir certifies Fraud on the Court
Citing the 6th Circuit Court -the 3rd Cir certifies the 5 requirements to document Fraud on the Court;
“The United States Court set forth five elements of fraud upon the court which consist of conduct: “1. On the part of an officer of the court; 2. That is directed to the ‘judicial machinery’ itself; 3. That is intentionally false, willfully blind to the truth, or is in reckless disregard for the truth; 4. That is a positive averment or is concealment when one is under a duty to disclose; 5. That deceives the court.” Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky, 10 F.3d 338, 348 (6th Cir. 1993). “
Mark Kenney helps Traub keep Threat against Laser Haas/CLI
Traub’s firm Susan Balaschak had threatened Haas that if he did not back off – he and CLI would not get paid and his career would suffer.
The MNAT law firm submitted a document that Traub and Barry Gold told the Court was a generous waiver by Haas and CLI of $3.7 million dollars in fees and expenses that Mark Kenney and Roberta DeAngelis seek to affirm.
What is so profoundly inane is – if you are going to forge a document to the Court – one should not do so in a half art manner.
Anyone who reads items 10 & 11 of the purported WAIVER can clearly see that it states CLI is entitled to its success fees.
So the big question is – how does a bright legal professional call a document that states Request for Payment of Expenses a Waiver?
http://petters-fraud.com/Haas_Affidavit_816.pdf
Haas discovers DE US Attorney is withholding evidence
One has to wonder how high up the food chain – the protection for Paul Traub goes. Most certainly Mark Kenney cannot keep Organized Criminal acts from prosecution by himself.
Amazingly – looking into the concept led to an immediate discovery that the DE US Attorney (Colm Connolly) whose office was refusing to investigate or prosecute the perjury and fraud – had his own Conflict of Interest.
Turns out US Attorney Colm Connolly was a partner with the MNAT law firm in 2001 – the very year that the Perjury and Fraud by MNAT began.
http://www.justice.gov/archive/olp/colmconnollyresume.htm
Laser reports the Mark Kenney, Roberta DeAngelis and Colm Connolly ethics and felony violations to the US Attorney Public Corruption Unit in CA.
The only thing that transpired apparently was The CA US ATtorney shuts down the Public Corruption Unit and Threatened Career Prosecutors.
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/mar/20/local/me-shakeup20
This is how guys like Bernie Madoff get off with billions in fraud over 10 years. He has help.
Goldman Sachs manipulated eToys from the beginning and Bain benefited as well.
MNAT, Barry Gold and Paul Traub all worked for Bain and Goldman Sachs issues.
Barry Gold and Paul Traub also helped Wells Fargo pull a $100 million dollar fraud as well.
There are over 100 felony violations
Not counting the 34 items of Perjury that MNAT and Paul Traub’s firm have already confessed to.
Including. but not limited to, Collusion, MisPrision of a Felony, Obstruction, Intimidation of Victim/Witness, Extortion, Failure to Disclose an Bankruptcy Asset, False Oath/Declaration, Scheme to Fix Fees, Conspiracy and being that it is more than $100 million, several years, several states, many different parties – RACKETEERING
There is $300 million in fraud in eToys
$100 Million in Fraud in Kay Bee Toys
Possibly a Billion dollars in Fraud in Stage Stores
One of the Reasons this has continued thus far.
Director Friedman of the EOUST Resigned
http://www.usdoj.gov/ust/eo/public_affairs/press/docs/friedman_resignation_4-27-05.htm
Paul Traub was a partner with Marc Dreier and Tom Petters
That is correct – after Paul Traub received his personal DOJ Get out of Jail Free Card – he became a full time partner with Petters Group Worldwide, Fingerhut and UBid as well as with the Marc Dreier firm.
Even if he is the mysterious deep throat there helping bring down the frauds; the Courts and DOJ cannot permit him to continue the crimes in eToys and other cases like Levitz and Domain RDVA.
The New York Supreme Court case 601805/2002 is the case that has been permitted to go forward for Goldman Sachs eToys IPO bad faith deeds.
When eToys went IPO in 1999 for $8 Billion (nearly $78 per share) Goldman Sachs was to get only $1.50 each share and eToys received $16.50
Where did the rest of the money go?
One of the first Motions that MNAT put forward in eToys was docket item 300 – the request for the Destruction of Books n Records – that benefited Goldman Sachs.
MNAT hand picked their fraud partner (Traub) to handle the NY Supreme Court case.
Traub knows that we caught him before by docket items he had long since forgotten.
To make sure the same thing does not happen now -
Nearly 1/2 of the NY Supreme Ct case of eToys (ebc 1 ) v Goldman Sachs
Is Under SEAL!
Source of Post
http://laserhaas.wordpress.com/doj-trial-attorney-mark-kenney-corruption/
US trustee corrupption
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Stop The Petters Scam Foundation Sues Star-Tribune for Breach of Contract for Censorship of Advertising Series that Newspaper Contracted to Publish
Lawsuit Alleges that Unknown Parties Pressured Newspaper to Halt Publication Of Ads That Raised Questions About Handling of Petters Bankruptcy
MINNEAPOLIS, Dec. 17 /PRNewswire/ -- Stop The Petters Scam Foundation, a Minnesota non-profit corporation, today filed a lawsuit against the Star-Tribune Company alleging breach of contract and related charges, and against 30 unknown "Doe" defendants for interference with contractual relations and related charges.
The Foundation's lawsuit asserts that the Star-Tribune "admittedly was pressured by certain unidentified persons to abruptly stop the publication" of a series of 15 advertisements that it had contracted to publish. Although the Star-Tribune agreed to run all the ads and accepted payment for them, it "apparently succumbed to pressure from as yet unknown powerful interests, and breached a fully executed oral agreement and abandoned its journalistic obligation to educate and enlighten its readers," the lawsuit states.
"Ultimately, this lawsuit is about the value of free speech in America," said Garrett Vail, president of the Foundation. "The Star-Tribune concedes that they received pressure to halt our ad series.
The public has a right to learn what's been going on in the handling of the Petters assets. Somebody doesn't want us to continue asking questions and raising embarrassing facts. We intend to identify who pressured the newspaper, and hold them and the Star-Tribune accountable."
After running the first nine ads in the series, "the Star-Tribune abruptly and unilaterally cancelled the remaining advertisements based upon its contention that it had received complaints from persons who it refused to identify, concerning the advertisements. It further contended that it had not had the opportunity to investigate the accuracy of the advertisements (even though it knows that investigation of the content of advertisements is not a role it assumes)," the lawsuit states.
"The Star-Tribune refused and failed to disclose what concerns had been made concerning the advertisements, and did not recommend any editing or clarification of the advertisements, or offer to accept any proof of the accuracy of same.
Rather, it made the blanket and unqualified statement that it would not permit any more advertisements to be made concerning the Petters Saga by Plaintiff, apparently because of the pressure it received from certain unidentified persons to desist further publication of the advertisements."
The lawsuit names 30 unidentified "Doe" defendants, and says that "Plaintiff will move expeditiously to conduct discovery to determine the identity of the responsible Doe defendants and to promptly amend the Complaint to name such responsible defendants."
The lawsuit seeks damages from the Star-Tribune and the unknown defendants. The damages arise in part from the Foundation's lost ability to publicize the planned airing of a $250,000 documentary film about the Petters case. The Star-Tribune's decision to halt the advertising series resulted in the Foundation not being able to air the documentary on any Minneapolis area network television stations, the lawsuit states.
The Foundation is represented in the case by Minneapolis attorney Dean Barkley, the law firm of Villaume and Schiek and by nationally prominent First Amendment attorney Anthony Glassman. Mr. Barkley, former United States Senator representing the State of Minnesota and independent candidate for the U.S. Senate seat in 2008, is an associate in the law firm Villaume & Schiek, P.A. Mr. Glassman in the past has obtained close to $10 million in jury verdicts against the New York Times on behalf of the then-largest shareholder of Santa Barbara Savings and Loan; won a $500,000 settlement on behalf of the founder of Seagate Technology against the Consumer Attorneys of California; successfully defended Playboy founder Hugh Hefner against personal defamation claims and successfully sued Larry Flynt and Hustler Magazine for invasion of privacy.
The Stop The Petters Scam Foundation was formed to raise public awareness of the handling of the bankruptcy and receivership proceedings involving companies and assets formerly owned by convicted Ponzi Scheme operator Thomas Petters, and to seek a just and fair resolution regarding the disposition of those assets.
The Foundation's advertising series raised questions about the handling of the Petters assets, and related issues.
SOURCE Stop The Petters Scam Foundation
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/stop-the-petters-scam-foundation-sues-star-tribune-for-breach-of-contract-for-censorship-of-advertising-series-that-newspaper-contracted-to-publish-79578222.html
r
More on the Petters Scam
r
www.TheSecondFraud.com
r
www.Petters-Fraud.com
r
r
MINNEAPOLIS, Dec. 17 /PRNewswire/ -- Stop The Petters Scam Foundation, a Minnesota non-profit corporation, today filed a lawsuit against the Star-Tribune Company alleging breach of contract and related charges, and against 30 unknown "Doe" defendants for interference with contractual relations and related charges.
The Foundation's lawsuit asserts that the Star-Tribune "admittedly was pressured by certain unidentified persons to abruptly stop the publication" of a series of 15 advertisements that it had contracted to publish. Although the Star-Tribune agreed to run all the ads and accepted payment for them, it "apparently succumbed to pressure from as yet unknown powerful interests, and breached a fully executed oral agreement and abandoned its journalistic obligation to educate and enlighten its readers," the lawsuit states.
"Ultimately, this lawsuit is about the value of free speech in America," said Garrett Vail, president of the Foundation. "The Star-Tribune concedes that they received pressure to halt our ad series.
The public has a right to learn what's been going on in the handling of the Petters assets. Somebody doesn't want us to continue asking questions and raising embarrassing facts. We intend to identify who pressured the newspaper, and hold them and the Star-Tribune accountable."
After running the first nine ads in the series, "the Star-Tribune abruptly and unilaterally cancelled the remaining advertisements based upon its contention that it had received complaints from persons who it refused to identify, concerning the advertisements. It further contended that it had not had the opportunity to investigate the accuracy of the advertisements (even though it knows that investigation of the content of advertisements is not a role it assumes)," the lawsuit states.
"The Star-Tribune refused and failed to disclose what concerns had been made concerning the advertisements, and did not recommend any editing or clarification of the advertisements, or offer to accept any proof of the accuracy of same.
Rather, it made the blanket and unqualified statement that it would not permit any more advertisements to be made concerning the Petters Saga by Plaintiff, apparently because of the pressure it received from certain unidentified persons to desist further publication of the advertisements."
The lawsuit names 30 unidentified "Doe" defendants, and says that "Plaintiff will move expeditiously to conduct discovery to determine the identity of the responsible Doe defendants and to promptly amend the Complaint to name such responsible defendants."
The lawsuit seeks damages from the Star-Tribune and the unknown defendants. The damages arise in part from the Foundation's lost ability to publicize the planned airing of a $250,000 documentary film about the Petters case. The Star-Tribune's decision to halt the advertising series resulted in the Foundation not being able to air the documentary on any Minneapolis area network television stations, the lawsuit states.
The Foundation is represented in the case by Minneapolis attorney Dean Barkley, the law firm of Villaume and Schiek and by nationally prominent First Amendment attorney Anthony Glassman. Mr. Barkley, former United States Senator representing the State of Minnesota and independent candidate for the U.S. Senate seat in 2008, is an associate in the law firm Villaume & Schiek, P.A. Mr. Glassman in the past has obtained close to $10 million in jury verdicts against the New York Times on behalf of the then-largest shareholder of Santa Barbara Savings and Loan; won a $500,000 settlement on behalf of the founder of Seagate Technology against the Consumer Attorneys of California; successfully defended Playboy founder Hugh Hefner against personal defamation claims and successfully sued Larry Flynt and Hustler Magazine for invasion of privacy.
The Stop The Petters Scam Foundation was formed to raise public awareness of the handling of the bankruptcy and receivership proceedings involving companies and assets formerly owned by convicted Ponzi Scheme operator Thomas Petters, and to seek a just and fair resolution regarding the disposition of those assets.
The Foundation's advertising series raised questions about the handling of the Petters assets, and related issues.
SOURCE Stop The Petters Scam Foundation
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/stop-the-petters-scam-foundation-sues-star-tribune-for-breach-of-contract-for-censorship-of-advertising-series-that-newspaper-contracted-to-publish-79578222.html
r
More on the Petters Scam
r
www.TheSecondFraud.com
r
www.Petters-Fraud.com
r
r
The Second Fraud - Story Exposing the Aftermath of the Largest Fraud in MN History - Rejected by all Major MN Media Outlets
THE SECOND FRAUD is a motion picture documentary that exposes the aftermath of the arrest of Twin Cities businessman Tom Petters. Petters was the brilliant mastermind behind the first multi-billion dollar "Ponzi scheme" ever discovered.
Our exposé dives into the initial Petters controversy, exploring how he was able to keep his lucrative scheme going for what authorities say was over a decade, ending with his inevitable conviction on December 2, 2009.
When Petters' scheme was unveiled, the local community was left stunned. Not even the cynical press had seen this coming. Eventually, light was cast on a problem much greater than a simple Ponzi scheme. A second story was developing in the aftermath of the first scandal that was much more sinister.
Ultimately we discovered a tangled web of local professionals: judges, politicians and lawyers, some of which may have knowingly or unknowingly allowed the Petters fraud to perpetuate in the first place. Now these groups are left in charge to clean up the mess. As hundreds of years of legal precedent are blatantly ignored, creditors and victims are crying foul from the sidelines as they are swindled a second time by the very system that is in place to protect them.
How can this be happening? What was the motivation behind these actions? Suddenly it became clear. Tom Petters had been running a Ponzi scheme, but he also had a legitimate business empire holding such entities as the American icon, Polaroid. While there was no money left from the Ponzi scheme, there was plenty in the rest of the Petters Empire. The only problem was, to fund their fee fest, the lawyers involved needed to find a valid connection — or create one.
This film spins the tale of a dark story complete with a colorful cast of characters who are incorporating what we believe to be THE SECOND FRAUD.
THE CONTROVERSY
Ours is truly an independent film. We have worked on a shoe-string budget with a limited crew, yet we have pulled off what we believe to be incredible production value. Our relevance is ripe as we come on the coat tails of Michael Moore’s CAPITALISM : A LOVE STORY, Steven Soderbergh’s THE INFORMANT, and F. Gary Gray’s LAW ABIDING CITIZEN. The public ear is tuned into the truth about both corporate and government greed and corruption.
This film brings to the table hard questions that demand real answers. The local Twin Cities media may have followed the Petters scandal as it happened, but as an outsider, as an independent filmmaker, I bring to the table a different flavor, one that is credible but also digs below the surface.
We bought airtime on every major Network Affiliate to broadcast our film on Sunday, December 13, 2009 and Monday, December 14, 2009. When they saw the content we were dealing with, however, each network independently rejected us.
As a filmmaker, I am not disappointed by what some might call “censorship” in this situation. Others may even say this is disregard of first amendment rights. What fascinates me is what looks like a massive cover up of a continuing fraud—taking place behind the scenes of a fraud that in the public view has been stopped in its tracks. So why isn’t anybody getting their money back?
II say, give my documentary a chance. Let the questions be asked. Let the answers be heard. Do not let precedent be created by a system that may be too corrupt to change once it has gone too far.
Sincerely,
Ryan James Frost
Producer/Writer/Director
r
Link to Story
www.TheSecondFraud.com
r
r
r
Our exposé dives into the initial Petters controversy, exploring how he was able to keep his lucrative scheme going for what authorities say was over a decade, ending with his inevitable conviction on December 2, 2009.
When Petters' scheme was unveiled, the local community was left stunned. Not even the cynical press had seen this coming. Eventually, light was cast on a problem much greater than a simple Ponzi scheme. A second story was developing in the aftermath of the first scandal that was much more sinister.
Ultimately we discovered a tangled web of local professionals: judges, politicians and lawyers, some of which may have knowingly or unknowingly allowed the Petters fraud to perpetuate in the first place. Now these groups are left in charge to clean up the mess. As hundreds of years of legal precedent are blatantly ignored, creditors and victims are crying foul from the sidelines as they are swindled a second time by the very system that is in place to protect them.
How can this be happening? What was the motivation behind these actions? Suddenly it became clear. Tom Petters had been running a Ponzi scheme, but he also had a legitimate business empire holding such entities as the American icon, Polaroid. While there was no money left from the Ponzi scheme, there was plenty in the rest of the Petters Empire. The only problem was, to fund their fee fest, the lawyers involved needed to find a valid connection — or create one.
This film spins the tale of a dark story complete with a colorful cast of characters who are incorporating what we believe to be THE SECOND FRAUD.
THE CONTROVERSY
Ours is truly an independent film. We have worked on a shoe-string budget with a limited crew, yet we have pulled off what we believe to be incredible production value. Our relevance is ripe as we come on the coat tails of Michael Moore’s CAPITALISM : A LOVE STORY, Steven Soderbergh’s THE INFORMANT, and F. Gary Gray’s LAW ABIDING CITIZEN. The public ear is tuned into the truth about both corporate and government greed and corruption.
This film brings to the table hard questions that demand real answers. The local Twin Cities media may have followed the Petters scandal as it happened, but as an outsider, as an independent filmmaker, I bring to the table a different flavor, one that is credible but also digs below the surface.
We bought airtime on every major Network Affiliate to broadcast our film on Sunday, December 13, 2009 and Monday, December 14, 2009. When they saw the content we were dealing with, however, each network independently rejected us.
As a filmmaker, I am not disappointed by what some might call “censorship” in this situation. Others may even say this is disregard of first amendment rights. What fascinates me is what looks like a massive cover up of a continuing fraud—taking place behind the scenes of a fraud that in the public view has been stopped in its tracks. So why isn’t anybody getting their money back?
II say, give my documentary a chance. Let the questions be asked. Let the answers be heard. Do not let precedent be created by a system that may be too corrupt to change once it has gone too far.
Sincerely,
Ryan James Frost
Producer/Writer/Director
r
Link to Story
www.TheSecondFraud.com
r
r
r
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
You Just Cannot Hide your Online Identity or what you Say, so why Bother trying..
Of Course you Mostly Knew this, it is EASY for Law Enforcement to Track Emails, Track Where they came from and to get information from Yahoo.. unless of course they are trying to make the bad guy look like the good guy.
So yes this information below is disturbing but is it really something new. I mean come on EVERYONE knows you cannot truly hide your identity online and that if Law Enforcement were JUST and on the Right Side of the Law they could easily buy, or supeona this information from Yahoo.
Here is the Article Sent to Me Today...
"Yahoo is spying on you
Allegedly acting as proxy for law enforcement, intel agencies
LIFE WITH BIG BROTHER
Posted: December 21, 20099:18 pm Eastern
By Michael Carl
2009 WorldNetDaily
Yahoo.com is allegedly spying on its customers and acting as a proxy for U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies.
According to Wired.com, Yahoo also charges the agencies for the information. That means U.S. citizens' tax dollars are being used by federal agencies to pay for information gathered in Yahoo's spying.
A Yahoo customer who asked not to be identified became suspicious of Yahoo's operations when the image below appeared on his screen while downloading his e-mail
Yahoo.com is allegedly spying on its customers and acting as a proxy for U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies.
According to Wired.com, Yahoo also charges the agencies for the information. That means U.S. citizens' tax dollars are being used by federal agencies to pay for information gathered in Yahoo's spying.
A Yahoo customer who asked not to be identified became suspicious of Yahoo's operations when the image below appeared on his screen while downloading his e-mail.
John Young, who runs the website http://www.cryptome.org/ , believes the Internet giant is gathering data from customer e-mails for possible disclosure to U. S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies.
Young says Yahoo has a standard operating procedure for e-mail data mining spelled out in the Yahoo Law Enforcement Compliance Manual. Young has posted a copy of Yahoo's manual on his Cryptome.com website.
Yahoo and its Washington, D.C.-based legal counsel, Steptoe and Johnson, have not responded to WND requests for comment
The manual says Yahoo records the IP address of any computer involved in a Yahoo e-mail exchange.
"Every message sent by a Yahoo! mail user contains the originating IP address in the header," the Yahoo manual says. "That is, Yahoo! records the IP address of the computer that was used to send the email, and Yahoo! inserts that IP address in the header of the message. Accordingly, if law enforcement is seeking to determine the IP address from which a Yahoo! e-mail was sent, Yahoo! will have no additional information other than what is visible in the message itself."
The manual continues.
"The relevant line from the header will generally look like this: Received: from [65.207.97.120] by web41705.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 05 Sep 2003 07:30:05 PDT
"In this example, the IP address in brackets corresponds to the computer from which the message was sent," the manual states.
Section V of the Yahoo compliance guide says:
"Yahoo! generally will accept service of court orders, search warrants, and criminal grand jury or administrative subpoenas for the production of documents by fax from government entities."
Then there's this paragraph a few lines later in the same section:
"Yahoo! will ask law enforcement to certify that the prior or delayed notice provisions have been satisfied if contents are sought with legal process other than a Search Warrant."
"…with legal process other than a Search Warrant."
An intelligence analyst and private terrorism investigator who asked not to be named, believes this phrase is key in Yahoo's willingness to turn over e-mail contents to U.S. intelligence agencies.
Young stands by his actions and what he has written about Yahoo's surveillance. He believes the public material may be a diversion for deeper surveillance.
"What remains unclear is what are other arrangements between Yahoo and law enforcement and intelligence agencies that are not covered by publicly available material. It is more than probable that the publicly available material diverts attention from these other shenanigans," Young observes.
He adds that other Internet providers are also involved in surveillance.
"Yahoo is not alone in these customer transgressions, the deceptive practices are widespread among telecommunications and IP providers," Young asserts.
A story on Mathaba.net states, "Cox Communications, SBC, Cingular, Nextel, GTE and other telecoms and Internet service providers," or ISPs, are involved in federally sanction data collection.
Young also believes media haven't done a good job reporting the abuses.
"There's an abysmal neglect of what the ISPs, OS (operating system) producers, network operators, data farmers and search engines are up to with customer data displayed on the computer screen."
Yahoo's legal counsel, Steptoe and Johnson, has contacted Young, acknowledging the compliance guide's existence and how it facilitates Yahoo's participation in intelligence and law enforcement investigations.
The letter posted on Cryptome.org reads.
The letter concludes with a threat of legal action.
The series of letters is posted on the www.Cryptome.org website. "
Source of This Post
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=119240
Yes No Real Surprise that Big Money, Political Games, and the Power Elite pay Yahoo to give them what they want to know. The Internet .. everything you say and do is tracked, either to Watch You, or to create a data base to Sell you Something.. oh Well...
I have Read the Yahoo Law Enforcement Manual above and well it is a No Brainer to get this information, should your attorney not fear local law enforcement.
It is EASY to prove where emails REALLY come from, this is EASY technical though many make it seem so intensely complex for their own personal game and to Hide their Lies. However you get one of the Power Elite that Wants that information and you have it in minutes.
SO Never think that your emails are Private, they just are not. And when you talk about how you feel online, good or bad don't hide your identity just be proud of your stance and talk as intelligently as you can about your point of view or reasons why.
Suing Yahoo... not sure if that will work when Big Money and the Power Elite Control the Courts as Well, adn google is no better, just be Out There with your Truth, don't hide. I mean come on wasn't Google at this Years Bilderberg meeting.. Come On ..
Just Simply Say what you Mean - Mean What you Say and For Goodness Sake put your name to it... How proud can you be of what you say or how sure of yourself are you if your Anonymous about it?
r
r
So yes this information below is disturbing but is it really something new. I mean come on EVERYONE knows you cannot truly hide your identity online and that if Law Enforcement were JUST and on the Right Side of the Law they could easily buy, or supeona this information from Yahoo.
Here is the Article Sent to Me Today...
"Yahoo is spying on you
Allegedly acting as proxy for law enforcement, intel agencies
LIFE WITH BIG BROTHER
Posted: December 21, 20099:18 pm Eastern
By Michael Carl
2009 WorldNetDaily
Yahoo.com is allegedly spying on its customers and acting as a proxy for U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies.
According to Wired.com, Yahoo also charges the agencies for the information. That means U.S. citizens' tax dollars are being used by federal agencies to pay for information gathered in Yahoo's spying.
A Yahoo customer who asked not to be identified became suspicious of Yahoo's operations when the image below appeared on his screen while downloading his e-mail
Yahoo.com is allegedly spying on its customers and acting as a proxy for U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies.
According to Wired.com, Yahoo also charges the agencies for the information. That means U.S. citizens' tax dollars are being used by federal agencies to pay for information gathered in Yahoo's spying.
A Yahoo customer who asked not to be identified became suspicious of Yahoo's operations when the image below appeared on his screen while downloading his e-mail.
John Young, who runs the website http://www.cryptome.org/ , believes the Internet giant is gathering data from customer e-mails for possible disclosure to U. S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies.
Young says Yahoo has a standard operating procedure for e-mail data mining spelled out in the Yahoo Law Enforcement Compliance Manual. Young has posted a copy of Yahoo's manual on his Cryptome.com website.
Yahoo and its Washington, D.C.-based legal counsel, Steptoe and Johnson, have not responded to WND requests for comment
The manual says Yahoo records the IP address of any computer involved in a Yahoo e-mail exchange.
"Every message sent by a Yahoo! mail user contains the originating IP address in the header," the Yahoo manual says. "That is, Yahoo! records the IP address of the computer that was used to send the email, and Yahoo! inserts that IP address in the header of the message. Accordingly, if law enforcement is seeking to determine the IP address from which a Yahoo! e-mail was sent, Yahoo! will have no additional information other than what is visible in the message itself."
The manual continues.
"The relevant line from the header will generally look like this: Received: from [65.207.97.120] by web41705.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 05 Sep 2003 07:30:05 PDT
"In this example, the IP address in brackets corresponds to the computer from which the message was sent," the manual states.
Section V of the Yahoo compliance guide says:
"Yahoo! generally will accept service of court orders, search warrants, and criminal grand jury or administrative subpoenas for the production of documents by fax from government entities."
Then there's this paragraph a few lines later in the same section:
"Yahoo! will ask law enforcement to certify that the prior or delayed notice provisions have been satisfied if contents are sought with legal process other than a Search Warrant."
"…with legal process other than a Search Warrant."
An intelligence analyst and private terrorism investigator who asked not to be named, believes this phrase is key in Yahoo's willingness to turn over e-mail contents to U.S. intelligence agencies.
Young stands by his actions and what he has written about Yahoo's surveillance. He believes the public material may be a diversion for deeper surveillance.
"What remains unclear is what are other arrangements between Yahoo and law enforcement and intelligence agencies that are not covered by publicly available material. It is more than probable that the publicly available material diverts attention from these other shenanigans," Young observes.
He adds that other Internet providers are also involved in surveillance.
"Yahoo is not alone in these customer transgressions, the deceptive practices are widespread among telecommunications and IP providers," Young asserts.
A story on Mathaba.net states, "Cox Communications, SBC, Cingular, Nextel, GTE and other telecoms and Internet service providers," or ISPs, are involved in federally sanction data collection.
Young also believes media haven't done a good job reporting the abuses.
"There's an abysmal neglect of what the ISPs, OS (operating system) producers, network operators, data farmers and search engines are up to with customer data displayed on the computer screen."
Yahoo's legal counsel, Steptoe and Johnson, has contacted Young, acknowledging the compliance guide's existence and how it facilitates Yahoo's participation in intelligence and law enforcement investigations.
The letter posted on Cryptome.org reads.
The letter concludes with a threat of legal action.
The series of letters is posted on the www.Cryptome.org website. "
Source of This Post
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=119240
****
Yes No Real Surprise that Big Money, Political Games, and the Power Elite pay Yahoo to give them what they want to know. The Internet .. everything you say and do is tracked, either to Watch You, or to create a data base to Sell you Something.. oh Well...
I have Read the Yahoo Law Enforcement Manual above and well it is a No Brainer to get this information, should your attorney not fear local law enforcement.
It is EASY to prove where emails REALLY come from, this is EASY technical though many make it seem so intensely complex for their own personal game and to Hide their Lies. However you get one of the Power Elite that Wants that information and you have it in minutes.
SO Never think that your emails are Private, they just are not. And when you talk about how you feel online, good or bad don't hide your identity just be proud of your stance and talk as intelligently as you can about your point of view or reasons why.
Suing Yahoo... not sure if that will work when Big Money and the Power Elite Control the Courts as Well, adn google is no better, just be Out There with your Truth, don't hide. I mean come on wasn't Google at this Years Bilderberg meeting.. Come On ..
Just Simply Say what you Mean - Mean What you Say and For Goodness Sake put your name to it... How proud can you be of what you say or how sure of yourself are you if your Anonymous about it?
r
r
Monday, December 21, 2009
Tachyon is Changing Everything - Learn ALL you Can About Tachyon Energy
"Our world exists in a state of chaos. Diseases are out of control, drug use is rampant, and pollution is choking streams, rivers, seas and the air we breathe. This energy, called Tachyon, is what many of the scientists of the world believe is the source energy of all energy we know to exist. It is imperative that no man interfere with its global distribution. I pray with heartfelt devotion that every living being will find the place of balance and order that comes from Tachyon. I believe we could change the world.
Tachyon is Changing Everything
By Larry Johnson
Named for a Greek word meaning "swift", a Tachyon is a particle proposed independently by Gerald Feinberg and by George Sudershan and co-workers, capable of only faster-than-light speeds.
In 1966, Gerald Feinberg described the existence of an untapped, unlimited supply of faster-than-light energy called Tachyon. This incredible body of information presented by Feinberg was the missing link in explaining, at least in theory, where most of the "free energy machines" actually derived their energy.
The word electricity describes a type of energy.
The word Tachyon describes the Source of All Energies.
In the summer of 1931, Nikola Tesla took his nephew to Buffalo, N.Y. to begin testing a new automobile into which he had installed a most remarkable device.
At the age of 70, and using his own private funds, Tesla built what is now believed to be the first known "energy receiver" (gravitational energy converter) that actually operated a motorless vehicle. The car was a large, heavy Pierce Arrow, one of the luxury cars of that era.
The engine was removed and replaced with an electric motor.
Under the dashboard, Tesla installed his energy receiver. Tesla said the converter produced enough power to illuminate an entire house as well as run the car. The car was tested for a week and effortlessly reached top speeds of 90 mph.
The performance data showed that besides using no fuel and producing no pollution, the response of the Arrow was at least equal to that of a gasoline engine. For the aging Tesla, this car was just a hobby that would not be taken seriously.
Tesla knew this advancement would be no more accepted than his invention to provide free energy to every home without wires. Speculation suggests that most probably the same technology was used for the device installed in the Arrow.
Thus, he would not discuss the Arrow’s technical achievements with engineers, theoretical scientists or companies almost without exception. Interestingly, only a few months after the tests were completed, the Pierce Arrow stopped all production forever.
It is believed by many that Tesla was the first, but not the last, to actually build a receiver that harnessed gravitational field energy, which is now understood to be a direct derivative of Tachyon Energy.
Since then, opposing great odds and against orthodox science, there has been a growing body of profound individuals who have been successful at harnessing this extraordinary faster-than-light energy called Tachyon.
Dr. T. Henry Moray of Salt Lake City, Utah is one of the gifted warriors. Working against an ignorant and money-oriented government and business society that suppresses the possibilities of a future without oil and nuclear energies, Dr. Moray continued until his death at gaining support for a revolutionary device. Dr. Moray was greatly impressed by the works of Tesla and in the 1930s was able to produce a 60 lb. converter that generated 50 kilowatts. Dr. Moray found the solution to our growing need for fuel.
These small converters could produce electricity without pollution or any electrical input. They could be used to run almost everything. On July 13, 1931, Dr. Moray applied to the U.S. Patent Office, and just like Tesla, he had successfully harnessed the Tachyon field which permeated everything and then converted it into usable electrical power.
The problem was that Dr. Moray could not prove where the source of energy came from, and in their infinite wisdom, the U.S. Patent Office rejected his device not because it didn't work (because it did), but rather because he could not prove the source of the energy.
The fate of Dr. Moray comes straight out of a comic book. He was harassed by everyone who could exploit or bury his invention including agents of the government. On March 2nd, 1940, Dr. Moray was shot in his own laboratory. After that he always carried a gun. His car had bulletproof windows, and yet the attacks still came.
Up until his death in 1974 he gave lectures and talks to small interested groups. The technical questions that could not be answered then still elude us today. Dr. Moray's son took over where his father left off at trying to get financing and answers to why his devices work.
The day will come when science will be able to prove the Tachyon Energy Field. On that day the world will rejoice. And even now we draw ever closer to that day, but first more history.
This interest in gravitational energy (Tachyon) waged on throughout our world. In the 1920s and 1930s the concepts were being addressed by physicists like Levetzow, Stanyukowiz and Shneiderov.
Dr. Nieper expanded on the gravitational field energy potential with certain theories that were supported by data gathered by NASA satellites during 1967-1971.
In 1970 an American physicist named Stokes, called Nieper's Theory the "Shielding Theory". In 1972 Stuhlinger, a well know physicist working with Wernher von Braun in Huntsville, Alabama, derived that the "shielding effect could only be explained by the effects of a Tachyon field that had been described by Feinberg in 1966."
Professor Shinichi Seike, director of the gravity research laboratory in Japan stated that "there is good news that Tachyons are surely present in gravitational space."
In contrast to several pronouncements, their existence (Tachyon) has been satisfactorily and reliably confirmed since 1975, especially by the USSR and Australian researchers. According to the calculations of a Japanese scientist, a leader in this area, "The energy concentration of this (Tachyon) field is several million joules per cm3, at approximately 800 million volts tension per centimeter-extraordinarily high! The basic principal is to force the Tachyon and its energy to interact with a different physical system."
The belief of such great scientists as Todeschini in Italy, Pages in France, Kooy in Holland, Wyniatt in New Zealand, Nieper in Germany is that the Tachyon Field is real, accessible and extremely rich in energy.
Today many scientists agree that Tachyon Energy exists, and by proof of so many devices that are now in existence, it is only a matter of time until all our lives are changed by this energy.
In the early 1960s a French scientist Andre Priore demonstrated a new aspect and potential of what could be done when Tachyon Energy is harnessed. Priore received a patent in France for a most remarkable device. And what does this device do?
Well, according to the Canadian "Clean Energy Newsletter," with the device "in a rhythmical manner, he can induce magnetic behavior in the irradiated objects, by modulation of loaded neutrinos (increasing the cells ability to attract Tachyon)".
The research focused on cancer and it showed so much potential that the French orthodox medical community took a very unfriendly attitude and so did Sir Alexander Haddow, President of the British Cancer Research Institute. When Priore brought his research to the USA in hopes of helping mankind, he was met with negativity. S.E. Luria, a well known researcher of cancer took it upon himself to torpedo the tests.
In the mid 1980s the apparatus finally began receiving solid French support from both the scientific world and the technological world. Most interestingly, the U.S. non-military scientific community continues to resist.
Even so, it shows us that the "Tachyon Era" has started, and the applications will be mind boggling. Natural Tachyon Energy healing and Tachyon converters producing free energy are not only in our future, but are our future.
Science has also associated a certain quality with Tachyon that is most exciting. It is called negative entropy or negentropy. Negentropy seems to cause order out of chaos.
It appears that the more positive entropy associated with an organism the more disorder, disease or chaos is present. That seems to help explain why Priore's device worked so well. It appears that it caused order out of a chaotic system. Patients with cancer (cancer cells are very chaotic and low vibration) were treated with his device, and it appeared to cause the body's natural cancer fighting abilities to become so active that the cancer disappeared.
In early 1982 an article exploring the significance of the Tachyon field was published in Raum & Zeit. At that time they focused on the potential for free energy.
Then in volume 4, 1991 of Raum & Zeit, Dr. Morton Walker, DPM wrote an article about the emergence of a company that had been successful in re-organizing certain materials. In particular, glass, water, and cloth had been used to become a conduit for Tachyon Energy to pass through. The article stirred the imagination. Dr. Walker associated the life force, Prana, Ch'i , Ki, and Qi, as being the same as Tachyon Energy causing a decrease in entropy by those who used these products.
Dr. Walker described several commercial products available in the U.S. for private use. All of these products were developed by a unidentified company by an unnamed scientist in Japan. Even so, the availability for an individual to actually be able to hold an antenna for Tachyon Energy was in itself a godsend.
In a follow-up article published in volume 3, number 2, 1992 of Raum & Zeit, Dr. Walker provided even more encouraging news about certain athletes who had increased their performances most impressively by the use of these little antennas of Tachyon Energy.
Dr. William H. Philpott, M.D. writes most impressively that all our healthy cells have a magnetic charge that attracts and converts Tachyon Energy into biological energy in the form of usable electrons. Furthermore, Dr. Philpott reported that when a cell is in a state of edema, inflammation or disorders of sodium-potassium, the cells are shorted out and therefore incapable of converting free space energy (Tachyon) into biological usable energy.
This seems to correspond with the negentropy philosophy associated with Tachyon Energy.
If in fact an unhealthy cell does not have access to Tachyon Energy or cannot convert Tachyon Energy into usable biological energy, then it would stand to reason that it could not rejuvenate itself. In 1990, Advanced Tachyon Technologies, a U.S. corporation announced it had perfected a revolutionary process that actually restructured natural materials at the sub-molecular level, turning them into permanent Tachyon antennas.
It only makes sense that if one could cause a large enough source of concentrated Tachyons to flow through the unhealthy cell and if negative entropy actually causes re-order, then the cell would quickly become balanced. When this theory becomes an accepted fact, then the incredible breakthrough in Tachyon Energy treatments will rock the institution of our chemically oriented medical science treatments. "The greatest breakthrough ever!" — Carla Bowes, N.D.
They wouldn’t divulge the process to me, but they did share that Tachyonization (their word for the permanent restructuring process) has demonstrated that it is not a frequency, and according to David Wagner, is the source of all frequencies. They say the entire process takes 14 days, and the process is 100% permanent and patentable.
Extensive research with the public's assistance began in May, 1991 using Tachyon antennas. Located in Sonoma County, California, the Tachyon Health Center, (a holistic health center) was started for the sole purpose of testing the effects of Tachyon Energy.
Studies were conducted on individuals with a large range of physical ailments. 1,400 treatments were administered with nothing less than amazing results. Most all of the clients reported immediate improvements that seem to compound dramatically with time. But, what is really exciting is that over 1,000 healthcare practitioners have been trained in the advanced uses of Tachyonized tools.
They quickly answer the only question left: How effective are Tachyonized tools at helping those in need?
From a distinguished list of independent researchers, practitioners and scientists involved in the testing of Tachyonized tools, spanning some 40 countries, comes the understanding that: "The future is here, and it is called Tachyon."
Christina Cummings M.D. told the world on VPN reports, a national television special:
"Tachyon energy works for me, maybe it will work for you!"
"This Tachyon breakthrough is tremendously exciting because it not only supports the energetic model of nutrition, but is a powerful self-healing and youthing tool," world renowned author of Spiritual Nutrition, Sevenfold Peace and Conscious Eating, Gabriel Cousens, M.D. wrote: "It appears experts agree that the future is here, and they call it Tachyon!"
If Tachyon Energy is all that it is cracked up to be, then in the near future all of us will be healthier, happier, and have a better quality of life. Maybe then our world will be a little better for our children's children.
Remember:
Our world exists in a state of chaos. Diseases are out of control, drug use is rampant, and pollution is choking streams, rivers, seas and the air we breathe. This energy, called Tachyon, is what many of the scientists of the world believe is the source energy of all energy we know to exist. It is imperative that no man interfere with its global distribution.
I pray with heartfelt devotion that every living being will find the place of balance and order that comes from Tachyon. I believe we could change the world.
Tachyon:
A theoretical subatomic particle traveling faster than the speed of light."
r
Source of Post
http://www.planet-tachyon.com/EN/TachyonLibrary/TachyonArticles/TachyonisChangingEverything/
tabid/292/language/en-US/Default.aspx
p
p
Tachyon is Changing Everything
By Larry Johnson
Named for a Greek word meaning "swift", a Tachyon is a particle proposed independently by Gerald Feinberg and by George Sudershan and co-workers, capable of only faster-than-light speeds.
In 1966, Gerald Feinberg described the existence of an untapped, unlimited supply of faster-than-light energy called Tachyon. This incredible body of information presented by Feinberg was the missing link in explaining, at least in theory, where most of the "free energy machines" actually derived their energy.
The word electricity describes a type of energy.
The word Tachyon describes the Source of All Energies.
In the summer of 1931, Nikola Tesla took his nephew to Buffalo, N.Y. to begin testing a new automobile into which he had installed a most remarkable device.
At the age of 70, and using his own private funds, Tesla built what is now believed to be the first known "energy receiver" (gravitational energy converter) that actually operated a motorless vehicle. The car was a large, heavy Pierce Arrow, one of the luxury cars of that era.
The engine was removed and replaced with an electric motor.
Under the dashboard, Tesla installed his energy receiver. Tesla said the converter produced enough power to illuminate an entire house as well as run the car. The car was tested for a week and effortlessly reached top speeds of 90 mph.
The performance data showed that besides using no fuel and producing no pollution, the response of the Arrow was at least equal to that of a gasoline engine. For the aging Tesla, this car was just a hobby that would not be taken seriously.
Tesla knew this advancement would be no more accepted than his invention to provide free energy to every home without wires. Speculation suggests that most probably the same technology was used for the device installed in the Arrow.
Thus, he would not discuss the Arrow’s technical achievements with engineers, theoretical scientists or companies almost without exception. Interestingly, only a few months after the tests were completed, the Pierce Arrow stopped all production forever.
It is believed by many that Tesla was the first, but not the last, to actually build a receiver that harnessed gravitational field energy, which is now understood to be a direct derivative of Tachyon Energy.
Since then, opposing great odds and against orthodox science, there has been a growing body of profound individuals who have been successful at harnessing this extraordinary faster-than-light energy called Tachyon.
Dr. T. Henry Moray of Salt Lake City, Utah is one of the gifted warriors. Working against an ignorant and money-oriented government and business society that suppresses the possibilities of a future without oil and nuclear energies, Dr. Moray continued until his death at gaining support for a revolutionary device. Dr. Moray was greatly impressed by the works of Tesla and in the 1930s was able to produce a 60 lb. converter that generated 50 kilowatts. Dr. Moray found the solution to our growing need for fuel.
These small converters could produce electricity without pollution or any electrical input. They could be used to run almost everything. On July 13, 1931, Dr. Moray applied to the U.S. Patent Office, and just like Tesla, he had successfully harnessed the Tachyon field which permeated everything and then converted it into usable electrical power.
The problem was that Dr. Moray could not prove where the source of energy came from, and in their infinite wisdom, the U.S. Patent Office rejected his device not because it didn't work (because it did), but rather because he could not prove the source of the energy.
The fate of Dr. Moray comes straight out of a comic book. He was harassed by everyone who could exploit or bury his invention including agents of the government. On March 2nd, 1940, Dr. Moray was shot in his own laboratory. After that he always carried a gun. His car had bulletproof windows, and yet the attacks still came.
Up until his death in 1974 he gave lectures and talks to small interested groups. The technical questions that could not be answered then still elude us today. Dr. Moray's son took over where his father left off at trying to get financing and answers to why his devices work.
The day will come when science will be able to prove the Tachyon Energy Field. On that day the world will rejoice. And even now we draw ever closer to that day, but first more history.
This interest in gravitational energy (Tachyon) waged on throughout our world. In the 1920s and 1930s the concepts were being addressed by physicists like Levetzow, Stanyukowiz and Shneiderov.
Dr. Nieper expanded on the gravitational field energy potential with certain theories that were supported by data gathered by NASA satellites during 1967-1971.
In 1970 an American physicist named Stokes, called Nieper's Theory the "Shielding Theory". In 1972 Stuhlinger, a well know physicist working with Wernher von Braun in Huntsville, Alabama, derived that the "shielding effect could only be explained by the effects of a Tachyon field that had been described by Feinberg in 1966."
Professor Shinichi Seike, director of the gravity research laboratory in Japan stated that "there is good news that Tachyons are surely present in gravitational space."
In contrast to several pronouncements, their existence (Tachyon) has been satisfactorily and reliably confirmed since 1975, especially by the USSR and Australian researchers. According to the calculations of a Japanese scientist, a leader in this area, "The energy concentration of this (Tachyon) field is several million joules per cm3, at approximately 800 million volts tension per centimeter-extraordinarily high! The basic principal is to force the Tachyon and its energy to interact with a different physical system."
The belief of such great scientists as Todeschini in Italy, Pages in France, Kooy in Holland, Wyniatt in New Zealand, Nieper in Germany is that the Tachyon Field is real, accessible and extremely rich in energy.
Today many scientists agree that Tachyon Energy exists, and by proof of so many devices that are now in existence, it is only a matter of time until all our lives are changed by this energy.
In the early 1960s a French scientist Andre Priore demonstrated a new aspect and potential of what could be done when Tachyon Energy is harnessed. Priore received a patent in France for a most remarkable device. And what does this device do?
Well, according to the Canadian "Clean Energy Newsletter," with the device "in a rhythmical manner, he can induce magnetic behavior in the irradiated objects, by modulation of loaded neutrinos (increasing the cells ability to attract Tachyon)".
The research focused on cancer and it showed so much potential that the French orthodox medical community took a very unfriendly attitude and so did Sir Alexander Haddow, President of the British Cancer Research Institute. When Priore brought his research to the USA in hopes of helping mankind, he was met with negativity. S.E. Luria, a well known researcher of cancer took it upon himself to torpedo the tests.
In the mid 1980s the apparatus finally began receiving solid French support from both the scientific world and the technological world. Most interestingly, the U.S. non-military scientific community continues to resist.
Even so, it shows us that the "Tachyon Era" has started, and the applications will be mind boggling. Natural Tachyon Energy healing and Tachyon converters producing free energy are not only in our future, but are our future.
Science has also associated a certain quality with Tachyon that is most exciting. It is called negative entropy or negentropy. Negentropy seems to cause order out of chaos.
It appears that the more positive entropy associated with an organism the more disorder, disease or chaos is present. That seems to help explain why Priore's device worked so well. It appears that it caused order out of a chaotic system. Patients with cancer (cancer cells are very chaotic and low vibration) were treated with his device, and it appeared to cause the body's natural cancer fighting abilities to become so active that the cancer disappeared.
In early 1982 an article exploring the significance of the Tachyon field was published in Raum & Zeit. At that time they focused on the potential for free energy.
Then in volume 4, 1991 of Raum & Zeit, Dr. Morton Walker, DPM wrote an article about the emergence of a company that had been successful in re-organizing certain materials. In particular, glass, water, and cloth had been used to become a conduit for Tachyon Energy to pass through. The article stirred the imagination. Dr. Walker associated the life force, Prana, Ch'i , Ki, and Qi, as being the same as Tachyon Energy causing a decrease in entropy by those who used these products.
Dr. Walker described several commercial products available in the U.S. for private use. All of these products were developed by a unidentified company by an unnamed scientist in Japan. Even so, the availability for an individual to actually be able to hold an antenna for Tachyon Energy was in itself a godsend.
In a follow-up article published in volume 3, number 2, 1992 of Raum & Zeit, Dr. Walker provided even more encouraging news about certain athletes who had increased their performances most impressively by the use of these little antennas of Tachyon Energy.
Dr. William H. Philpott, M.D. writes most impressively that all our healthy cells have a magnetic charge that attracts and converts Tachyon Energy into biological energy in the form of usable electrons. Furthermore, Dr. Philpott reported that when a cell is in a state of edema, inflammation or disorders of sodium-potassium, the cells are shorted out and therefore incapable of converting free space energy (Tachyon) into biological usable energy.
This seems to correspond with the negentropy philosophy associated with Tachyon Energy.
If in fact an unhealthy cell does not have access to Tachyon Energy or cannot convert Tachyon Energy into usable biological energy, then it would stand to reason that it could not rejuvenate itself. In 1990, Advanced Tachyon Technologies, a U.S. corporation announced it had perfected a revolutionary process that actually restructured natural materials at the sub-molecular level, turning them into permanent Tachyon antennas.
It only makes sense that if one could cause a large enough source of concentrated Tachyons to flow through the unhealthy cell and if negative entropy actually causes re-order, then the cell would quickly become balanced. When this theory becomes an accepted fact, then the incredible breakthrough in Tachyon Energy treatments will rock the institution of our chemically oriented medical science treatments. "The greatest breakthrough ever!" — Carla Bowes, N.D.
They wouldn’t divulge the process to me, but they did share that Tachyonization (their word for the permanent restructuring process) has demonstrated that it is not a frequency, and according to David Wagner, is the source of all frequencies. They say the entire process takes 14 days, and the process is 100% permanent and patentable.
Extensive research with the public's assistance began in May, 1991 using Tachyon antennas. Located in Sonoma County, California, the Tachyon Health Center, (a holistic health center) was started for the sole purpose of testing the effects of Tachyon Energy.
Studies were conducted on individuals with a large range of physical ailments. 1,400 treatments were administered with nothing less than amazing results. Most all of the clients reported immediate improvements that seem to compound dramatically with time. But, what is really exciting is that over 1,000 healthcare practitioners have been trained in the advanced uses of Tachyonized tools.
They quickly answer the only question left: How effective are Tachyonized tools at helping those in need?
From a distinguished list of independent researchers, practitioners and scientists involved in the testing of Tachyonized tools, spanning some 40 countries, comes the understanding that: "The future is here, and it is called Tachyon."
Christina Cummings M.D. told the world on VPN reports, a national television special:
"Tachyon energy works for me, maybe it will work for you!"
"This Tachyon breakthrough is tremendously exciting because it not only supports the energetic model of nutrition, but is a powerful self-healing and youthing tool," world renowned author of Spiritual Nutrition, Sevenfold Peace and Conscious Eating, Gabriel Cousens, M.D. wrote: "It appears experts agree that the future is here, and they call it Tachyon!"
If Tachyon Energy is all that it is cracked up to be, then in the near future all of us will be healthier, happier, and have a better quality of life. Maybe then our world will be a little better for our children's children.
Remember:
Our world exists in a state of chaos. Diseases are out of control, drug use is rampant, and pollution is choking streams, rivers, seas and the air we breathe. This energy, called Tachyon, is what many of the scientists of the world believe is the source energy of all energy we know to exist. It is imperative that no man interfere with its global distribution.
I pray with heartfelt devotion that every living being will find the place of balance and order that comes from Tachyon. I believe we could change the world.
Tachyon:
A theoretical subatomic particle traveling faster than the speed of light."
r
Source of Post
http://www.planet-tachyon.com/EN/TachyonLibrary/TachyonArticles/TachyonisChangingEverything/
tabid/292/language/en-US/Default.aspx
p
p
The True Story of the Bilderberg Group - Great Book - You NEED to READ
"Unravel one of the best-kept secrets in political history.
Delving into a world once shrouded in complete mystery and impenetrable security, this investigative report provides a fascinating account of the annual meetings of the world’s most powerful people—the Bilderberg Group.
Since its inception in 1954 at the Bilderberg Hotel in the small Dutch town of Oosterbeek, the Bilderberg Group has been comprised of European prime ministers, American presidents, and the wealthiest CEOs of the world, all coming together to discuss the economic and political future of humanity.
The press has never been allowed to attend, nor have statements ever been released on the attendees' conclusions or discussions, which have ramifications on the citizens of the world. Using methods that resemble the spy tactics of the Cold War—and in several instances putting his own life on the line—the author did what no one else has managed to achieve: he learned what was being said behind the closed doors of the opulent hotels and has made it available to the public for the first time.
Daniel Estulin is an award-winning investigative journalist and has been researching the Bilderberg Group for more than 14 years. He is the host of two radio shows in Spain."
r
Source of Post and Where to Buy this Book from the Author.
http://trineday.com/paypal_store/product_pages/Bilderbergers.html
r
More on Daniel Estulin and the Bilderberg Group at
This Awesome Site
rThis Awesome Site
r
Roy L. Reardon, Response to Roy Reardon - New York Supreme Court Appellate Division - Chairman
DRAFT Response to Roy Reardon, New York Supreme Court
How Long Can This Guy handle Complaints against Himself, be involved Coverups, Conspiracies, and the Stealing of a Trillion Dollar Patent by way of ignoring complaints and DOING Nothing?
r
Here is the Responce to Roy L. Reardon NY Supreme Court
from Eliot Bernstein.
r
Monday, December 14, 2009
I-VIEW-IT HOLDINGS, INC.
I-VIEW-IT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Eliot I. Bernstein
Founder & Inventor
TO: Roy L. Reardon
Chairman
New York Supreme Court
Appellate Division First
Judicial Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee
61 Broadway
New York, NY 10006
(212) 401-0800
also Partner @
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
425 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10017-3954
Regarding: Your Continued Insanity in handling complaints against YOURSELF, Alan W. Friedberg and Other Defendents in a Twelve Count - Twelve Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Legally Related to a Whistleblower Causing Mass Liablity, you are Concealing from the State of New York and the People of New York.
roy reardon
Dear Mr. Reardon,
I. Response to Your Letter Dated December 07, 2009.
Your audacity bemuses me and allow me to retort to your and Mr. Friedberg’s
insanity and again put forth some basic realities regarding your misconduct and criminal
acts.
First, my seventy-eight page complaint against Mr. Friedberg and YOU, if you
have read it, is also a RE-FILED complaint against you, this letter shall serve as a third
and a bit more severe complaint.
Your letter is in response to the earlier complaints against Mr. Friedberg and yourself that you buried since February 2009, until sequestered by the NEW YORK STATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, which requested that you provide information regarding the CONCEALED complaints to them, not me.
Nevertheless, in delusion, you responded to me regarding your complaints and tried to
dismiss complaints against yourself and your partner in crime, Mr. Friedberg, while your
department is in a lawsuit with me. In that lawsuit, your department has representative
ILLEGALLY retained counsel, the New York Attorney General and yet you continue to
pester me with your continued handling of your own and Mr. Friedberg’s complaints, as well as, attempting ILLEGALLY to dismiss complaints against other defendants in the
lawsuit.
Let me dissect your letters errors one by one before I begin my further FORMAL
COMPLAINT against you in addition to the one you have buried for months and now try
to dismiss:
1. First, you state, “Your 78 page fax dated December 3, 2009 labeled as a
complaint against Chief Counsel Alan W. Friedberg has been referred to me.”
The problem in this statement is that you fail to see that the 78 Page Fax
Complaint, is a re-filing of the complaint you have admitted to concealing
since February 2009 against both YOU and Mr. Friedberg.
The FORMAL COMPLAINT is actually against you and Mr. Friedberg, so had you really
read the Complaint, you would see it would be impossible for it to be referred to you, as you are a Main Character in the Complaint. I resubmitted that complaint due ONLY to your prior CONCEALMENT of OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS.
I have attached herein, that same complaint but have individually broke it out for you with your very own cover page. By the by, your inappropriate letter that defies ethics again has NO FORMAL DOCKETING number for the Friedberg case, so I wonder how to appeal it or
if it has been CONCEALED again.
2. Next, you claim laughably, “Among other things, the document contains
copies of letters from you to State Senator John L. Sampson of the New York
Senate Judiciary Committee alleging that the DDC has engaged in conflicts of
interest, corruption and other wrongful acts. We find no merit in those
accusations.”
The silliness of your statement here, although criminal in
nature, is very telling of your cognizance of the allegations contained in the
FORMAL COMPLAINT that was CONCEALED and further stands as
ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE OF YOUR CONTINUED CRIMINAL
CONDUCT in trying to dismiss complaints you and your whole department
are conflicted in, Mr. Friedberg and yourself especially, since you have
FORMAL COMPLAINTS LODGED AGAINST BOTH OF YOU.
Now it becomes a bit dicey for you, as your RULES AND REGULATIONS OF YOUR DEPARTMENT CLAIM § 605.6 Investigations and Informal Proceedings
(g) Preliminary Screening of Complaints. Any complaint
received by the Office of Chief Counsel against a member
of the Committee or Staff counsel involving alleged
misconduct shall be transmitted forthwith to the Committee
Chairperson, who shall assign it either to the Office of
Chief Counsel or to special counsel who shall conduct or
direct the appropriate investigation, and give a written
recommendation as to the disposition of the Complaint to
the Committee Chairperson, who shall determine the
appropriate disposition of the Complaint.
Any such Complaint which relates to the Committee Chairperson shall, in the first instance, be transmitted to a Hearing Panel Chairperson, who shall conduct the appropriate investigation and determine the appropriate disposition of the Complaint.
My complaint Mr. Roy Reardon is a twofold problem for you as the FORMAL COMPLAINTS YOU HAVE CONCEALED SINCE FEBRUARY 2009, are against YOU, acting as the Chair of the DDC and your partner in crime, Mr. Alan Friedberg, acting as Chief Counsel.
It is clever how in your SELF DISMISSING LETTER which defies ethics, you try and CONCEAL that Friedberg’s complaint has been transferred to you, which according to your own rules would be a violation, as the COMPLAINT is also against YOU.
Thus, you are AGAIN violating your OWN rules by trying to hide that you
also are knowingly COMPLAINED of FORMALLY, by way of the Sampson
Letters you have received several times now and the ORIGINAL
COMPLAINT I re-filed. Nice try, though, “desperate men…”
3. Amazingly, your letter continues “In any event, your new "complaint" against
Mr. Friedberg provides no basis on which the Committee should pursue
action.” First, there is NO NEW COMPLAINT, this is merely a re-filing of
the ORIGINAL COMPLAINT you have ILLEGALLY CONCEALED in
violation of LAW against both you and Mr. Alan W. Friedberg and now your trying to
make it as a new complaint is both ridiculous and further criminal and will so
be reported to ALL appropriate oversight authorities and criminal
investigators of your continued violations and further attempt at CRIMINAL
CONCEALMENT.
Second, since you should not be handling complaints against yourself or your partner in crime Mr. Friedberg, it defies logic and law how you claim there is no basis in a complaint against yourself and where you should have already turned the matter over, per your rules you would have to turn the matter over to a Hearing Panel Chair, which obviously you fail to do in regard to the FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST YOU AND MR.
FRIEDBERG.
Again serving as prima facie evidence of your CONTINUED
CRIMINAL CONDUCT, this statement will also be forwarded to all
appropriate oversight of your continued CRIMINAL CONDUCT.
4. The next statement truly shows your detachment from both reality and the
rules and regulations that define ETHICS. I quote your insanity, “Indeed, you
appear to be arguing that anyone associated with the Committee is precluded
from considering the merits of your complaint.” Yes indeed Mr. Reardon I do
make the claim that NOBODY in your department can handle these
complaints and for several factual reasons.
First, your department is a DEFENDANT in a 12-COUNT, 12-TRILLION dollar LAWSUIT, which I am certain you are not concealing from state auditors, well, perhaps you could clarify that for me in writing, as I am sure you are reporting the liability on
your and the states books, liabilities directly related to your CRIMINAL
CONDUCT and CONTINUED CRIMINAL CONDUCT.
As DEFENDANT’S in the ONGOING LEGAL ACTION the whole First
Department is precluded from involvement due to CONFLICTS OF
INTEREST and THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY this creates.
Next, the CONFLICTS and APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY also act
together to create CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION OF OFFICIAL
PROCEEDINGS. This CRIMINAL ACT, also will be reported to your
oversight and CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS.
As the First Department DDC is a DEFENDANT in the LAWSUIT, the DDC
also has representative ILLEGAL counsel, the New York Attorney General
and Monica Connell of their offices.
Upon filing the complaints against other DEFENDANTS in the same LAWSUIT, Ms. Connell advised me as YOUR COUNSEL to file the complaints with your offices against the Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner attorneys (as the attorneys complained of are licensed
there) but that they would be moved instantly to a NON CONFLICTED
THIRD PARTY.
Moved to avoid the OBVIOUS CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND APPEARANCES OF IMPROPRIETY your handling of the complaints creates.
Yet, somehow, you sneaky dog, you and your partner in
crime, Mr. Friedberg, interceded and attempted to DISMISS COMPLAINTS
AGAINST OTHER DEFENDANTS IN THE LAWSUIT YOUR
DEPARTMENT IS A NAMED DEFENDANT IN.
Again, these CONFLICTS act to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE and will duly be noted to all
oversight of the DDC and CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS.
Therefore, your question asks if I think anyone in your department can handle
these complaints and the answer is NO THEY CANNOT and I advise YOU,
Mr. Friedberg and any other department official that each act on these
complaints will result in further FORMAL COMPLAINTS to your oversight
and CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS.
5. Your letter continues insanely “On October 7, 2009 I wrote to you advising that your previous complaints against Mr. Friedberg and other attorneys have been closed.” Now here your sneakiness is better than a proverbial “snake in the grass” as you attempt to state that my previous complaints filed against you and Mr. Friedberg for dismissing complaints against other DEFENDANTS are closed. Mixing apples and oranges while hiding the beef.
First, my previous complaints against other attorneys, resulted in you and Mr.
Friedberg handling them, leading to separate complaints against both you and
Mr. Friedberg.
Love how you refer to “other attorneys” in a third person voice, versus
identifying that YOU Mr. Reardon, are one of the “other” attorneys you
reference. Do you often refer to yourself in the third person; this is a very
symbolic sign of pathological behavior indicating delusion. Perhaps you
could have written more accurately, something like – your complaints against
Mr. Friedberg, MYSELF and other attorneys.
Again, you CONCEAL MATERIAL FACTS, which creates further CRIMINAL CONDUCT.
Finally, I am not sure how the FORMAL COMPLAINTS can be closed when they have not been opened formally with Complaint Numbers for me to even respond too, as demanded in my complaint and as part of the RULES and REGULATIONS of your department that you psychotically continue to ignore, ah, “desperate men…”
6. Finally, this my favorite act of your insanity, I quote, “You may wish to
consider consulting with counsel regarding the matters raised in your
submissions.” To be clear, I have consulted counsel, YOUR COUNSEL the
New York Attorney General and it was determined that you are conflicted and
cannot handle complaints against other Defendants nor yourself and Mr.
Friedberg, per your own departmental Rules and Regulation, Part 600, per the
Attorney Code of Conduct and Law. The result, was to have the complaints moved to a NON CONFLICTED THIRD PARTY.
I advise you therefore to consider consulting with YOUR COUNSEL regarding the matters raised against you CRIMINALLY and then CIVIL charges against you and your
department in the civil complaint.
I advise you to consult your counsel as to further pestering me directly, where
as you know, I represent myself Pro Se, so it is highly unethical and against
the Attorney Conduct Code for you, an attorney, to be contacting me directly
when you have representative counsel.
I find teaching your ethics at this point to be an utter waste of my time, as you seem not be able to discern realistically what your own ethical obligations are, nor what the Rules
you are charged with oversighting state and finally the Law.
I therefore highly recommend that you discontinue with contacting me directly and have
your attorney handle these matters going forward.
Of course, your attorney, the New York Attorney General, is also a DEFENDANT in my LAWSUIT and his representation is therefore suspect as aiding and abetting illegally your department through CONFLICTED representation that VIOLATES the NYAG Rules Public Office Rule 17 for one and that ILLEGAL REPRESENTATION also compounds to cause
Obstruction of Justice as the Conflict precludes the NYAG from doing his public duty of investigating dirty rotten Public Officials, like yourself and Mr. Friedberg.
As my LAWSUIT has been marked legally “RELATED” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin to that of the First Department DDC Whistleblower case of Christine C. Anderson, we see that Anderson similarly is complaining that the NYAG illegal representation of State Defendants from your offices, is a Violation of the NYAG Rules and Regulations and Law, whereby you can get a gander for her position at the following URL, incorporated by reference in entirety herein @ ____________
The allegations in the FORMAL COMPLAINTS against Mr. Friedberg and yourself are replete with concrete evidence of crimes you are committing by violating the very ethics laws you and Mr. Friedberg are in charge of upholding. Conflicts like your department and several of the First Department Judges are direct defendants in a TWELVE COUNT, TWELVE TRILLION DOLLAR FEDERAL LAWSUIT that of course, I know you are not too delusional to have reported this liability and your involvement to any state auditors, state agencies and others who have liability resulting from your continued criminal conduct.
The very fact that you attempt to ignore the conflicts and continue to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE in violation of FEDERAL and STATE CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION LAWS, ATTORNEY ETHICS CODES and more will be formally reported to your oversight and criminal authorities.
Yet, while your letter attempts to claim no conflict, almost, you failed to sign and
return the CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE FORM attached to the
COMPLAINT. This failure serves as further evidence of your CRIMINAL
OBSTRUCTION through CONFLICT OF INTEREST, which now will be formulated
along with this letter, to several of your oversight authorities, as a FORMAL AFFIRMED
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST YOU.
Under the laws of NEW YORK and the UNITED STATES, in the interim until authorities can arrest you for your felonious acts, I place you under CITIZENS ARREST and I advise you not only to seek independent counsel but also to turn yourself in to the proper authorities for processing for FELONY charges both state and federal.
I remind you that I have sent the JUDICIARY COMMITTEE OF NEW YORK
and FEDERAL AUTHORITIES information regarding your involvement in RICO
related crimes, along with many in your department.
Quite contrary to your claim, I do not think anyone in your CORRUPT COMMITTEE or DEPARTMENT can handle these complaints without conflict and if you are so confident in your meritorious good work on behalf of the Good People of New York, you should welcome a NON CONFLICTED THIRD PARTY review, as certainly you have nothing to hide.
Nothing to hide but everything, including the complaint against yourself that you keep concealing, even in your recent reply trying to dismiss the FORMAL COMPLAINT
against Mr. Friedberg while failing to state that you are also complained of since February of 2009, making your handling of any complaints, including your own, not only conflicted but criminal. Your attached letter, mentions other attorneys complained of but
fails to mention that YOU sir are one of those complained of and therefore are certainly
conflicted.
II. Actions to be Taken
• Please see 78 Page Complaint Against You filed for a Second Time since
February 2009 after you concealed those complaints
• This complaint is a refilling of that complaint and submission to the
Judiciary Committee for Oversight of Your Office and pursuing criminal investigations
within their scope of power over your Department, as part of the ONGOING
INVESTIGATION BY THE NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
ABOUT YOUR and YOUR DEPARTMENTS FAILURE IN TOTO.
• Note that we are attaching copy of a SWORN AFFIRMED CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT to all of the following, including but not limited to,
o Blah
o Blah
III. Conclusion
According to Whistleblower Christine Anderson under sworn oath in a Federal
Court and many others who have come forth to expose the ongoing Whitewashing of
Complaints, your offices are alleged to be involved in criminal obstruction of official
proceedings and threatening federal witnesses.
Nice reputation for an ETHICS department but we will get to that in a moment.
Not only are your offices accused of obstructing proceedings against “Favored Law Firms and Lawyers” but further criminal Whitewashing of Complaints was also alleged in regard to Whitewashing disciplinary complaints for the US Attorney, District Attorney and Assistant District Attorney by the “Cleaner”.
The “Cleaner” aka Naomi Goldstein of your offices, so named by your former Staff Attorney, Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson your offices should be under not only internal investigation but external.
Again, solid reasons for you and your entire department’s recusal from further involvement, other than turning yourself in and getting non-conflicted counsel to represent you.
Further, and most importantly, your failure to regulate the misconducts of the lawyers in your department according to well established rules and regulations of your department, you have failed this great nation and the People of the Great State of New York in your obfuscations of regulation.
For example, had you done your job investigating Proskauer Rose for example when I first complained, your department could have saved many peoples losses in the Sir Allan Stanford affairs, where Proskauer Rose and Partner Thomas Sjoblom ( a former SEC Enforcement Employee ) were involved in teaching employees how to lie to Federal Authorities and have been sued for the entire amount of the Ponzi losses in a Global Class Action lawsuit.
My recommendation will be for any unrecoverable losses that those VICTIMS sue you and
your department for failure to regulate and possible conspiratorial roles in the cover up of
the crimes.
Had you investigated Proskauer Rose when I first informed you of their misconducts
and crimes, you also could have prevented many people over the 7 seven years from
losing their lives savings in the Bernard Madoff affair and saved the hundreds of charities
destroyed by Madoff and lives ruined.
Yes, you are the oversight that could have prevented these calamities and are responsible for your failures to the victims. In fact, since Proskauer appears to have senior partners basically running the First Department and the Ethics Department from Steven C. Krane, a Proskauer partner caught handling his own and his firms complaints while an officer of the First Department DDC, to recently deceased DDC officer Stephen Rakowe Kaye, a Proskauer partner and married to former Chief Judge Judith Kaye who had ultimate control over the department with her husband and Krane her former clerk, no wonder complaints bounced off them into your trash can.
Yet and personally more tragic, is the fact that had you done your job regulating
the attorneys, your “favored law firms and lawyers” most likely a BOMB would not have
been placed in my family minivan ( images at www.iviewit.tv ) allowing someone to
ATTEMPT to MURDER us.
It is strange to note how the timing of that event coincided with discovery that STEVEN C. KRANE of Proskauer and Thomas Cahill ( former Chief Counsel of the DDC ) where found violating First Department DDC Rules and Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and Law leading to the First Department Court, in inanimous consent, transferring complaints against Krane of PROSKAUER and also a FIRST DEPARTMENT OFFICER, Krane’s Proskauer partners he was representing ILLEGALLY in complaints while a DDC OFFICER and even Krane representing himself while an officer ( sounds familiar ).
Thomas Cahill also was transferred for Special Inquiry at that time and your recent handling of that complaint, with Mr. Stephen Lamont and attempting to dismiss that complaint, again while really clever, will also be further evidence of your CRIMINAL ACTS filed with CRIMINAL AUTHORITIES.
Lest us not forget to remind those judging your actions of the fact that your
department is supposed to regulate Wall Street lawyers and we can all see what your lax
regulations have produced.
I also remind you that your department appears to be the regulator for several fine attorneys in the Justice Department and Office of Legal Counsel who are being accused of war crimes for their violations of ethics and law that have allowed the torture and murder of innocent untried people, quite similar to Nazi Extermination Camps where habeas rights similarly were removed by dirty rotten lawyers, who were actually criminals with legal degrees who made concentration camps and murder legal for undesirables.
I remind you of the Judges Trial so that today while you feel elevated above the law, enough so to first conceal and then attempt to dismiss complaints against yourself, in drunken and high delusions of grandeur, that one day you will be tried for these crimes as Justice is restored and even the Nazi lawyers and judges had their day in the infamous Judges Trial at the Nuremberg Trials. I await hearing your defenses from behind the glass.
Truly, and I mean this FIGURATIVELY not LITERALLY, I hope this letter feels
like a bomb in your car and you may live with your family in similar trepidation that one
day your world will end, when your scam ends and you are tried in a fair and impartial
court, free of conflict ( you know the thing your supposed to be protecting ) where
hopefully you will serve the remainder of your life contemplating the magnanimity of the
damage you have done to my family, my shareholders, those you have embroiled in your
crimes like Ms. Anderson, those victims of your crimes that appear lining up with each
new Judiciary Committee, all those who lost homes or 401k’s from lawyers schemes in
an unregulated capacity free to commit financial crimes, as the REGULATOR, YOU was
naught more than a criminal in on the crimes.
Most DisRespectfully Yours,
Eliot I. Bernstein
Founder & Inventor
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – FL
Iviewit Technologies, Inc. – DL
Uview.com, Inc. – DL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – DL
I.C., Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com LLC – DL
Iviewit LLC – DL
Iviewit Corporation – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Corporation
cc/ec:
Roy L. Reardon
Chairman Monday, December 14, 2009
New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
First Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee
Re: YOUR CONTINUED INSANITY IN HANDLING COMPLAINTS AGAINST YOURSELF,
ALAN W. FRIEDBERG AND OTHER DEFENDANTS IN A TWELVE COUNT TWELVE
TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT LEGALLY RELATED TO A WHISTLEBLOWER
CAUSING MASS LIABILITY YOU ARE CONCEALING FROM THE STATE AND
PEOPLE OF NEW YORK DIRECTLY RESULTING FROM YOUR CONTINUED
CRIMINAL CONDUCT
roy reardon
Iviewit Holdings , Inc.
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
Source:
www.iviewit.tv
r
Much More on Roy L. Reardon Coming Soon.
r
How Long Can This Guy handle Complaints against Himself, be involved Coverups, Conspiracies, and the Stealing of a Trillion Dollar Patent by way of ignoring complaints and DOING Nothing?
r
Here is the Responce to Roy L. Reardon NY Supreme Court
from Eliot Bernstein.
r
Monday, December 14, 2009
I-VIEW-IT HOLDINGS, INC.
I-VIEW-IT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Eliot I. Bernstein
Founder & Inventor
TO: Roy L. Reardon
Chairman
New York Supreme Court
Appellate Division First
Judicial Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee
61 Broadway
New York, NY 10006
(212) 401-0800
also Partner @
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
425 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10017-3954
Regarding: Your Continued Insanity in handling complaints against YOURSELF, Alan W. Friedberg and Other Defendents in a Twelve Count - Twelve Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Legally Related to a Whistleblower Causing Mass Liablity, you are Concealing from the State of New York and the People of New York.
roy reardon
Dear Mr. Reardon,
I. Response to Your Letter Dated December 07, 2009.
Your audacity bemuses me and allow me to retort to your and Mr. Friedberg’s
insanity and again put forth some basic realities regarding your misconduct and criminal
acts.
First, my seventy-eight page complaint against Mr. Friedberg and YOU, if you
have read it, is also a RE-FILED complaint against you, this letter shall serve as a third
and a bit more severe complaint.
Your letter is in response to the earlier complaints against Mr. Friedberg and yourself that you buried since February 2009, until sequestered by the NEW YORK STATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, which requested that you provide information regarding the CONCEALED complaints to them, not me.
Nevertheless, in delusion, you responded to me regarding your complaints and tried to
dismiss complaints against yourself and your partner in crime, Mr. Friedberg, while your
department is in a lawsuit with me. In that lawsuit, your department has representative
ILLEGALLY retained counsel, the New York Attorney General and yet you continue to
pester me with your continued handling of your own and Mr. Friedberg’s complaints, as well as, attempting ILLEGALLY to dismiss complaints against other defendants in the
lawsuit.
Let me dissect your letters errors one by one before I begin my further FORMAL
COMPLAINT against you in addition to the one you have buried for months and now try
to dismiss:
1. First, you state, “Your 78 page fax dated December 3, 2009 labeled as a
complaint against Chief Counsel Alan W. Friedberg has been referred to me.”
The problem in this statement is that you fail to see that the 78 Page Fax
Complaint, is a re-filing of the complaint you have admitted to concealing
since February 2009 against both YOU and Mr. Friedberg.
The FORMAL COMPLAINT is actually against you and Mr. Friedberg, so had you really
read the Complaint, you would see it would be impossible for it to be referred to you, as you are a Main Character in the Complaint. I resubmitted that complaint due ONLY to your prior CONCEALMENT of OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS.
I have attached herein, that same complaint but have individually broke it out for you with your very own cover page. By the by, your inappropriate letter that defies ethics again has NO FORMAL DOCKETING number for the Friedberg case, so I wonder how to appeal it or
if it has been CONCEALED again.
2. Next, you claim laughably, “Among other things, the document contains
copies of letters from you to State Senator John L. Sampson of the New York
Senate Judiciary Committee alleging that the DDC has engaged in conflicts of
interest, corruption and other wrongful acts. We find no merit in those
accusations.”
The silliness of your statement here, although criminal in
nature, is very telling of your cognizance of the allegations contained in the
FORMAL COMPLAINT that was CONCEALED and further stands as
ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE OF YOUR CONTINUED CRIMINAL
CONDUCT in trying to dismiss complaints you and your whole department
are conflicted in, Mr. Friedberg and yourself especially, since you have
FORMAL COMPLAINTS LODGED AGAINST BOTH OF YOU.
Now it becomes a bit dicey for you, as your RULES AND REGULATIONS OF YOUR DEPARTMENT CLAIM § 605.6 Investigations and Informal Proceedings
(g) Preliminary Screening of Complaints. Any complaint
received by the Office of Chief Counsel against a member
of the Committee or Staff counsel involving alleged
misconduct shall be transmitted forthwith to the Committee
Chairperson, who shall assign it either to the Office of
Chief Counsel or to special counsel who shall conduct or
direct the appropriate investigation, and give a written
recommendation as to the disposition of the Complaint to
the Committee Chairperson, who shall determine the
appropriate disposition of the Complaint.
Any such Complaint which relates to the Committee Chairperson shall, in the first instance, be transmitted to a Hearing Panel Chairperson, who shall conduct the appropriate investigation and determine the appropriate disposition of the Complaint.
My complaint Mr. Roy Reardon is a twofold problem for you as the FORMAL COMPLAINTS YOU HAVE CONCEALED SINCE FEBRUARY 2009, are against YOU, acting as the Chair of the DDC and your partner in crime, Mr. Alan Friedberg, acting as Chief Counsel.
It is clever how in your SELF DISMISSING LETTER which defies ethics, you try and CONCEAL that Friedberg’s complaint has been transferred to you, which according to your own rules would be a violation, as the COMPLAINT is also against YOU.
Thus, you are AGAIN violating your OWN rules by trying to hide that you
also are knowingly COMPLAINED of FORMALLY, by way of the Sampson
Letters you have received several times now and the ORIGINAL
COMPLAINT I re-filed. Nice try, though, “desperate men…”
3. Amazingly, your letter continues “In any event, your new "complaint" against
Mr. Friedberg provides no basis on which the Committee should pursue
action.” First, there is NO NEW COMPLAINT, this is merely a re-filing of
the ORIGINAL COMPLAINT you have ILLEGALLY CONCEALED in
violation of LAW against both you and Mr. Alan W. Friedberg and now your trying to
make it as a new complaint is both ridiculous and further criminal and will so
be reported to ALL appropriate oversight authorities and criminal
investigators of your continued violations and further attempt at CRIMINAL
CONCEALMENT.
Second, since you should not be handling complaints against yourself or your partner in crime Mr. Friedberg, it defies logic and law how you claim there is no basis in a complaint against yourself and where you should have already turned the matter over, per your rules you would have to turn the matter over to a Hearing Panel Chair, which obviously you fail to do in regard to the FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST YOU AND MR.
FRIEDBERG.
Again serving as prima facie evidence of your CONTINUED
CRIMINAL CONDUCT, this statement will also be forwarded to all
appropriate oversight of your continued CRIMINAL CONDUCT.
4. The next statement truly shows your detachment from both reality and the
rules and regulations that define ETHICS. I quote your insanity, “Indeed, you
appear to be arguing that anyone associated with the Committee is precluded
from considering the merits of your complaint.” Yes indeed Mr. Reardon I do
make the claim that NOBODY in your department can handle these
complaints and for several factual reasons.
First, your department is a DEFENDANT in a 12-COUNT, 12-TRILLION dollar LAWSUIT, which I am certain you are not concealing from state auditors, well, perhaps you could clarify that for me in writing, as I am sure you are reporting the liability on
your and the states books, liabilities directly related to your CRIMINAL
CONDUCT and CONTINUED CRIMINAL CONDUCT.
As DEFENDANT’S in the ONGOING LEGAL ACTION the whole First
Department is precluded from involvement due to CONFLICTS OF
INTEREST and THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY this creates.
Next, the CONFLICTS and APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY also act
together to create CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION OF OFFICIAL
PROCEEDINGS. This CRIMINAL ACT, also will be reported to your
oversight and CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS.
As the First Department DDC is a DEFENDANT in the LAWSUIT, the DDC
also has representative ILLEGAL counsel, the New York Attorney General
and Monica Connell of their offices.
Upon filing the complaints against other DEFENDANTS in the same LAWSUIT, Ms. Connell advised me as YOUR COUNSEL to file the complaints with your offices against the Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner attorneys (as the attorneys complained of are licensed
there) but that they would be moved instantly to a NON CONFLICTED
THIRD PARTY.
Moved to avoid the OBVIOUS CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND APPEARANCES OF IMPROPRIETY your handling of the complaints creates.
Yet, somehow, you sneaky dog, you and your partner in
crime, Mr. Friedberg, interceded and attempted to DISMISS COMPLAINTS
AGAINST OTHER DEFENDANTS IN THE LAWSUIT YOUR
DEPARTMENT IS A NAMED DEFENDANT IN.
Again, these CONFLICTS act to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE and will duly be noted to all
oversight of the DDC and CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS.
Therefore, your question asks if I think anyone in your department can handle
these complaints and the answer is NO THEY CANNOT and I advise YOU,
Mr. Friedberg and any other department official that each act on these
complaints will result in further FORMAL COMPLAINTS to your oversight
and CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS.
5. Your letter continues insanely “On October 7, 2009 I wrote to you advising that your previous complaints against Mr. Friedberg and other attorneys have been closed.” Now here your sneakiness is better than a proverbial “snake in the grass” as you attempt to state that my previous complaints filed against you and Mr. Friedberg for dismissing complaints against other DEFENDANTS are closed. Mixing apples and oranges while hiding the beef.
First, my previous complaints against other attorneys, resulted in you and Mr.
Friedberg handling them, leading to separate complaints against both you and
Mr. Friedberg.
Love how you refer to “other attorneys” in a third person voice, versus
identifying that YOU Mr. Reardon, are one of the “other” attorneys you
reference. Do you often refer to yourself in the third person; this is a very
symbolic sign of pathological behavior indicating delusion. Perhaps you
could have written more accurately, something like – your complaints against
Mr. Friedberg, MYSELF and other attorneys.
Again, you CONCEAL MATERIAL FACTS, which creates further CRIMINAL CONDUCT.
Finally, I am not sure how the FORMAL COMPLAINTS can be closed when they have not been opened formally with Complaint Numbers for me to even respond too, as demanded in my complaint and as part of the RULES and REGULATIONS of your department that you psychotically continue to ignore, ah, “desperate men…”
6. Finally, this my favorite act of your insanity, I quote, “You may wish to
consider consulting with counsel regarding the matters raised in your
submissions.” To be clear, I have consulted counsel, YOUR COUNSEL the
New York Attorney General and it was determined that you are conflicted and
cannot handle complaints against other Defendants nor yourself and Mr.
Friedberg, per your own departmental Rules and Regulation, Part 600, per the
Attorney Code of Conduct and Law. The result, was to have the complaints moved to a NON CONFLICTED THIRD PARTY.
I advise you therefore to consider consulting with YOUR COUNSEL regarding the matters raised against you CRIMINALLY and then CIVIL charges against you and your
department in the civil complaint.
I advise you to consult your counsel as to further pestering me directly, where
as you know, I represent myself Pro Se, so it is highly unethical and against
the Attorney Conduct Code for you, an attorney, to be contacting me directly
when you have representative counsel.
I find teaching your ethics at this point to be an utter waste of my time, as you seem not be able to discern realistically what your own ethical obligations are, nor what the Rules
you are charged with oversighting state and finally the Law.
I therefore highly recommend that you discontinue with contacting me directly and have
your attorney handle these matters going forward.
Of course, your attorney, the New York Attorney General, is also a DEFENDANT in my LAWSUIT and his representation is therefore suspect as aiding and abetting illegally your department through CONFLICTED representation that VIOLATES the NYAG Rules Public Office Rule 17 for one and that ILLEGAL REPRESENTATION also compounds to cause
Obstruction of Justice as the Conflict precludes the NYAG from doing his public duty of investigating dirty rotten Public Officials, like yourself and Mr. Friedberg.
As my LAWSUIT has been marked legally “RELATED” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin to that of the First Department DDC Whistleblower case of Christine C. Anderson, we see that Anderson similarly is complaining that the NYAG illegal representation of State Defendants from your offices, is a Violation of the NYAG Rules and Regulations and Law, whereby you can get a gander for her position at the following URL, incorporated by reference in entirety herein @ ____________
The allegations in the FORMAL COMPLAINTS against Mr. Friedberg and yourself are replete with concrete evidence of crimes you are committing by violating the very ethics laws you and Mr. Friedberg are in charge of upholding. Conflicts like your department and several of the First Department Judges are direct defendants in a TWELVE COUNT, TWELVE TRILLION DOLLAR FEDERAL LAWSUIT that of course, I know you are not too delusional to have reported this liability and your involvement to any state auditors, state agencies and others who have liability resulting from your continued criminal conduct.
The very fact that you attempt to ignore the conflicts and continue to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE in violation of FEDERAL and STATE CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION LAWS, ATTORNEY ETHICS CODES and more will be formally reported to your oversight and criminal authorities.
Yet, while your letter attempts to claim no conflict, almost, you failed to sign and
return the CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE FORM attached to the
COMPLAINT. This failure serves as further evidence of your CRIMINAL
OBSTRUCTION through CONFLICT OF INTEREST, which now will be formulated
along with this letter, to several of your oversight authorities, as a FORMAL AFFIRMED
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST YOU.
Under the laws of NEW YORK and the UNITED STATES, in the interim until authorities can arrest you for your felonious acts, I place you under CITIZENS ARREST and I advise you not only to seek independent counsel but also to turn yourself in to the proper authorities for processing for FELONY charges both state and federal.
I remind you that I have sent the JUDICIARY COMMITTEE OF NEW YORK
and FEDERAL AUTHORITIES information regarding your involvement in RICO
related crimes, along with many in your department.
Quite contrary to your claim, I do not think anyone in your CORRUPT COMMITTEE or DEPARTMENT can handle these complaints without conflict and if you are so confident in your meritorious good work on behalf of the Good People of New York, you should welcome a NON CONFLICTED THIRD PARTY review, as certainly you have nothing to hide.
Nothing to hide but everything, including the complaint against yourself that you keep concealing, even in your recent reply trying to dismiss the FORMAL COMPLAINT
against Mr. Friedberg while failing to state that you are also complained of since February of 2009, making your handling of any complaints, including your own, not only conflicted but criminal. Your attached letter, mentions other attorneys complained of but
fails to mention that YOU sir are one of those complained of and therefore are certainly
conflicted.
II. Actions to be Taken
• Please see 78 Page Complaint Against You filed for a Second Time since
February 2009 after you concealed those complaints
• This complaint is a refilling of that complaint and submission to the
Judiciary Committee for Oversight of Your Office and pursuing criminal investigations
within their scope of power over your Department, as part of the ONGOING
INVESTIGATION BY THE NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
ABOUT YOUR and YOUR DEPARTMENTS FAILURE IN TOTO.
• Note that we are attaching copy of a SWORN AFFIRMED CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT to all of the following, including but not limited to,
o Blah
o Blah
III. Conclusion
According to Whistleblower Christine Anderson under sworn oath in a Federal
Court and many others who have come forth to expose the ongoing Whitewashing of
Complaints, your offices are alleged to be involved in criminal obstruction of official
proceedings and threatening federal witnesses.
Nice reputation for an ETHICS department but we will get to that in a moment.
Not only are your offices accused of obstructing proceedings against “Favored Law Firms and Lawyers” but further criminal Whitewashing of Complaints was also alleged in regard to Whitewashing disciplinary complaints for the US Attorney, District Attorney and Assistant District Attorney by the “Cleaner”.
The “Cleaner” aka Naomi Goldstein of your offices, so named by your former Staff Attorney, Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson your offices should be under not only internal investigation but external.
Again, solid reasons for you and your entire department’s recusal from further involvement, other than turning yourself in and getting non-conflicted counsel to represent you.
Further, and most importantly, your failure to regulate the misconducts of the lawyers in your department according to well established rules and regulations of your department, you have failed this great nation and the People of the Great State of New York in your obfuscations of regulation.
For example, had you done your job investigating Proskauer Rose for example when I first complained, your department could have saved many peoples losses in the Sir Allan Stanford affairs, where Proskauer Rose and Partner Thomas Sjoblom ( a former SEC Enforcement Employee ) were involved in teaching employees how to lie to Federal Authorities and have been sued for the entire amount of the Ponzi losses in a Global Class Action lawsuit.
My recommendation will be for any unrecoverable losses that those VICTIMS sue you and
your department for failure to regulate and possible conspiratorial roles in the cover up of
the crimes.
Had you investigated Proskauer Rose when I first informed you of their misconducts
and crimes, you also could have prevented many people over the 7 seven years from
losing their lives savings in the Bernard Madoff affair and saved the hundreds of charities
destroyed by Madoff and lives ruined.
Yes, you are the oversight that could have prevented these calamities and are responsible for your failures to the victims. In fact, since Proskauer appears to have senior partners basically running the First Department and the Ethics Department from Steven C. Krane, a Proskauer partner caught handling his own and his firms complaints while an officer of the First Department DDC, to recently deceased DDC officer Stephen Rakowe Kaye, a Proskauer partner and married to former Chief Judge Judith Kaye who had ultimate control over the department with her husband and Krane her former clerk, no wonder complaints bounced off them into your trash can.
Yet and personally more tragic, is the fact that had you done your job regulating
the attorneys, your “favored law firms and lawyers” most likely a BOMB would not have
been placed in my family minivan ( images at www.iviewit.tv ) allowing someone to
ATTEMPT to MURDER us.
It is strange to note how the timing of that event coincided with discovery that STEVEN C. KRANE of Proskauer and Thomas Cahill ( former Chief Counsel of the DDC ) where found violating First Department DDC Rules and Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and Law leading to the First Department Court, in inanimous consent, transferring complaints against Krane of PROSKAUER and also a FIRST DEPARTMENT OFFICER, Krane’s Proskauer partners he was representing ILLEGALLY in complaints while a DDC OFFICER and even Krane representing himself while an officer ( sounds familiar ).
Thomas Cahill also was transferred for Special Inquiry at that time and your recent handling of that complaint, with Mr. Stephen Lamont and attempting to dismiss that complaint, again while really clever, will also be further evidence of your CRIMINAL ACTS filed with CRIMINAL AUTHORITIES.
Lest us not forget to remind those judging your actions of the fact that your
department is supposed to regulate Wall Street lawyers and we can all see what your lax
regulations have produced.
I also remind you that your department appears to be the regulator for several fine attorneys in the Justice Department and Office of Legal Counsel who are being accused of war crimes for their violations of ethics and law that have allowed the torture and murder of innocent untried people, quite similar to Nazi Extermination Camps where habeas rights similarly were removed by dirty rotten lawyers, who were actually criminals with legal degrees who made concentration camps and murder legal for undesirables.
I remind you of the Judges Trial so that today while you feel elevated above the law, enough so to first conceal and then attempt to dismiss complaints against yourself, in drunken and high delusions of grandeur, that one day you will be tried for these crimes as Justice is restored and even the Nazi lawyers and judges had their day in the infamous Judges Trial at the Nuremberg Trials. I await hearing your defenses from behind the glass.
Truly, and I mean this FIGURATIVELY not LITERALLY, I hope this letter feels
like a bomb in your car and you may live with your family in similar trepidation that one
day your world will end, when your scam ends and you are tried in a fair and impartial
court, free of conflict ( you know the thing your supposed to be protecting ) where
hopefully you will serve the remainder of your life contemplating the magnanimity of the
damage you have done to my family, my shareholders, those you have embroiled in your
crimes like Ms. Anderson, those victims of your crimes that appear lining up with each
new Judiciary Committee, all those who lost homes or 401k’s from lawyers schemes in
an unregulated capacity free to commit financial crimes, as the REGULATOR, YOU was
naught more than a criminal in on the crimes.
Most DisRespectfully Yours,
Eliot I. Bernstein
Founder & Inventor
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – FL
Iviewit Technologies, Inc. – DL
Uview.com, Inc. – DL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – DL
I.C., Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com LLC – DL
Iviewit LLC – DL
Iviewit Corporation – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Corporation
cc/ec:
Roy L. Reardon
Chairman Monday, December 14, 2009
New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
First Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee
Re: YOUR CONTINUED INSANITY IN HANDLING COMPLAINTS AGAINST YOURSELF,
ALAN W. FRIEDBERG AND OTHER DEFENDANTS IN A TWELVE COUNT TWELVE
TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT LEGALLY RELATED TO A WHISTLEBLOWER
CAUSING MASS LIABILITY YOU ARE CONCEALING FROM THE STATE AND
PEOPLE OF NEW YORK DIRECTLY RESULTING FROM YOUR CONTINUED
CRIMINAL CONDUCT
roy reardon
Iviewit Holdings , Inc.
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
Source:
www.iviewit.tv
r
Much More on Roy L. Reardon Coming Soon.
r
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
RSS Feed (xml)
